1
|
Müller MP, Metelmann C, Thies KC, Greif R, Scquizzato T, Deakin CD, Auricchio A, Barry T, Berglund E, Böttiger BW, Burkart R, Busch HJ, Caputo ML, Cheskes S, Cresta R, Damjanovic D, Degraeuwe E, Ekkel MM, Elschenbroich D, Fredman D, Ganter J, Gregers MCT, Gronewald J, Hänsel M, Henriksen FL, Herzberg L, Jonsson M, Joos J, Kooy TA, Krammel M, Marks T, Monsieurs K, Ng WM, Osche S, Salcido DD, Scapigliati A, Schwietring J, Semeraro F, Snobelen P, Sowa J, Stieglis R, Tan HL, Trummer G, Unterrainer J, Vercammen S, Wetsch WA, Metelmann B. Reporting standard for describing first responder systems, smartphone alerting systems, and AED networks. Resuscitation 2024; 195:110087. [PMID: 38097108 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.110087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Standardized reporting of data is crucial for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) research. While the implementation of first responder systems dispatching volunteers to OHCA is encouraged, there is currently no uniform reporting standard for describing these systems. A steering committee established a literature search to identify experts in smartphone alerting systems. These international experts were invited to a conference held in Hinterzarten, Germany, with 40 researchers from 13 countries in attendance. Prior to the conference, participants submitted proposals for parameters to be included in the reporting standard. The conference comprised five workshops covering different aspects of smartphone alerting systems. Proposed parameters were discussed, clarified, and consensus was achieved using the Nominal Group Technique. Participants voted in a modified Delphi approach on including each category as a core or supplementary element in the reporting standard. Results were presented, and a writing group developed definitions for all categories and items, which were sent to participants for revision and final voting using LimeSurvey web-based software. The resulting reporting standard consists of 68 core items and 21 supplementary items grouped into five topics (first responder system, first responder network, technology/algorithm/strategies, reporting data, and automated external defibrillators (AED)). This proposed reporting standard generated by an expert opinion group fills the gap in describing first responder systems. Its adoption in future research will facilitate comparison of systems and research outcomes, enhancing the transfer of scientific findings to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Müller
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, St. Josefs Hospital, Freiburg, Germany; Region of Lifesavers, Freiburg, Germany; German Resuscitation Council (GRC), Ulm, Germany.
| | - C Metelmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; German Resuscitation Council (GRC), Ulm, Germany
| | - K C Thies
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, EvKB, Bielefeld University Hospitals, Campus Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - R Greif
- University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; School of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; European Resuscitation Council, Niel, Belgium
| | - T Scquizzato
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Italian Resuscitation Council (IRC), Bologna, Italy
| | - C D Deakin
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK, South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Otterbourne, UK
| | - A Auricchio
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Fondazione Ticino Cuore, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - T Barry
- Department of General Practice, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E Berglund
- Center for Resuscitation Science, Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - B W Böttiger
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cologne, Germany; German Resuscitation Council (GRC), Ulm, Germany; European Resuscitation Council, Niel, Belgium
| | - R Burkart
- Interverband für Rettungswesen IVR-IAS, Aarau, Switzerland; Swiss Resuscitation Council, Bern, Switzerland
| | - H J Busch
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Region of Lifesavers, Freiburg, Germany; German Resuscitation Council (GRC), Ulm, Germany
| | - M L Caputo
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Fondazione Ticino Cuore, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - S Cheskes
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - R Cresta
- Fondazione Ticino Cuore, Lugano, Switzerland; Federazione Cantonale Ticinese Servizi Autoambulanze (FCTSA), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - D Damjanovic
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - E Degraeuwe
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics (GE35), Gent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Gent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Belgian First Responder Network EVapp, Belgium
| | - M M Ekkel
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Elschenbroich
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - D Fredman
- Heartrunner Citizen Responder System, Heartrunner Sweden AB, Solna, Sweden
| | - J Ganter
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - M C T Gregers
- Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J Gronewald
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Hänsel
- Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Carus Teaching Center, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - F L Henriksen
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - L Herzberg
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - M Jonsson
- Center for Resuscitation Science, Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Joos
- Region of Lifesavers, Freiburg, Germany
| | - T A Kooy
- Stan, Citizen Responder Network HartslagNu, Netherlands
| | - M Krammel
- Emergency Medical Service Vienna, Vienna, Austria; PULS Austrian Cardiac Arrest Awareness Association, Vienna, Austria
| | - T Marks
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; Department of Surgery, Kreiskrankenhaus Demmin, Demmin, Germany
| | - K Monsieurs
- Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Belgium; European Resuscitation Council, Niel, Belgium
| | - W M Ng
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore
| | - S Osche
