1
|
Lacy AJ, Kim MJ, Li JL, Croft A, Kane EE, Wagner JC, Walker PW, Brent CM, Brywczynski JJ, Mathews AC, Long B, Koyfman A, Svancarek B. Prehospital Cricothyrotomy: A Narrative Review of Technical, Educational, and Operational Considerations for Procedure Optimization. J Emerg Med 2025; 70:19-34. [PMID: 39915151 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Definitive airway management is a requisite skill in the prehospital setting, most often accomplished with either an endotracheal tube or supraglottic airway. When clinicians encounter a cannot oxygenate and cannot ventilate scenario, a patient's airway still must be secured. Prehospital cricothyrotomy is a high acuity, low frequency procedure used to secure the airway through the anterior neck. Patients who require cricothyrotomy often have significant comorbid conditions and mortality, and there can be a high rate of procedural complications. The ability to perform a cricothyrotomy is within the scope of practice for many prehospital clinicians and mastery of the procedure is crucial for patient outcomes. Despite this, initial training on the procedure is minimal, and paramedics report discomfort in their ability to perform the procedure. OBJECTIVE Review and summarize the best available evidence relating to the performance of cricothyrotomies and propose technical, educational, and operational considerations to minimize complications and optimize success of prehospital cricothyrotomies. DISCUSSION Technical considerations when performing cricothyrotomy in the prehospital setting can be used to mitigate airway misplacement, mainstem intubation, and hemorrhage. Educational consideration should include focus on a singular technique, use of established curriculum, spaced repetition with either simulation or mental practice, and a focus on intention training of when to perform the procedure. The preferred technique from the National Association of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Physician guidelines is the surgical technique. Operational considerations to optimize a successful procedure should include checklists, preassembled kits, and robust quality improvement and insurance after a cricothyrotomy is performed. CONCLUSIONS By focusing on technical, educational, and operation considerations relating to prehospital cricothyrotomy, prehospital clinicians can optimize the chance for procedural success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Lacy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
| | - Michael J Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - James L Li
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Alexander Croft
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Erin E Kane
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jason C Wagner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Philip W Walker
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Christine M Brent
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jeremy J Brywczynski
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Amanda C Mathews
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Brit Long
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam, Houston, Texas
| | - Alex Koyfman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Bridgette Svancarek
