'CPR for Feet' care bundle to improve foot assessment in inpatient diabetes

Enhancing Self-Management Skills of Patients With Existing Diabetic Foot Ulcerations: A Quality Improvement Project

PURPOSE

The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to determine the impact of a nurse-administered foot care intervention bundle (NA-FCIB) upon self-management knowledge, skills, and outcomes in patients with diabetic foot ulcerations.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

The sample comprised 39 patients being treated for diabetic foot ulceration at a wound care clinic in a tertiary care hospital in Arlington, Virginia. The project was conducted from August 2017 to February 2018.

APPROACH

This quality improvement project used the Johns Hopkins Plan-Do-Study-Act Method supplemented by self-regulation theory for diabetic patient education and evidence in clinical literature. The 12-week-long intervention included one-on-one teaching in the prevention of ulcerations and optimal care of the diabetic foot, blood glucose level tracking logs, patient "teach-back" and skills demonstration, and free foot care tools.

OUTCOMES

From baseline to post-NA-FCIB, the number of participants knowing the reasons for temperature foot protection increased by 92%, those knowing major factors leading to diabetic foot ulceration by 85%, those knowing what to look for in the foot self-exam by 85%, and those able to demonstrate correct foot self-exam by 84%. The number of participants understanding proper footwear increased by 74%, and those identifying ways to avoid/decrease the likelihood of diabetic foot ulcers by 72%. Mean serum hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) levels decreased from baseline to postintervention (8.27%; SD 2.05% vs 7.46%; SD 1.58%; P = .002).

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The NA-FCIB intervention was successfully incorporated into routine clinic care as the standard of care. Our experience suggests that the NA-FCIB may be feasible and effective for use at comparable wound care clinics and may have secondary benefits for HgbA1c regulation.

The benefits of using a first generation SEM scanner versus an equipment selection pathway in preventing HAPUs

Several studies have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in pressure ulcer prevention using the SEM scanner, but none have compared it with other methods. In one of Scotland's health boards, 'hot spot' wards had been unable to reduce the number of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) after several years of focused improvement work. In addition, other wards showed high use of dynamic therapy systems with associated costs. This review compares the use of a first generation SEM scanner versus a mattress and equipment selection pathway over a 6-week period. The findings show that the SEM scanner wards had zero HAPU while the equipment pathway wards developed a total of 4 HAPU. The two SEM scanner wards showed a 11% and 33% reduction in dynamic therapy use, while the pathway wards showed an average 40% increase. Consideration should be given to using SEM scanners to support staff decision-making to reduce HAPU development and dynamic therapy usage.

Association of Risk Factors with Receiving a Foot Check in People With Diabetes: NHANES 2013-2016

AIMS

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends annual foot examinations for those with diabetes. The factors related to who receives an annual examination is not completely understood. This study aims to identify factors that influence whether individuals with diabtes had their feet checked for sores or irritations.

METHODS

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), were analyzed to determine the factors that influence whether an annual foot check was performed.

RESULTS

Participants with abnormal A1C (> 6.5%) had higher odds of having their feet checked compared to those with a normal A1C (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-5.30). The presence of retinopathy (AOR = 2.76; 95% CI:1.13-6.73) or kidney disease (AOR = 2.37; 95% CI:1.11-5.03) also increased the odds of a foot check. Finally, the number of risk factors for diabetic complications was significantly associated with having a foot check when modeled as a continuous variable (AOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.14-1.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Whether an individual received an annual foot check for sores or irritations was influenced by the number of risk factors they had, especially an elevated A1C value, and the presence of retinopathy or kidney disease.