Use of four asymmetric marks to orient the donor graft during Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Principal Component Analysis of a Real-World Cohort of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Cases: Demonstration of a Powerful Data-Mining Technique for Identifying Areas of Research

PURPOSE

Principal component analysis (PCA) is a descriptive exploratory statistical technique that is widely used in complex fields for data mining. However, it is rarely used in ophthalmology. We explored its research potential with a large series of eyes that underwent 3 keratoplasty techniques: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), conventional Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (ConDSAEK), or ultrathin-DSAEK (UT-DSAEK).

METHODS

All consecutive DMEK/DSAEK cases conducted in 2016 to 2022 that had ≥24 months of follow-up were included. ConDSAEK and UT-DSAEK were defined as preoperative central graft thickness ≥130 and <130 μm, respectively. Seventy-six patient, disease, surgical practice, and temporal outcome variables were subjected to PCA, including preoperative anterior keratometry, the use of sulfur hexafluoride gas (SF6) versus air for primary tamponade, and postoperative best corrected visual acuity and endothelial cell density. Associations of interest that were revealed by PCA were assessed with the Welch t test or Pearson test.

RESULTS

A total of 331 eyes were treated with DMEK (n = 165), ConDSAEK (n = 95), or UT-DSAEK (n = 71). PCA showed that ConDSAEK and UT-DSAEK clustered closely, including regarding postoperative best corrected visual acuity, and were clearly distinct from DMEK. PCA and follow-up univariate analyses suggested that in DMEK, 1) flatter preoperative anterior keratometry (average, K1, and K2) associated with more rebubbling (P = 0.004-0.089) and graft detachment (P = 0.007-0.022); 2) graft marking did not affect postoperative ECD; and 3) lower postoperative endothelial cell density associated with SF6 use (all P > 0.001) and longer surgery (P = 0.005-0.091). All associations are currently under additional investigation in our hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

PCA is a powerful technique that can rapidly reveal clinically relevant associations in complex ophthalmological datasets.

Effect of Anterior Chamber Air on Central Corneal Thickness in Human Donor Eyes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe the effects of intracameral air on corneal edema.

METHODS

A laboratory investigation was performed on human donor corneas. Baseline pachymetry measurements through anterior segment optical coherence tomography and endothelial cell density were obtained for all corneas. Each pair of corneas was separated and randomly assigned to undergo air injection or Optisol-GS into a BIONIKO artificial anterior chamber for 5 minutes at physiologic intraocular pressure confirmed by digital palpation. Photographs were obtained immediately on connection of the cornea to the artificial anterior chamber and on completion of the 5 minutes of treatment, with anterior chamber air being exchanged for Optisol-GS. Pretreatment and posttreatment photographs were obtained. Immediately after treatment, pachymetry was again obtained on all corneas. Pachymetry data underwent statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Corneal pachymetry improved from 690.5 ± 126.6 to 576.1 ± 87.2 μm, yielding a 114.4 ± 50.4 μm improvement of pachymetry in the group with air injected into the anterior chamber. This was a significant improvement of pachymetry when compared with the group with Optisol-GS injected into the anterior chamber, which showed an improvement from 662.3 ± 126.5 to 613.5 ± 108.0 μm, yielding an improvement of 48.8 ± 34.3 μm.

CONCLUSIONS

Injection of air into the anterior chamber leads to a significant decrease in corneal pachymetry. We thereby propose that injecting air intracamerally is an effective intraoperative intervention when visualization is negatively affected by corneal edema.

DMEK surgical training: An instructional guide on various wet-lab methods

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a partial-thickness corneal transplantation procedure that involves selective transplantation of the Descemet membrane and endothelium. DMEK offers significant advantages over other keratoplasty techniques, such as faster visual rehabilitation, better final visual acuity due to minimal optical interface effects, lower risk of allograft rejection, and less long-term dependence on topical steroids. Despite all its advantages, DMEK has been found to be more challenging than other corneal transplantation techniques, and its steep learning curve appears to be an obstacle to its widespread use and adoption by corneal surgeons worldwide. DMEK surgical training laboratories (wet labs) provide a window of opportunity for surgeons to learn, prepare, manipulate, and deliver these grafts in a risk-free environment. Wet labs are a significant learning tool, especially for those institutions that have limited tissue availability in their local centers. We provide a step-by-step guide for preparing DMEK grafts using different techniques on human and nonhuman models with instructional videos. This article should eventually help the trainees and the educators understand the requirements for performing DMEK and conducting a DMEK wet lab and develop their skills and interests from a wide variety of available techniques.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Update on preoperative considerations, surgical techniques, and outcomes

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is the closest to the physiological replacement of endothelial cells. In the initial years, the technique was surgically challenging. Over the years, with better understanding and modifications in the surgical steps, the technique has evolved as an alternative to more popular procedure Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. The article highlights the various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative nuances of DMEK. Additionally, it summarizes the various comparative and noncomparative studies on DMEK outcomes.