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rovati L, Privitera D, Finch AS, Litell JM, Brogan AM, Tekin A, Castillo Zambrano C, Dong Y, Gajic O, Madsen BE, Truong HH, Nikravangolsefid N, Ozkan MC, Lal A, Kilickaya O, Niven AS, Aaronson E, Abdel-Qader DH, Abraham DE, Aguilera P, Ali S, Bahreini M, Baniya A, Bellolio F, Bergs J, Bjornsson HM, Bonfanti A, Bravo J, Brown CS, Bwambale B, Capsoni N, Casalino E, Chartier LB, David SN, Dawadi S, Di Capua M, Efeoglu M, Eidinejad L, Eis D, Ekelund U, Eken C, Freund Y, Gilbert B, Giustivi D, Grossman S, Hachimi Idrissi S, Hansen K, How CK, Hruska K, Khan AG, Laugesen H, Laugsand LE, Kule L, Huong LTT, Lerga M, Macias Maroto M, Mavrinac N, Menacho Antelo W, Aksu NM, Mileta T, Mirkarimi T, Mkanyu V, Mnape N, Mufarrij A, Elgasim MEM, Adam VN, Hang TNT, Ninh NX, Nouri SZ, Ouchi K, Patibandla S, Ngoc PT, Prkačin I, Redfern E, Rendón Morales AA, Scaglioni R, Scholten L, Scott B, Shahryarpour N, Silanda O, Silva L, Sim TB, Slankamenac K, Sonis J, Sorić M, Sun Y, Tri NT, Quoc TV, Tunceri SK, Turner J, Vrablik MC, Wali M, Yin X, Zafar S, Zakayo AS, Zhou JC, Delalic D, Anchise S, Colombo M, Bettina M, et alRovati L, Privitera D, Finch AS, Litell JM, Brogan AM, Tekin A, Castillo Zambrano C, Dong Y, Gajic O, Madsen BE, Truong HH, Nikravangolsefid N, Ozkan MC, Lal A, Kilickaya O, Niven AS, Aaronson E, Abdel-Qader DH, Abraham DE, Aguilera P, Ali S, Bahreini M, Baniya A, Bellolio F, Bergs J, Bjornsson HM, Bonfanti A, Bravo J, Brown CS, Bwambale B, Capsoni N, Casalino E, Chartier LB, David SN, Dawadi S, Di Capua M, Efeoglu M, Eidinejad L, Eis D, Ekelund U, Eken C, Freund Y, Gilbert B, Giustivi D, Grossman S, Hachimi Idrissi S, Hansen K, How CK, Hruska K, Khan AG, Laugesen H, Laugsand LE, Kule L, Huong LTT, Lerga M, Macias Maroto M, Mavrinac N, Menacho Antelo W, Aksu NM, Mileta T, Mirkarimi T, Mkanyu V, Mnape N, Mufarrij A, Elgasim MEM, Adam VN, Hang TNT, Ninh NX, Nouri SZ, Ouchi K, Patibandla S, Ngoc PT, Prkačin I, Redfern E, Rendón Morales AA, Scaglioni R, Scholten L, Scott B, Shahryarpour N, Silanda O, Silva L, Sim TB, Slankamenac K, Sonis J, Sorić M, Sun Y, Tri NT, Quoc TV, Tunceri SK, Turner J, Vrablik MC, Wali M, Yin X, Zafar S, Zakayo AS, Zhou JC, Delalic D, Anchise S, Colombo M, Bettina M, Ciceri L, Fazzini F, Guerrieri R, Tombini V, Geraneo A, Mazzone A, Alario C, Bologna E, Rocca E, Parravicini G, Li Veli G, Paduanella I, Sanfilippo M, Coppola M, Rossini M, Saronni S. Development of an Emergency Department Safety Checklist through a global consensus process. Intern Emerg Med 2024. [DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03760-y] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Abstract
AbstractEmergency departments (EDs) are at high risk for medical errors. Checklist implementation programs have been associated with improved patient outcomes in other high-risk clinical settings and when used to address specific aspects of ED care. The aim of this study was to develop an ED Safety Checklist with broad applicability across different international ED settings. A three-round modified Delphi consensus process was conducted with a multidisciplinary and multinational panel of experts in emergency medicine and patient safety. Initial checklist items were identified through a systematic review of the literature. Each item was evaluated for inclusion in the final checklist during two rounds of web-based surveys and an online consensus meeting. Agreement for inclusion was defined a priori with a threshold of 80% combined agreement. Eighty panel members from 34 countries across all seven world regions participated in the study, with comparable representation from low- and middle-income and high-income countries. The final checklist contains 86 items divided into: (1) a general ED Safety Checklist focused on diagnostic evaluation, patient reassessment, and disposition and (2) five domain-specific ED Safety Checklists focused on handoff, invasive procedures, triage, treatment prescription, and treatment administration. The checklist includes key clinical tasks to prevent medical errors, as well as items to improve communication among ED team members and with patients and their families. This novel ED Safety Checklist defines the essential elements of high-quality ED care and has the potential to ensure their consistent implementation worldwide.
