1
|
Guo Y, Li X, Tan H, Xie J, Luo H, Li F. A novel approach to clinical thinking training for medical students: the combined World Café discussion and case-based learning experience introduction. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 2024; 48:479-487. [PMID: 38695081 DOI: 10.1152/advan.00174.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/19/2024]
Abstract
It is essential for modern medical students to continuously enhance their clinical thinking abilities. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the combined World Café discussion and case-based learning (CBL) approach within the clinical thinking training course. The clinical thinking training course incorporated the combined World Café discussion and CBL approach. The assessment of the accuracy and rationality of clinical symptoms, medical examination, pathological processes, diagnostic results, diagnostic basis, and drug use was conducted through case-related queries. Feedback from students and instructors regarding the teaching content, teaching process, and teaching effect was gathered through questionnaires. The findings indicate that the students achieved high marks in all assessed areas, including clinical symptoms, medical examination, pathological processes, diagnostic results, diagnostic basis, and drug use. The feedback from students and instructors on the teaching content, teaching process, and teaching effect was positive. Medical educators can use our findings to implement the combined World Café discussion and CBL mode to enhance student engagement.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The combined World Café discussion and case-based learning approach was implemented in the clinical thinking training course. Students' scores for clinical symptoms, medical examination, pathological process, diagnostic results, diagnostic basis, and drug use were all excellent. Feedback from both students and teachers on the teaching content, teaching process, and teaching effect was positive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Guo
- Faculty of Basic Medical Science, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Xia Li
- Faculty of Basic Medical Science, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Heng Tan
- Faculty of Basic Medical Science, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Jianping Xie
- Library, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, China
| | - Haiyun Luo
- Faculty of Basic Medical Science, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Fei Li
- Faculty of Basic Medical Science, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wells M, Harding S, Dixon G, Buckley K, Russell AM, Barratt SL. Patient and caregiver shared experiences of pulmonary fibrosis (PF): A systematic literature review. Respir Med 2024; 227:107659. [PMID: 38729528 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Pulmonary Fibrosis (PF) describes a group of lung diseases characterised by progressive scarring (fibrosis). Symptoms worsen over time and include breathlessness, tiredness, and cough, giving rise to psychological distress. Significant morbidity accompanies PF, so ensuring patients' care needs are well defined and provided for, represents an important treatment strategy. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise what is currently known about the psychosocial morbidity, illness experience and needs of people with pulmonary fibrosis and their informal caregivers. Eight databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane database of Systematic reviews (CDSR), Web of Science Social Sciences Citation Index, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES and CINAHL) were used to identify studies exploring the supportive needs of adults with PF and/or their caregivers. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. 53 studies were included, the majority using qualitative methodology (79 %, 42/53), 6 as part of mixed methodological studies. Supportive care needs were mapped to eight domains using an a priori framework analysis. Findings highlight a lack of psychological support throughout the course of the illness, misconceptions about and barriers to, the provision of palliative care despite its potential positive impacts. Patients and caregivers express a desire for greater disease specific education and information provision throughout the illness. Trials of complex interventions are needed to address the unique set of challenges for patients and carers living with PF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Wells
- Bristol Interstitial Lung Disease Service, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
| | - Sam Harding
- Research and Development, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
| | - Giles Dixon
- Bristol Interstitial Lung Disease Service, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK; Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Kirsten Buckley
- Library and Knowledge Services, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Russell
- Birmingham Regional Interstitial Lung Disease Service, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK; Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Shaney L Barratt
