Efficacy and safety of the peripheral kappa agonist fedotozine versus placebo in the treatment of functional dyspepsia

The Kappa Opioid Receptor: A Promising Therapeutic Target for Multiple Pathologies

Kappa-opioid receptors (KOR) are widely expressed throughout the central nervous system, where they modulate a range of physiological processes depending on their location, including stress, mood, reward, pain, inflammation, and remyelination. However, clinical use of KOR agonists is limited by adverse effects such as dysphoria, aversion, and sedation. Within the drug-development field KOR agonists have been extensively investigated for the treatment of many centrally mediated nociceptive disorders including pruritis and pain. KOR agonists are potential alternatives to mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists for the treatment of pain due to their anti-nociceptive effects, lack of abuse potential, and reduced respiratory depressive effects, however, dysphoric side-effects have limited their widespread clinical use. Other diseases for which KOR agonists hold promising therapeutic potential include pruritis, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, inflammatory diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, cancer, and ischemia. This review highlights recent drug-development efforts targeting KOR, including the development of G-protein–biased ligands, mixed opioid agonists, and peripherally restricted ligands to reduce side-effects. We also highlight the current KOR agonists that are in preclinical development or undergoing clinical trials.

Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of DA-9701 in Parkinson's Disease: PASS-GI Study

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of DA‐9701 on gastrointestinal symptom‐related quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease on stable dopaminergic medications.

Methods

This multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 4 trial included a total of 144 patients with Parkinson's disease with gastrointestinal dysfunctions based on predefined criteria. Participants were randomized to take either DA‐9701 or placebo for 4 weeks, and then both groups were administered DA‐9701 for an additional 8 weeks while antiparkinsonian medications were unchanged. The primary outcome measure was gastrointestinal symptoms and related quality‐of‐life changes assessed on the Korean Nepean dyspepsia index after 4 and 12 weeks of therapy. We also evaluated the impact of DA‐9701 therapy on parkinsonian motor symptoms at each time point.

Results

The gastrointestinal symptom‐related quality‐of‐life score significantly improved in the DA‐9701‐treated group compared with the placebo‐treated group after 4weeks (adjusted P = 0.012 by linear mixed effect model analysis). The overall gastrointestinal symptom and dyspepsia sum scores improved at 12 weeks after intervention in the DA‐9701‐first treated group (adjusted P = 0.002 and 0.014, respectively) and also in the placebo‐first treated group (adjusted P = 0.019 and 0.039) compared with the baseline. Parkinsonian motor severity was not significantly affected by DA‐9701 treatment in both groups at 4 and 12 weeks after intervention. There were no drug‐related serious adverse events throughout the trial.

Conclusions

DA‐9701 therapy improved gastrointestinal symptom‐related quality of life, and 12 weeks of daily administration can relieve the overall severity of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease without affecting motor symptoms. (Clinical trial identifier: NCT02775591.) © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Toward an effective peripheral visceral analgesic: responding to the national opioid crisis

This minireiew summarizes recent new developments in visceral analgesics. This promising field is important, as a new approach to address abdominal pain with peripheral visceral analgesics is considered a key approach to addressing the current opioid crisis. Some of the novel compounds address peripheral pain mechanisms through modulation of opioid receptors via biased ligands, nociceptin/orphanin FQ opioid peptide (NOP) receptor, or dual action on NOP and μ-opioid receptor, buprenorphine and morphiceptin analogs. Other compounds target nonopioid mechanisms, including cannabinoid (CB2), N-methyl-d-aspartate, calcitonin gene-related peptide, estrogen, and adenosine A_2B receptors and transient receptor potential (TRP) channels (TRPV1, TRPV4, and TRPM8). Although current evidence is based predominantly on animal models of visceral pain, early human studies also support the evidence from the basic and animal research. This augurs well for the development of nonaddictive, visceral analgesics for treatment of chronic abdominal pain, an unmet clinical need.

Pharmacological, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacogenomic Aspects of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

This article reviews medications commonly used for the treatment of patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Specifically, we review the animal models that have been validated for the study of drug effects on sensation and motility; the preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology usually required for introduction of new drugs; the biomarkers that are validated for studies of sensation and motility endpoints with experimental medications in humans; the pharmacogenomics applied to these medications and their relevance to the FGIDs; and the pharmacology of agents that are applied or have potential for the treatment of FGIDs, including psychopharmacologic drugs.

Emerging drugs for functional dyspepsia

INTRODUCTION

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a relatively common gastrointestinal clinical condition that remains poorly understood. Controversies remain regarding the definition, pathophysiology and optimum treatment. The current treatment of FD is limited and no established regimen is available.

AREAS COVERED

Recent advances have improved our understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease and have led to the development of newer tailored therapies. Novel agents such as the motilin receptor agonist camicinal and the muscarinic M1 and M2 receptor antagonist acotiamide appear promising; however, the need for a safe and efficacious treatment remains largely unmet. This review describes the currently available management options for FD and critically evaluates emerging therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

The optimal treatment for FD is yet to be determined. A proton pump inhibitor or a prokinetic agent constitutes primary treatment. Helicobacter pylori testing and eradication is recommended. Based on currently available data, acotiamide appears promising, particularly in postprandial distress syndrome. Further large-scale multicentered trials are required to define the duration of treatment and the side-effect profile.

