Outcome Prognostication of Acute Brain Injury using the Neurological Pupil Index (ORANGE) study: protocol for a prospective, observational, multicentre, international cohort study

Quantitative Pupillometry Predicts Neurologic Deterioration in Patients with Large Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses whether longitudinal quantitative pupillometry predicts neurological deterioration after large middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke and determines how early changes are detectable.

METHODS

This prospective, single-center observational cohort study included patients with large MCA stroke admitted to Boston Medical Center's intensive care unit (2019-2024). Associations between time-to-neurologic deterioration and quantitative pupillometry, including Neurological Pupil Index (NPi), were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent covariates adjusted for age, sex, and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score. Models using dilation velocity were compared with partial likelihood ratio tests. Pupillometric changes over 2-h intervals in the 12 h preceding deterioration were analyzed with linear mixed-effects modeling and Tukey's test. Matched referents (age, sex, stroke side, follow-up duration) were used for comparison. Optimal thresholds were identified using the Youden Index.

RESULTS

Among 71 patients (mean age 66.5 years; 59.2% women), 32 (45.1%) experienced deterioration. A 1-unit decrease in NPi was associated with a higher hazard of deterioration (hazard ratio 2.46; 95% confidence interval 1.68-3.61). Dilation velocity improved model performance compared to NPi alone. NPi was significantly lower at 0-2 h (3.81 vs. 4.38, p = 0.001) and 2-4 h (3.71 vs. 4.38, p < 0.001) before deterioration compared to 10-12 h prior. Optimal thresholds were 4.01 for NPi, 0.49 mm/s for dilation velocity, and -0.15 change in NPi over 12 h.

INTERPRETATION

Quantitative pupillometry predicts neurological deterioration in MCA stroke, with declines detectable up to 12 h prior. Dilation velocity shows promise as a novel biomarker. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:930-941.

Using smartphone pupillometer application to measure pupil size and light reflex: An unsuccessful prototype and analysis of the causes of failure

The accurate assessment of pupillary light reflex (PLR) is essential for monitoring critically ill patients, particularly those with traumatic brain injury or stroke and those in postoperative care. Smartphone-based pupillometers represent a potentially cost-effective solution for addressing this need. We developed a smartphone pupillometer application (app) and evaluated its effectiveness against the penlight test and quantitative pupillometry. This study included 50 volunteers aged >20 years and excluded individuals with neurologic or ophthalmic conditions. The app captured pupillary images by displaying a red circle on the screen, and an algorithm processed these images to calculate the pupil constriction percentage (PCP). The results revealed that the smartphone app often required multiple attempts for successful image acquisition. The obtained PCPs were consistently smaller and less variable than those obtained using the penlight test and a commercial pupillometer (app vs penlight for the right eye: 27.0% [27.0%-8.0%] vs 33.0% [32.3%-39.3%]; app vs pupillometer for the right eye: 27.0% [27.0%-28.0%] vs 35.0% [31.8%-38.3%]; app vs penlight for the left eye: 29.0% [28.0%-29.0%] vs 33.0% [29.8%-34.3%]; app vs pupillometer for the left eye: 29.0% [28.0%-29.0%] vs 36.0% [30.8%-38.0%]; P <.001 for all). Notably, the penlight and the pupillometer exhibited comparable PCPs (right eye: penlight vs pupillometer: 33.0% [32.3%-39.3%] vs 35.0% [31.8%-38.3%], P = .469; left eye: penlight vs pupillometer: 33.0% [29.8%-34.3%] vs 36.0% [30.8%-38.0%], P = .148). The app requires further refinement to yield results comparable to those of established methods. Future iterations can include alternative measurement strategies and dynamic assessment. Penlight and quantitative pupillometry remain indispensable as established tools for PLR.

Neurological Pupil Index and Intracranial Hypertension in Patients With Acute Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of the ORANGE Study

Importance

Invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) is the standard of care in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) with impaired consciousness. The Neurological Pupil Index (NPi) obtained by automated pupillometry is promising for noninvasively estimating ICP.

Objectives

To evaluate the association between repeated NPi and invasive ICP values.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study is a secondary analysis of the Outcome Prognostication of Acute Brain Injury With the Neurological Pupil Index (ORANGE), a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with ABI performed from October 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022, with follow-up at 6 months after ABI. The ORANGE study was performed at neurologic intensive care units of tertiary hospitals in Europe and North America. In ORANGE, 514 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support were admitted to the intensive care unit after ABI.

Exposure

Invasive ICP monitoring and automated pupillometry assessment every 4 hours during the first 7 days, considered as a standard of care.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Association between ICP and NPi values over time, using bayesian joint models, with linear and logistic mixed-effects longitudinal submodels.