- Bristol Interstitial Lung Disease Service, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK; Academic Respiratory Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oliveira A, Fabbri G, Gille T, Bargagli E, Duchemann B, Evans R, Pinnock H, Holland AE, Renzoni E, Ekström M, Jones S, Wijsenbeek M, Dinh-Xuan AT, Vagheggini G. Holistic management of patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Breathe (Sheff) 2023; 19:230101. [PMID: 37719243 PMCID: PMC10501708 DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0101-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a complex interstitial lung disease that impacts substantially on patients' daily lives, requiring personalised and integrated care. We summarise the main needs of patients with PF and their caregivers, and suggest a supportive care approach. Individualised care, education, emotional and psychological support, specialised treatments, and better access to information and resources are necessary. Management should start at diagnosis, be tailored to the patient's needs, and consider end-of-life care. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions should be individualised, including oxygen therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation, with digital healthcare utilised as appropriate. Further research is needed to address technical issues related to oxygen delivery and digital healthcare. Educational aims To identify the main needs of patients with PF and their caregivers.To describe the components of a comprehensive approach to a supportive care programme for patients with PF.To identify further areas of research to address technical issues related to the management of patients with PF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Oliveira
- Lab 3R Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), IBMED Aveiro PT, Aveiro, Portugal
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gaia Fabbri
- Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Neuro-Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Thomas Gille
- Inserm U1272 “Hypoxia & the Lung”, UFR SMBH Léonard de Vinci, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France
- Service Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Paris Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
| | - Elena Bargagli
- Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Neuro-Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Boris Duchemann
- Inserm U1272 “Hypoxia & the Lung”, UFR SMBH Léonard de Vinci, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France
- Service d'oncologie médicale et thoracique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Paris Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
| | - Rachel Evans
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Hilary Pinnock
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anne E. Holland
- Central Clinical School, Monash University and Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elisabetta Renzoni
- Interstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Clinical Group, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Margaret Turner Warwick Centre for Fibrosing Lung Diseases, NHLI, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Magnus Ekström
- Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Palliative Medicine, Lund, Sweden
| | - Steve Jones
- European Pulmonary Fibrosis Federation, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marlies Wijsenbeek
- Centre for Expertise for Interstitial Lung Disease and Sarcoidosis, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan
- Service de Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionnelles, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Guido Vagheggini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Respiratory Failure Pathway, Azienda USL Toscana Nordovest, Pisa, Italy
- Fondazione Volterra Ricerche ONLUS, Volterra (PI), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gersten RA, Seth B, Arellano L, Shore J, O'Hare L, Patel N, Safdar Z, Krishna R, Mageto Y, Cochran D, Lindell K, Danoff SK, Patel D, Whelan TP, Adams T, Reichuber J, Russell T, Bachert H, Luckhardt TR, Morrison L, Dematte JE, Gripaldo RE, Henderson M, Thavarajah K, Tomic R. Provider Perspectives on and Access to Palliative Care for Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease. Chest 2022; 162:375-384. [PMID: 35305969 PMCID: PMC9633804 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interstitial lung disease (ILD) results in profound symptom burden and carries high mortality. Palliative care (PC) is dedicated to improving quality of life in patients with serious illness. Early PC provision improves rates of advance care planning and symptom management in patients with ILD. RESEARCH QUESTION What are the current perspectives on PC among ILD providers, and what are the barriers to PC in ILD specialty centers? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS A 24-question electronic survey was disseminated to providers at the 68 Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Care Centers across the United States from October 2020 to December 2020. RESULTS The survey was completed by 128 participants representing all 68 Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Care Center Network sites. Most respondents were physicians. Most providers exhibit good knowledge of, feel comfortable assessing a patient's readiness for, and agree with the need for PC for patients with ILD. Providers are most likely to refer to PC at objective disease and/or symptomatic progression rather than at initial diagnosis. In comparison with providers who report referring their patients to PC, providers who report rare referral are more likely to cite lack local PC availability (P < .01) and less likely to feel comfortable discussing prognosis/disease trajectory (P = .03) or feel it is important to address advance directives in ILD clinic (P = .02). There is a lack of standardized measures used to assess specific symptoms, overall symptom burden, or health-related quality of life across institutions. Discordance exists between self-reported and actual access to local inpatient and outpatient PC services. INTERPRETATION Most ILD providers use PC and are comfortable discussing PC. Barriers to PC identified in this survey include the following: perceived lack of local access to PC, lack of systematic tools to assess symptom burden, lack of established optimal timing of PC referral, and unclear need for specialized PC delivery.
Collapse
|