Viability of preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts with 96-hour shipment

Plastic vs. glass: the effect of the synthetic material in contact with DMEK tissue during staining on endothelial cell loss

PURPOSE

Endothelial cell loss (ECL) during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation has been shown to affect graft survival and the need for re-grafting. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the impact of the plastic and glass mediums in contact with DMEK donor tissue during intra-operative graft staining on ECL.

METHODS

Retrospective study that included patients who underwent DMEK surgery between January 2019 and June 2021 at Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont and the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal, Canada. DMEK grafts were stained with 0.06% Trypan blue ophthalmic solution (VisionBlue®, Dutch Ophthalmic, USA, Exeter, NH) for 120 s in either a plastic or glass medium prior to delivery into the recipient's eye. The ECL was compared between the two groups 12-30 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

ECL at 12-30 months was significantly less in the eyes that had received grafts stained in a plastic medium compared to those stained in a glass medium. Graft survival and re-bubbling was higher in the glass group however this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Staining of the DMEK graft in a plastic medium caused less ECL compared to the glass medium.

Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density and morphology with Optisol GS and Life4C storage media in the eye bank: a 5-year retrospective analysis

Purpose

Optisol GS and Life4C are corneal storage media used by eye banks worldwide. We sought to determine if either solution was associated with superior corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) or morphology in a large cohort of donor corneas.

Methods

From January 2016 through December 2020, 10,316 corneas from 5,624 unique donors were acquired and analyzed at Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Bank. In April 2019, Life4C replaced Optisol GS as the sole storage medium. We compared ECD and morphology before and after April 2019, and excluded corneas processed within the transition period. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses accounted for age, sex, tobacco use, heavy alcohol use, and diabetes. Only right corneas were analyzed to account for the correlation between eyes.

Results

Of 5042 right corneas analyzed, 3486 were stored in Optisol GS and 1556 in Life4C. There was no significant difference in ECD across groups (2794 vs. 2793 cells/mm2 in Optisol GS and Life4C, p=0.88). In multivariate analyses, there was no significant difference in corneal ECD (0.6 cells/mm2 higher with Life4C, p=0.96) or hexagonality (0.22% higher with Life4C, p=0.31). However, the coefficient of variation was significantly lower in the Life4C group (-0.0039, p=0.03). After adjustment for above factors, corneas in Life4C demonstrated a 3.1% decreased likelihood of exhibiting CV values greater than 0.40 (p=0.009).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates comparable and favorable outcomes using both storage media and confirms their overall efficacy. The decreased CV in Life4C is not of clinically significant magnitude, but merits further research in clinical and long-term settings.

Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using a Preloaded Imported Graft

PURPOSE

Although the popularity of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is increased, there is still few clinical studies in Korea. In this study, we aimed to report the initial clinical outcomes of DMEK in patients followed up for more than 6 months.

METHODS

A total of 96 eyes that underwent DMEK by a single surgeon for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, or other indications were evaluated for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), postoperative complications, and graft survival.

RESULTS

The postoperative BCVA significantly increased compared to the preoperative BCVA by 59.4% (1.00 ± 0.77 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vs. 0.67 ± 0.76 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, p < 0.001). The average preoperative ECD was 754 ± 382 cells/mm2, increasing to 1,333 ± 562 cells/mm2 at 3 months (76.8%, p < 0.001), 1,334 ± 632 cells/mm2 at 6 months (76.9%, p < 0.001), 1,121 ± 474 cells/mm2 at 12 months (48.7%, p = 0.024), and 972 ± 458 cells/mm2 at 24 months postoperatively (28.9%, p = 0.445). Compared to 3 months, the ECD declined by 15.9% at 12 months (p = 0.009) and 27.1% at 24 months postoperatively (p = 0.158). The average CCT was 675 ± 113 μm preoperatively, decreasing to 581 ± 102, 574 ± 101, and 594 ± 94 μm at 6, 12, and 24 months after DMEK, respectively (p < 0.001 between all follow-up time points). Allograft rejection was detected in three (3.1%) and 14 eyes (14.6%) underwent retransplantation at an average of 10.1 ± 8.4 months after DMEK.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK is promising for maintaining corneal clarity, low postoperative complication rates, and stable graft longevity.

Glasses-Assisted 3D Display System-Guided Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue Preparation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue preparation using a glasses-assisted 3-dimensional (3D) display system and to compare it with a conventional surgical microscope.

METHODS

Healthy pairs of human corneas suitable for penetrating keratoplasty surgery were selected for this study. The tissues were randomly divided into 2 groups. Each pair of corneas had 1 cornea (group 1) prepared with NGENUITY (Alcon) with a 5-second staining time with vision blue, and the fellow cornea (group 2) was prepared using a OPMI Lumera 700 surgical microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) with a 30-second staining time. DMEK graft preparation time, speed of stripping, graft width, and endothelial cell loss were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight pairs of corneas were included in this study. The graft preparation time was significantly higher in the 3D group than in the conventional group (498 ± 147 vs. 418 ± 85 seconds, P value = 0.031). The mean speed of stripping was 0.59 ± 0.081 mm/s in group 1 and 0.089 ± 0.005 mm/s in group 2 ( P value = 0.024). The mean endothelial cell density in group 1 and group 2 before tissue preparation was 2162 ± 115.21 and 2153 ± 122.45, respectively ( P value > 0.1). After tissue preparation, the endothelial cell density reduced to 1911 ± 150.72 in group 1 and 1998 ± 90.72 in group 2 ( P value = P value > 0.05). The graft width was 5.05 ± 0.71 mm in group 1 and 4.92 ± 0.23 mm in group 2 ( P value > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK tissue preparation with 3D display system NGENUITY is feasible with a slightly increased preparation time. The improved visualization allows a reduced staining time that could be beneficial for eye banks because it may reduce the toxic effect of staining colorants.