1
|
Anastasi JK, Capili B, Norton M, McMahon DJ, Marder K. Recruitment and retention of clinical trial participants: understanding motivations of patients with chronic pain and other populations. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2024; 4:1330937. [PMID: 38606348 PMCID: PMC11006977 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1330937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
This paper aims to present and discuss the issues, challenges, and strategies related to recruitment and retention in clinical trials involving participants with chronic pain. The randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) is widely regarded as the gold standard for evaluating clinical interventions. However, it is crucial to acknowledge and address the challenges associated with recruiting and retaining participants. To prioritize the experience of the study population, targeted outreach strategies and a patient-centric approach are necessary. Researchers should consider incorporating recruitment and retention strategies during the study design phase. Implementing multi-pronged recruitment methods, leveraging relationships with community providers, and involving representatives of the patient population are helpful approaches. Effective communication and maintaining a professional environment are vital for optimizing engagement and supporting the successful execution of clinical trials involving participants with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce K. Anastasi
- Division of Special Studies in Symptom Management, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bernadette Capili
- Heilbrunn Family Center for Research Nursing, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Margaret Norton
- Division of Special Studies in Symptom Management, New York University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Nursing, St. Joseph's University, Brooklyn, NY, United States
| | - Donald J. McMahon
- Division of Special Studies in Symptom Management, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Karen Marder
- Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hagège M, Bringuier M, Martinez-Tapia C, Chouaïd C, Helissey C, Brain E, Lempdes GR, Dubot C, Bello-Roufai D, Geiss R, Kempf E, Gourden A, Elgharbi H, Garrigou S, Gregoire L, Derbez B, Canouï-Poitrine F. Disentangling the reasons why older adults do not readily participate in cancer trials: a socio-epidemiological mixed methods approach. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae007. [PMID: 38346934 PMCID: PMC10861365 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies of the under-representation of older adults in cancer clinical trials (CTs) have encompassed the entire pathway from a trial being available in a cancer centre to the patient's invitation to participate and then agreement or refusal to participate. OBJECTIVES The study's primary objective was to evaluate CT non-invitation and refusal rates. The secondary objectives were to identify factors associated with non-invitation and refusal and to assess experiences of CT participation from the patients' and professionals' perspectives. METHODS Here, we used mixed methods and a socio-epidemiological approach to analyse reasons for the non-participation of eligible older patients with a solid cancer in cancer CTs in France. RESULTS We found that non-invitation and low CT participation are mainly related to the patients' sociodemographic characteristics and living conditions (such as social isolation, being single, divorced or widowed, not having children and the absence of close family members) and the healthcare professionals' perceptions of insufficient informal support or a high homecare requirement. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that efforts to increase fair inclusion and the participation of older adults in CTs should target the physician-patient relationship, the medical profession and hospital funding, rather than the patient alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meoïn Hagège
- Department of Health, French institute for health research, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, InsermU955, Eq. CEpiA & University Paris Est Créteil, 8 rue du general Sarrail, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | | | - Claudia Martinez-Tapia
- Department of Health, French institute for health research, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, InsermU955, Eq. CEpiA & University Paris Est Créteil, 8 rue du general Sarrail, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | - Christos Chouaïd
- Department of Health, French institute for health research, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, InsermU955, Eq. CEpiA & University Paris Est Créteil, 8 rue du general Sarrail, F-94010 Créteil, France
- Department of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Créteil, 40 Av. de Verdun, F-94000 Créteil, France
| | - Carole Helissey
- Departement of Oncology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin, 69 Av. de Paris, F-94160 Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, F-92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | - Coraline Dubot
- Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, F-92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | - Romain Geiss
- Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, F-92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Emmanuelle Kempf
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 54 avenue du maréchal lattre de tassigny, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | - Audrey Gourden
- Departement of Oncology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin, 69 Av. de Paris, F-94160 Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Hanane Elgharbi
- Department of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Créteil, 40 Av. de Verdun, F-94000 Créteil, France
| | - Sonia Garrigou
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 54 avenue du maréchal lattre de tassigny, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | - Laetitia Gregoire
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 54 avenue du maréchal lattre de tassigny, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | - Benjamin Derbez
