Examining interprofessional collaboration in oncogenetic service delivery models for hereditary cancers: a scoping review protocol

Addressing uncertainty in hereditary colorectal cancer: the role of a regional expert multidisciplinary team meeting

There is frequent uncertainty in both the precise quantification of risk, and the application of clinical interventions, designed to mitigate increased heritable colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility. We evaluated the role of a collaborative specialist multidisciplinary team meeting (MDM) for familial and hereditary CRC, led by the St Mark's Hospital Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer specifically in supporting the clinical management of uncertainty. A retrospective thematic analysis of meeting outcomes from inception in June 2020 until March 2023 was performed. Descriptive statistics were employed to ascertain clinicopathological data, clinical queries and whether MDM recommendations were outside the scope of current guidelines. In total 260 cases were discussed from 13 regional institutions. A prior personal history of cancer was present in 215 (82.6%), and a family history of CRC in 107(41.2%) and non-CRC 27(10.4%) cases. In thematic analysis uncertainty related to indications for genetic testing was considered in 148 (56.9%) of cases, with unexplained mismatch repair deficiency (u-dMMR) in 78 (30%) of cases, and resolution of molecular interpretation in 61 (23.5%). Surveillance related queries represented 55 (21.1%), and mainstreaming 29 (11%) of cases. Management was recommended beyond the scope of existing guidelines in 64 (24.6%) cases. This regional hereditary CRC MDM provides clinicians with support in areas of uncertainty in diagnosis and clinical management, supporting clinical decision-making where evidence and clinical guidelines may be limited. This model could be replicated to support complexity in clinical care in other geographical regions or other health conditions.

Mapping inter-professional collaboration in oncogenetics: Results from a scoping review

Inter-professional collaboration could improve timely access and quality of oncogenetic services. Here, we present the results of a scoping review conducted to systematically identify collaborative models available, unpack the nature and extent of collaboration proposed, synthesize evidence on their implementation and evaluation, and identify areas where additional research is needed. A comprehensive search was conducted in four journal indexing databases on June 13th, 2022, and complemented with searches of the grey literature and citations. Screening was conducted by two independent reviewers. Eligible documents included those describing either the theory of change, planning, implementation and/or evaluation of collaborative oncogenetic models. 165 publications were identified, describing 136 unique interventions/studies on oncogenetic models with somewhat overlapping collaborative features. Collaboration appears to be mostly inter-professional in nature, often taking place during risk assessment and pre-testing genetic counseling. Yet, most publications provide very limited information on their collaborative features, and only a few studies have set out to formally evaluate them. Better quality research is needed to comprehensively examine and make conclusions regarding the value of collaboration in this oncogenetics. We propose a definition, logic model, and typology of collaborative oncogenetic models to strengthen future planning, implementation, and evaluation in this field.