Collapse
|
3
|
Rödler JV, Hilgers S, Rüppel M, Föhr P, Hohn A, Chorianopoulos E, Bergrath S. [Indications and success rate of endotracheal emergency intubation in clinical acute and emergency medicine]. DIE ANAESTHESIOLOGIE 2024:10.1007/s00101-024-01444-y. [PMID: 39093363 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-024-01444-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Securing the airway in the emergency department (ED) is a high-stakes procedure; however, the primary success and complication rate are largely unknown in Germany. The aim of this study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected resuscitation room data for endotracheal intubation (ETI) regarding indications, performance and complications. METHOD Between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2023 all ETIs conducted in the ED (Kliniken Maria Hilf, Moenchengladbach, Germany) were analyzed following approval by the ethics committee (EK 23-369). Primary intubations performed by the anesthesiology department were excluded. The core medical team of the ED underwent a six-week training program including a two-week anesthesia rotation prior to performing ETI in the ED. There were standard operating procedures (SOP) for both rapid sequence induction (RSI) and airway exchange with a placed laryngeal tube (LT) utilizing video laryngoscopy (C-Mac, Storz), rocuronium for relaxation and primary intubation with an elastic bougie. The primary success rate, overall success rate and intubation-related complications were analyzed. Additionally, the factor of consultant ED staff and residents was evaluated with respect to the primary success rate. RESULTS During the study period 499 patients were intubated by the core ED team and 28 patients underwent airway exchange from LT to ETI. Primary success could be achieved in 489/499 (98.0%) ETI and in 25/28 (89.3%) LT exchange patients. Surgically achieved securing of the airway was carried out in 5/527 (0.9%) patients in a cannot intubate situation and 11/527 (2.2%) patients suffered cardiac arrest minutes after the ETI. The overall first pass success rate of endotracheal tube placement was 514/527 (97.4%). The comparison of the primary success of consultants (168/175; 96.0%) vs. residents 320/325 (98.5%) yielded no significant differences (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION In clinical acute and emergency medicine, a standardized approach utilizing video laryngoscopy and a bougie following a structured training concept, can achieve an above-average high primary success rate with simultaneous low severe complications in the high-risk collective of critically ill emergency patients in an intrahospital setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Vienna Rödler
- Zentrum für klinische Akut- und Notfallmedizin, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Viersener Straße 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland.
| | - Sabrina Hilgers
- Zentrum für klinische Akut- und Notfallmedizin, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Viersener Straße 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
- Lehrstuhl für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Marc Rüppel
- Zentrum für klinische Akut- und Notfallmedizin, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Viersener Straße 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Philipp Föhr
- Zentrum für klinische Akut- und Notfallmedizin, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Viersener Straße 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Hohn
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Kliniken Maria Hilf Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Emmanuel Chorianopoulos
- Klinik für Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie und internistische Intensivmedizin, Kliniken Maria Hilf Mönchengladbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Sebastian Bergrath
- Zentrum für klinische Akut- und Notfallmedizin, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Viersener Straße 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
- Lehrstuhl für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wing R, Goldman MP, Prieto MM, Miller KA, Baluyot M, Tay KY, Bharath A, Patel D, Greenwald E, Larsen EP, Polikoff LA, Kerrey BT, Nishisaki A, Nagler J. Usability Testing Via Simulation: Optimizing the NEAR4PEM Preintubation Checklist With a Human Factors Approach. Pediatr Emerg Care 2024; 40:575-581. [PMID: 39078284 DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000003223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To inform development of a preintubation checklist for pediatric emergency departments via multicenter usability testing of a prototype checklist. METHODS This was a prospective, mixed methods study across 7 sites in the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) collaborative. Pediatric emergency medicine attending physicians and senior fellows at each site were first oriented to a checklist prototype, including content previously identified using a modified Delphi approach. Each site used the checklist in 2 simulated cases: an "easy airway" and a "difficult airway" scenario. Facilitators recorded verbalization, completion, and timing of checklist items. After each simulation, participants completed an anonymous usability survey. Structured debriefings were used to gather additional feedback on checklist usability. Comments from the surveys and debriefing were qualitatively analyzed using a framework approach. Responses informed human factors-based optimization of the checklist. RESULTS Fifty-five pediatric emergency medicine physicians/fellows (4-13 per site) participated. Participants found the prototype checklist to be helpful, easy to use, clear, and of appropriate length. During the simulations, 93% of checklist items were verbalized and more than 80% were completed. Median time to checklist completion was 6.2 minutes (interquartile range, 4.8-7.1) for the first scenario and 4.2 minutes (interquartile range, 2.7-5.8) for the second. Survey and debriefing data identified the following strengths: facilitating a shared mental model, cognitively offloading the team leader, and prompting contingency planning. Suggestions for checklist improvement included clarifying specific items, providing more detailed prompts, and allowing institution-specific customization. Integration of these data with human factors heuristic inspection resulted in a final checklist. CONCLUSIONS Simulation-based, human factors usability testing of the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Preintubation Checklist allowed optimization prior to clinical implementation. Next steps involve integration into real-world settings utilizing rigorous implementation science strategies, with concurrent evaluation of the impact on patient outcomes and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Wing
