Critical care in the Emergency Department: organ donation

Analysis of Factors Affecting Emergency Physicians' Attitudes toward Deceased Organ & Tissue Donation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate differences in knowledge, and attitudes toward deceased organ and tissue donation of emergency physicians. Additionally, we analyzed factors affecting the attitudes toward deceased organ and tissue donation.

METHODS

We conducted a survey of specialists and residents registered with the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine in December 2020. The respondents' sex, age, position, personal registration for organ donation, experience of soliciting organ donation, participation in related education, knowledge, and attitude about brain death organ donation, and attitude toward stopping life-sustaining treatments were investigated. According to the characteristics of the respondents (specialists or residents, experience and education on organ and tissue donation), their knowledge and attitude toward deceased organ donation were compared. Stepwise hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the factors affecting the attitudes toward deceased organ and tissue donation.

RESULTS

Of the total 428 respondents, there were 292 emergency medicine specialists and 136 medical residents. Specialists and those who registered or wished to donate organs had higher knowledge and attitude scores regarding deceased organ and tissue donation. Those who had experience recommending organ and tissue donation more than 6 times had higher knowledge scores on deceased organ and tissue donation and higher overall scores in attitude. Those who received education from the Korean Organ Donation Agency had higher knowledge scores. Specialists, and those who wished to donate or had registered as organ donors and had a higher life-sustaining treatment attitude score and knowledge about deceased organ and tissue donation, had more positive attitudes toward deceased organ and tissue donation.

CONCLUSION

For more potential deceased organ and tissue donors to be referred for donation, there should be continuous education for emergency physicians on brain-dead organ and tissue donation-related knowledge and procedures. In addition, institutional or systematic improvements that can lead to organ donation when deciding on the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment should be considered.

Effect of a multidisciplinary program to improve organ donation in the emergency department

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

As the emergency department (ED) is an important source of potential organ donors, it may play an important role in the organ donation process.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of the multidisciplinary organ donation improvement program (ODIP) on identifying potential donors and improving organ donation in South Korean EDs.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS

This study was a retrospective, observational study of the ED-inclusive ODIP implemented in 55 tertiary teaching hospitals contracted with the Korea Organ Donation Agency (KODA) since 2014. The inclusion criteria were: patients in the ED with a serious brain injury and futile prognosis or expected death of the patient within a few days, no contraindications for organ donation, and no objections registered in the donor registry.

INTERVENTION

The ED-inclusive multidisciplinary approach was implemented to improve organ donation. It included regular meetings of the ODIP committee, hospital visits and staff education, improvement of notifications, and support of a coordination team.

OUTCOMES MEASURE AND ANALYSIS

We assessed the changes in the number of deceased organ donors per year and notifications of potential brain-dead donors by medical staff after the implementation of the new ED-inclusive ODIP. The entire organ donation process was monitored and measured.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in deceased organ donors per million population after the implementation of the ED-inclusive multidisciplinary ODIP of KODA compared to the pre-intervention period: 5.21 vs. 9.72, difference 4.51 (95% confidence interval 2.11-6.91). During the study period, the proportion of deceased organ donors occurred from KODA-contracted hospitals increased from 25.3 to 50.3% in South Korea's total deceased organ donors. Emergency physicians of KODA-contracted hospitals notified increasingly more potential brain-dead donors each year throughout the study period (36 in 2014 vs. 135 in 2018). The longer the period contracted with KODA, the higher the potential brain-death identification rates (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, the implementation of multidisciplinary ODIP in the ED led to significantly higher deceased organ donors per million population and awareness of potential brain-dead donors in South Korea.

The Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Approach for Potential Organ Donors in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation process of a multidisciplinary approach for potential organ donors in the emergency department (ED) in order to incorporate organ donation into their end-of-life care plans.

