Design and rationale of DUTCH-AF: a prospective nationwide registry programme and observational study on long-term oral antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation

Embedding routine health care data in clinical trials: with great power comes great responsibility

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are vital for medical progress. Unfortunately, 'traditional' RCTs are expensive and inherently slow. Moreover, their generalisability has been questioned. There is considerable overlap in routine health care data (RHCD) and trial-specific data. Therefore, integration of RHCD in an RCT has great potential, as it would reduce the effort and costs required to collect data, thereby overcoming some of the major downsides of a traditional RCT. However, use of RHCD comes with other challenges, such as privacy issues, as well as technical and practical barriers. Here, we give a current overview of related initiatives on national cardiovascular registries (Netherlands Heart Registration, Heart4Data), showcasing the interrelationships between and the relevance of the different registries for the practicing physician. We then discuss the benefits and limitations of RHCD use in the setting of a pragmatic RCT from a cardiovascular perspective, illustrated by a case study in heart failure.

Screening over 100 000 patients in 39 general practices in the Netherlands for anticoagulation underprescription in atrial fibrillation: a descriptive, cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the underprescription of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in individual atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in primary care.

SETTING

Screening of patient records in 39 participating general practitioners (GPs) across the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

We screened 101 207 patient records identifying 2375 non-valvular AF patients.

METHODS

Using electronic patient files, we were able to screen the entire GP population for AF, CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk scores, and the use of guidelines recommended OAC prescription. In case of a deviation from guidelines recommended OAC prescription, we checked the electronic patient file for any documented reason. Additionally, 6 weeks following the screening, we asked all GPs to provide information on any actions taken for the underprescribed patients.

RESULTS

We found a mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3.2. OAC prescription consisted of direct OAC in 1342/1984 (68%) and vitamin K-antagonists in the remainder of patients. OAC underprescription was present in 93/944 (9.9%) females and 101/1374 (9.7%) in males, respectively. In 111/146 (76.0%) of the underprescribed AF patients, no reason to withhold OAC was reported. Reported reasons to withhold OAC were patient refusal (n=10), cardiologist advice (n=7) and high risk of bleeding (n=7). Data regarding actions following the identification of OAC underprescription were available for 92/194 (47%) of the OAC underprescribed cases. After consultation OAC was initiated in 9/92 (10%) only.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large Dutch study among GPs, we observed 9.8% underprescription of OAC in AF patients. In 76% of the AF patients lacking a prescription for OAC, no documentation for deviating from the guidelines was found. Only in a minority of cases detection of OAC underprescription lead to OAC initiation.

Health economic evaluation of nation-wide screening programmes for atrial fibrillation in the Netherlands

AIMS

Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) is recommended by the European Society of Cardiology guideline to prevent strokes. Cost-effectiveness analyses of different screening programs for AF are difficult to compare, because of varying settings and models used. We compared the impact and cost-effectiveness of various AF screening programs in the Netherlands.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The base case economic analysis was conducted from the societal perspective. Health effects and costs were analysed using a Markov model. The main model inputs were derived from the ARISTOTLE, RE-LY and ROCKET AF trial combined with Dutch observational data. Univariate, probabilistic sensitivity and various scenario analyses were performed. The maximum number of newly detected AF patients in The Netherlands ranged from 4554 to 39 270, depending on the screening strategy used. Adequate treatment with anticoagulation would result in a maximum of more than 3000 strokes prevented using single time point AF screening. Compared with no screening, screening 100 000 persons provided a gain in QALYs ranging from 984 to 8727, and a mean cost difference ranging from -6650 000€ to 898 000€, depending on the screening strategy used. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) demonstrated a 100% likelihood that screening all patients ≥ 75 years visiting the Geriatric outpatient clinic was cost-saving. Four out of six strategies were cost-saving in ≥ 74% of the PSA simulations. Out of these, opportunistic screening of all patients ≥ 65 years visiting the GPs office had the highest impact on strokes prevented.

CONCLUSION

Most single-time point AF screening strategies are cost-saving and have an important impact on stroke prevention.

Assessment of adherence, treatment satisfaction and knowledge of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients

AIM

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about the association between medication adherence, patient satisfaction and treatment knowledge. The objective was to determine patients' DOAC adherence and their treatment satisfaction over time. Furthermore, we respectively investigated possible associations of treatment satisfaction and treatment knowledge in relation to adherence.

METHODS

Longitudinal study conducted in AF patients hospitalized in 2019 in a tertiary university hospital. DOAC adherence, treatment satisfaction and knowledge were assessed with validated questionnaires. Mixed effects logistic regression was modelled to investigate the effect of both treatment satisfaction and knowledge on DOAC adherence over time.

RESULTS

In total, 164 patients participated of which 128 and 101 patients could be recontacted after a period of respectively 3 (first contact) and 6 months (second contact) to assess adherence and treatment satisfaction. Suboptimal adherence was observed in 40.6% of the patients after 3 months and in 42.6% after 6 months (p=0.78). There was no significant difference (p=0.29) in the total score for treatment satisfaction between the first (79.2%) and the second contact (80.6%). DOAC adherence was not affected by time (p=0.71) nor by total knowledge score (p=0.61) or treatment satisfaction score (p=0.34). Nonetheless, a strong correlation between treatment satisfaction and knowledge was found (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

DOAC adherence was suboptimal. Treatment satisfaction and knowledge were not associated with DOAC adherence over a 6 month period. Knowledge gaps were identified that could be remediated through patient education and follow-up.