Assessing the sensibility and utility of a short-form version of the HIV Disability Questionnaire in clinical practice settings in Canada, Ireland and the USA: a mixed methods study

Patient perspectives on rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: insights from a large-scale survey

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) are prevalent among Arabic-speaking patients in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), yet their perspectives remain underexplored. This study examines patient experiences and perspectives.

METHOD

A cross-sectional survey was developed using pilot testing with clinimetric sensibility assessment to ensure clarity and relevance, and the Open-Source Metric for Measuring Arabic Narratives (OSMAN) to assess readability. The Checklist for Reporting Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) was used to enhance the quality of the survey. The survey was distributed via social media to Arabic-speaking patients with self-reported RMDs. Collected data included demographics, disease characteristics, medication use, treatment satisfaction factors, perceived causes, and patient concerns.

RESULTS

Of the 1050 responses received, 456 were complete and included in the analysis. Most respondents were female (81.4%) and between the ages of 25 and 44 (63.4%). The most frequently reported diseases were systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Nearly all (97.1%) used medications within the previous three months, primarily hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoids, and biologics. Key factors influencing treatment satisfaction were pain relief, laboratory result discussions, sleep quality, and mood improvement. Patients perceived immune system abnormalities (76.5%), psychological factors (54.8%), and genetics (41.7%) as primary disease causes. Main concerns included fear of disease complications, adverse drug reactions, and being a burden to others. Rheumatologists and internet search engines were the primary sources of information for patients. Most avoided alternative medicine, while 33.3% used it.

CONCLUSION

This survey is the first and largest in the MENA region, providing valuable insights into patient perspectives on RMD. It highlights the need for holistic management, enhanced education, and supportive services to improve quality of life. Key Points • The most commonly perceived causes of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases among patients with RMD were immune system abnormalities, psychological factors, genetic/hereditary influences, and envy. • Patients' top concerns included fear of future complications, adverse drug reactions, becoming a burden to others, physical disability, and issues related to marriage and childbirth. • Key factors influencing treatment satisfaction included pain relief, discussions of laboratory results, sleep quality, and mood improvement. • Approximately one-third of patients had consulted practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine.

Disrupted HIV care during COVID-19 pandemic associated with increased disabilities among people living with HIV in Belize

The COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted disabilities among people living with HIV; however, data on the association between COVID-19 pandemic-related healthcare disruptions and disabilities among people living with HIV is limited. We aimed to evaluate the association between COVID-19-affected HIV care behaviors and disability domains among people living with HIV in Belize. A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Western Regional Hospital and Southern Regional Hospital between August and October 2021 among people living with HIV in Belize aged ≥ 21 years and on antiretroviral therapy. A self-reported questionnaire captured data on demographic and clinical characteristics (gender, age, ethnicity, marital status, employment, education, CD4 count, and viral load), COVID-19-affected HIV care behaviors, and disability across six domains (physical, cognitive, and mental-emotional symptoms and impairments; uncertainty; difficulties carrying out day-to-day activities; and social inclusion challenges) using the Short-Form HIV Disability Questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to analyze the data. Of the 489 participants, 276 (56.4%) were women and 213 (43.6%) were men. After adjusting for covariates, (age, gender, employment, CD4 count, viral load, COVID-19-affected HIV care behaviours), our results showed that people living with HIV, whose HIV care behaviors were greatly affected by COVID-19, were more likely to have disabilities across various domains: physical (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-2.41, p = 0.018), cognitive (AOR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.58-3.94, p < 0.001), uncertainty (AOR: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.68-5.12, p < 0.001), difficulties carrying out day-to-day activities (AOR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.06-2.69, p = 0.027), and social inclusion challenges (AOR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.27-2.81, p = 0.002). Mitigating disruptions in care behaviors through the implementation of more accessible and comprehensive healthcare services may potentially address the multifaceted nature of HIV disabilities.

Episodic disability questionnaire (EDQ) measurement properties among adults living with HIV in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States

BACKGROUND

The Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) is a generic 35-item patient-reported outcome measure of presence, severity and episodic nature of disability. We assessed the measurement properties of the Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) with adults living with HIV.

METHODS

We conducted a measurement study with adults living with HIV in eight clinical settings in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States. We electronically administered the EDQ followed by three reference measures (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; Patient Health Questionnaire; Social Support Scale) and a demographic questionnaire. We administered the EDQ only 1 week later. We assessed the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha; > 0.7 acceptable), and test-retest reliability (Intra Class Correlation Coefficient; > 0.7 acceptable). We estimated required change in EDQ domain scores to be 95% certain that a change was not due to measurement error (Minimum Detectable Change (MDC95%)). We evaluated construct validity by assessing 36 primary hypotheses of relationships between EDQ scores and scores on the reference measures (> 75% hypotheses confirmed indicated validity).

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty nine participants completed the questionnaires at time point 1, of which 321 (89%) completed the EDQ approximately 1 week later. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency ranged from 0.84 (social domain) to 0.91 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale, and 0.72 (uncertainty domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale, and 0.87 (physical, cognitive, mental-emotional domains) to 0.89 (uncertainty domain) for the EDQ episodic scale. ICCs for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.79 (physical domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale and from 0.71 (uncertainty domain) to 0.85 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale. Highest precision was demonstrated in the severity scale for each domain (MDC95% range: 19-25 out of 100), followed by the presence (MDC95% range: 37-54) and episodic scales (MDC95% range:44-76). Twenty-nine of 36 (81%) construct validity hypotheses were confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

The EDQ possesses internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and test-retest reliability, with limited precision when administered electronically with adults living with HIV across in clinical settings in four countries. Given the measurement properties, the EDQ can be used for group level comparisons for research and program evaluation in adults living with HIV.

Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) measurement properties among adults living with HIV in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States

Background

The Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) is a generic 35-item patient-reported outcome measure of presence, severity and episodic nature of disability. We assessed the measurement properties of the Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) with adults living with HIV.

Methods

We conducted a measurement study with adults living with HIV in eight clinical settings in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States. We electronically administered the EDQ followed by three reference measures (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; Patient Health Questionnaire; Social Support Scale) and a demographic questionnaire. We administered the EDQ only 1 week later. We assessed the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha; >0.7 acceptable), and test-retest reliability (Intra Class Correlation Coefficient; >0.7 acceptable). We estimated required change in EDQ domain scores to be 95% certain that a change was not due to measurement error (Minimum Detectable Change (MDC95%)). We evaluated construct validity by assessing 36 primary hypotheses of relationships between EDQ scores and scores on the reference measures (> 75% hypotheses confirmed indicated validity).

Results

359 participants completed the questionnaires at time point 1, of which 321 (89%) completed the EDQ approximately 1 week later. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency ranged from 0.84 (social domain) to 0.91 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale, and 0.72 (uncertainty domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale, and 0.87 (physical, cognitive, mental-emotional domains) to 0.89 (uncertainty domain) for the EDQ episodic scale. ICCs for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.79 (physical domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale and from 0.71 (uncertainty domain) to 0.85 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale. Highest precision was demonstrated in the severity scale for each domain (MDC95% range: 19-25 out of 100), followed by the presence (MDC95% range: 37-54) and episodic scales (MDC95% range:44-76). Twenty-nine of 36 (81%) construct validity hypotheses were confirmed.

Conclusions

The EDQ possesses internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and test-retest reliability, with limited precision when administered electronically with adults living with HIV across in clinical settings in four countries. Given the measurement properties, the EDQ can be used for group level comparisons for research and program evaluation in adults living with HIV.