Results

The study included 318 adult patients (median [IQR] age, 58 [43-69] years; 187 [58.8%] male) who required intensive care unit admission, intubation, and mechanical ventilatory support due to acute traumatic brain injury (n = 133 [41.8%]), intracerebral hemorrhage (n = 104 [32.7%]), or aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 81 [25.5%]) and had automatic infrared pupillometry used as part of the standard evaluation practice and ICP monitoring. A total of 8692 ICP measurements were collected, with a median (IQR) of 31 (18-37) evaluations per patient. The median (IQR) NPi and ICP for the study population were 4.1 (3.5-4.5) and 10 (5-14) mm Hg, respectively. In a linear mixed model, the mean change in the NPi value, as a continuous variable, was -0.003 (95% credible interval [CrI], -0.006 to 0.000) for each 1-mm Hg ICP increase. No significant association between ICP and abnormal NPi (<3; odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CrI, 0.99-1.03) or absent NPi (0; odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CrI, 0.99-1.06) was observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although an abnormal NPi could indicate brainstem dysfunction, in this large and heterogeneous population of patients, NPi values were not significantly associated overall with ICP values. Repeated NPi measurements may not be a sufficient replacement for invasive monitoring.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04490005.

Development of an Innovative Pupillometer Able to Selectively Stimulate the Eye's Fundus Photoreceptor Cells

Recent advancements in clinical research have identified the need to combine pupillometry with a selective stimulation of the eye's photoreceptor cell types to broaden retinal and neuroretinal health assessment opportunities. Our thorough analysis of the literature revealed the technological gaps that currently restrict and hinder the effective utilization of a method acknowledged to hold great potential. The available devices do not adequately stimulate the photoreceptor types with enough contrast and do not guarantee seamless device function integration, which would enable advanced data analysis. RetinaWISE is an advanced silencing pupillometry device that addresses these deficiencies. It combines a Maxwellian optical arrangement with advanced retinal stimulation, allowing for calibrated standard measurements to generate advanced and consistent results across multiple sites. The device holds a Class 1 CE marking under EU regulation 2017/745, thus facilitating clinical research progress.

[Current Aspects of Intensive Medical Care for Traumatic Brain Injury - Part 1 - Primary Treatment Strategies, Haemodynamic Management and Multimodal Monitoring]

This two-part article deals with the intensive medical care of traumatic brain injury. Part 1 addresses the primary treatment strategy, haemodynamic management and multimodal monitoring, Part 2 secondary treatment strategies, long-term outcome, neuroprognostics and chronification. Traumatic brain injury is a complex clinical entity with a high mortality rate. The primary aim is to maintain homeostasis based on physiological targeted values. In addition, further therapy must be geared towards intracranial pressure. In addition to this, there are other monitoring options that appear sensible from a pathophysiological point of view with appropriate therapy adjustment. However, there is still a lack of data on their effectiveness. A further aspect is the inflammation of the cerebrum with the "cross-talk" of the organs, which has a significant influence on further intensive medical care.

The Role of Automated Infrared Pupillometry in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review

Pupillometry, an integral component of neurological examination, serves to evaluate both pupil size and reactivity. The conventional manual assessment exhibits inherent limitations, thereby necessitating the development of portable automated infrared pupillometers (PAIPs). Leveraging infrared technology, these devices provide an objective assessment, proving valuable in the context of brain injury for the detection of neuro-worsening and the facilitation of patient monitoring. In cases of mild brain trauma particularly, traditional methods face constraints. Conversely, in severe brain trauma scenarios, PAIPs contribute to neuro-prognostication and non-invasive neuromonitoring. Parameters derived from PAIPs exhibit correlations with changes in intracranial pressure. It is important to acknowledge, however, that PAIPs cannot replace invasive intracranial pressure monitoring while their widespread adoption awaits robust support from clinical studies. Ongoing research endeavors delve into the role of PAIPs in managing critical neuro-worsening in brain trauma patients, underscoring the non-invasive monitoring advantages while emphasizing the imperative for further clinical validation. Future advancements in this domain encompass sophisticated pupillary assessment tools and the integration of smartphone applications, emblematic of a continually evolving landscape.

Poor Accuracy of Manually Derived Head Computed Tomography Parameters in Predicting Intracranial Hypertension After Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The utility of head computed tomography (CT) in predicting elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is known to be limited in traumatic brain injury; however, few data exist in patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data in patients with nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH] or intraparenchymal hemorrhage [IPH]) who underwent external ventricular drain (EVD) placement. Head CT scans performed immediately prior to EVD placement were quantitatively reviewed for features suggestive of elevated ICP, including temporal horn diameter, bicaudate index, basal cistern effacement, midline shift, and global cerebral edema. The modified Fisher score (mFS), intraventricular hemorrhage score, and IPH volume were also measured, as applicable. We calculated the accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of these radiographic features for the coprimary outcomes of elevated ICP (> 20 mm Hg) at the time of EVD placement and at any time during the hospital stay. Multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant radiographic factors associated with elevated ICP.