- From the Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children's Hospital; Lifespan Medical Simulation Center, Providence, RI
| | - Michael P Goldman
- Departments of Pediatrics (Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine) and Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Monica M Prieto
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kelsey A Miller
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mariju Baluyot
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Divisions of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Simulation, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Khoon-Yen Tay
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anita Bharath
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Phoenix Children's, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Deepa Patel
- Department of Pediatrics, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Cohen Children's Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Emily Greenwald
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke Children's Hospital, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | - Ethan P Larsen
- Center for Healthcare Quality and Analytics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lee A Polikoff
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Benjamin T Kerrey
- University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine and the Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Akira Nishisaki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joshua Nagler
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hay RE, Martin DA, Rutas GJ, Jamal SM, Parsons SJ. Measuring evidence-based clinical guideline compliance in the paediatric intensive care unit. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002485. [PMID: 38429064 PMCID: PMC10910644 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based clinical care guidelines improve medical treatment by reducing error, improving outcomes and possibly lowering healthcare costs. While some data exist on individual guideline compliance, no data exist on overall compliance to multiple nuanced guidelines in a paediatric intensive care setting. METHODS Guideline compliance was observed and measured with a prospective cohort at a tertiary academic paediatric medical-surgical intensive care unit. Adherence to 19 evidence-based clinical care guidelines was evaluated in 814 patients, and reasons for non-compliance were noted along with other associated outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Overall facility compliance was unexpectedly high at 77.8% over 4512 compliance events, involving 826 admissions. Compliance varied widely between guidelines. Guidelines with the highest compliance were stress ulcer prophylaxis (97.1%) and transfusion administration such as fresh frozen plasma (97.4%) and platelets (94.8%); guidelines with the lowest compliance were ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention (28.7%) and vitamin K administration (34.8%). There was no significant change in compliance over time with observation. Guidelines with binary decision branch points or single-page decision flow diagrams had a higher average compliance of 90.6%. Poor compliance was more often observed with poor perception of guideline trustworthiness and time limitations. CONCLUSIONS Measuring guideline compliance, though onerous, allowed for evaluation of current clinical practices and identified actionable areas for institutional improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca E Hay
- Pediatric Critical Care, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Pediatric Critical Care, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dori-Ann Martin
- Pediatric Critical Care, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gary J Rutas
- Pediatric Critical Care, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shelina M Jamal
- Pediatric Critical Care, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Simon J Parsons
- Pediatric Critical Care, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miller KA, Prieto MM, Wing R, Goldman MP, Polikoff LA, Nishisaki A, Nagler J. Development of a paediatric airway management checklist for the emergency department: a modified Delphi approach. Emerg Med J 2023; 40:287-292. [PMID: 36788006 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Airway management checklists have improved paediatric patient safety in some clinical settings, but consensus on the appropriate components to include on a checklist for paediatric tracheal intubation in the ED is lacking. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of 14 experts in airway management within and outside of paediatric emergency medicine participated in a modified Delphi approach to develop consensus on the appropriate components for a paediatric airway management checklist for the ED. Panel members reviewed, modified and added to the components from the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children airway safety checklist for paediatric intensive care units using a 9-point appropriateness scale. Components with a median score of 7.0-9.0 and a 25th percentile score ≥7.0 achieved consensus for inclusion. A priori, the modified Delphi method was limited to a maximum of two rounds for consensus on essential components and one additional round for checklist creation. RESULTS All experts participated in both rounds. Consensus was achieved on 22 components. Twelve were original candidate items and 10 were newly suggested or modified items. Consensus components included the following categories: patient assessment and plan (5 items), patient preparation (5 items), pharmacy (2 items), equipment (7 items) and personnel (3 items). The components were formatted into a 17-item clinically usable checklist. CONCLUSIONS Using the modified Delphi method, consensus was established among airway management experts around essential components for an airway management checklist intended for paediatric tracheal intubation in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey A Miller
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Monica M Prieto
- Department of Pediatrics - Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robyn Wing
- Department of Emergency Medicine - Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Michael P Goldman
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lee A Polikoff
- Department of Pediatrics, Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Akira Nishisaki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joshua Nagler
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meulendyks S, Korpal D, Jin HJ, Mal S, Pace J. Airway registries in primarily adult, emergent endotracheal intubation: a scoping review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2023; 31:11. [PMID: 36890554 PMCID: PMC9993388 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-023-01075-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency Department (ED) airway registries are formalized methods to collect and document airway practices and outcomes. Airway registries have become increasingly common in EDs globally; yet there is no consensus of airway registry methodology or intended utility. This review builds on previous literature and aims to provide a thorough description of international ED airway registries and discuss how airway registry data is utilized. METHODS A search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Libraries, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed with no date limitations applied. English language full-text publications and grey literature from centres implementing an ongoing airway registry to monitor intubations performed in mainly adult patients in an ED setting were included. Non-English publications and publications describing airway registries to monitor intubation practices in predominantly paediatric patients or settings outside of the ED were excluded. Study screening for eligibility was performed by two team members individually, with any disagreements resolved by a third team member. Data was charted using a standardized data charting tool created for this review. RESULTS Our review identified 124 eligible studies from 22 airway registries with a global distribution. We found that airway registry data is used for quality assurance, quality improvement, and clinical research regarding intubation practices and contextual factors. This review also demonstrates that there is a great deal of heterogeneity in definitions of first-pass success and adverse events in the peri-intubation period. CONCLUSIONS Airway registries are used as a crucial tool to monitor and improve intubation performance and patient care. ED airway registries inform and document the efficacy of quality improvement initiatives to improve intubation performance in EDs globally. Standardized definitions of first-pass success and peri-intubation adverse events, such as hypotension and hypoxia, may allow for airway management performance to be compared on a more equivalent basis and allow for the development of more reliable international benchmarks for first-pass success and rates of adverse events in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Meulendyks
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.
| | - Daniel Korpal
- Department of Emergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Helen Jingshu Jin
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada
| | - Sameer Mal
- Department of Emergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Jacob Pace
- Department of Emergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huber M, Greif R, Pedersen TH, Theiler L, Kleine-Brueggeney M. Risk patterns of consecutive adverse events in airway management: a Bayesian network analysis. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:368-378. [PMID: 36564247 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minor adverse airway events play a pivotal role in the safety of airway management. Changes in airway management strategies can reduce such events, but the broader impact on airway management remains unclear. METHODS Minor, frequently occurring adverse airway events were audited before and after implementation of changes to airway management strategies. We used two Bayesian networks to examine conditional probabilities of subsequent airway events and to compute the likelihood of certain events given that certain previous events occurred. RESULTS Independent of sex, age, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, targeted changes to airway management strategies reduced the risk of a first event. Obese patients were an exception, in whom no risk reduction was achieved. Frequently occurring event sequences were identified, for example the most likely event to follow difficult bag-mask ventilation was a Cormack-Lehane grade ≥3, with a risk of 14.3% (95% credible interval [CI], 11.4-17.2%). An impact of the targeted changes was detected on the likelihood of some event sequences, for example the likelihood of no consecutive event after a tracheal tube-related event increased from 43.3% (95% CI, 39.4-47.6%) to 56.4% (95% CI, 52.0-60.5%). CONCLUSIONS Identification of risk patterns and typical structures of event sequences provides a clinically relevant perspective on airway incidents. It further provides a means to quantify the impact of targeted airway management changes. These targeted changes can influence some event sequences, but overall, the benefit results from the cumulative effect of improvements in multiple events. Targeted airway management changes with knowledge of risk patterns and event sequences can potentially further improve patient safety in airway management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02743767.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Huber