[Current issues in functional dyspepsia]

Functional dyspepsia is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders encountered in clinical practice. Functional dyspepsia is currently defined by Rome III criteria as the chronic dyspeptic symptoms (postprandial fullness, early satiety, epigastric pain or burning) in the absence of underling structural or metabolic disease that readily explain the symptoms. According to the Rome III consensus, functional dyspepsia can be subdivided into postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS). Although the Rome III criteria have been published more than 8 years ago, not much effort has been put into validating these criteria and direct scientific evidence supporting the validity of the subdividing functional dyspepsia into PDS and EPS are lacking. This article is intended to review the validity of the Rome III criteria on the subdivisions of functional dyspepsia, i.e. PDS and EPS. The impact of sleep disorder, Helicobacter pylori-associated dyspepsia, and the emerging drug therapies in functional dyspepsia will also be discussed in this article.

From ischochymia to gastroparesis: proposed mechanisms and preferred management of dyspepsia over the centuries

Dyspeptic symptoms are common with most patients suffering functional disorders that remain a therapeutic challenge for medical practitioners. Within the last three decades, gastric infection, altered motility, and hypersensitivity have gained and lost traction in explaining the development of functional dyspepsia. Considering these shifts, the aim of this review was to analyze changing understanding of and approaches to dyspepsia over a longer time period. Monographs, textbooks, and articles published during the last three centuries show that our understanding of normal gastric function has improved dramatically. With increased insight came new ideas about disease mechanisms, diagnostic options, and treatments. Despite shifts over time, the importance of functional abnormalities was recognized early on and explained in the context of societal influences and stressors, anxieties, and biological influences, thus resembling the contemporary biopsychosocial model of illness. Symptoms were often attributed to changes in secretion, motility, and sensation or perception with technological innovation often influencing proposed mechanisms and treatments. Many of the principles or even agents applied more than a century ago are still part of today's approach. This includes acid suppression, antiemetics, analgesics, and even non-pharmacologic therapies, such as gastric decompression or electrical stimulation of the stomach. This historical information does not only help us understand how we arrived at our current state of knowledge and standards of care, it also demonstrates that enthusiastic adoption of various competing explanatory models and the resulting treatments often did not survive the test of time. In view of the benign prognosis of dyspepsia, the data may function as a call for caution to avoid the potential harm of overly aggressive approaches or treatments with a high likelihood of adverse effects.

DA-9701: A New Multi-Acting Drug for the Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia

Motilitone^® (DA-9701) is a new herbal drug that was launched for the treatment of functional dyspepsia in December 2011 in Korea. The heterogeneous symptom pattern and multiple causes of functional dyspepsia have resulted in multiple drug target strategies for its treatment. DA-9701, a compound consisting of a combination of Corydalis Tuber and Pharbitidis Semen, has being developed for treatment of functional dyspepsia. It has multiple mechanisms of action such as fundus relaxation, visceral analgesia, and prokinetic effects. Furthermore, it was found to significantly enhance meal-induced gastric accommodation and increase gastric compliance in dogs. DA-9701 also showed an analgesic effect in rats with colorectal distension induced visceral hypersensitivity and an antinociceptive effect in beagle dogs with gastric distension-induced nociception. The pharmacological effects of DA-9701 also include conventional effects, such as enhanced gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit. The safety profi le of DA-9701 is also preferable to that of other treatments.

Abdominal bloating: pathophysiology and treatment

Abdominal bloating is a very common and troublesome symptom of all ages, but it has not been fully understood to date. Bloating is usually associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders or organic diseases, but it may also appear alone. The pathophysiology of bloating remains ambiguous, although some evidences support the potential mechanisms, including gut hypersensitivity, impaired gas handling, altered gut microbiota, and abnormal abdominal-phrenic reflexes. Owing to the insufficient understanding of these mechanisms, the available therapeutic options are limited. However, medical treatment with some prokinetics, rifaximin, lubiprostone and linaclotide could be considered in the treatment of bloating. In addition, dietary intervention is important in relieving symptom in patients with bloating.

Current management strategies and emerging treatments for functional dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia refers to painful and nonpainful symptoms that are perceived to arise in the upper digestive tract but are not secondary to organic, systemic or metabolic diseases. The symptoms of this syndrome often overlap with those of GERD and IBS, making its management far from simple. If Helicobacter pylori infection is diagnosed in patients with functional dyspepsia, it should be treated. In patients with mild or intermittent symptoms, reassurance and lifestyle advice might be sufficient; in patients not responding to these measures, or in those with more severe symptoms, drug therapy should be considered. Both PPIs and prokinetics can be used in initial empirical pharmacotherapy based on symptom patterns--a PPI is more likely to be effective in the presence of retrosternal or epigastric burning or epigastric pain, whereas a prokinetic is more effective in dyspepsia with early satiation or postprandial fullness. Although combinations of PPIs and prokinetics might have additive symptomatic effects, single-drug therapy is initially preferable. Antidepressants or referral to a psychiatrist or psychotherapist can be considered in nonresponders and in those whose symptoms have a marked effect on daily functioning. Despite extensive research, functional dyspepsia treatment often remains unsatisfactory. Better characterization of dyspeptic subgroups and understanding of underlying mechanisms will enable treatment advances to be made in the future.