- Department of Sociology, Université Paris 8, Cresspa CSU, 2 Rue de la Liberté, F-93200 Saint-Denis, France
| | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- Department of Health, French institute for health research, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, InsermU955, Eq. CEpiA & University Paris Est Créteil, 8 rue du general Sarrail, F-94010 Créteil, France
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 54 avenue du maréchal lattre de tassigny, F-94010 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liang JE, Liang MY, Zhang EE, Peng YY, Chen LL, Deng JY, Lin T, Fu J, Zhang JN, Li SL, Li F, Xiao HM, Huang WM, Liu YH. Factors influencing willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials and strategies for effective recruitment. Int J Ophthalmol 2024; 17:157-163. [PMID: 38239943 PMCID: PMC10754671 DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.01.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM To explore the factors influencing individuals' willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials. METHODS A questionnaire survey was conducted from January to April 2021 among patients and their family members at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, in Guangzhou, China. The survey gathered data on respondents' willingness, demographic and socioeconomic profiles, as well as their reasons and concerns regarding engagement in clinical trials. RESULTS Of the 1078 residents surveyed (mean age 31.2±13.1y; 65.8% females) in Guangzhou, 749 (69.5%) expressed a willingness to participate in future ophthalmic clinical trials. Specific characteristics associated with greater willingness included a younger age, lower annual income, higher education, prior participation experience, previous ophthalmic treatment, and a better understanding of clinical trials. With the exception of age, these characteristics were significantly linked to a higher willingness. The primary barrier to participation, expressed by 64.8% of those willing and 54.4% of those unwilling, was "Uncertain efficacy". In terms of motivations, the willing group ranked "Better therapeutic benefits" (35.0%), "Professional monitoring" (34.3%), and "Trust in healthcare professionals" (33.1%) as their top three reasons, whereas the unwilling participants indicated "Full comprehension of the protocol" (46.2%) as the key facilitator. CONCLUSION This study reveals a substantial willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials and demonstrates the predictive role of demographic and socioeconomic factors. Variations in motivators and concerns between willing and unwilling participants highlight the significance of tailored recruitment strategies. Importantly, the need for and trust in healthcare professionals stand out as powerful motivations, underscoring the importance of enhancing physician-patient relationships, adopting patient-centered communication approaches, and addressing individualized needs to improve accrual rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-En Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Meng-Yin Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - En-En Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yu-Ying Peng
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ling-Ling Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jia-Yu Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ting Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jun Fu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jia-Ni Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shao-Li Li
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Fei Li
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hui-Ming Xiao
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Wen-Min Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yu-Hong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soares AP, Fischer H, Orassi V, Heiland M, Checa S, Schmidt-Bleek K, Rendenbach C. Patients ' perspectives on bone replacement materials in a German university hospital setting. Biomed Eng Online 2023; 22:84. [PMID: 37641065 PMCID: PMC10464219 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-023-01147-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The challenges in developing new bone replacement materials and procedures reside not solely in technological innovation and advancement, but also in a broader patient therapy acceptance. Therefore, there is a need to assess patients' perspectives on the materials and approaches in use as well as the ones being developed to better steer future progress in the field. METHODS A self-initiating cross-sectional questionnaire aimed at people seeking treatment at the university hospital environment of Charité Berlin was formulated. The survey contained 15 close-ended questions directed toward the participant's epidemiological profile, willingness, acceptance, and agreement to receive different bone replacement materials, as well as, worries about the post-surgical consequences that can arise post bone replacement surgery. Descriptive and categorical analysis was performed to compare the observed number of subjects, their profile and each related response (Pearson's chi-square test or Fischer's test, p < 0.05). RESULTS A total of 198 people engaged with the questionnaire, most of them Millennials. Overall patients trusted scientifically developed biomaterials designed for bone replacement, as demonstrated by their willingness to participate in a clinical trial, their acceptance of alloplastic materials, and the none/few worries about the presence of permanent implants. The data revealed the preferences of patients towards autologous sources of cells and blood to be used with a biomaterial. The data have also shown that both generation and education influenced willingness to participate in a clinical trial and acceptance of alloplastic materials, as well as, worries about the presence of permanent implants and agreement to receive a material with pooled blood and cells. CONCLUSION Patients were open to the implantation of biomaterials for bone replacement, with a preference toward autologous sources of blood and/or tissue. Moreover, patients are concerned about strategies based on permanent implants, which indicates a need for resorbable materials. The knowledge gained in this study supports the development of new bone biomaterials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Prates Soares