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Robert Greif
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; School of Medicine, Sigmund Freud Private University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tina H Pedersen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hillerod, Denmark
| | - Lorenz Theiler
- Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maren Kleine-Brueggeney
- Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Anaesthesiology Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Umana E, Foley J, Grossi I, Deasy C, O'Keeffe F. National Emergency Resuscitation Airway Audit (NERAA): a pilot multicentre analysis of emergency intubations in Irish emergency departments. BMC Emerg Med 2022; 22:91. [PMID: 35643431 PMCID: PMC9148500 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-022-00644-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is paucity of literature on why and how patients are intubated, and by whom, in Irish Emergency Departments (EDs). The aim of this pilot study was to characterise emergency airway management (EAM) of critically unwell patients presenting to Irish EDs. METHODS A multisite prospective pilot study was undertaken from February 10 to May 10, 2020. This project was facilitated through the Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network (ITERN). All patients over 16 years of age requiring EAM were included. Eleven EDs participated in the project. Data recorded included patients' demographics, indication for intubation, technique of airway management, medications used to facilitate intubation, level of training and specialty of the intubating clinician, number of attempts, success/complications rates and variation across centres. RESULTS Over a 3-month period, 118 patients underwent 131 intubation attempts across 11 EDs. The median age was 57 years (IQR: 40-70). Medical indications were reported in 83% of patients compared to 17% for trauma. Of the 118 patients intubated, Emergency Medicine (EM) doctors performed 54% of initial intubations, while anaesthesiology/intensive care medicine (ICM) doctors performed 46%. The majority (90%) of intubating clinicians were at registrar level. Emergency intubation check lists, video laryngoscopy and bougie were used in 55, 53 and 64% of first attempts, respectively. The first pass success rate was 89%. Intubation complications occurred in 19% of patients. EM doctors undertook a greater proportion of intubations in EDs with > 50,000 attendance (65%) compared to EDs with < 50,000 attendances (16%) (p < 0.000). CONCLUSION This is the first study to describe EAM in Irish EDs, and demonstrates comparable first pass success and complication rates to international studies. This study highlights the need for continuous EAM surveillance and could provide a vector for developing national standards for EAM and EAM training in Irish EDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etimbuk Umana
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown, Mill Road, Abbotstown, Dublin, Ireland.
- Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network (ITERN), Dublin, Ireland.
| | - James Foley
- Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network (ITERN), Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Irene Grossi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Conor Deasy
- Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network (ITERN), Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Francis O'Keeffe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Groombridge CJ, Maini A, Ayton D, Soh SE, Walsham N, Kim Y, Smit DV, Fitzgerald M. Emergency physicians' experience of stress during resuscitation and strategies for mitigating the effects of stress on performance. Emerg Med J 2021; 39:839-846. [PMID: 34907004 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explored the perspectives and behaviours of emergency physicians (EPs), regularly involved in resuscitation, to identify the sources and effects of any stress experienced during a resuscitation as well as the strategies employed to deal with these stressors. METHODS This was a two-centre sequential exploratory mixed-methods study of EPs consisting of a focus group, exploring the human factors related to resuscitation, and an anonymous survey. Between April and June 2020, the online survey was distributed to all EPs working at Australia's largest two major trauma centres, both in Melbourne, and investigated sources of stress during resuscitation, impact of stress on performance, mitigation strategies used, impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress and stress management training received. Associations with gender and years of clinical practice were also examined. RESULTS 7 EPs took part in the focus group and 82 responses to the online survey were received (81% response rate). The most common sources of stress reported were resuscitation of an 'unwell young paediatric patient' (81%, 95% CI 70.6 to 87.6) or 'unwell pregnant patient' (71%, 95% CI 60.1 to 79.5) and 'conflict with a team member' (71%, 95% CI 60.1 to 79.5). The most frequently reported strategies to mitigate stress were 'verbalising a plan to the team' (84%, 95% CI 74.7 to 90.5), 'implementing a standardised/structured approach' (73%, 95% CI 62.7 to 81.6) and 'asking for help' (57%, 95% CI 46.5 to 67.5). 