- German Red Cross, Berlin, Germany; German Resuscitation Council (GRC), Ulm, Germany
| | - D D Salcido
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - A Scapigliati
- Insitute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Italian Resuscitation Council (IRC), Bologna, Italy
| | - J Schwietring
- ADAC Air Ambulance, Dept. of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - F Semeraro
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and EMS, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy; European Resuscitation Council, Niel, Belgium
| | - P Snobelen
- Peel Regional Paramedic Services, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Sowa
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - R Stieglis
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H L Tan
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G Trummer
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany; Region of Lifesavers, Freiburg, Germany; German Resuscitation Council (GRC), Ulm, Germany
| | - J Unterrainer
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - S Vercammen
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Gent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - W A Wetsch
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cologne, Germany; German Resuscitation Council (GRC), Ulm, Germany
| | - B Metelmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; German Resuscitation Council (GRC), Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang W, Luo M, Liu Y, Cai S, Yang Q, Huang Y, Yu X. A Pilot Study to Investigate the Role of Virtual Reality in the Preservice Training of Nursing Staff in Isolation Wards. Comput Inform Nurs 2022; 40:307-316. [PMID: 35266899 PMCID: PMC9093228 DOI: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Healthcare providers without working experience in isolation wards experience enormous challenges. Traditional ward orientation is constrained by space, time, and even infection risk in particular periods (eg, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic). Virtual reality has been used widely, but rarely in wards. This study aimed to explore the experience of utilizing virtual reality for isolation ward training among nurses. In this study, nurses completed virtual reality training via an online platform and were then trained in isolation wards, after which their perceptions were explored by questionnaire and interviews. A total of 1868 participants completed the training. Most participants thought the preservice training was important and believed the virtual reality experience was consistent with the in-person training. Virtual reality was found not only to be convenient and valuable for training but also to have the benefits of occupational protection. However, whereas 50.48% of participants wanted to learn the ward via virtual reality, 87.21% of participants wanted to learn via in-person training before working in the wards. As a substitute for in-person training, virtual reality is a feasible and practical instrument to provide preservice training in particular periods. However, there is room for improvement due to general discomfort and technological problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenyan Zhang
- Author Affiliation: Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Mengdan Luo
- Author Affiliation: Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Author Affiliation: Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Sisi Cai
- Author Affiliation: Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qing Yang
- Author Affiliation: Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yi Huang
- Author Affiliation: Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoyan Yu
- Author Affiliation: Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Heffernan E, Keegan D, Mc Sharry J, Barry T, Tugwell P, Murphy AW, Deasy C, Menzies D, O'Donnell C, Masterson S. Community first response and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Identifying priorities for data collection, analysis, and use via the nominal group technique. Resusc Plus 2022; 9:100197. [PMID: 35059679 PMCID: PMC8760509 DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Community First Response (CFR) is an important component of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest management in many countries, including Ireland. Reliable, strategic data collection and analysis are required to support the development of CFR. However, data on CFR are currently limited in Ireland and internationally. This research aimed to identify the most important CFR data to record, the most important uses of CFR data, and barriers and facilitators to CFR data collection and use. METHODS The Nominal Group Technique structured consensus process was used. An expert panel comprising key stakeholders, including volunteers, clinicians, researchers, policy-makers, and a patient, completed a survey to generate lists of the most important CFR data to record and the most important uses of CFR data. Subsequently, they participated in a consensus meeting to agree the top ten priorities from each list. They also identified barriers and facilitators to CFR data collection and use. RESULTS The top ten CFR data items to record included volunteer response time, interventions/activities completed by volunteers, and the mental/physical impact on volunteers. The top ten most important uses of CFR data included providing feedback to volunteers, improving volunteer training, and measuring CFR effectiveness. Barriers included time constraints and limited training. Facilitators included having appropriate software/equipment and collecting minimal data. CONCLUSION The results can guide CFR research and inform the development of CFR data collection and analysis policy and practice in Ireland and internationally. Ultimately, improving CFR data collection and use will help to optimise this important intervention and enhance its evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eithne Heffernan
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Dylan Keegan
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jenny Mc Sharry
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Tomás Barry
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter Tugwell