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heilwig Fischer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Health (BIH) Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Orassi
- Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sara Checa
- Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Schmidt-Bleek
- Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) Centre for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Rendenbach
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mäder M, Timpel P, Schönfelder T, Militzer-Horstmann C, Scheibe S, Heinrich R, Häckl D. Evidence requirements of permanently listed digital health applications (DiGA) and their implementation in the German DiGA directory: an analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:369. [PMID: 37069592 PMCID: PMC10108444 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09287-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With its digital health application (DiGA)-system, Germany is considered one of Europe's pioneers in the field of evidence-based digital health. Incorporating DiGA into standard medical care must be based on evidence-based success factors; however, a comprehensive overview of the evidence required of scientific studies for their approval is lacking. OBJECTIVE The study aims to, (1) identify specific requirements defined by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (German: Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel- und Medizinprodukte; BfArM) to design adequate studies, proving a positive healthcare effect, and (2) to assess the evidence given for applications permanently listed in the DiGA directory. METHODS A multi-step approach was used: (1) identification of the evidence requirements for applications permanently listed in the DiGA directory, (2) identification of the evidence available supporting them. RESULTS All DiGA permanently listed in the DiGA directory (13 applications) are included in the formal analysis. Most DiGA addressed mental health (n = 7), and can be prescribed for one or two indications (n = 10). All permanently listed DiGA have demonstrated their positive healthcare effect through a medical benefit, and most of them provide evidence for one defined primary endpoint. All DiGA manufacturers conducted a randomized controlled trial. DISCUSSION It is striking that- although patient-relevant structural and procedural improvements show high potential for improving care, especially in terms of processes - all DiGA have provided a positive care effect via a medical benefit. Although BfArM accepts study designs with a lower level of evidence for the proof of a positive healthcare effect, all manufacturers conducted a study with a high level of evidence. CONCLUSION The results of this analysis indicate that permanently listed DiGA meet higher standards than required by the guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Mäder
- Faculty of Economics and Management Science, Leipzig University, Chair for Health Economics and Management, Leipzig, Germany.
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Patrick Timpel
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tonio Schönfelder
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Health Sciences/Public Health, Dresden University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Carsta Militzer-Horstmann
- Faculty of Economics and Management Science, Leipzig University, Chair for Health Economics and Management, Leipzig, Germany
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sandy Scheibe
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Health Sciences/Public Health, Dresden University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ria Heinrich
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dennis Häckl
- Faculty of Economics and Management Science, Leipzig University, Chair for Health Economics and Management, Leipzig, Germany
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cintoli S, Elefante C, Radicchi C, Brancati GE, Bacciardi S, Bonaccorsi J, Siciliano G, Maremmani I, Perugi G, Tognoni G. Could Temperamental Features Modulate Participation in Clinical Trials? J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12031121. [PMID: 36769768 PMCID: PMC9917573 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The prodromal stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are the primary focus of research aimed at slowing disease progression. This study explores the influence of affective temperament on the motivation of people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) to participate in clinical trials. One hundred four subjects with MCI and SCD were screened for participation in pharmacological and non-pharmacological trials. Affective temperament was assessed based on the Temperament Evaluation of the Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego (TEMPS) scale. Demographic variables and temperament subscales scores were compared between MCI and SCD patients and among patients participating in the pharmacological trial, the non-pharmacological trial and refusing participation. Twenty-one subjects consented to participate in the pharmacological trial, seventy consented to the non-pharmacological trial and thirteen refused to participate in any trial. Patients with SCD had greater education and more depressive temperamental traits than those with MCI. While older age, higher education and anxious temperament were negatively associated with participation in the pharmacological trial, irritable temperamental positively predicted pharmacological trial participation. In conclusion, temperamental features may affect the willingness of patients with MCI and SCD to take part in clinical trials and, especially, the choice to participate in pharmacological studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Cintoli
- Neurology Unit, Santa Chiara University Hospital, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Camilla Elefante
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Claudia Radicchi
- Institute of Neuroscience, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Giulio Emilio Brancati
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Silvia Bacciardi