79% (95% CI 69.3 to 86.6) of EPs reported that they would like additional training on stress management. Junior EPs more frequently reported the use of 'mental rehearsal' to mitigate stress during a resuscitation (62% vs 22%; p<0.01) while female EPs reported 'asking for help' as a mitigator of stress more frequently than male EPs (79% vs 47%; p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Stress is commonly experienced by EPs during resuscitation and can impact decision-making and procedural performance. This study identifies the most common sources of stress during a resuscitation as well as the strategies that EPs use to mitigate the effects of stress on their performance. These findings may contribute to the development of tailored stress management training for critical care clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher James Groombridge
- National Trauma Research Institute, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia .,Emergency & Trauma Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amit Maini
- National Trauma Research Institute, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency & Trauma Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Darshini Ayton
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sze-Ee Soh
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicola Walsham
- Emergency Department, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yesul Kim
- National Trauma Research Institute, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - De Villiers Smit
- Emergency & Trauma Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Fitzgerald
- National Trauma Research Institute, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Groombridge CJ, Maini A, Johnny C, McCreary D, Kim Y, Smit DV, Fitzgerald M. Randomised controlled trial in cadavers investigating methods for intubation via a supraglottic airway device: Comparison of flexible airway scope guided versus a retrograde technique. Emerg Med Australas 2021; 34:411-416. [PMID: 34837890 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A supraglottic airway device (SAD) may be utilised for rescue re-oxygenation following a failed attempt at endotracheal intubation with direct or video laryngoscopy. However, the choice of subsequent method to secure a definitive airway is not clearly established. The aim of the present study was to compare two techniques for securing a definitive airway via the in-situ SAD. METHODS A randomised controlled trial was undertaken. The population studied was emergency physicians (EPs) attending a cadaveric airway course. The intervention was intubation through a SAD using a retrograde intubation technique (RIT). The comparison was intubation through a SAD guided by a flexible airway scope (FAS). The primary outcome was time to intubation. The trial was registered with ANZCTR.org.au (ACTRN12621000995875). RESULTS Four EPs completed intubations using both methods on four cadavers for a total of 32 experiments. The mean time to intubation was 18.2 s (standard deviation 8.8) in the FAS group compared with 52.9 s (standard deviation 11.7) in the RIT group; a difference of 34.7 s (95% confidence interval 27.1-42.3, P < 0.001). All intubations were completed within 2 min and there were no equipment failures or evidence of airway trauma. CONCLUSION Successful tracheal intubation of cadavers by EPs is achievable, without iatrogenic airway trauma, via a SAD using either a FAS or RIT, but was 35 s quicker with the FAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Groombridge
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amit Maini
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cecil Johnny
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David McCreary
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yesul Kim
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - De Villiers Smit
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Fitzgerald
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Groombridge CJ, Maini A, Mathew J, Kim Y, Fitzgerald M, Smit DV, O'Reilly G. Comparing methods to secure a tracheal tube placed via a surgical cricothyroidotomy: a randomised controlled study in cadavers. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2021; 29:104. [PMID: 34321049 PMCID: PMC8317275 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-021-00925-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective In the ‘can’t intubate can’t oxygenate’ scenario, techniques to achieve front of neck access to the airway have been described in the literature but there is a lack of guidance on the optimal method for securing the tracheal tube (TT) placed during this procedure. The aim of this study was to compare three different methods of securing a TT to prevent extubation following a surgical cricothyroidotomy. Methods A randomised controlled trial was undertaken. The population studied were emergency physicians (EPs) attending a cadaveric airway course. The intervention was securing a TT placed via a surgical cricothyroidotomy by suture. The comparison was securing the TT using fabric tape with two different tying techniques. The primary outcome was the force required to extubate the trachea. The trial was registered with ANZCTR.org.au (ACTRN12621000320853). Results 17 emergency physicians completed intubations using all three of the securing methods on 12 cadavers for a total of 51 experiments. The mean extubation force was 6.54 KG (95 % CI 5.54–7.55) in the suture group compared with 2.28 KG (95 % CI 1.91–2.64) in the ‘Wilko tie’ group and 2.12 KG (95 % CI 1.63–2.60) in the ‘Lark’s foot tie’ group; The mean difference between the suture and fabric tie techniques was significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions Following a surgical cricothyroidotomy in cadavers, EPs were able to effectively secure a TT using a suture technique, and this method was superior to tying the TT using fabric tape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Groombridge