Evaluation of corneal nerves and dendritic cells by in vivo confocal microscopy after Descemet's membrane keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy

This study evaluated changes in corneal nerves and the number of dendritic cells (DCs) in corneal basal epithelium following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery for bullous keratopathy (BK). Twenty-three eyes from 16 consecutive patients that underwent DMEK for BK were included. Eyes of age-matched patients that underwent pre-cataract surgery (12 eyes) were used as controls. In vivo confocal microscopy was performed pre- and postoperatively at 6, 12, and 24 months. Corneal nerve length, corneal nerve trunks, number of branches, and the number of DCs were determined. The total corneal nerve length of 1634.7 ± 1389.1 μm/mm² before surgery was significantly increased in a time-dependent manner to 4485.8 ± 1403.7 μm/mm², 6949.5 ± 1477.1 μm/mm², and 9389.2 ± 2302.2 μm/mm² at 6, 12, and 24 months after DMEK surgery, respectively. The DC density in BK cornea pre- and postoperatively at 6 months was significantly higher than in the controls, and decreased postoperatively at 12 and 24 months and was significantly lower than that at 6 months postoperatively. Thus, our results suggest that DMEK can repair and normalize the corneal environment.

Clinical results after single asymmetrical shark fin for graft orientation in DMEK

PURPOSE

Evaluating the effect of a single peripheral triangular mark to ensure the correct anterior-posterior graft orientation in DMEK.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients scheduled for DMEK due to Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and divided into 2 study groups: Group -M (n = 184) had no mark of the EDM (Endothelial Descemet membrane) and group + M (n = 193) had a triangular peripheral mark. Follow-up time was 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The postoperative graft turning and Re-DMEK rate could be significantly reduced by the use of a peripheral mark (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, respectively). Re-DMEK due to primary graft failure was significantly associated with prior graft turning (p < 0.001). Both groups showed comparable values for visual acuity, central corneal thickness and endothelial cell count after a follow-up of 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Single peripheral triangular marking is a simple and cost-saving addition to EDM preparation to ensure the correct orientation of the graft intraoperatively and could lead to a significant reduction in graft turning and re-DMEK rate in this study.

Graft Edge Reflection of a Tightly Scrolled Roll Using Endoillumination as a Simple Method for Determining Graft Orientation in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To describe a simple finding that can be used to determine donor tissue orientation in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). This involves the appearance of a highly reflective round curved line from an overlapping graft edge within the anterior chamber using light from an endoilluminator. We here name this Kobayashi sign (K-sign).

METHODS

Twelve consecutive eyes from 12 patients who underwent DMEK were evaluated for the presence of a K-sign. The presence of Berrospi sign (B-sign), a double-line reflection from the peripheral curls of the Descemet membrane (DM) roll that has been reported to be useful for correct graft orientation, was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 12 cases, 3 donors showed a loosely scrolled roll soon after DM donor insertion; all 3 of these showed a positive B-sign only when the endoilluminator was used. Nine donors showed a tightly scrolled DM roll without a B-sign; among these 9 donors, a K-sign was visible in 7 cases only when the endoilluminator was used. The remaining 2 cases with a tight scroll configuration showed no K-sign even with the use of endoillumination, indicating that the roll edge was located completely downward; rotation of the roll using a small jet of fluid from paracentesis revealed K-sign in these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique is useful for determining the correct orientation of a tightly scrolled DM roll, subsequently enabling rapid DMEK surgery. For loosely scrolled DM roll, endoillumination enhanced B-sing is proven useful.

Iris Posterior Synechiae After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Eyes: Prevention and Management of Posterior Synechiae

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of a mydriatic agent for posterior synechiae after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation followed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (staged DMEK).

