Strategies for antenatal detection of Down's syndrome

Prenatal Screening, Ethics and Down’s Syndrome: a literature review

This article reviews the literature on prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome. To be evidence based, medicine and nursing have to take account of research evidence and also of how this evidence is processed through the influence of prevailing social and moral attitudes. This review of the extensive literature examines how appropriate widely-held understandings of Down’s syndrome are, and asks whether or not practitioners and prospective parents have access to the full range of moral arguments and social evidence on the matter. Highly valued ideals of justice, personal autonomy, parental choice, women’s control over their reproduction and of avoiding harm can all tend towards negative rather than neutral approaches to Down’s syndrome. This article considers how ethics and prenatal screening policies and practice that take greater account of social evidence of disability could use moral arguments that inform rather than determine the choices of people who use prenatal services.

Early diagnosis of congenital heart disease

Routine examination of apparently healthy newborn babies detects less than half of those with congenital cardiac malformations because they are asymptomatic and without signs. More severe cardiac malformations are not detected more easily. A normal clinical examination does not exclude serious congenital cardiac malformation. Left heart obstruction is easily overlooked but often causes serious deterioration in less than 3 weeks. It is important to arrange early echocardiography of babies with signs and to consider cardiac malformation in a sick baby even if a previous routine examination was normal. All babies with Down syndrome should have early expert cardiological assessment.

Presentation of congenital heart disease in infancy: implications for routine examination

AIM

To investigate the performance of routine neonatal and 6 week examinations for detecting congenital heart disease.

METHODS

A retrospective review of findings on clinical examination was conducted of a cohort of live born infants with congenital heart disease in one health region in 1987-94.

RESULTS

Of 1590 babies with congenital heart disease, 523 (33%) presented before neonatal examination because of symptoms or non-cardiac abnormalities. 1061 underwent routine neonatal examination which was abnormal in 476 (45%), but only 170 were referred directly for diagnosis. Of 876 discharged with no diagnosis, 306 presented or died undiagnosed before 6 weeks. At 6 weeks 252 of 569 babies underwent a second routine examination which was abnormal in 164 (65%).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine neonatal examination fails to detect more than half of babies with heart disease; examination at 6 weeks misses one third. A normal examination does not exclude heart disease. Babies with murmurs at neonatal or 6 week examinations should be referred for early paediatric cardiological evaluation which will result either in a definitive diagnosis of congenital heart disease or in authoritative reassurance of normal cardiac anatomy and function.