Double-masked, sham and placebo-controlled trial of corneal cross-linking and topical difluprednate in the treatment of bacterial keratitis: Steroids and Cross-linking for Ulcer Treatment Trial (SCUT II) study protocol

Steroids and Cross-Linking for Ulcer Treatment Trial II: Baseline Characteristics

PURPOSE

The Steroids and Cross-linking for Ulcer Treatment Trial is an NIH-funded international, randomized, double-masked, sham and placebo-controlled clinical trial to determine the benefit of adjunctive corneal cross-linking with riboflavin and/or topical difluprednate in addition to topical antibiotic drops for treatment of smear-positive bacterial ulcers. The purpose of this study was to explore the baseline characteristics for infection of patients enrolled, and the ocular comorbidities of patients screened for inclusion.

METHODS

Of the 2005 patients with smear-positive bacterial ulcers screened, 280 patients were enrolled. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and characterize the data.

RESULTS

Eligible patients in India had baseline factors associated with agricultural work (N = 132; 47%) and manual labor (N = 54; 19%), whereas patients in the United States were associated with contact lens wear (N = 11; 69%) ( P <0.001). Nearly, 10% of patients with unilateral infectious keratitis are at risk of bilateral blindness because of preexisting visual disability in their other eye and thus ineligible for inclusion. India had higher rates of exclusionary factors for blindness in the other eye such as cataract (N = 48; 27%) and glaucoma (N = 24; 13) compared with the United States (N = 0; 0%) ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While corneal ulceration is an important cause of disability in technologically advanced countries, it occurs more frequently in low and middle-income countries, and the implications on these populations should be considered. These baseline factors can be evaluated to address such health care disparities.

Steroids in the Management of Infectious Keratitis

PURPOSE

To summarize the evidence base on the use of topical corticosteroids for infectious keratitis.

METHODS

Narrative review.

RESULTS

Infectious keratitis is a painful condition that often results in visually significant corneal stromal scarring, even when antimicrobial therapy is successful. Corticosteroids may reduce inflammation and subsequent scar formation and while relieving the acute ocular pain associated with a corneal ulcer. However, corticosteroids also reduce the host immune response, which could hinder the ability to clear infection. The safety and effectiveness of corticosteroids depends to a large part on the efficacy of the antimicrobials being used to treat the underlying infection. Randomized trials have found that corticosteroids are safe and effective for herpetic keratitis when used with appropriate antiviral therapy, and are safe for bacterial keratitis when used with broad spectrum topical antibiotics. The effectiveness of corticosteroids for bacterial keratitis has not been shown conclusively, although more advanced bacterial corneal ulcers may do better with corticosteroids. No randomized trials have assessed the safety and effectiveness of steroids for fungal or acanthamoeba keratitis. Animal studies suggest corticosteroids may be harmful in fungal keratitis, and observational human studies have found that steroids are harmful for fungal and acanthamoeba keratitis when started prior to anti-amoebics.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical corticosteroids, when used as an adjunct to antimicrobial therapy, may be beneficial if the antimicrobial being used can effectively clear or suppress the infection, such as in bacterial and herpetic keratitis. Randomized trials would be helpful to further delineate the role of corticosteroids for infectious keratitis.

The role of matrix metalloproteinases in infectious corneal ulcers

During infectious keratitis, the production of collagenolytic and inflammatory substances, along with increased corneal matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity, induces the degradation of corneal collagen and may cause postkeratitis complications, such as opacity, thinning, and corneal perforation. MMPs, especially MMP-2 and MMP-9, are overexpressed in infectious keratitis and sustained over time by inflammatory and nonmicrobial mechanisms. The high MMP levels are correlated with excessive corneal destruction in bacterial, herpetic, fungal, and acanthamoeba infections. Nonspecific treatments, such as tetracyclines, particularly doxycycline, or corticosteroids, are used as adjuvants to antimicrobials to alleviate the disproportionate degradation and inflammation of the corneal layers caused by corneal MMPs and decrease the recruitment and infiltration of inflammatory cells. Treatments showing inhibition of specific MMPs (Galardin, ZHAWOC7726), interfering with pro-MMP activation (EDTA, ascorbic acid), or showing anticytokine effect (epigallocatechin-2-gallate, TRAM-34) have been reported. Other treatments show a direct action over corneal collagen structure such as corneal cross-linking or have been associated with reduction of MMP levels such as amniotic membrane grafting. Although the use of these drugs has been shown in studies to be effective in controlling inflammation, especially in experimental ones, robust studies are still needed based on randomized and randomized clinical trials to demonstrate their potential effect as adjuvants in the management of infectious keratitis.

Review of the literature on the currently available evidence for the management of infectious keratitis with PACK-CXL

Infectious keratitis (IK) is one of the most common causes of monocular blindness worldwide, especially in developing countries and may account for 5.1%-32.3% of all indications for penetrating keratoplasty (PK). However, performing a therapeutic PK on a "hot eye" is associated with a higher incidence of IK recurrence and graft rejection. Standard treatment includes antimicrobials (ATM) and, once the causative pathogen has been identified, must be continued with targeted treatment, depending on antibiogram sensitivity. However, appearance of multiresistant strains to ATM is progressively increasing at an alarming rate. Besides that, the diversity of the causative microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses) may hinder the clinical diagnosis and secondarily the proper treatment from the beginning. It is estimated that only 50% of eyes will have a good visual result if the correct therapy is delayed. All these factors make the identification of alternatives to ATM treatment of paramount importance. Due to the ATM properties of photoactivated chromophore (riboflavin, RB) and ultraviolet (UV) light of wavelength (λ) 200-400 nanometers (nm), used in multiple medical and non-medical applications for disinfection, photoactivated chromophore for corneal cross-linking (CXL) of IK (PACK-CXL), as an addition to the therapeutic arsenal for the management of IK has been proposed. It must be differentiated from CXL used for the management of progressive keratoconus (KC). The objective of this review is to update the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of PACK-CXL in IKs.