RESULTS

Of 608 patients with intracranial hemorrhages enrolled during the study time frame, 243 (40%) received an EVD and 165 (n = 107 SAH, n = 58 IPH) had a preplacement head CT scan available for rating. Elevated opening pressure and elevated ICP during hospitalization were recorded in 48 of 152 (29%) and 103 of 165 (62%), respectively. The presence of ≥ 1 radiographic feature had only 32% accuracy for identifying elevated opening pressure (PPV 30%, NPV 58%, area under the curve [AUC] 0.537, 95% asymptotic confidence interval [CI] 0.436-0.637, P = 0.466) and 59% accuracy for predicting elevated ICP during hospitalization (PPV 63%, NPV 40%, AUC 0.514, 95% asymptotic CI 0.391-0.638, P = 0.820). There was no significant association between the number of radiographic features and ICP elevation. Head CT scans without any features suggestive of elevated ICP occurred in 25 of 165 (15%) patients. However, 10 of 25 (40%) of these patients had elevated opening pressure, and 15 of 25 (60%) had elevated ICP during their hospital stay. In multivariable models, mFS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.36, 95% CI 1.10-1.68) and global cerebral edema (aOR 2.93, 95% CI 1.27-6.75) were significantly associated with elevated ICP; however, their accuracies were only 69% and 60%, respectively. All other individual radiographic features had accuracies between 38 and 58% for identifying intracranial hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 50% of patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage without radiographic features suggestive of elevated ICP actually had ICP > 20 mm Hg during EVD placement or their hospital stay. Morphological head CT findings were only 32% and 59% accurate in identifying elevated opening pressure and ICP elevation during hospitalization, respectively.

The Neurological Pupil index for outcome prognostication in people with acute brain injury (ORANGE): a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Improving the prognostication of acute brain injury is a key element of critical care. Standard assessment includes pupillary light reactivity testing with a hand-held light source, but findings are interpreted subjectively; automated pupillometry might be more precise and reproducible. We aimed to assess the association of the Neurological Pupil index (NPi)-a quantitative measure of pupillary reactivity computed by automated pupillometry-with outcomes of patients with severe non-anoxic acute brain injury.

METHODS

ORANGE is a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study at 13 hospitals in eight countries in Europe and North America. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit after traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, or intracerebral haemorrhage were eligible for the study. Patients underwent automated infrared pupillometry assessment every 4 h during the first 7 days after admission to compute NPi, with values ranging from 0 to 5 (with abnormal NPi being <3). The co-primary outcomes of the study were neurological outcome (assessed with the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOSE]) and mortality at 6 months. We used logistic regression to model the association between NPi and poor neurological outcome (GOSE ≤4) at 6 months and Cox regression to model the relation of NPi with 6-month mortality. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04490005.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 1, 2020, and May 3, 2022, 514 patients (224 with traumatic brain injury, 139 with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, and 151 with intracerebral haemorrhage) were enrolled. The median age of patients was 61 years (IQR 46-71), and the median Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission was 8 (5-11). 40 071 NPi measurements were taken (median 40 per patient [20-50]). The 6-month outcome was assessed in 497 (97%) patients, of whom 160 (32%) patients died, and 241 (47%) patients had at least one recording of abnormal NPi, which was associated with poor neurological outcome (for each 10% increase in the frequency of abnormal NPi, adjusted odds ratio 1·42 [95% CI 1·27-1·64]; p<0·0001) and in-hospital mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 5·58 [95% CI 3·92-7·95]; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

NPi has clinically and statistically significant prognostic value for neurological outcome and mortality after acute brain injury. Simple, automatic, repeat automated pupillometry assessment could improve the continuous monitoring of disease progression and the dynamics of outcome prediction at the bedside.

FUNDING

NeurOptics.

Application of Pupillometry in Neurocritical Patients

Pupillary light reflex (PLR) assessment is a crucial examination for evaluating brainstem function, particularly in patients with acute brain injury and neurosurgical conditions. The PLR is controlled by neural pathways modulated by both the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. Altered PLR is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes after traumatic and ischemic brain injuries. However, the assessment of PLR needs to take many factors into account since it can be modulated by various medications, alcohol consumption, and neurodegenerative diseases. The development of devices capable of measuring pupil size and assessing PLR quantitatively has revolutionized the non-invasive neurological examination. Automated pupillometry, which is more accurate and precise, is widely used in diverse clinical situations. This review presents our current understanding of the anatomical and physiological basis of the PLR and the application of automated pupillometry in managing neurocritical patients. We also discuss new technologies that are being developed, such as smartphone-based pupillometry devices, which are particularly beneficial in low-resource settings.

