1
|
Christodoulou CC, Pitsillides M, Hadjisavvas A, Zamba-Papanicolaou E. Dietary Intake, Mediterranean and Nordic Diet Adherence in Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2025; 17:336. [PMID: 39861466 PMCID: PMC11767999 DOI: 10.3390/nu17020336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 01/14/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Dementia is not a single disease but an umbrella term that encompasses a range of symptoms, such as memory loss and cognitive impairments, which are severe enough to disrupt daily life. One of the most common forms of dementia is Alzheimer's Disease (AD), a complex neurodegenerative condition influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Recent research has highlighted diet as a potential modifiable risk factor for AD. Decades of research have explored the role of dietary patterns, including the Mediterranean Diet (MD) and its components, in neuroprotection and cognitive health. Systematic review examines studies investigating the impact of the Mediterranean Diet, Mediterranean-like diets, the Nordic Diet (ND), dietary intake patterns, and specific components such as extra virgin olive oil and rapeseed oil on cognitive function, disease onset, and progression in AD and dementia. METHODS A comprehensive search of PubMed, the Directory of Open Access Journals, and the Social Science Research Network was conducted independently by two reviewers using predefined search terms. The search period included studies from 2006 to 2024. Eligible studies meeting the inclusion criteria were systematically reviewed, yielding 88 studies: 85 focused on the MD and its relationship to AD and dementia, while only 3 investigated the ND. RESULTS The findings suggest that adherence to the Mediterranean and Nordic diets is generally associated with improved cognitive function and delayed cognitive decline and that adherence to both these diets can improve cognitive function. Some studies identified that higher legume consumption decreased dementia incidence, while fruits and vegetables, carbohydrates, and eggs lowered dementia prevalence. Most studies demonstrated that high MD or ND adherence was associated with better cognitive function and a lower risk of poor cognition in comparison to individuals with lower MD or ND adherence. However, some studies reported no significant benefits of the MD on cognitive outcomes, while two studies indicated that higher red meat consumption was linked to better cognitive function. CONCLUSION Despite promising trends, the evidence remains varying across studies, underscoring the need for further research to establish definitive associations between diet and cognitive function. These findings highlight the essential role of dietary interventions in the prevention and management of dementia and AD, therefore offering critical insights into the underlying mechanisms by which the diet may impact brain health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiana C. Christodoulou
- Neuroepidemiology Department, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia 2371, Cyprus; (C.C.C.); (M.P.)
| | - Michalis Pitsillides
- Neuroepidemiology Department, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia 2371, Cyprus; (C.C.C.); (M.P.)
| | - Andreas Hadjisavvas
- Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics and Ultrastructural Pathology Department, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia 2371, Cyprus
| | - Eleni Zamba-Papanicolaou
- Neuroepidemiology Department, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia 2371, Cyprus; (C.C.C.); (M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gramkow MH, Waldemar G, Frederiksen KS. The Digitized Memory Clinic. Nat Rev Neurol 2024; 20:738-746. [PMID: 39455807 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-024-01033-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024]
Abstract
Several major challenges, including an ageing population and declining workforce and the implementation of recent breakthrough therapies for Alzheimer disease, are prompting a necessary rethink of how people with neurodegenerative dementias are diagnosed and medically managed. Digital health technologies could play a pivotal part in this transformation, with new advances enabling the collection of millions of data points from a single individual. Possible applications include unobtrusive monitoring that aids early detection of disease and artificial intelligence-based health advice. To translate these advances to meaningful benefits for people living with a disease, technologies must be implemented within a system that retains the physician expert as a central figure in decision-making. This Perspective presents a new framework, termed the Digitized Memory Clinic, for the diagnostic pathway of neurodegenerative dementias that incorporates digital health technologies with currently available assessment tools, such as fluid and imaging biomarkers, in an interplay with the physician. The Digitized Memory Clinic will manage people across the entire disease spectrum, from the detection of risk factors for cognitive decline and the earliest symptoms to dementia, and will replace the present paradigm of a pure 'brick-and-mortar' memory clinic. Important ethical, legal and societal barriers associated with the implementation of digital health technologies in memory clinics need to be addressed. The envisioned Digitized Memory Clinic aims to improve diagnostics and enable precise disease-tracking prognostication for individuals with memory disorders and to open new possibilities, such as precision medicine for prevention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Holsey Gramkow