METHODS

In this prospective study, the outcomes of DMEK with or without mydriasis (0.5% tropicamide and 0.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride [Mydrin-P; Santen, Osaka, Japan]) after the DMEK procedure were analyzed. Patients underwent IOL implantation approximately 4 weeks before DMEK. Six months after DMEK, the iris posterior synechiae severity score was evaluated based on the extent of posterior synechiae affecting the eight areas (45° each) of the pupillary rim (posterior synechiae score; grades 0-8). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, axial length, and the amount of air at the end of the surgery were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifteen eyes of 15 patients (mydriatic: n=8, control: n=7) were eligible for inclusion. Iris posterior synechiae were detected in all seven eyes (100.0%) in the control group, whereas they were noted in two eyes in the mydriatic group (25%). The mean iris posterior synechiae score was 0.69±1.20 in the mydriatic group and was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.57±0.90; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in other clinical factors. Although the incidence and scores of posterior synechiae in the control group were higher, the incidence was significantly reduced with the use of a mydriatic agent (in the mydriatic group).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a mydriatic agent is an effective measure to prevent postoperative synechiae after DMEK.

Anatomical Changes in the Anterior Chamber Volume After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate changes in the anterior chamber of eyes that have undergone Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and to identify factors that affect these changes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 25 pseudophakic eyes of 25 patients who underwent DMEK. We determined the preoperative and postoperative values of the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent (SE), anterior chamber volume (ACV), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and scleral spur angle (SSA) evaluated using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and iris damage score and iris posterior synechiae score. We defined ∆ as the average change rate from the preoperative to postoperative value for each factor at 1 month (SE at 6-12 months) postoperatively. We also analyzed correlations between ∆ACV, ∆SE, and other preexisting factors.

RESULTS

Compared with the preoperative ACV value (128 ± 28 mm3), the postoperative value significantly increased to 155 ± 21 mm3 (P < 0.001); ∆SE was +1.01 ± 1.09 diopters. ∆ACV was negatively correlated with preoperative ACD (R = 0.643, P < 0.001) and SSA (R = 0.555, P = 0.001) and positively correlated with ∆ACD (R = 0.799, P < 0.001) and ∆SSA (R = 0.608, P < 0.001). ∆CCT, iris damage score, and iris posterior synechiae score were not significantly correlated with ∆ACV. ∆SE was positively correlated with ∆ACV, ∆ACD, and ∆SSA (R = 0.680, 0.455, and 0.478; P < 0.001, <0.05, and <0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in the ACV and hyperopic change was noted after successful DMEK, especially in eyes with narrow-angled shallow anterior chambers.

Comparison of the Success Rate of Two Different Marking Techniques (F-Mark and Asymmetric Triangular Mark) to Orient the Donor Graft During Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effects of various graft-marking techniques on surgical results in patients undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, 65 eyes from 55 patients that had received various types of marking or no marking and that had been used for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty endothelial graft preparation were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the marking technique used: group I (F-marked graft; 17 eyes), group II (asymmetric triangle-marked graft; 12 eyes), and group III (unmarked graft; 36 eyes). The main outcome measurements were best-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, postoperative complications, rebubbling, and secondary keratoplasty rates.

RESULTS

In groups I, II, and III, rates of patients with 6-month best-corrected visual acuity ≥ 20/32 were 35.7%, 77.8%, and 71.9%, respectively (P = .04). The mean 6-month endothelial cell density decrease for each group was 43.3%, 48.8%, and 46.4%, respectively (P = .589), whereas the mean 6-month central corneal thickness decrease for each group was 7.7%, 15.8%, and 34.0%, respectively (P = .001). Rates of primary graft failure for groups I, II, and III were 35.3%, 8.3%, and 13.9%, respectively. Rebubbling was performed in 21.5% of eyes, and secondary keratoplasty was required in 29.2% of eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although graft-marking techniques for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty greatly facilitate graft positioning during surgery, both the potential toxic effects of alcohol on the endothelium when marking with gentian violet dye and the risk of graft detachment with asymmetric marking must be considered.

Microscope Integrated Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided DMEK in Corneas with Poor Visualization

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of microscope-integrated intraoperative optical coherence tomography (Mi-OCT) for performing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in corneas with poor visualization.

METHODS

It is a prospective interventional case series that included 25 consecutive cases of corneal decompensation with poor visualization that underwent Mi-OCT-guided DMEK at a tertiary eye care centre. The main outcome measures were graft attachment on day 3 and requirement for re-bubbling.

RESULTS

The etiology for corneal decompensation was pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (n=17), Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (n=4), failed graft (n=2), iridocorneal endothelial syndrome (n=1) and failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (n=1). Complete graft attachment was noted in 72% of cases. Graft detachment was noted in 16% of cases which required re-bubbling. No intervention was done for shallow peripheral detachment (n=2) and peripheral Descemet membrane (DM) fold (n=1). All grafts were attached at six-months follow-up. The mean corrected distance visual acuity and central corneal thickness improved from 1.4 ± 0.5 logMAR and 799.6 ± 110.9 µm at baseline to 0.3 ± 0.3 logMAR and 536.28 ± 11.44 um at six months. Mi-OCT was helpful in visualizing areas of peripheral anterior synechiae, missing DM, retained DM tags after descemetorhexis, DMEK roll configuration and orientation in the injector and anterior chamber, interface fluid and peripheral folds in the DMEK graft.