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- The World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Knowledge Translation and Health Technology Assessment in Health Equity, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew W. Murphy
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Conor Deasy
- Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
- National Ambulance Service, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David Menzies
- St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- CFR Ireland, Ireland
| | | | - Siobhan Masterson
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Keegan D, Heffernan E, McSharry J, Barry T, Masterson S. Identifying priorities for the collection and use of data related to community first response and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: protocol for a nominal group technique study. HRB Open Res 2021; 4:81. [PMID: 34909578 PMCID: PMC8637246 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13347.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a devastating health event that affects over 2000 people each year in Ireland. Survival rate is low, but immediate intervention and initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and administration of an automated external defibrillator (AED) can increase chances of survival. It is not always possible for the emergency medical services (EMS) to reach OHCA cases quickly. As such, volunteers, including lay and professional responders (e.g. off-duty paramedics and fire-fighters), trained in CPR and AED use, are mobilised by the EMS to respond locally to prehospital medical emergencies (e.g. OHCA and stroke). This is known as community first response (CFR). Data on the impact of CFR interventions are limited. This research aims to identify the most important CFR data to collect and analyse, the most important uses of CFR data, as well as barriers and facilitators to data collection and use. This can inform policies to optimise the practice of CFR in Ireland. Methods: The nominal group technique (NGT) is a structured consensus process where key stakeholders (e.g. CFR volunteers, clinicians, EMS personnel, and patients/relatives) develop a set of prioritised recommendations. This study will employ the NGT, incorporating an online survey and online consensus meeting, to develop a priority list for the collection and use of CFR data in Ireland. Stakeholder responses will also identify barriers and facilitators to data collection and use, as well as indicators that improvements to these processes have been achieved. The maximum sample size for the NGT will be 20 participants to ensure sufficient representation from stakeholder groups. Discussion: This study, employing the NGT, will consult key stakeholders to establish CFR data collection, analysis, and use priorities. Results from this study will inform CFR research, practice, and policy, to improve the national CFR service model and inform international response programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Keegan
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Eithne Heffernan
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Jenny McSharry
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Tomás Barry
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland
| | - Siobhán Masterson
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
- National Ambulance Service, Health Service Executive, St. Eunan's Hall, St Conal's Hospital, Letterkenny, Donegal, F92 XK84, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Keegan D, Heffernan E, McSharry J, Barry T, Masterson S. Identifying priorities for the collection and use of data related to community first response and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: protocol for a nominal group technique study. HRB Open Res 2021; 4:81. [PMID: 34909578 PMCID: PMC8637246 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13347.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a devastating health event that affects over 2000 people each year in Ireland. Survival rate is low, but immediate intervention and initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and administration of an automated external defibrillator (AED) can increase chances of survival. It is not always possible for the emergency medical services (EMS) to reach OHCA cases quickly. As such, volunteers, including lay and professional responders (e.g. off-duty paramedics and fire-fighters), trained in CPR and AED use, are mobilised by the EMS to respond locally to prehospital medical emergencies (e.g. OHCA and stroke). This is known as community first response (CFR). Data on the impact of CFR interventions are limited. This research aims to identify the most important CFR data to collect and analyse, the most important uses of CFR data, as well as barriers and facilitators to data collection and use. This can inform policies to optimise the practice of CFR in Ireland. Methods: The nominal group technique (NGT) is a structured consensus process where key stakeholders (e.g. CFR volunteers, clinicians, EMS personnel, and patients/relatives) develop a set of prioritised recommendations. This study will employ the NGT, incorporating an online survey and online consensus meeting, to develop a priority list for the collection and use of CFR data in Ireland. Stakeholder responses will also identify barriers and facilitators to data collection and use, as well as indicators that improvements to these processes have been achieved. The maximum sample size for the NGT will be 20 participants to ensure sufficient representation from stakeholder groups. Discussion: This study, employing the NGT, will consult key stakeholders to establish CFR data collection, analysis, and use priorities. Results from this study will inform CFR research, practice, and policy, to improve the national CFR service model and inform international response programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Keegan
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Eithne Heffernan
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Jenny McSharry
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Tomás Barry
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland
| | - Siobhán Masterson
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
- National Ambulance Service, Health Service Executive, St. Eunan's Hall, St Conal's Hospital, Letterkenny, Donegal, F92 XK84, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|