Multimorbidity in patients living with and beyond cancer: protocol for a scoping review

Socioeconomic disparities in health-related quality of life and healthcare use in the last year of life of patients with advanced cancer: longitudinal results from the eQuiPe study

PURPOSE

To examine socioeconomic disparities in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and healthcare use during the last year of life of patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

Data was used from a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, observational study of patients with advanced cancer in forty Dutch hospitals (eQuiPe). Adult patients with stage IV cancer completed 3-monthly questionnaires until death. Socioeconomic position (SEP) was defined as estimated income on street-level. Mixed-effects regression analysis was used to identify associated factors.

RESULTS

A total of 639 patients were included, 14% with a lower SEP, 59% medium SEP and 28% higher SEP. Patients with a lower SEP were more often lower educated (40% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) and less often reported to have a partner (61% vs. 90%, p < 0.001) than those with a higher SEP. In the last year of life, patients with lower SEP were more likely to experience disease-related financial difficulties than those with higher SEP (28% vs. 12%, p = 0.001; β 8.2, 95%CI 2.9-13.3). No significant associations were found between SEP and HRQoL, hospital admissions or emergency department admissions. Although, patients with lower SEP had more frequent (≥ 5 per month) interactions with healthcare professionals than patients with higher SEP in the last year of life (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.0-3.5).

CONCLUSION

Some socioeconomic disparities are present during the last year of life of patients with advanced cancer. It is important for clinicians to be aware of the greater financial impact and higher healthcare utilization in patients with a lower SEP to ensure equitable end-of-life care.

Combinations of multiple long term conditions and risk of hospital admission or death during winter 2021-22 in England: population based cohort study

Objective

To describe which combinations of long term conditions were associated with a higher risk of hospital admission or death during winter 2021-22 (the third wave of the covid-19 pandemic) in adults in England.

Design

Population based cohort study.

Setting

Linked primary and secondary care data from the General Practice Extraction Service Data for Pandemic Planning and Research (GDPPR) database, Hospital Episode Statistics, and Office for National Statistics death registry, comprising pseudoanonymised routinely collected electronic medical records from the whole population of England registered at a general practice, 1 December 2021 to 31 March 2022.

Participants

48 253 125 individuals, registered in GDPPR in England, aged ≥18 years, and alive on 1 December 2021.

Main outcomes measures

All cause hospital admissions and deaths associated with combinations of multiple long term conditions compared with those with no long term conditions, during the winter season (1 December 2021 to 31 March 2022). Overdispersed Poisson regression models were used to estimate the incidence rate ratios after adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, and index of multiple deprivation.

Results

Complete data were available for 48 253 125 adults, of whom 15 million (31.2%) had multiple long term conditions. Rates of hospital admissions and deaths among individuals with no long term conditions were 96.3 and 0.8 per 1000 person years, respectively. Compared with those with no long term conditions, the adjusted incidence rate ratio of hospital admissions were 11.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.4 to 12.7) for those with a combination of cancer, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus; 9.8 (8.3 to 11.4) for those with cancer, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and osteoarthritis; and 9.6 (8.6 to 10.7) for those with cancer, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Compared with those with no long term conditions, the adjusted rate ratio of death was 21.4 (17.5 to 26.0) for those with chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and dementia; 23.2 (17.5 to 30.3) for those with cancer, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and dementia; and 24.3 (19.1 to 30.4) for those with chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, dementia, and osteoarthritis. Cardiovascular disease with dementia appeared in all of the top five combinations of multiple long term conditions for mortality, and this two disease combination was associated with a substantially higher rate of death than many three, four, and five disease combinations.

Conclusions

In this study, rates of hospital admission and death varied by combinations of multiple long term conditions and were substantially higher in those with than in those without any long term conditions. High risk combinations for prioritisation and preventive action by policy makers were highlighted to help manage the challenges imposed by winter pressures on the NHS.

