1
|
Pei S, Huang JQ, Liang HW, Liu Y, Chen L, Yu BB, Huang W, Pan XB. Adjuvant treatment patterns for pT3N0M0 esophageal cancer undergoing surgery. Dis Esophagus 2024; 37:doae026. [PMID: 38553783 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doae026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
To assess adjuvant treatment patterns on survival in patients with pT3N0M0 esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Stage pT3N0M0 esophageal cancer patients were assessed between 2000 and 2020 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival (OS) among various treatment patterns. We identified 445 patients: 252 (56.6%) received surgery alone, 85 (19.1%) received surgery+chemoradiotherapy, 80 (18.0%) underwent surgery+chemotherapy, and 28 (6.3%) received surgery+ radiotherapy. For squamous cell carcinoma, surgery+chemoradiotherapy ([hazard ratio] HR = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-1.66; P = 0.873), surgery+chemotherapy (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.42-1.22; P = 0.221), and surgery+radiotherapy (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.74-2.39; P = 0.341) had similar OS compared to surgery alone. For adenocarcinoma, surgery+chemoradiotherapy (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.74; P < 0.001) and surgery+chemotherapy (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.87; P = 0.006) had better OS compared to surgery alone. However, surgery+radiotherapy had a comparable OS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.44-1.49; P = 0.495).Adjuvant treatments did not improve survival in stage pT3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. In contrast, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy were recommended for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Pei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jiang-Qiong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Huan-Wei Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Long Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Bin-Bin Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Wei Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xin-Bin Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Worrell SG, Goodman KA, Altorki NK, Ashman JB, Crabtree TD, Dorth J, Firestone S, Harpole DH, Hofstetter WL, Hong TS, Kissoon K, Ku GY, Molena D, Tepper JE, Watson TJ, Williams T, Willett C. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Society for Radiation Oncology Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:28-46. [PMID: 37921736 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer have improved over the last decade with the implementation of multimodality therapy. There are currently no comprehensive guidelines addressing multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer that have incorporated the input of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. To address the need for multidisciplinary input in the management of esophageal cancer and to meet current best practices for clinical practice guidelines, the current guidelines were created as a collaboration between The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Physician representatives chose 8 key clinical questions pertinent to the care of patients with locally advanced, resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (excluding cervical location). A comprehensive literature review was performed identifying 227 articles that met the inclusion criteria covering the use of induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy before surgery, optimal radiation dose, the value of esophagectomy, timing of esophagectomy, the approach and extent of lymphadenectomy, the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy, and the value of adjuvant therapy after resection. The relevant data were reviewed and voted on by the panel with 80% of the authors, with 75% agreement on class and level of evidence. These data were then complied into the guidelines document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie G Worrell
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona.
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Nasser K Altorki
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - Traves D Crabtree
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
| | - Jennifer Dorth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - David H Harpole
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Geoffrey Y Ku
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joel E Tepper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Thomas J Watson
- Thoracic Surgery Group, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Terence Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Christopher Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clements HA, Underwood TJ, Petty RD. Total neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:9-18. [PMID: 37898721 PMCID: PMC10781745 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02458-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction represent a large burden of cancer death in the Western World with an increasing incidence. In the past two decades, the overall survival of patients on a potentially curative treatment pathway has more than doubled due to the addition of perioperative oncological therapies to surgery. However, patients often fail to respond to oncological treatment or struggle to complete their treatment after surgery. In this review, we discuss the current evidence for total neoadjuvant therapy and options for assessment of treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hollie A Clements
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
| | - Tim J Underwood
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Russell D Petty
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Tayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Worrell SG, Goodman KA, Altorki NK, Ashman JB, Crabtree TD, Dorth J, Firestone S, Harpole DH, Hofstetter WL, Hong TS, Kissoon K, Ku GY, Molena D, Tepper JE, Watson TJ, Williams T, Willett C. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Society for Radiation Oncology Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction. Ann Thorac Surg 2024; 117:15-32. [PMID: 37921794 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer have improved over the last decade with the implementation of multimodality therapy. There are currently no comprehensive guidelines addressing multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer that have incorporated the input of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. To address the need for multidisciplinary input in the management of esophageal cancer and to meet current best practices for clinical practice guidelines, the current guidelines were created as a collaboration between The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Physician representatives chose 8 key clinical questions pertinent to the care of patients with locally advanced, resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (excluding cervical location). A comprehensive literature review was performed identifying 227 articles that met the inclusion criteria covering the use of induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy before surgery, optimal radiation dose, the value of esophagectomy, timing of esophagectomy, the approach and extent of lymphadenectomy, the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy, and the value of adjuvant therapy after resection. The relevant data were reviewed and voted on by the panel with 80% of the authors, with 75% agreement on class and level of evidence. These data were then complied into the guidelines document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie G Worrell
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona.
