Lessons learnt from the first wave of COVID-19 in Damascus, Syria: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

Respiratory health and the Syrian conflict: a scoping literature review

Conflict adversely affects respiratory health in both direct and indirect ways among populations whose health is already compromised through the compounding effects of conflict. Our aim is to review academic and grey literature relevant to respiratory health in the Syrian conflict (now more than a decade in duration) to explore its impacts on populations across Syria. We performed a scoping literature review of academic and grey literature on respiratory health in Syria between March 2011 (taken as the start of the conflict for practicality) and December 2023. Of 11,472 papers screened, 34 met the inclusion criteria, of which 29 were peer reviewed. Key themes identified included the impact of conflict on asthma diagnosis and management; the burden of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and COVID-19; the impact of chemical weapon use and the impact of destruction and interruptions to the health system(s) across Syria on respiratory health. This review highlights the need for more in-depth exploration of the impact of conflict on respiratory health in Syria with focus on social determinants, for example, shelter, public health interventions, smoking cessation, and supporting early diagnosis and treatment of respiratory conditions to counter the effects that conflict has had on respiratory health.

Lung Cancer Diagnoses and Outcomes During the Syrian War, 2011-2018

Importance

Protracted wars, which disproportionately affect low-resource countries, exacerbate the challenges faced by cancer care systems, with lung cancer being the most affected as the most fatal oncological condition.

Objective

To characterize the presentation and survival of patients with lung cancer during the decade-long Syrian war.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included patients at a large oncology center in Syria during the first 8 years of the Syrian armed conflict (2011-2018). All patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer were included. Variables investigated included histological subtypes, TNM classification (tumor, lymph nodes, and metastasis), and staging at diagnosis as well as the yearly follow-ups up to 5 years after presentation.

Exposure

The Syrian war divided the country into temporary regions with different political influences and heterogeneously impacted health care accessibility among these regions.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Change in prevalence of advanced lung cancer cases at presentation; change in overall survival odds.

Results

The study included 5160 patients from all Syrian governorates (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [10.8] years; 4399 men [85.3%]). New diagnoses sharply declined during the first 3 years of the war, with partial recovery afterward. Regardless of their tempo-geographical regions, 60% to 80% of the yearly diagnoses presented with metastases. The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 13.1% (423 of 3238 patients with follow-up results) and 0.1% (2 of 1853 patients), respectively. Patients who presented from regions more involved in the armed conflicts showed poorer survival rates with odds ranging between 0.51 (95% CI, 0.44-0.59) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.49-0.74) across follow-ups for up to 2 years in comparison with patients presenting from safer regions. War-related health care inaccessibility explained a greater percentage of the variability in survival (Nagelkerke R2 = 7.5%; P < .001) than both patients' age and the stage of the disease combined (Nagelkerke R2 = 3.9%; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

The Syrian war has been associated with a marked decline in the management of patients with lung cancer, with limited access to specialized care, delayed diagnoses, and substantial decrease in survival rates correlating with the intensity of armed conflict in the respective regions. The profound repercussions of the prolonged armed conflict on patients with lung cancer in Syria necessitates urgent comprehensive strategies to improve the accessibility and quality of health care services, especially in conflict-ridden zones.

Patterns of War-Related Traumatic Brain Injuries and Predictors of Mortality Among Civilians During the Syrian Armed Conflict

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-velocity weapons were used against unshielded civilians during the Syrian armed conflict, leading to a variety of combat-related traumatic brain injuries with high fatality and morbidity. Because of the lack of data in the literature about the management and outcomes of similar injuries, we aimed in this study to characterize shrapnel and gunshot injuries in this vulnerable group and to describe the association between the mechanisms, site, and type of injury and the outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study on new traumatic brain injuries in civilians who presented alive to the neurosurgery department at Damascus Hospital between 2014 and 2017. The analyzed data included the mechanism of injury and its type and site based on computed tomography scans. We also studied the neurological status at admission, the major interventions applied, and outcomes including mortality and neurological deficits at discharge.

RESULTS

Shrapnel and gunshot injuries more likely affected the frontal and parietal lobes, respectively. While shrapnel led to injuries in multiple body parts, gunshots led to localized but more severe injuries. Despite that, mortality rates were comparable between the two mechanisms. Injuries to the right parietal and right frontal lobes were more fatal with odds ratios of 2.61 (1.23-5.52) and 2.12 (1.00-4.50), respectively. Moreover, mortality was also linked to the radiological findings of loss of brain material with an odds ratio of 3.73 (1.42-9.81), intracerebral hemorrhage with an odds ratio of 3.60 (1.67-7.80), intraventricular hemorrhage with an odds ratio of 5.49 (1.68-17.95), and subdural hemorrhage with an odds ratio of 6.35 (2.29-17.66).

CONCLUSION

The unfortunate nature of the Syrian armed conflict, wherein civilians were targeted during their daily routine, seems to manifest a heightened propensity to affect the parietal lobes, potentially resulting in higher morbidity. Although shrapnel and gunshot injuries showed no significant difference in mortality rates, injuries involving loss of brain tissue and intracranial hemorrhage emerged as independent predictors of mortality.