Multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial comparing intermittent versus daily treatment for non-cavitary nodular/bronchiectatic Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease with rifampicin, ethambutol and clarithromycin (iREC): study protocol

Treatment strategies with alternative treatment options for patients with Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease

Diseases caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection in the lungs are increasing worldwide. The recurrence rate of MAC-pulmonary disease (PD) has been reported to be as high as 25-45%. A significant percentage of recurrences occurs because of reinfection with a new genotype from the environment. A focus on reducing exposure to MAC organisms from the environment is therefore an essential component of the management of this disease as well as standard MAC-PD treatment. A macrolide-containing three-drug regimen is recommended over a two-drug regimen as a standard treatment, and azithromycin is recommended rather than clarithromycin. Both the 2007 and 2020 guidelines recommend a treatment duration of MAC-PD of at least one year after the culture conversion. Previous clinical studies have reported that ethambutol could prevent macrolide resistance. Furthermore, the concomitant use of aminoglycoside, amikacin liposomal inhalation, clofazimine, linezolid, bedaquiline, and fluoroquinolone with modification of guideline-based therapy has been studied. Long-term management of MAC-PD remains challenging because of the discontinuation of multi-drug regimens and the acquisition of macrolide resistance. Moreover, the poor compliance of guideline-based therapy for MAC-PD treatment worldwide is concerning since it causes macrolide resistance. Therefore, in this review, we focus on MAC-PD treatment and summarize various treatment options when standard treatment cannot be maintained, with reference to the latest ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guidelines revised in 2020.

Low-dosage ethambutol, less than 12.5 mg/kg/day, does not worsen the clinical outcomes of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare disease: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Multidrug chemotherapy is recommended for treating pulmonary Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare disease. Although ethambutol has been demonstrated to inhibit macrolide resistance, the ethambutol dosage is sometimes decreased due to concerns about optic neuropathy. We aimed to assess whether lower ethambutol doses impact treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Patients treated over 12 months between 2016 and 2020 were collected retrospectively. Clinical outcomes, including negative culture conversion, microbiological cure, adverse events, resistance to macrolides, and recurrence, were compared according to daily ethambutol dosage.

RESULTS

Among 146 patients, 42 were treated with ethambutol dosages over 12.5 mg/kg/day, and 104 were treated with lower dosages. Negative culture conversion was achieved for 125 patients, and 90 patients achieved microbiological cure. Recurrence was identified in 16 patients who achieved microbiological cure. No macrolide resistance was observed, and no significant difference was observed in the percentage of negative culture conversion (P = 1.00) or microbiological cure (P = 0.67) between the high- and low-dosage ethambutol groups. Sputum smear positivity was associated with a lower adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of negative culture conversion (aOR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29-0.80). A lower aOR of microbiological cure was independently associated with sputum smear positivity (aOR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.37-0.74) and with the use of an intermittent regimen (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.87). Daily ethambutol dosage was not identified as a prognostic factor for any of the outcomes. Optic neuropathy was observed in 7.1% of the high-dose ethambutol group and 1.0% of the low-dosage ethambutol group (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

An ethambutol dosage of 12.5 mg/kg/day or less in guideline-based chemotherapy may reduce optic neuropathy without worsening clinical outcomes.

