Study protocol: Minimum effective low dose: anti-human thymocyte globulin (MELD-ATG): phase II, dose ranging, efficacy study of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) within 6 weeks of diagnosis of type 1 diabetes

Immunosuppressive agents in diabetes treatment: Hope or despair?

Exploration of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of diabetes is a burgeoning field that has captured the attention of the medical community. The innovative approach of using these agents to combat diabetes is driven by their diverse capabilities to regulate the immune system, which is pivotal for disease pathogenesis. The primary objective is to enhance the management of blood glucose levels, which is a critical factor in the daily life of diabetic patients. This comprehensive review delves into the therapeutic horizons opened by immunosuppressive agents, particularly their potential impact on type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and their utility in the transplantation process. The complex etiology of diabetes, which involves a delicate interplay of genetic, environmental, and immunological factors, presents a multifaceted target landscape for these therapies. The agents discussed in the review, including CD3 inhibitors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4-immunoglobulin G, Janus kinase inhibitors, anti-thymocyte globulin, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, CD20 inhibitors, alefacept, and alemtuzumab, each bring a unique mechanism to the table, offering a tailored approach to immune modulation. As research progresses, emphasis is being placed on evaluating the long-term efficacy and safety of these agents to pave the way for more personalized and effective diabetes management strategies.

Therapeutic potential of anti-thymocyte globulin in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune condition characterized by the destruction of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) has emerged as a promising immunomodulatory therapy aimed at preserving beta-cell function and altering the disease course. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence from the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of low-dose ATG in individuals with T1D.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Science Direct, Scopus, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov, to identify studies investigating ATG in T1D in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools for randomized clinical trials and case-control studies were used to assess the quality and evaluate the risk of bias in the eligible studies.

RESULTS

The primary outcomes assessed were preservation of C-peptide levels, glycemic control, and adverse events. Results indicated that ATG showed potential in preserving beta-cell function and improving clinical outcomes in recent-onset T1D. However, the incidence of adverse events, such as cytokine release syndrome and lymphopenia, necessitated careful monitoring and management.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose ATG presents a promising therapeutic approach for modifying the progression of T1D. While early-phase trials demonstrate potential benefits in preserving beta-cell function, further large-scale, long-term studies are essential to establish optimal dosing regimens, long-term efficacy, and safety profiles. This review highlights the importance of continued research to fully elucidate the role of ATG in T1D management.

Immunomodulatory agents and cell therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (TID) is a chronic disease caused by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells, that progresses in three stages: 1) stage 1: β-cell autoimmunity + normoglycemia; 2) stage 2: β-cell autoimmunity + mild dysglycemia; 3) stage 3: symptomatic disease + hyperglycemia. Interventions to prevent or cure T1D in the various stages of the disease have been pursued and may target the prevention of the destruction of β cells, regression of insulitis, preservation or recovery of β cells residual mass. Some therapies show promising results that might change the natural history and the approach to patients with T1D in the next few years. Teplizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to CD3, was recently approved in the USA to delay Stage 3 T1D in individuals ≥ 8 years of age. Other non-cellular immunomodulatory therapies, both antigen-specific and non-specific, have shown interesting results either in patients with stage 2 or recent onset stage 3 T1D. Cell therapies such as non-myeloablative transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and tolerogenic dendritic cells have been also studied in these individuals, aiming immunomodulation. Stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy is promising for patients with long- standing T1D, especially with asymptomatic hypoglycemia not resolved by technology. This review aimed to provide updated information on the main immunomodulatory agents and cell therapy options for type 1 diabetes.

Screening, immunotherapy and the future of type 1 diabetes care in children and young people

Over the past decade there has been a drive towards prevention of type 1 diabetes (T1D), which has led to the development of screening programmes to identify individuals with early-stage disease. In the same period, clinical trials have been taking place on the use of immunotherapy in preventing T1D progression. These developments in screening and immunotherapy require care pathways that provide monitoring, information and support to children and young people with early-stage type 1 diabetes and their families. This article provides an overview of the developments in screening and immunotherapy and considers the implications for children and young people and their families and for the healthcare professionals involved in their care.