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian Steen Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knowledge of risk and protective factors for dementia in older German adults A population-based survey on risk and protective factors for dementia and internet-based brain health interventions. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277037. [PMID: 36342935 PMCID: PMC9639821 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence on potentially modifiable risk factors for dementia is accumulating rapidly, including e.g. physical inactivity, hypertension, or diabetes. It is unclear to what extent these risk factors are known among the general population in Germany. We investigated knowledge on risk and protective factors for dementia and openness to eHealth interventions for brain health in the older general population in Germany. Methods A population-based telephone survey among randomly selected community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 60 years was conducted. We assessed sociodemographic factors, knowledge on risk and protective factors for dementia, openness towards eHealth and psychosocial outcomes (health literacy, resilience). Factors associated with interest in information on brain health and openness towards eHealth interventions were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results Of n = 500 respondents (mean age: 74.8 years, % female: 62.8), 67.9% believed that dementia risk is modifiable. Participants mostly endorsed physical and cognitive activity as protective factors and social isolation as a risk factor. Knowledge on cardiovascular risk factors was low to moderate. 38.0% were interested in information on dementia risk reduction. Better knowledge of risk factors for dementia and higher age were linked to interest in information on brain health. Being widowed and higher levels of health literacy were associated with lower interest in information. Openness to eHealth interventions was moderate (46.2%). Younger age, better knowledge of risk and protective factors were linked to openness towards eHealth tools, as was knowing someone with dementia and interest in information on brain health. Conclusion Belief in preventability of dementia was higher in our sample than previously reported. However, knowledge on cardiovascular risk factors for disease was insufficient and more information and intervention approaches targeted at older adults are needed. Interest in information on dementia risk reduction and eHealth approaches was moderate, and further studies are warranted to assess needs and concerns of older adults regarding dementia prevention.
Collapse
|
4
|
Vrijsen J, Maeckelberghe ELM, Broekstra R, de Vries JJ, Abu-Hanna A, De Deyn PP, Voshaar RCO, Reesink FE, Buskens E, de Rooij SE, Smidt N. Knowledge, health beliefs and attitudes towards dementia and dementia risk reduction among descendants of people with dementia: a qualitative study using focus group discussions. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1344. [PMID: 34233658 PMCID: PMC8265097 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11415-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Individuals with a parental family history of dementia have an increased risk of developing dementia because they share their genes as well as their psychosocial behaviour. Due to this increased risk and their experience with dementia, they may be particularly eager to receive information regarding dementia risk reduction (DRR). This study evaluated the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards dementia and DRR among descendants of people with dementia. Method Using a semi-structured topic guide, three focus group discussions were conducted consisting of 12 female (80%) and 3 male (20%) descendants of people with dementia with a mean (± SD) age of 48.8 (± 12) years. Focus group discussions were audio recorded and transcribed. Each transcript was analysed thoroughly, and where appropriate, a code was generated and assigned by two researchers independently. Then, similar codes were grouped together and categorized into themes. Results The items in the topic guide could only be addressed after participants had been given the opportunity to share their experiences of having a parent with dementia. Participants were unaware or uncertain about the possibility of reducing the risk of developing dementia and therefore hesitant to assess their dementia risk without treatment options in sight. Moreover, participants indicated that their general practitioner only gave some information on heritability, not on DRR. Although participants identified a large number of modifiable risk factors as a group during the group discussions, they were eager to receive more information on dementia and DRR. In the end, participants adopted a more positive attitude towards a DRR programme and provided suggestions for the development of future DRR programmes. Conclusions Although the research aim was to evaluate the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards dementia and DRR, sharing experiences of having a parent with dementia seemed a prerequisite for considering participants’ own risk of developing dementia and participating in a DRR programme. Knowledge of dementia and DRR was limited. Due to unawareness of the possibility of reducing dementia risk, participants were hesitant about assessing their dementia risk. Group discussions positively changed the perception of dementia risk assessment and participants’ willingness to participate in a DRR programme. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11415-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Vrijsen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, FA40, PO Box 30 001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - E L M Maeckelberghe
- Wenckebach Institute for Training and Education, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - R Broekstra
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, FA40, PO Box 30 001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J J de Vries
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - A Abu-Hanna
- Department of Medical Informatics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P P De Deyn
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - R C Oude Voshaar
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - F E Reesink
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - E Buskens
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, FA40, PO Box 30 001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - S E de Rooij
- Department of Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - N Smidt
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, FA40, PO Box 30 001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|