CONCLUSION

Mi-OCT helps in identification of the anatomy and dynamics of the host DM, DM roll and anterior chamber in cases with poor visualization and is a useful tool while performing DMEK in such cases.

How to Avoid an Upside-Down Orientation of the Graft during Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty?

Purpose

Incorrect anterior-posterior orientation of the Descemet endothelial complex (DEC) is one of the causes of failure of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). We evaluated a new marking technique to avoid such a misorientation.

Method

A new marking technique of the DEC was evaluated in patients requiring primary DMEK. A Braille-“R”-letter was applied dot by dot onto the stromal surface of the DEC after lifting it by injecting an air-bubble into the interface between the endothelial surface of the partially stripped graft. The positioning of the graft was intraoperatively controlled by an orientation of the Braille-“R”-letter. Laboratory tests were conducted to test the impact of the marking technique on endothelial cell count.

Results

We included prospectively 37 eyes of 30 patients. Four eyes were phakic and 33 pseudophakic. Five grafts (14%) presented an undifferentiated rolling tendency in the anterior chamber, and evaluation of their positioning was possible due to orientation of the mark alone. In case of an upside-down orientation, grafts were flipped immediately. A correct orientation of the graft was achieved in all cases at the end of the surgery. The endothelial cell loss due to the mark was estimated to be less than 0.3%. At 3- and 6-month follow-ups, the mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.21 ± 0.15 and 0.15 ± 0.11 logMAR, respectively, and endothelial cell density was 1661 ± 349 and 1618 ± 396 cells/mm², respectively. Only one patient (3%) needed re-bubbling.

Conclusions

To rely on the natural rolling tendency of the graft alone does not assure its correct positioning in all cases. Creation of the mark with 4 dots punctuated on the air-lifted stromal side of the DEC is a simple and endothelial cell saving marking method to ensure correct orientation of the graft during DMEK.

Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty for pseudoexfoliation syndrome: a case series

Background

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and features of Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX).

Methods

In this retrospective study, 37 DMEK cases were reviewed from available medical records. Patients who exhibited endothelial dysfunction derived from PEX or Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and successfully underwent cataract surgery about four weeks before DMEK were enrolled. The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), and incidence of intra-operative/post-operative complications of DMEK were analyzed.

Results

This study included 14 eyes of 14 patients (PEX: n = 6, FECD: n = 8). There was no primary graft failure. In the PEX group, BSCVA improved from 0.67 ± 0.28 at the preoperative point to 0.43 ± 0.14 at 1 month, 0.27 ± 0.10 at 3 months, and 0.19 ± 0.08 at 6 months after DMEK. The donor corneal ECD was 2704 ± 225 cells/mm² at the preoperative point and decreased to 1691 ± 498 cells/mm² at 1 month, 1425 ± 366 cells/mm² at 3 months, and 1281 ± 340 cells/mm² (52.7 ± 11.7% less than ECD of the donor graft) at 6 months after DMEK. None of the patients required rebubbling. When compared with the FECD group, no statistical difference was observed in CCT (p = 0.821); BSCVA (p = 0.001) and the reduction rate of ECD (p = 0.010) were relatively worse.

Conclusions

DMEK is effective for the treatment of endothelial dysfunction due to PEX.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-019-1130-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ultrastructural findings in graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and new triple procedure

To investigate factors that influence graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) based on transmission electron microscopy results.Retrospective observational case series.This single center study included 16 eyes of 16 patients with penetrating keratoplasty (n = 14) or repeat DMEK (n = 2) following graft failure after DMEK. The main outcome measures were ultrastructural changes in the explanted graft on transmission electron microscopy, best-corrected visual acuity, and central corneal thickness.The mean preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 1.01 ± 0.54 logMAR and 0.56 ± 0.37 logMAR. The mean central corneal preoperative and postoperative thickness was 667 ± 187 μm and 511 ± 42 μm. Visual acuity and central corneal thickness improved significantly (P = .001/P = .003) after repeat surgery. Electron microscopy showed that 3 of 14 corneas showed upside down transplantation, and 3 corneas had pigmented cells or pigment granules at the Descemet-stroma interface. Further, 9 of 16 specimens showed a posterior collagenous layer deposited onto the Descemet membrane (average thickness 5.1 ± 6.2 μm; ranged 0.65-20 μm); this did not correlate significantly with the time between the original and repeat keratoplasty. Of 16 original grafts, 7 showed ultrastructural anomalies of the Descemet membrane, but one excised cornea showed no Descemet membrane pathologies.The majority of eyes with graft failure after DMEK showed ultrastructural changes in the Descemet membrane. It is crucial to assess donor tissue quality and to conduct graft marking before surgery to avoid immediate or delayed graft failure after DMEK. Nevertheless, repeat keratoplasty provided significant improvement in central corneal thickness and visual acuity.

