Does geriatric follow-up visits reduce hospital readmission among older patients discharged to temporary care at a skilled nursing facility: a before-and-after cohort study

ROBot-assisted physical training of older patients during acUte hospitaliSaTion-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ROBUST)

BACKGROUND

During hospitalisation, older patients spend most of their time passive in bed, which increases the risk of functional decline and negative adverse outcomes. Our aim is to examine the impact of robot-assisted physical training on functional status in older geriatric patients during acute hospitalisation.

METHODS

This is a single-centre investigator-blinded placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial including geriatric patients aged ≥ 65 years, able to ambulate before hospitalisation, and with expected length of stay ≥ 2 days. In addition to standard physiotherapy treatment, the intervention group receive active robot-assisted resistance training and the control group passive robot-assisted sham training. Exclusion criteria are as follows: ambulation without assistance at the time of inclusion, known severe dementia, delirium, patients who have received less than three training sessions at discharge, terminal illness, recent major surgery/lower extremity fracture, conditions contradicting the use of training robot, lower extremity metastases, deemed unsuitable for robot-assisted training by a healthcare professional, or weight > 165 kg. The primary outcome is functional status assessed by change in Barthel Index-100 and 30-s chair stand test between inclusion and day of discharge. Secondary outcomes include functional status at 1- and 3-month follow-up, quality of life, depression, concern about falling, falls, cognition, qualitative interviews, need of homecare, discharge destination, readmissions, healthcare costs, sarcopenia, muscle quantity (bioimpedance), and mortality. Clinical meaningful change of the Barthel Index is 5 points. A recent study in geriatric patients reported a 6.9-point change following exercise. With a significance level of 5%, 80% power, and a drop-out rate of 20%, 244 participants per group (n = 488) are needed to detect the same mean difference. With a significance level of 5%, 80% power, and a drop-out rate of 20%, 74 participants per group (n = 148) are needed to detect a minimum clinical change of 2.6 repetitions for 30-s chair stand test. Recruitment started in January 2023 and is expected to continue for 19 months including follow-up.

DISCUSSION

If our study shows that in-hospital robot-assisted training prevents functional decline in older patients, this may have a major impact on the individual patient due to increased wellbeing and a higher level of independency. In addition, society will benefit due to potential decrease in the need of municipality-delivered homecare following discharge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05782855. Registration date: March 24, 2023.

Structured decision support to prevent hospitalisations of community-dwelling older adults in Denmark (PATINA): an open-label, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ageing populations and health-care staff shortages encourage efforts in primary care to recognise and prevent health deterioration and acute hospitalisation in community-dwelling older adults. The PATINA algorithm and decision-support tool alerts home-based-care nurses to older adults at risk of hospitalisation. The study aim was to test whether use of the PATINA tool was associated with changes in health-care use.

METHODS

An open-label, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial was done in three Danish municipalities, covering 20 area teams providing home-based care to around 7000 recipients. During a period of 12 months, area teams were randomly assigned to an intervention crossover for older adults (aged 65 years or older) who received care at home. The primary outcome was hospitalisation within 30 days of identification by the algorithm as being at risk of hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes were hospital readmission and other hospital contacts, outpatient contacts, contact with primary care physicians (PCPs), temporary care, and death, within 30 days of identification. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NTC04398797).

FINDINGS

In total, 2464 older adults participated in the study: 1216 (49·4%) in the control phase and 1248 (50·6%) in the intervention phase. In the control phase, 102 individuals were hospitalised within 30 days during 33 943 days of risk (incidence 0·09 per 30 days), compared with 118 individuals within 34 843 days of risk (0·10 per 30 days) during the intervention phase. The intervention was not associated with a reduction in the number of first hospitalisations within 30 days (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1·10 [90% CI 0·90-1·40]; p=0·28). Furthermore it was not associated with reduced rates of other hospital contacts (IRR 1·10 [95% CI 0·90-1·40]; p=0·28), outpatient contacts (1·10 [0·88-1·40]; p=0·42), or mortality (0·82 [0·58-1·20]; p=0·25). The intervention was associated with a 59% reduction in readmissions within 30 days of hospital discharge (IRR 0·41 [95% CI 0·24-0·68]; p=0·0007), a 140% increase in contacts with PCPs (2·40 [1·18-3·20]; p<0·0001), and a 150% increase in use of temporary care (2·50 [1·40-4·70]; p=0·0027).

INTERPRETATION

Despite having no effect on the primary outcome, the PATINA tool showed other benefits for older adults receiving home-based care. Such algorithms have the potential to shift health-care use from secondary to primary care but need to be tested in other home-based care settings. Implementation of algorithms in clinical practice should be informed by analysis of cost-effectiveness and potential harms as well as the benefits.

FUNDING

Innovation Fund Denmark and Region of Southern Denmark.

TRANSLATIONS

For the Danish, French and German translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Healthcare professionals' experience with emergency department-based acute care performed within nursing homes

BACKGROUND

hospital admissions of residents from nursing homes often lead to delirium, infections, mortality and reduced functional capacity. We initiated a new service, 'emergency department-based acute care service', maintained by consultants from an emergency department (ED) moving emergency care from the hospitals into nursing homes.

OBJECTIVE

this study explored healthcare professionals' experiences with this service.

DESIGN

qualitative semi-structured focus group discussions.

INTERVENTION/SETTING

the new service provides acute on-site evaluation and treatment to nursing home residents following calls to the emergency dispatch centre.

METHODS

we conducted focus groups with general practitioners, prehospital personnel, municipal acute care nurses, ED staff and nursing home staff. The analysis was performed using the iterative and explorative approach, 'systematic text condensation'.

RESULTS

the participants considered the service as a meaningful and appropriate alternative to hospital admission, as the treatment can be tailored to meet the residents' wishes and daily capabilities. This was experienced to promote dignity for the residents by reducing unnecessary transfers to the ED and the residents could remain in familiar surroundings with staff who knew their habitual behaviour and history. The nursing home staff contributed valuable information to the ED consultants' decision-making. The service made it possible to base the decision-making on complete patient pictures, as the ED consultants had the time to get to understand the residents.

CONCLUSION

acute care at nursing homes provides an alternative to routine admissions to hospitals and enables healthcare professionals to provide more dignity in the care of nursing home residents.