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Nasser K Altorki
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - Traves D Crabtree
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
| | - Jennifer Dorth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - David H Harpole
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Geoffrey Y Ku
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joel E Tepper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Thomas J Watson
- Thoracic Surgery Group, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Terence Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Christopher Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jeon YJ, Yoo J, Cho JH, Shim YM. Clinical Trends in Management of Locally Advanced ESCC: Real-World Evidence from a Large Single-Center Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:4953. [PMID: 36230875 PMCID: PMC9564200 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (NCRT+S) has been widely applied to patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); however, treatment trends and their survival outcomes in a real-world clinical setting are poorly understood. This study aimed to analyze real-world evidence to understand treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with ESCC. We analyzed the treatment pattern and 5-year overall survival (5yOS) by synthesizing the individuals’ general characteristics, cancer information, and treatment records extracted from the Clinical Data Warehouse from 1994 to 2018. Of a total of 2151 patients, most patients received upfront surgery and 5yOS was 36.8% (31.4−43.1%). From 2003 to 2012, the use of NCRT increased, and 5yOS was improved to 42.2% (38.8−45.7%). Notably, after 2013, the proportion of NCRT+S markedly increased up to >50% of patients: 5yOS was much improved to 56.3% (53.2−59.6%). With regard to treatment, patients with NCRT+S had the most favorable 5yOS of 58.1% (53−63.7%), although that for patients with upfront surgery was 48.6% (45.9−51.5%, p < 0.001). Moreover, patients who received adjuvant therapy after surgery had better OS than those with surgery alone (58.4% (52.7−64.7%) vs. 47.3% (44.1−50.7%), p < 0.001). This analysis of real-world data demonstrated a significantly improved survival outcome for locally advanced ESCC over time since NCRT prior to surgery had been routinely applied. We revealed that NCRT+S was the most effective treatment for locally advanced ESCC and that adjuvant chemotherapy may be an encouraging therapeutic option for patients with positive nodes after upfront surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeong Jeong Jeon
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Junsang Yoo
- Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06355, Korea
| | - Jong Ho Cho
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Young Mog Shim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06355, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rahman S, Thomas B, Maynard N, Park MH, Wahedally M, Trudgill N, Crosby T, Cromwell DA, Underwood TJ. Impact of postoperative chemotherapy on survival for oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemotherapy and surgery. Br J Surg 2022; 109:227-236. [PMID: 34910129 PMCID: PMC10364695 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative chemotherapy is widely used in the treatment of oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (OGAC) with a substantial survival benefit over surgery alone. However, the postoperative part of these regimens is given in less than half of patients, reflecting uncertainty among clinicians about its benefit and poor postoperative patient fitness. This study estimated the effect of postoperative chemotherapy after surgery for OGAC using a large population-based data set. METHODS Patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus, gastro-oesophageal junction or stomach diagnosed between 2012 and 2018, who underwent preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery, were identified from a national-level audit in England and Wales. Postoperative therapy was defined as the receipt of systemic chemotherapy within 90 days of surgery. The effectiveness of postoperative chemotherapy compared with observation was estimated using inverse propensity treatment weighting. RESULTS Postoperative chemotherapy was given to 1593 of 4139 patients (38.5 per cent) included in the study. Almost all patients received platinum-based triplet regimens (4004 patients, 96.7 per cent), with FLOT used in 3.3 per cent. Patients who received postoperative chemotherapy were younger, with a lower ASA grade, and were less likely to have surgical complications, with similar tumour characteristics. After weighting, the median survival time after postoperative chemotherapy was 62.7 months compared with 50.4 months without chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.77 to 0.94; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION This study has shown that postoperative chemotherapy improves overall survival in patients with OGAC treated with preoperative chemotherapy and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saqib Rahman
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Betsan Thomas
- Department of Oncology, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Nick Maynard
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Min Hae Park
