The role of non-invasive ventilation in the emergency department

Helmet CPAP in the emergency department: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

The choice of correct interface for the right patient is crucial for the success of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) therapy. Helmet CPAP is a type of interface used to deliver NIV. Helmet CPAP improves oxygenation by keeping the airway open throughout the breathing cycle with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review describes the technical aspects and clinical indications of helmet continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). In addition, we explore the advantages and challenges faced using this device at the Emergency Department (ED).

DISCUSSION

Helmet CPAP is tolerable than other NIV interfaces, provides a good seal and has good airway stability. During Covid-19 pandemic, there are evidences it reduced the risk of aerosolization. The potential clinical benefit of helmet CPAP is demonstrated in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (ACPO), Covid-19 pneumonia, immunocompromised patient, acute chest trauma and palliative patient. Compare to conventional oxygen therapy, helmet CPAP had been shown to reduce intubation rate and decrease mortality.

CONCLUSION

Helmet CPAP is one of the potential NIV interface in patients with acute respiratory failure presenting to the emergency department. It is better tolerated for prolonged usage, reduced intubation rate, improved respiratory parameters, and offers protection against aerosolization in infectious diseases.

Cardiopulmonary interactions in patients with heart failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to summarize recent findings concerning the consequences of cardiopulmonary interactions in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, weaning from mechanical ventilation and fluid-responsiveness assessment by respiratory variations of stroke volume.

RECENT FINDINGS

The efficacy of continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema was strongly suggested by two recent meta-analyses. There is growing evidence to suggest that weaning-induced cardiac dysfunction and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema could explain a large amount of liberation failure from mechanical ventilation. Despite a potential role for echocardiography and plasma measurements of B-type natriuretic peptide in demonstrating a cardiac origin to weaning failure, the demonstration of a significant increase in pulmonary-artery occlusion pressure during the weaning trial remains the gold standard for this purpose. In patients with heart failure there is no evidence for revisiting the reliability of the respiratory variation of stroke-volume surrogates to predict fluid responsiveness.

SUMMARY

For clinical practice, the knowledge of cardiopulmonary interactions is of paramount importance in understanding the crucial role of mechanical ventilation for treating patients with heart failure and, by contrast, the deleterious cardiovascular effects of weaning in patients with overt or hidden cardiac failure.