Short Axial Length and Iris Damage Are Associated With Iris Posterior Synechiae After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the frequency and severity of iris posterior synechiae after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and to investigate possible causes of iris posterior synechiae.

METHODS

Twenty-three eyes were investigated in 20 Asian patients who underwent DMEK 1 month after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation surgery. A preexisting iris damage score was defined by iris damage and classified into 5 grades. Six months after DMEK, the iris posterior synechiae severity score was evaluated based on the extent of posterior synechiae, according to every 45 degrees of the pupillary rim (posterior synechiae score, 0-8). Correlations were analyzed between the posterior synechiae score and preexisting factors (preexisting iris damage score, axial length [AXL], anterior chamber depth, and anterior chamber volume, both before and after cataract surgery).

RESULTS

Iris posterior synechiae appeared in 20 of 23 eyes (87.0%). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity significantly improved at 6 months after DMEK (P < 0.001). Endothelial cell density was 1596 ± 530 cells/mm (P < 0.001); loss of cell density was 37.8 ± 19.9% at 6 months. Single regression analysis showed that the onset of iris posterior synechiae was correlated with the preexisting iris damage score (P = 0.006, r = 0.55), AXL (P < 0.001, r = -0.71), anterior chamber depth (P < 0.001, r = -0.70), and anterior chamber volume before cataract surgery (P < 0.001, r = -0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Iris posterior synechiae after DMEK frequently appeared in Asian eyes with shorter AXLs or a damaged iris.

Evaluation of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Irregularity After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To investigate the changes in anterior and posterior corneal irregularity after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 27 eyes of 23 patients who underwent DMEK and 27 eyes of age-matched healthy controls. Corneal irregularity indexes, surface regularity of height (SR_H), and higher-order aberrations were evaluated in 4- and 6-mm diameters of the cornea, preoperatively and postoperatively, using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) improved from 1.01 ± 0.54 preoperatively to 0.08 ± 0.11 at 6 months postoperatively. Anterior SR_H was significantly lower at 6 months postoperatively [from 1.86 ± 0.73 to 1.20 ± 0.34 (P < 0.01) (4-mm) and from 2.29 ± 0.62 to 1.64 ± 0.42 (P < 0.01) (6-mm)]. Posterior SR_H showed a significant decrease from 6.87 ± 4.19 to 2.18 ± 0.51 (4-mm) and from 5.21 ± 2.60 to 2.44 ± 0.38 (6-mm) at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). The SR_H was positively correlated with best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (anterior 4 mm: R = 0.524; anterior 6 mm: R = 0.477; posterior 4 mm: R = 0.655; posterior 6 mm: R = 0.655, P < 0.001) and with higher-order aberrations for 4-mm and 6-mm diameters (R = 0.511 and R = 0.325, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The SR_H reflects corneal irregularity and is correlated with the visual outcome after DMEK, which may be very helpful to corneal surgeons as an index indicating the severity before DMEK, and the quality of visual function after DMEK.

Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Vitrectomized Eyes with Sutured Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for vitrectomized eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and transscleral-sutured intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Methods

In this retrospective study, DMEK cases were reviewed from medical records and divided into two groups: the eyes after PPV and transscleral-sutured IOL implantation (vitrectomized group) and the eyes with in-the-bag IOL implantation (control group) prior to DMEK. The main outcome measures included time of graft unfolding during surgery and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) at 1, 3, and 6 months after the DMEK.

Results

Twenty-three eyes (vitrectomized group, n = 8; control group, n = 15) in 23 patients were included in this study. The unfolding time was significantly longer in the vitrectomized group than in the control group (P < 0.001). Postoperative BSCVA was worse in the vitrectomized group (0.16 ± 0.15) than in the control group (−0.06 ± 0.06; P = 0.017). The improvement in BSCVA was negatively correlated with the patients' age and frequency of previous surgeries.

Conclusions

Despite the longer graft unfolding time and limited visual recovery, DMEK should be applicable to vitrectomized eyes with transscleral-sutured IOL implantation.