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Muhammad Wahedally
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Nigel Trudgill
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tom Crosby
- Department of Oncology, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - David A. Cromwell
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Tim J. Underwood
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lymph Node Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg 2021; 273:1141-1149. [PMID: 31274656 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate primary tumor (PT) and lymph node (LN) responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for predicting long-term survival in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer (EC). BACKGROUND In evaluating NACT responses in patients with EC, imaging modalities typically target the PT in the esophagus, which is unmeasurable. Targeting measurable organs, like positive LNs, might provide more accurate assessments. METHODS We enrolled 251 patients with EC and clinically positive LNs that underwent curative resections, after triplet NACT. The percent reduction of PT area was measured with bidimensional computed tomography. The LN response was defined as the percent reduction of the sum of the short diameters in all positive LNs. RESULTS NACT reduced PTs and LNs by (median, range) 58.0% (38.1-94.9) and 34.5% (46.2-68.2), respectively. Based on the receiver-operating characteristic analyses for predicting a histological response and a 10% stepwise cutoff analyses of recurrence-free survival (RFS), responder/nonresponder cutoff values were ≥60% for PT area reductions and ≥30% for LN size reductions. 39.6% of patients showed discordant PT and LN responses. Compared with PT-responders, LN-responders had significantly less advanced pN (P < 0.0001) and pM (P = 0.015) in addition to less advanced pT (P < 0.0001) and better histological responses (P < 0.0001), and closer correlations to lymphatic, distant metastases and dissemination. A multivariate analysis of RFS identified 2 independent prognostic factors: the LN response [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.63-3.95, P < 0.0001] and the pN (HR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.44-5.64, P = 0.0016), but not the PT response. CONCLUSIONS The LN response to NACT predicted long-term survival more precisely than the PT response in patients with metastatic EC.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bott RK, Beckmann K, Zylstra J, Wilkinson MJ, Knight WRC, Baker CR, Kelly M, Maisey N, Waters J, Van Hemelrijck M, Smyth EC, Allum WH, Lagergren J, Gossage JA, Cunningham D, Davies AR. Adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with clear resection margins. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:672-680. [PMID: 33586602 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1885057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery is contentious. In UK practice, surgical resection margin status is often used to classify patients into receiving adjuvant treatment. This study aimed to assess any survival benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients with clear resection margins. METHODS This was a retrospective collaborative cohort study combining two prospectively collected UK institutional databases of patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity matched analyses were used to compare overall and recurrence-free survival according to the adjuvant treatment. RESULTS Of 374 patients with clear resection margins, 221 patients (59%) had no adjuvant treatment, 137 patients (37%) had adjuvant chemotherapy and 16 patients (4%) had adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. For patients who had received NAC (290, 76%), when adjuvant chemotherapy was compared to no adjuvant treatment, hazard ratios (HRs) favoured adjuvant chemotherapy but did not reach independent significance (overall survival [OS] HR 0.65 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-1.06; p .0.087). Responders to NAC (Mandard 1-3) were seemingly more likely to demonstrate a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.42 95% CI 0.15-1.11; p .1.081). CONCLUSIONS Although no independent survival benefit was observed, the point estimates favoured adjuvant treatment, predominantly in patients with chemo-responsive tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca K. Bott
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Kerri Beckmann
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King’s College London, London, UK
- University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Janine Zylstra
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michelle J. Wilkinson
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - William R. C. Knight
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Cara R. Baker
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Kelly
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Nick Maisey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK
| | - Justin Waters
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maidstone Hospital, Kent, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - William H. Allum
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jesper Lagergren
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - James A. Gossage
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - David Cunningham
