A Roadmap for conducting psychosocial research in epidemiological studies: perspectives of cohort study principal investigators

The feasibility and acceptability of collecting psychosocial outcome measures embedded within a precision medicine trial for childhood cancer

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are increasingly being collected within cancer clinical trials, yet limited literature on the feasibility and acceptability of doing so.

METHODS

We collected parent-proxy and adolescent (≥12 years old) PROMs through a longitudinal, psychosocial sub-study ('PRISM-Impact') embedded in a precision medicine trial for children with poor prognosis cancer ('PRISM'). We report on feasibility (response, participation, and attrition rates; follow-up and responding to elevated distress) and acceptability (parents' perceived benefit/burden of participation; and impact on decision to participate in PRISM) of PRISM-Impact.

RESULTS

Over the reporting period, 462 families were eligible for PRISM-Impact. Family and adolescent response rates were 53% and 45%, respectively. Parents whose child had relapsed were more likely to participate in PRISM-Impact than parents whose child had not (p < 0.001). Parent and adolescent attrition rates were 30% and 56% respectively. We conducted 478 calls for intake and to follow-up on missing questionnaires, and 122 calls to respond to elevated distress. Parents reported wanting to participate in PRISM-Impact for altruistic reasons and because they valued psychosocial research. Parents reported little-to-no burden and some benefit from participating in PRISM-Impact, with little change in ratings overtime. Most parents felt that participating in PRISM-Impact did not impact their desire to participate in PRISM (72%), with some feeling more eager to participate (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

PRISM-Impact response rates were comparable to other psycho-oncology studies, despite the poor prognosis population. Integration of PROMs within a paediatric oncology trial is acceptable to parents, and may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the impact of trial participation.

Assessment of chronic stress in the adult population of the Vladimir region

Aim. To assess the prevalence of chronic stress in the adult population in the Vladimir region, taking into account sex characteristics.

Material and methods. This cross-sectional population study was performed in five cities of the Vladimir Oblast (Vladimir, Kovrov, Murom, Yuryev-Polsky and Vyazniki) from May 2018 to March 2020. From six health care facilities, 9 therapeutic areas were selected. Then, from the assigned population aged 30-69 years, respondents from each area were invited to the study. To identify chronic stress, the Reeder questionnaire was used, which makes it possible to identify three types of disorders: low, moderate and severe stress. The study analyzed fully completed Reeder L. chronic stress questionnaires from 1081 respondents (393 men and 688 women).

Results. Among men, every second person has a low chronic stress, 42% — moderate stress, while high chronic stress was found in 6.4% of cases. A similar trend is observed among women. High levels of chronic stress were detected in 8% of women, and the gap between the prevalence of low and moderate chronic stress was minimal. In general, the prevalence of various levels of chronic stress between men and women was comparable, without significant differences. Sex variability in the prevalence of chronic stress was revealed in various cities of the Vladimir Oblast. In Vladimir, the prevalence of high stress among men was three times higher than in women, while in Vyazniki and Kovrov the opposite pattern was observed. In the other two cities (Murom and Yuryev Polsky), the prevalence of high chronic stress between men and women was comparable.

Conclusion. In the working-age population, a high chronic stress level is detected in up to 10%. In some cities, there are sex differences between men and women. The mean level of chronic stress is determined in 42-43% of cases. The results obtained indicate the need for large-scale preventive measures to combat chronic stress among working-age men and women of in the Vladimir Oblast.

Psychoemotional risk factors for non-communicable diseases in outpatient practice. Guidelines for internists

Methodological guidelines "Psychoemotional risk factors in outpatient practice" were developed as a practical document for primary care physicians in order to expand and improve knowledge, as well as provide care to the adult population within the studied theme. The methodological guidelines include an information and content part for medical specialists and a practical part for patients, presented in the format of memos. The guidelines include the main sections: definition, structure and epidemiology of psychoemotional risk factors, psychoemotional risk factors in the clinics of internal diseases, screening of psychoemotional risk factors, prevention and correction of psychoemotional risk factors for noncommunicable diseases, non-drug care for patients, pharmacotherapy of psychoemotional disorders. The guidelines are intended for primary care physicians, for specialists who develop and implement educational programs for patients, as well as for therapeutic residents.

2022 Prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases in Of the Russian Federation. National guidelines

.