Prognostic Value of the Neurological Pupil Index in Patients With Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The Neurological Pupil index (NPi) provides a quantitative assessment of pupil reactivity and may have prognostic value in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). We aimed to explore associations between the NPi and clinical outcomes in patients with SAH.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 79 consecutive patients with acute SAH. Age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score, and respiratory failure and NPi in each eye were recorded at admission. The primary outcomes included death and poor clinical outcome (defined as inpatient death, care withdrawal, or discharge Glasgow Outcome Score <4). Groups were compared using the Fisher exact test, and predictive models developed with fast-and-frugal trees (FFTs).

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients were included: 21 (40%) had poor clinical outcomes and 2 (4%) died. Univariate analysis found that only APACHE-II score (P < 0.001) and respiratory failure (P = 0.04) were significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes. NPi was lower among patients with poor clinical outcomes (mean 4.3 in the right eye and 4.2 in the left eye) vs those without (mean 4.5 in the right eye and 4.5 in the left eye), but neither was significant. However, the most accurate FFTs for death and poor clinical outcome included NPi after accounting for age in the death FFT and APACHE-II score in the poor outcome FFT (sensitivity [sn] = 100%, specificity [sp] = 94%, and accuracy (ac) = 94% in a model for death; sn = 100%, sp = 50%, and ac = 70%) in a model for poor clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the NPi as a useful prognostic marker for poor outcomes in acute SAH after accounting for age and APACHE-II score.

Management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: an update for the intensivist

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains one of the most fatal and debilitating conditions in the world. Current clinical management in severe TBI patients is mainly concerned with reducing secondary insults and optimizing the balance between substrate delivery and consumption. Over the past decades, multimodality monitoring has become more widely available, and clinical management protocols have been published that recommend potential interventions to correct pathophysiological derangements. Even while evidence from randomized clinical trials is still lacking for many of the recommended interventions, these protocols and algorithms can be useful to define a clear standard of therapy where novel interventions can be added or be compared to. Over the past decade, more attention has been paid to holistic management, in which hemodynamic, respiratory, inflammatory or coagulation disturbances are detected and treated accordingly. Considerable variability with regards to the trajectories of recovery exists. Even while most of the recovery occurs in the first months after TBI, substantial changes may still occur in a later phase. Neuroprognostication is challenging in these patients, where a risk of self-fulfilling prophecies is a matter of concern. The present article provides a comprehensive and practical review of the current best practice in clinical management and long-term outcomes of moderate to severe TBI in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Neurological Pupil Index for the Early Prediction of Outcome in Severe Acute Brain Injury Patients

In this study, we examined the early value of automated quantitative pupillary examination, using the Neurological Pupil index (NPi), to predict the long-term outcome of acute brain injured (ABI) patients. We performed a single-centre retrospective study (October 2016−March 2019) in ABI patients who underwent NPi measurement during the first 3 days following brain insult. We examined the performance of NPi—alone or in combination with other baseline demographic (age) and radiologic (CT midline shift) predictors—to prognosticate unfavourable 6-month outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1−3). A total of 145 severely brain-injured subjects (65 traumatic brain injury, TBI; 80 non-TBI) were studied. At each time point tested, NPi <3 was highly predictive of unfavourable outcome, with highest specificity (100% (90−100)) at day 3 (sensitivity 24% (15−35), negative predictive value 36% (34−39)). The addition of NPi, from day 1 following ABI to age and cerebral CT scan, provided the best prognostic performance (AUROC curve 0.85 vs. 0.78 without NPi, p = 0.008; DeLong test) for 6-month neurological outcome prediction. NPi, assessed at the early post-injury phase, has a superior ability to predict unfavourable long-term neurological outcomes in severely brain-injured patients. The added prognostic value of NPi was most significant when complemented with baseline demographic and radiologic information.

Inter-device reliability of the NPi-200 and NPi-300 pupillometers

The pupillary evaluation is an essential part of the neurological examination. Research suggests that the traditional examination of the pupil with a handheld flashlight has limited interrater reliability. Automated pupillometers were developed to provide an objective scoring of various pupillary parameters. The NPi-200 pupillometer is used for quantitative pupillary examinations, the NPi-300 was launched in July 2021 with enhanced features. The purpose of this study is to compare results from the NPi-200 to the NPi-300 to ensure that data are translatable across both platforms. This study examines the inter-device reliability of the NPi-200 compared to the NPi-300 in two cohorts: 20 patients at risk for cerebral edema and 50 healthy controls. Paired assessments of the devices were made from all participants. Each assessment included bilateral PLR readings within a 5-minute interval. Data showed high agreement between the two devices for the Neurological Pupil Index (NPi) reading (k = 0.94; CI: 0.91-0.99) and for pupil diameter assessment (k = 0.91; CI: 0.87-0.96). There is a very high level of agreement between the NPi-200 and NPi-300 among healthy controls and critically ill patients. Clinicians and researchers can interpret the results from either device equally.