Batch-to-Batch Variation and Patient Heterogeneity in Thymoglobulin Binding and Specificity: One Size Does Not Fit All

Background: Thymoglobulin is used to prevent allograft rejection and is being explored at low doses as intervention immunotherapy in type 1 diabetes. Thymoglobulin consists of a diverse pool of rabbit antibodies directed against many different targets on human thymocytes that can also be expressed by other leukocytes. Since Thymoglobulin is generated by injecting rabbits with human thymocytes, this conceivably leads to differences between Thymoglobulin batches. Methods: We compared different batches for antibody composition and variation between individuals in binding to PBMC and T cell subsets, and induction of cytokines. Four different batches of Thymoglobulin were directly conjugated with Alexa-Fluor 647. Blood was collected from five healthy donors, and PBMCs were isolated and stained with Thymoglobulin followed or preceded by a panel of fluorescent antibodies to identify PBMC and T cell subsets. In addition, whole blood was incubated with unlabeled Thymoglobulin to measure cytokine induction. Results: Cluster analysis of flow cytometry data shows that Thymoglobulin bound to all PBMC subpopulations including regulatory T cells. However, Thymoglobulin binding was highly variable between donors and to a lesser extent between batches. Cytokines related to cytokine release syndrome were highly, but variably, increased by all Thymoglobulin batches, with strong differences between donors and moderate differences between batches. Discussion: The variation in Thymoglobulin binding and action between donors regarding PBMC recognition and cytokine response may underlie the different clinical responses to Thymoglobulin therapy and require personalized dose adjustment to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse side effects.

Identifying Promising Immunomodulators for Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) and Islet Transplantation

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune chronic disorder that damages beta cells in the pancreatic islets of Langerhans and results in hyperglycemia due to the loss of insulin. Exogenous insulin therapy can save lives but does not stop disease progression. Thus, an effective therapy may require beta cell restoration and suppression of the autoimmune response. However, currently, there are no treatment options available that can reverse T1D. Within the National Clinical Trial (NCT) database, a majority of over 3000 trials to treat T1D are devoted to insulin therapy. This review focuses on noninsulin pharmacological therapies, specifically immunomodulators. Many investigational new drugs fall under this category, such as the recently FDA-approved CD3 monoclonal antibody teplizumab to delay the onset of T1D. In total, we identified 39 different immunomodulatory investigational drugs. FDA-approved teplizumab for Stage 2 T1D is discussed along with other immunomodulators that have been tested in Phase 3 clinical trials or higher, including otelixizumab (another anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody), daclizumab (an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody), ladarixin (CXCR1/2 inhibitor), and antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Immunomodulators also play roles in islet transplantation and cellular therapies like FDA-approved Lantidra. Several immunomodulators involved in Phase 3 clinical studies of islet transplantation are also discussed, including alemtuzumab, basiliximab, etanercept, and reparixin, some already FDA-approved for other uses. These include alemtuzumab, basiliximab, etanercept, and reparixin, some of which have been FDA-approved for other uses. This review provides background, mechanism of action, results of completed trials, and adverse effects as well as details regarding ongoing clinical trials for each of these immunomodulators. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03875729, NCT01030861, NCT00129259, NCT00385697, NCT01280682; NCT03929601, NCT04598893, NCT05757713, NCT00678886, NCT01123083, NCT00064714, NCT00468117, NCT04628481, NCT01106157, NCT02215200, NCT00331162, NCT00679042, NCT01220856, NCT01817959.