- Department of Psychiatry, North-Western Tuscany Region NHS Local Health Unit, Versilia Zone, 55049 Viareggio, Italy
- PISA-School of Clinical and Experimental Psychiatry, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - Joyce Bonaccorsi
- Neurology Unit, Santa Chiara University Hospital, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Gabriele Siciliano
- Neurology Unit, Santa Chiara University Hospital, 56126 Pisa, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Icro Maremmani
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
- G. De Lisio Institute of Behavioral Sciences, 56127 Pisa, Italy
- Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences (UniCamillus), 00131 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-050-992965; Fax: +39-050-993267
| | - Giulio Perugi
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
- G. De Lisio Institute of Behavioral Sciences, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | - Gloria Tognoni
- Neurology Unit, Santa Chiara University Hospital, 56126 Pisa, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang W, Dove-Medows E, Shealey J, Sanchez K, Benson L, Seymore DD, Sullivan PS, Bradley HM, Siegler AJ. COVID-19 vaccine attitudes among a majority black sample in the Southern US: public health implications from a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:88. [PMID: 36631819 PMCID: PMC9834032 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14905-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have high caseloads in the US, with vaccines a critical component of the response. Disparities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality have been identified across states and racial/ethnic groups, which are likely in part due to disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake. This study aims to better understand and contextualize COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among persons from under-represented racial/ethnic populations in the Southern US. METHODS We conducted 29 in-depth interviews with a sample of households in Atlanta, GA that were selected from an address-based sampling frame. We purposively approached households, from February 6 to June 27, 2021, that declined participation in a national COVID-19 serosurvey to gain perspectives of people who are often under-represented in research. Interviews were conducted in-person or over phone calls for participants with that preference. Thematic analysis was used to identify barriers and facilitators of COVID-19 vaccination, and to contextualize drivers of vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS Decision-making about vaccination was described as dynamic, and was compared to the feeling of being on a roller coaster. The predominant reported sources of information were mass media and social media. Facilitators of vaccination included altruism, positive communication from trusted community members and workplace colleagues, and local vaccine provision sites. Driving reasons for vaccine hesitancy included limited trust in the government and concerns about COVID-19 vaccine safety, which one participant compared to jumping off a cliff without a tested rope. Among a subset of participants, beliefs regarding perceived intent to harm the Black community were prevalent. Opportunities to optimally address vaccine hesitancy included countering negative social media messages with positive messaging that matches the community's vivid ways of discussing vaccines, collaborating with community stakeholders on vaccine promotion efforts, and offering workplace-based vaccine promotion efforts. CONCLUSIONS This study presents data that indicate it may be optimal to more broadly define 'community' in COVID-19 vaccine promotion efforts to include social media and workplace venues. To optimize vaccine and vaccine booster uptake and equity, public health must address historic racism and other concerns by using outreach that is grounded in communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenting Huang
- grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Emily Dove-Medows
- grid.214458.e0000000086837370Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Jalissa Shealey
- grid.256304.60000 0004 1936 7400Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Katia Sanchez
- grid.256304.60000 0004 1936 7400Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Lauren Benson
- grid.256304.60000 0004 1936 7400Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - DawnSheska D. Seymore
- grid.256304.60000 0004 1936 7400Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Patrick S. Sullivan
- grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Heather M. Bradley
- grid.256304.60000 0004 1936 7400Department of Epidemiology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Aaron J. Siegler
- grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA ,grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ştefănuţ AM, Vintilă M, Bădău LM, Grujic D, Oprean CM, Goian C, Sârbescu P. Perception of disease, dyadic coping, and the quality of life of oncology patients in the active treatment phase and their life partners: an approach based on the actor-partner interdependence model. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1069767. [PMID: 37179865 PMCID: PMC10172643 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1069767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study based on the Systemic Transactional Model was to examine the relationship between dyadic coping and (1) disease perception and (2) quality of life of a sample of cancer patients and their life partners. Method This cross-sectional study included 138 oncological dyads. The following questionnaires were used: Stress Appraisal Measure, Dyadic Coping Inventory, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30. Data collected was analysed by applying the actor-partner interdependence model. Results The perception of the disease as a threat as well as its centrality significantly negatively influences the positive forms of dyadic coping whilst the perception of the disease as a challenge has a significant positive influence on them. Dyadic coping does not influence symptoms but has significant influences on global health/quality of life. Conclusion This study has highlighted new information regarding how couples cope with cancer. The results encourage the inclusion of the perception of the disease and dyadic coping in interventions that aim to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and their life partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adelina Mihaela Ştefănuţ