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. .,Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. .,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Amit Maini
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joseph Mathew
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Yesul Kim
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Fitzgerald
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - De Villiers Smit
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gerard O'Reilly
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Groombridge CJ, Maini A, Mathew J, Fritz P, Kim Y, Fitzgerald M, Smit DV, O’Reilly G. Comparison of fibre-optic-guided endotracheal intubation through a supraglottic airway device versus hyperangulated video laryngoscopy by emergency physicians: A randomised controlled study in cadavers. HONG KONG J EMERG ME 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/10249079211034272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: After failed endotracheal intubation, using direct laryngoscopy, rescued using a supraglottic airway device, the choice of subsequent method to secure a definitive airway is not clearly determined. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the time to intubation using a fibre-optic airway scope, to guide an endotracheal tube through the supraglottic airway device, with a more conventional approach using a hyperangulated video laryngoscope. Methods: A single-centre randomised controlled trial was undertaken. The population studied were emergency physicians working in an adult major trauma centre. The intervention was intubation through a supraglottic airway device guided by a fibre-optic airway scope. The comparison was intubation using a hyperangulated video laryngoscope. The primary outcome was time to intubation. The trial was registered with ANZCTR.org.au (ACTRN12621000018819). Results: Four emergency physicians completed intubations using both of the two airway devices on four cadavers for a total of 32 experiments. The mean time to intubation was 14.0 s (95% confidence interval = 11.1–16.8) in the hyperangulated video laryngoscope group compared with 29.2 s (95% confidence interval = 20.7–37.7) in the fibre-optic airway scope group; a difference of 15.2 s (95% confidence interval = 8.7–21.7, p < 0.001). All intubations were completed within 2 min, and there were no equipment failures or evidence of airway trauma. Conclusion: Successful intubation of the trachea without airway trauma by emergency physicians in cadavers is achievable by either fibre-optic airway scope via a supraglottic airway device or hyperangulated video laryngoscope. Hyperangulated video laryngoscope was statistically but arguably not clinically significantly faster than fibre-optic airway scope via supraglottic airway device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Groombridge
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amit Maini
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Mathew
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Fritz
- Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Yesul Kim
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Fitzgerald
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - De Villiers Smit
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gerard O’Reilly
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Groombridge CJ, Maini A, Olaussen A, Kim Y, Fitzgerald M, Smit DV. Unintended consequences: The impact of airway management modifications introduced in response to COVID-19 on intubations in a tertiary centre emergency department. Emerg Med Australas 2021; 33:728-733. [PMID: 34080299 PMCID: PMC8209873 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective In response to COVID‐19, we introduced and examined the effect of a raft of modifications to standard practice on adverse events and first‐attempt success (FAS) associated with ED intubation. Methods An analysis of prospectively collected registry data of all ED intubations over a 3‐year period at an Australian Major Trauma Centre. During the first 6 months of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Australia, we introduced modifications to standard practice to reduce the risk to staff including: aerosolisation reduction, comprehensive personal protective equipment for all intubations, regular low fidelity simulation with ‘sign‐off’ for all medical and nursing staff, senior clinician laryngoscopist and the introduction of pre‐drawn medications. Results There were 783 patients, 136 in the COVID‐19 era and 647 in the pre‐COVID‐19 comparator group. The rate of hypoxia was higher during the COVID‐19 era compared to pre‐COVID‐19 (18.4% vs 9.6%, P < 0.005). This occurred despite the FAS rate remaining very high (95.6% vs 93.8%, P = 0.42) and intubation being undertaken by more senior laryngoscopists (consultant 55.9% during COVID‐19 vs 22.6% pre‐COVID‐19, P < 0.001). Other adverse events were similar before and during COVID‐19 (hypotension 12.5% vs 7.9%, P = 0.082; bradycardia 1.5% vs 0.5%, P = 0.21). Video laryngoscopy was more likely to be used during COVID‐19 (95.6% vs 82.5%, P < 0.001) and induction of anaesthesia more often used ketamine (66.9% vs 42.3%, P < 0.001) and rocuronium (86.8% vs 52.1%, P < 0.001). Conclusions This raft of modifications to ED intubation was associated with significant increase in hypoxia despite a very high FAS rate and more senior first laryngoscopist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Groombridge
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amit Maini
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander Olaussen
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yesul Kim
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Fitzgerald
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - De Villiers Smit
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|