METHODS

A new multidisciplinary approach was implemented in 6 hospitals in The Netherlands between January 2016 and January 2018. The approach was introduced during staff meetings in the ED, intensive care unit (ICU), and neurology department. When patients with a devastating brain injury had a futile prognosis in the ED, without contraindications for organ donation, an ICU admission was considered. Every ICU admission to incorporate organ donation into end-of-life care was systematically evaluated with the involved physicians using a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

In total, 55 potential organ donors were admitted to the ICU to incorporate organ donation into end-of-life care. Twenty-seven families consented to donation and 20 successful organ donations were performed. Twenty-nine percent of the total pool of organ donors in these hospitals were admitted to the ICU for organ donation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a devastating brain injury and futile medical prognosis in the ED are an important proportion of the total number of donors. The implementation of a multidisciplinary approach is feasible and could lead to better identification of potential donors in the ED.

Criteria to Identify a Potential Deceased Organ Donor: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the global published literature defining a potential deceased organ donor and identifying clinical triggers for deceased organ donation identification and referral.

DATA SOURCES

Medline and Embase databases from January 2006 to September 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

All published studies containing a definition of a potential deceased organ donor and/or clinical triggers for referring a potential deceased organ donor were eligible for inclusion. Dual, independent screening was conducted of 3,857 citations.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction was completed by one team member and verified by a second team member. Thematic content analysis was used to identify clinical criteria for potential deceased organ donation identification from the published definitions and clinical triggers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

One hundred twenty-four articles were included in the review. Criteria fell into four categories: Neurological, Medical Decision, Cardiorespiratory, and Administrative. Distinct and globally consistent sets of clinical criteria by type of deceased organ donation (neurologic death determination, controlled donation after circulatory determination of death, and uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death) are reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the clinical criteria sets reported will reduce ambiguity associated with the deceased organ donor identification and the subsequent referral process, potentially reducing the number of missed donors and saving lives globally through increased transplantation.

Barriers to Brain Death Notifications From Emergency Departments

PURPOSE

Emergency departments (EDs) are a new focus of interest in recent years as a possible solution for increasing organ donations, as, EDs are full of missed opportunities. In this study, we aimed to determine the barriers to the identification and referral by emergency medicine physicians (EMPs) of potential brain death (BD) cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The participants of the study consist of 252 EMPs who had answered the questionnaire sent via e-mail.

FINDINGS

The following causes were found in the questionnaire: (1) negative attitudes and lack of knowledge about organ donation in society (63.1%); (2) religious beliefs (57.5%); (3) family refusal (57.1%); (4) disruption of bodily integrity (45.6%); (5) inadequate knowledge of doctors (50.4%); (6) difficulties in predicting the prognosis of the patient and diagnosing BD in EDs (40.1%); (7) fear of negative reactions from relatives of patients (37.7%); (8) the absence of an organ procurement unit (OPU) (36.5%); (9) lack of ideal candidates (27%); (10) increased workload in EDs (23.8%); and (11) fear of legal problems arising (23.8%). Of the participants, 42.9% stated that there was an OPU in their hospital. Of the participants, 15.8% reported that they have good communication with the OPU.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative attitudes and lack of knowledge about organ donation in society, religious beliefs, inadequate knowledge of EMPs, and the absence of an OPU in hospitals are important barriers to organ donor notification from EDs. Increasing social awareness and increasing of the level of knowledge of EMPs and close cooperation between OPU and EDs will significantly contribute to the increase of organ donor notifications from EDs.

[Organ donation: Lessons to be learned from abroad?]

The profound and ongoing crisis of organ donation and transplantation medicine in Germany urges for swift and sustainable improvement. Over the last few decades, various European countries have introduced national action plans and have efficiently begun to tap into their national potential for organ donation. Our paper sheds light on a variety of measures that have proven successful in different countries. Careful evaluation and comprehensive debate in public and professional bodies may warrant a tailor-made approach towards successful, albeit fundamental, changes in Germany's organ donation system.