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania
| | - Mona Vintilă
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania
- *Correspondence: Mona Vintilă,
| | - Larisa Maria Bădău
- Hygiene Department, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania
| | - Daciana Grujic
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania
| | - Cristina Marinela Oprean
- Morpho-pathology Department, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania
| | - Cosmin Goian
- Department of Social Assistance, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania
| | - Paul Sârbescu
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cox NS, Lee JYT, McDonald CF, Mahal A, Alison JA, Wootton R, Hill CJ, Zanaboni P, O'Halloran P, Bondarenko J, Macdonald H, Barker K, Crute H, Mellerick C, Wageck B, Boursinos H, Lahham A, Nichols A, Czupryn P, Corbett M, Handley E, Burge AT, Holland AE. Perceived Autonomy Support in Telerehabilitation by People With Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Mixed Methods Study. Chest 2022:S0012-3692(22)04344-6. [PMID: 36574926 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autonomy-supportive health environments can assist patients in achieving behavior change and can influence adherence positively. Telerehabilitation may increase access to rehabilitation services, but creating an autonomy-supportive environment may be challenging. RESEARCH QUESTION To what degree does telerehabilitation provide an autonomy-supportive environment? What is the patient experience of an 8-week telerehabilitation program? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Individuals undertaking telerehabilitation or center-based pulmonary rehabilitation within a larger randomized controlled equivalence trial completed the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ; short form) to assess perceived autonomy support. Telerehabilitation participants were invited 1:1 to undertake semistructured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded thematically to identify major themes and subthemes. RESULTS One hundred thirty-six participants (n = 69 telerehabilitation) completed the HCCQ and 30 telerehabilitation participants (42%) undertook interviews. HCCQ summary scores indicated that participants strongly agreed that the telerehabilitation environment was autonomy supportive, which was similar to center-based participants (HCCQ summary score, P = .6; individual HCCQ items, P ≥ .3). Telerehabilitation interview data supported quantitative findings identifying five major themes, with subthemes, as follows: (1) making it easier to participate in pulmonary rehabilitation, because telerehabilitation was convenient, saved time and money, and offered flexibility; (2) receiving support in a variety of ways, including opportunities for peer support and receiving an individualized program guided by expert staff; (3) internal and external motivation to exercise as a consequence of being in a supervised group, seeing results for effort, and being inspired by others; (4) achieving success through provision of equipment and processes to prepare and support operation of equipment and technology; and (5) after the rehabilitation program, continuing to exercise, but dealing with feelings of loss. INTERPRETATION Telerehabilitation was perceived as an autonomy-supportive environment, in part by making it easier to undertake pulmonary rehabilitation. Support for behavior change, understanding, and motivation were derived from clinicians and patient-peers. The extent to which autonomy support translates into ongoing self-management and behavior change is not clear. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: ACTRN12616000360415; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narelle S Cox
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne; Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne.
| | - Joanna Y T Lee
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne
| | - Christine F McDonald
- Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne; Respiratory and Sleep Medicine Clinic, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Melbourne
| | - Ajay Mahal
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne; Melbourne
| | - Jennifer A Alison
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Allied Health Research and Education Unit, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard Wootton
- Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Catherine J Hill
- Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne; Department of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Melbourne
| | - Paolo Zanaboni
- Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Paul O'Halloran
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne
| | | | | | - Kathryn Barker
- Community Based Rehabilitation Service, Western Health, Melbourne
| | - Hayley Crute
- Physiotherapy Service, Wimmera Health Care Group, Horsham
| | - Christie Mellerick
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne
| | - Bruna Wageck
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne
| | - Helen Boursinos
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne
| | - Aroub Lahham
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne
| | - Amanda Nichols
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne
| | - Pawel Czupryn
- Physiotherapy Service, West Wimmera Health Service, Nhill, VIC
| | - Monique Corbett
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne
| | - Emma Handley
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne
| | - Angela T Burge
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne; Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne; Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne
| | - Anne E Holland
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne; Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne; Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne
| |
Collapse
|