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andrew R. Davies
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Paireder M, Jomrich G, Kristo I, Asari R, Rieder E, Beer A, Ilhan-Mutlu A, Preusser M, Schmid R, Schoppmann SF. Modification of preoperative radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer (CROSS protocol) is safe and efficient with no impact on surgical morbidity. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:779-786. [PMID: 32055873 PMCID: PMC7449995 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01594-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCTH) is proven to be highly effective in the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC). We investigated oncological outcome and morbidity in patients treated with a modified CROSS protocol followed by esophagectomy at our institution. Methods Patients with EC receiving neoadjuvant RCTH with paclitaxel and carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy (46 Gy) followed by esophagectomy were included in this retrospective analysis. Histopathological response, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free interval (RFI) as well as perioperative morbidity were investigated. Results Thirty-six patients (86.1% male, mean age 61.3 years, standard deviation 11.52) received neoadjuvant RCTH before surgery. Sixteen patients (44.4%) were treated for squamous cell cancer, whereas 20 patients (55.6%) had adenocarcinoma. The majority (75%) underwent abdominothoracic esophageal resection. Major complications occurred in 7 patients (19.5%) including anastomotic leakage in 4 patients (11.1%). A R0 resection was achieved in 97.2%. A complete pathological remission was seen in 13 patients (36.1%). Major response, classified as Mandard tumor regression grade 1 and 2, was found in 26 patients (72.2%). Median OS and RFI were not reached. Conclusions Neoadjuvant radiotherapy with 46 Gy and concomitant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is safe and effective. The results of this modified radiotherapy protocol are encouraging and should be considered in future patient treatment and study designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Paireder
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Service, Comprehensive Cancer Center GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerd Jomrich
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Service, Comprehensive Cancer Center GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ivan Kristo
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Service, Comprehensive Cancer Center GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Reza Asari
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Service, Comprehensive Cancer Center GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Erwin Rieder
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Service, Comprehensive Cancer Center GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Beer
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu
- Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I and Comprehensive Cancer Center, GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I and Comprehensive Cancer Center, GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rainer Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sebastian F Schoppmann
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Service, Comprehensive Cancer Center GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sanz Álvarez L, Turienzo Santos E, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Moreno Gijón M, Amoza Pais S, Sanz Navarro S, Rizzo Ramos A. Evidence in follow-up and prognosis of esophagogastric junction cancer. Cir Esp 2019; 97:465-469. [PMID: 31060735 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2019.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Five-year survival of tumors of the esophagogastric junction is 50%, in the most favourable stages and with the most effective adjuvant treatments. More than 40% of patients will have recurrences within a short period, usually the first year after potentially curative surgery. Survival after this recurrence is usually less than 6 months because treatment is not very effective, be it palliative chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgical excision of single recurrences. As the detection of asymptomatic recurrences allows for earlier and more effective treatments to be used, the type and frequency of follow-up has an influence on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lourdes Sanz Álvarez
- Sección de Tubo Digestivo, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Asturias, España.
| | - Estrella Turienzo Santos
- Sección de Tubo Digestivo, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Asturias, España
| | - José Luis Rodicio Miravalles
- Sección de Tubo Digestivo, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Asturias, España
| | - María Moreno Gijón
- Sección de Tubo Digestivo, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Asturias, España
| | - Sonia Amoza Pais
- Sección de Tubo Digestivo, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Asturias, España
| | - Sandra Sanz Navarro
- Sección de Tubo Digestivo, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Asturias, España
| | - Amaya Rizzo Ramos
- Sección de Tubo Digestivo, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Asturias, España
| |
Collapse
|