1
|
Osula D, Wu B, Schesing K, Das SR, Moss E, Alvarez K, Clark C, Halm EA, Brown NJ, Vongpatanasin W. Comparison of Pharmacy Refill Data With Chemical Adherence Testing in Assessing Medication Nonadherence in a Safety Net Hospital Setting. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e027099. [PMID: 36193931 PMCID: PMC9673714 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.027099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Pharmacy fill data are a practical tool for assessing medication nonadherence. However, previous studies have not compared the accuracy of pharmacy fill data to measurement of plasma drug levels, or chemical adherence testing (CAT). Methods and Results We performed a cross-sectional study in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in outpatient clinics in a safety net health system. Plasma samples were obtained for measurement of common cardiovascular drugs, including calcium channel blockers, thiazide diuretics, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and statins, using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Proportion of days covered (PDC), a method for tracking pharmacy fill data, was calculated via linkages with Surescripts, and its diagnostic test characteristics were compared with CAT. Among 77 patients with uncontrolled hypertension, 13 (17%) were nonadherent to at least 1 antihypertensive drug and 23 (37%) were nonadherent to statins by CAT. PDC was significantly lower in the nonadherent versus the adherent group by CAT only among patients prescribed an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker or statin (all P<0.05) but not in patients prescribed other drug classes. The sensitivity and specificity of PDC in detecting nonadherence to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and statin drugs by CAT were 75% to 82% and 56% to 79%, respectively. The positive predictive value of PDC in detecting nonadherence was only 11% to 27% for antihypertensive drugs and 45% for statins. Conclusions PDC is useful in detecting nonadherence to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and statins but has limited usefulness in detecting nonadherence to calcium channel blockers, beta blockers, or thiazide diuretics and has a low positive predictive value for all drug classes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Osula
- Department of Internal MedicineParkland Health & Hospital SystemDallasTX
| | - Bryan Wu
- Department of Internal MedicineParkland Health & Hospital SystemDallasTX
| | - Kevin Schesing
- Department of Internal MedicineParkland Health & Hospital SystemDallasTX
| | - Sandeep R. Das
- Cardiology DivisionParkland Health & Hospital SystemDallasTX
| | - Elizabeth Moss
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of MedicineParkland Health & Hospital SystemDallasTX
| | - Kristin Alvarez
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of MedicineParkland Health & Hospital SystemDallasTX
| | - Christopher Clark
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of MedicineParkland Health & Hospital SystemDallasTX
| | - Ethan A. Halm
- Department of MedicineRobert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolNew BrunswickNJ
| | | | - Wanpen Vongpatanasin
- Cardiology DivisionParkland Health & Hospital SystemDallasTX
- Hypertension SectionUT Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lane D, Lawson A, Burns A, Azizi M, Burnier M, Jones DJL, Kably B, Khunti K, Kreutz R, Patel P, Persu A, Spiering W, Toennes SW, Tomaszewski M, Williams B, Gupta P, Dasgupta I. Nonadherence in Hypertension: How to Develop and Implement Chemical Adherence Testing. Hypertension 2022; 79:12-23. [PMID: 34739765 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.17596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Nonadherence to antihypertensive medication is common, especially in those with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (true treatment-resistant hypertension requires exclusion of nonadherence), and its routine detection is supported by clinical guidelines. Chemical adherence testing is a reliable and valid method to detect adherence, yet methods are unstandardized and are not ubiquitous. This article describes the principles of chemical adherence testing for hypertensive patients and provides a set of recommendations for centers wishing to develop the test. We recommend testing should be done in either of two instances: (1) in those who have resistant hypertension or (2) in those on 2 antihypertensives who have a less than 10 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure on addition of the second antihypertensive medication. Furthermore, we recommend that verbal consent is secured before undertaking the test, and the results should be discussed with the patient. Based on medications prescribed in United Kingdom, European Union, and United States, we list top 20 to 24 drugs that cover >95% of hypertension prescriptions which may be included in the testing panel. Information required to identify these medications on mass spectrometry platforms is likewise provided. We discuss issues related to ethics, sample collection, transport, stability, urine versus blood samples, qualitative versus quantitative testing, pharmacokinetics, instrumentation, validation, quality assurance, and gaps in knowledge. We consider how to best present, interpret, and discuss chemical adherence test results with the patient. In summary, this guidance should help clinicians and their laboratories in the development of chemical adherence testing of prescribed antihypertensive drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Lane
- The Department of Chemical Pathology and Metabolic Diseases, Level 4, Sandringham Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom (D.L., P.P., P.G.)
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom (D.L., K.K.)
| | - Alexander Lawson
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Immunology and Toxicology, Heartlands Hospital University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom (A.L.)
| | - Angela Burns
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom (A.B.)
| | - Michel Azizi
- Université de Paris, Inserm CIC1418, Paris, France (M.A.)
- APHP, Hypertension Unit, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France (M.A.)
| | - Michel Burnier
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (M.B.)
| | - Donald J L Jones
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom (D.J.L.J., P.P., P.G.)
| | - Benjamin Kably
- Université de Paris, France (B.K.)
- APHP, Pharmacology Unit, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France (B.K.)
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom (D.L., K.K.)
| | - Reinhold Kreutz
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Prashanth Patel
- The Department of Chemical Pathology and Metabolic Diseases, Level 4, Sandringham Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom (D.L., P.P., P.G.)
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom (D.J.L.J., P.P., P.G.)
| | - Alexandre Persu
- Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium/Pole of Cardiovascular Research, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain (A.P.)
| | - Wilko Spiering
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands (W.S.)
| | - Stefan W Toennes
- Institute of Legal Medicine, Department of Forensic Toxicology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany (S.W.T.)
| | - Maciej Tomaszewski
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom (M.T.)
- Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (M.T.)
| | - Bryan Williams
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom (B.W.)
| | - Pankaj Gupta
- The Department of Chemical Pathology and Metabolic Diseases, Level 4, Sandringham Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom (D.L., P.P., P.G.)
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom (D.J.L.J., P.P., P.G.)
| | - Indranil Dasgupta
- Renal Unit, Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham and Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom (I.D.)
| | | |
Collapse
|