A Plasma miR-193b-365 Signature Combined With Age and Glycemic Status Predicts Response to Lactococcus lactis-Based Antigen-Specific Immunotherapy in New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes

Immunomodulation combined with antigen therapy holds great promise to arrest autoimmune type 1 diabetes, but clinical translation is hampered by a lack of prognostic biomarkers. Low-dose anti-CD3 plus Lactococcus lactis bacteria secreting proinsulin and IL-10 reversed new-onset disease in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice, yet some mice were resistant to the therapy. Using miRNA profiling, six miRNAs (i.e., miR-34a-5p, miR-125a-3p, miR-193b-3p, miR-328, miR-365-3p, and miR-671-3p) were identified as differentially expressed in plasma of responder versus nonresponder mice before study entry. After validation and stratification in an independent cohort, plasma miR-193b-3p and miR-365-3p, combined with age and glycemic status at study entry, had the best power to predict, with high sensitivity and specificity, poor response to the therapy. These miRNAs were highly abundant in pancreas-infiltrating neutrophils and basophils with a proinflammatory and activated phenotype. Here, a set of miRNAs and disease-associated parameters are presented as a predictive signature for the L. lactis-based immunotherapy outcome in new-onset type 1 diabetes, hence allowing targeted recruitment of trial participants and accelerated trial execution.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Low-dose anti-CD3 combined with oral gavage of genetically modified Lactococcus lactis bacteria secreting human proinsulin and IL-10 holds great promise to arrest autoimmune type 1 diabetes, but the absence of biomarkers predicting therapeutic success hampers clinical translation. A set of cell-free circulation miRNAs together with age and glycemia at baseline predicts a poor response after L. lactis-based immunotherapy in nonobese mice with new-onset diabetes. Pancreas-infiltrating neutrophils and basophils are identified as potential cellular sources of discovered miRNAs. The prognostic signature could guide targeted recruitment of patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes in clinical trials with the L. lactis-based immunotherapy.

Autoantibody test for type 1 diabetes in children: are there reasons to implement a screening program in the general population? A statement endorsed by the Italian Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes (SIEDP-ISPED) and the Italian Society of Paediatrics (SIP)

In recent years screening of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in both at risk children and general population has been widely discussed with the aim of increasing awareness of the importance to early detect (and possibly treat) at-risk children in early stages of the chronic autoimmune progression to T1D.In fact, it is well known that first-degree relatives have the highest risk of T1D, but up to 90% of children who develop T1D do not have a family history and belong to the general population.The reasons for screening children well before the clinical onset of T1D include prevention of DKA (still up to 60% children are diagnosed with DKA) and related morbidities and mortality, reducing the need for hospitalisation, time to provide emotional support and education to ensure a smooth transition to insulin treatment, and opportunities for new treatments to prevent or delay progression.There are pros and cons of screening of T1D in children, but recent evidences suggest that it is now time to consider possible a screening for T1D in children.Recently, the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) has endorsed a Position Statement, discussing the pros and cons of screening for T1D in the general population; ESPE supports national Societies for Paediatric Endocrinology to spread information on this important issue in various countries throughout Europe; the Italian Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes (SIEDP-ISPED) and the Italian Society of Paediatrics (SIP) endorse this document with the specific aim of increasing awareness on screening for paediatric T1D in the general population.

INNODIA Master Protocol for the evaluation of investigational medicinal products in children, adolescents and adults with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

The INNODIA consortium has established a pan-European infrastructure using validated centres to prospectively evaluate clinical data from individuals with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes combined with centralised collection of clinical samples to determine rates of decline in beta-cell function and identify novel biomarkers, which could be used for future stratification of phase 2 clinical trials.

METHODS

In this context, we have developed a Master Protocol, based on the "backbone" of the INNODIA natural history study, which we believe could improve the delivery of phase 2 studies exploring the use of single or combinations of Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs), designed to prevent or reverse declines in beta-cell function in individuals with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Although many IMPs have demonstrated potential efficacy in phase 2 studies, few subsequent phase 3 studies have confirmed these benefits. Currently, phase 2 drug development for this indication is limited by poor evaluation of drug dosage and lack of mechanistic data to understand variable responses to the IMPs. Identification of biomarkers which might permit more robust stratification of participants at baseline has been slow.

DISCUSSION

The Master Protocol provides (1) standardised assessment of efficacy and safety, (2) comparable collection of mechanistic data, (3) the opportunity to include adaptive designs and the use of shared control groups in the evaluation of combination therapies, and (4) benefits of greater understanding of endpoint variation to ensure more robust sample size calculations and future baseline stratification using existing and novel biomarkers.