Intermittent prophylactic antibiotics for bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is a common but under-diagnosed chronic disorder characterised by permanent dilation of the airways arising from a cycle of recurrent infection and inflammation. Symptoms including chronic, persistent cough and productive phlegm are a significant burden for people with bronchiectasis, and the main aim of treatment is to reduce exacerbation frequency and improve quality of life. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy aims to break this infection cycle and is recommended by clinical guidelines for adults with three or more exacerbations a year, based on limited evidence. It is important to weigh the evidence for bacterial suppression against the prevention of antibiotic resistance and further evidence is required on the safety and efficacy of different regimens of intermittently administered antibiotic treatments for people with bronchiectasis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intermittent prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of adults and children with bronchiectasis.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, which contains studies identified through multiple electronic searches and handsearches of other sources. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of primary studies. We conducted searches on 6 September 2021, with no restriction on language of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least three months' duration comparing an intermittent regime of prophylactic antibiotics with placebo, usual care or an alternate intermittent regimen. Intermittent prophylactic administration was defined as repeated courses of antibiotics with on-treatment and off-treatment intervals of at least 14 days' duration. We included adults and children with a clinical diagnosis of bronchiectasis confirmed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), plain film chest radiograph, or bronchography and a documented history of recurrent chest infections. We excluded studies where participants received high dose antibiotics immediately prior to enrolment or those with a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), primary ciliary dyskinesia, hypogammaglobulinaemia, sarcoidosis, or a primary diagnosis of COPD. Our primary outcomes were exacerbation frequency and serious adverse events. We did not exclude studies on the basis of review outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We analysed dichotomous data as odds ratios (ORs) or relative risk (RRs) and continuous data as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs). We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We conducted GRADE assessments for the following primary outcomes: exacerbation frequency; serious adverse events and secondary outcomes: antibiotic resistance; hospital admissions; health-related quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs, with interventions ranging from 16 to 48 weeks, involving 2180 adults. All evaluated one of three types of antibiotics over two to six cycles of 28 days on/off treatment: aminoglycosides, ß-lactams or fluoroquinolones. Two studies also included 12 cycles of 14 days on/off treatment with fluoroquinolones. Participants had a mean age of 63.6 years, 65% were women and approximately 85% Caucasian. Baseline FEV₁ ranged from 55.5% to 62.6% predicted. None of the studies included children. Generally, there was a low risk of bias in the included studies. Antibiotic versus placebo: cycle of 14 days on/off. Ciprofloxacin reduced the frequency of exacerbations compared to placebo (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93; I² = 65%; 2 studies, 469 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with eight people (95% CI 6 to 28) needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome. The intervention increased the risk of antibiotic resistance more than twofold (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.35; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 624 participants; high-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events, lung function (FEV₁), health-related quality of life, and adverse effects did not differ between groups. Antibiotic versus placebo: cycle of 28 days on/off. Antibiotics did not reduce overall exacerbation frequency (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.02; I² = 0%; 8 studies, 1695 participants; high-certainty evidence) but there were fewer severe exacerbations (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.93; I² = 54%; 3 studies, 624 participants), though this should be interpreted with caution due to low event rates. The risk of antibiotic resistance was more than twofold higher based on a pooled analysis (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.42; I² = 0%; 3 studies, 685 participants; high-certainty evidence) and consistent with unpooled data from four further studies. Serious adverse events, time to first exacerbation, duration of exacerbation, respiratory-related hospital admissions, lung function, health-related quality of life and adverse effects did not differ between study groups. Antibiotic versus usual care. We did not find any studies that compared intermittent antibiotic regimens with usual care. Cycle of 14 days on/off versus cycle of 28 days on/off. Exacerbation frequency did not differ between the two treatment regimens (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.24; I² = 71%; 2 studies, 625 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) However, inconsistencies in the results from the two trials in this comparison indicate that the apparent aggregated similarities may not be reliable. There was no evidence of a difference in antibiotic resistance between groups (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.48; I² = 60%; 2 studies, 624 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events, adverse effects, lung function and health-related quality of life did not differ between the two antibiotic regimens.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, in adults who have frequent chest infections, long-term antibiotics given at 14-day on/off intervals slightly reduces the frequency of those infections and increases antibiotic resistance. Intermittent antibiotic regimens result in little to no difference in serious adverse events. The impact of intermittent antibiotic therapy on children with bronchiectasis is unknown due to an absence of evidence, and further research is needed to establish the potential risks and benefits.

Recent advances in nontuberculous mycobacterial lung infections

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are members of the Mycobacterium genus other than Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and Mycobacterium leprae. NTM are widely distributed in the environment and are increasingly recognized as causes of chronic lung disease that can be challenging to treat. In this brief review, we consider recent developments in the ecology, epidemiology, natural history, and treatment of NTM lung disease with a focus on Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus complex .