Non-pharmacological therapies for pain management in paediatric intensive care units: a protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

In critically ill children, pain management is complex owing to cognitive development and the nature of hospitalisation in paediatric intensive therapy units. Although there are many protocols and guidelines for pain control via pharmacological interventions, non-pharmacological practices should also be explored and disseminated for their potential benefit.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic literature search will be performed using the following databases: Academic Search Premier, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica Database, Virtual Health Library, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Theses from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Dart Europe, Open Access Theses and Dissertations and grey literature from Google Scholar. The research will consider quantitative and qualitative studies, mixed-method studies, systematic reviews, text articles, opinion articles, letters to editors and editorials in any language and from any database. The following will be eligible for inclusion: (1) newborns, infants, children and adolescents; and (2) non-pharmacological therapies used for pain in paediatric intensive care.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study does not require ethical approval. The results of this research will be disseminated through social media channels and podcasts about pain in children.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/DZHKT).

The future of cancer care in the UK-time for a radical and sustainable National Cancer Plan

Cancer affects one in two people in the UK and the incidence is set to increase. The UK National Health Service is facing major workforce deficits and cancer services have struggled to recover after the COVID-19 pandemic, with waiting times for cancer care becoming the worst on record. There are severe and widening disparities across the country and survival rates remain unacceptably poor for many cancers. This is at a time when cancer care has become increasingly complex, specialised, and expensive. The current crisis has deep historic roots, and to be reversed, the scale of the challenge must be acknowledged and a fundamental reset is required. The loss of a dedicated National Cancer Control Plan in England and Wales, poor operationalisation of plans elsewhere in the UK, and the closure of the National Cancer Research Institute have all added to a sense of strategic misdirection. The UK finds itself at a crossroads, where the political decisions of governments, the cancer community, and research funders will determine whether we can, together, achieve equitable, affordable, and high-quality cancer care for patients that is commensurate with our wealth, and position our outcomes among the best in the world. In this Policy Review, we describe the challenges and opportunities that are needed to develop radical, yet sustainable plans, which are comprehensive, evidence-based, integrated, patient-outcome focused, and deliver value for money.

Multimorbidity in people living with and beyond cancer: a scoping review

Globally, both cancer incidence and survival are increasing. Early cancer detection and improved treatment means many people with cancer will survive for ten or more years following diagnosis. Multimorbidity, defined as two or more chronic conditions, is up to three times higher in people living with and beyond cancer (LWBC) compared to the general population. This scoping review summarises the research evidence on the association between cancer and multimorbidity in people LWBC. It explores five key domains in people LWBC: 1) prevalence of multimorbidity, 2) association between ethnicity and socio-economic status (SES) and multimorbidity, 3) association between health status and multimorbidity, 4) adverse health consequences of cancer and related treatments, and 5) whether being a cancer survivor impacts treatment received for multimorbidity. It focuses on ten common cancers with high survival rates: prostate, breast, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, bowel/colorectal, kidney, head and neck, bladder, leukaemia, uterine and myeloma. A search of Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases identified 9,460 articles, 115 of which met the inclusion criteria. Articles were included in the review that involved multimorbidity in adult cancer patients. An evaluation of the evidence was performed, and a summary of findings was generated according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. This review included work from 20 countries, most studies were from the US (44%). The results showed that the most common long-term conditions in people LWBC were: hypertension, heart conditions, depression, COPD, and diabetes. The most reported incident comorbidities after a cancer diagnosis were congestive heart failure, chronic pain, and chronic fatigue. Multimorbidity tended to be higher amongst people LWBC from ethnic minority groups and those with lower SES. Quality of life was poorer in people LWBC with multimorbidity. The review identified the need for a uniform approach to measure multimorbidity in cancer patients across the world. Further research is required to compare multimorbidity before and after a cancer diagnosis, to explore the association of multimorbidity with ethnicity and socio-economic status and to determine whether a cancer diagnosis impacts care received for multimorbidity in people LWBC.