1
|
Häckel S, Hofmann E, Anwander H, Albers CE, Basedow J, Bigdon SF, Exadaktylos AK, Keel MJB, Dunn RN, Maqungo S, Benneker LM, Held M, Hoppe S. Anterior-posterior view by full-body digital X-ray to rule out severe spinal injuries in Polytraumatized patients. BMC Emerg Med 2021; 21:27. [PMID: 33663394 PMCID: PMC7934441 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-021-00419-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal injuries are present in 16-31% of polytraumatized patients. Rapid identification of spinal injuries requiring immobilization or operative treatment is essential. The Lodox-Statscan (LS) has evolved into a promising time-saving diagnostic tool to diagnose life-threatening injuries with an anterior-posterior (AP)-full-body digital X-ray. METHODS We aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy and the interrater reliability of AP-LS to detect spinal injuries in polytraumatized patients. Therefore, within 3 years, AP-LS of polytraumatized patients (ISS ≥ 16) were retrospectively analyzed by three independent observers. The sensitivity and specificity of correct diagnosis with AP-LS compared to CT scan were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by using the area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic curve) for sensitivity and specificity. Interrater reliability between the three observers was calculated using Fleiss' Kappa. The sensitivity of AP-LS was further analyzed by the severity of spinal injuries. RESULTS The study group included 320 patients (48.5 years ±19.5, 89 women). On CT scan, 207 patients presented with a spinal injury (65%, total of 332 injuries). AP-LS had a low sensitivity of 9% (31 of 332, range 0-24%) and high specificity of 99% (range 98-100%). The sensitivity was highest for thoracic spinal injuries (14%). The interrater reliability was slight (κ = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.03). Potentially unstable spinal injuries were more likely to be detected than stable injuries (sensitivity 18 and 6%, respectively). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated high specificity with low sensitivity of AP-LS in detecting spinal injuries compared to CT scan. In polytraumatized patients, AP-LS, implemented in the Advanced Trauma Life Support-algorithm, is a helpful tool to diagnose life-threatening injuries. However, if spinal injuries are suspected, performing a full-body CT scan is necessary for correct diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Häckel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Elena Hofmann
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Helen Anwander
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christoph E Albers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jasmin Basedow
- Department of Radiology, Sonnenhof Hospital, Buchserstrasse 30, 3006, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian F Bigdon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Aristomenis K Exadaktylos
- Emergency Department, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marius J B Keel
- Trauma Center Hirslanden, Clinik Hirslanden Zurich, Witellikerstrasse 40, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert N Dunn
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital and Red Cross Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Klipfontein Rd, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa
| | - Sithombo Maqungo
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital and Red Cross Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Klipfontein Rd, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa
| | - Lorin M Benneker
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Held
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital and Red Cross Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Klipfontein Rd, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa
| | - Sven Hoppe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mughal Z, Charlton AR, Dwivedi R, Natesh B. Impacted denture in the oesophagus: review of the literature and its management. BMJ Case Rep 2019; 12:12/10/e229655. [PMID: 31653620 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2019-229655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Foreign body impaction in the oesophagus is a common cause of acute dysphagia. Oesophageal impaction of sharp objects such as dentures can be life threatening due to the risk of oesophageal perforation. This condition requires urgent treatment, and therefore prompt diagnosis and management is vital to avoid complications. Diagnosing oesophageal foreign body can be challenging due to its poor localising symptoms. We describe a case of an impacted denture in which considerable delays to treatment were encountered, and discuss the pitfalls and lessons learnt. This case and review of the literature draw attention to clinical assessment, investigation and treatment options for oesophageal foreign body impaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahir Mughal
- Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Alexander Rowan Charlton
- Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Raghav Dwivedi
- Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Basavaiah Natesh
- Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang L, Ye LG, Ding JB, Zheng ZJ, Zhang M. Use of a full-body digital X-ray imaging system in acute medical emergencies: a systematic review. Emerg Med J 2014; 33:144-51. [PMID: 25490925 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2014] [Accepted: 11/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the available evidence for the clinical effectiveness and biohazard safety of a full-body digital X-ray imaging system (Lodox) in acute medical emergencies. METHODS Electronic databases (including PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library; up to January 2014) and reference lists of articles were searched. The quality of the included studies was determined, and a narrative assessment was undertaken. RESULTS A total of 256 articles were reviewed. Fifteen clinical studies and eight case series met the eligibility criteria. All 23 studies reporting use of a full-body X-ray imaging system in acute medical emergencies on Lodox. Based on figures in six studies comprising various evaluation methods, image quality of Lodox was mostly comparable to that of conventional X-rays and the radiation dose was considerably lower. Lodox demonstrated a sensitivity ranging from 62% to 73%, and a specificity ranging from 99% to 100% compared with CT for the evaluation of emergency patients with polytrauma, which is similar to that of conventional X-rays. Examination time using Lodox ranged from 3.5 to 13.9 min compared with 8 to 25.7 min using conventional X-rays. However, there was no evidence it significantly shortened resuscitation time or emergency department length of stay. Publication bias might have occurred; some published studies might have been influenced by conflicts of interest. CONCLUSIONS The Lodox machine is capable of rapidly scanning the entire body and offers an equivalent diagnostic assessment tool compared with conventional X-rays. It seems to have the potential to reduce cumulative radiation dosage for emergency patients compared with conventional X-rays. Application of Lodox might be helpful to reduce resource use and simplify care in lower-resourced areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Yang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine & Institute of Emergency Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Li-Gang Ye
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine & Institute of Emergency Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Bo Ding
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine & Institute of Emergency Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhong-Jun Zheng
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine & Institute of Emergency Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mao Zhang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine & Institute of Emergency Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A review of full-body radiography in nontraumatic emergency medicine. Emerg Med Int 2012; 2012:108129. [PMID: 23243508 PMCID: PMC3517877 DOI: 10.1155/2012/108129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2012] [Accepted: 11/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper reports on the application of full-body radiography to nontraumatic emergency situations. The Lodox Statscan is an X-ray machine capable of imaging the entire body in 13 seconds using linear slit scanning radiography (LSSR). Nontraumatic emergency applications in ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt visualisation, emergency room arteriography (ERA), detection of foreign bodies, and paediatric emergency imaging are presented. Reports show that the fast, full-body, and low-dose scanning capabilities of the Lodox system make it well suited to these applications, with the same or better image quality, faster processing times, and lower dose to patients. In particular, the large format scans allowing visualisation of a greater area of anatomy make it well suited to VP shunt monitoring, ERA, and the detection of foreign bodies. Whilst more studies are required, it can be concluded that the Lodox Statscan has the potential for widespread use in these and other nontraumatic emergency radiology applications.
Collapse
|