Drug development for the irritable bowel syndrome: current challenges and future perspectives

Medications are frequently used for the treatment of patients with the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), although their actual benefit is often debated. In fact, the recent progress in our understanding of the pathophysiology of IBS, accompanied by a large number of preclinical and clinical studies of new drugs, has not been matched by a significant improvement of the armamentarium of medications available to treat IBS. The aim of this review is to outline the current challenges in drug development for IBS, taking advantage of what we have learnt through the Rome process (Rome I, Rome II, and Rome III). The key questions that will be addressed are: (a) do we still believe in the "magic bullet," i.e., a very selective drug displaying a single receptor mechanism capable of controlling IBS symptoms? (b) IBS is a "functional disorder" where complex neuroimmune and brain-gut interactions occur and minimal inflammation is often documented: do we need to target gut motility, visceral sensitivity, or minimal inflammation? (c) are there validated biomarkers (accepted by regulatory agencies) for studies of sensation and motility with experimental medications in humans? (d) do animal models have predictive and translational value? (e) in the era of personalized medicine, does pharmacogenomics applied to these medications already play a role? Finally, this review will briefly outline medications currently used or in development for IBS. It is anticipated that a more focused interaction between basic science investigators, pharmacologists, and clinicians will lead to better treatment of IBS.

Human experimental pain models for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of analgesic drugs

Pain models in animals have shown low predictivity for analgesic efficacy in humans, and clinical studies are often very confounded, blurring the evaluation. Human experimental pain models may therefore help to evaluate mechanisms and effect of analgesics and bridge findings from basic studies to the clinic. The present review outlines the concept and limitations of human experimental pain models and addresses analgesic efficacy in healthy volunteers and patients. Experimental models to evoke pain and hyperalgesia are available for most tissues. In healthy volunteers, the effect of acetaminophen is difficult to detect unless neurophysiological methods are used, whereas the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could be detected in most models. Anticonvulsants and antidepressants are sensitive in several models, particularly in models inducing hyperalgesia. For opioids, tonic pain with high intensity is attenuated more than short-lasting pain and nonpainful sensations. Fewer studies were performed in patients. In general, the sensitivity to analgesics is better in patients than in healthy volunteers, but the lower number of studies may bias the results. Experimental models have variable reliability, and validity shall be interpreted with caution. Models including deep, tonic pain and hyperalgesia are better to predict the effects of analgesics. Assessment with neurophysiologic methods and imaging is valuable as a supplement to psychophysical methods and can increase sensitivity. The models need to be designed with careful consideration of pharmacological mechanisms and pharmacokinetics of analgesics. Knowledge obtained from this review can help design experimental pain studies for new compounds entering phase I and II clinical trials.

Current management of functional dyspepsia: impact of Rome III subdivision

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a highly prevalent disease characterized by symptoms originating from the gastroduodenal region in the absence of underlying organic disease. The Rome III consensus made a distinction between meal-induced and meal-unrelated symptoms and proposed subdivision of FD into postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome. The applicability of this subdivision and the impact on management are areas of active research. So far, empirical approaches are still employed for the treatment of FD, although various therapeutic modalities for FD have been explored; acid-suppressive, prokinetic, and fundic relaxant drugs, antidepressants and psychological therapies. FD remains a challenge and presents unmet clinical needs.

Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction

OPINION STATEMENT

Opioid analgesics are commonly prescribed for moderate to severe pain. Opioids exert effects via receptors in the central and enteric nervous systems. Thus, central opioid analgesia can be limited by side effects involving the gastrointestinal tract, particularly by gastrointestinal motility delay. Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction is commonly treated with bulking agents, stimulant laxatives, lubiprostone, and tegaserod (removed from the market in March 2007). However, these treatments' efficacy in opioid bowel dysfunction has not been proven. Recent research has focused on developing peripheral μ opioid antagonists such as methylnatrexone and alvimopan. These drugs selectively block μ opioid receptors in the enteric nervous system without penetrating the blood-brain barrier and can avert adverse gastrointestinal symptoms of opioids without reducing central analgesia. Methylnaltrexone and alvimopan also reduce hospitalization duration in surgical patients with postoperative ileus. A second line of research has focused on peripheral κ opioid agonists that modulate nociception in the enteric nervous system without producing central nervous system side effects. Asimadoline and fedotozine reduce nociceptive reflexes caused by gut distention and improve pain symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. ADL 10-0101 (Adolor Corp., Exton, PA) is another peripheral κ opioid agonist that lowers pain scores in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Although peripheral κ opioid agonists are promising, clinical studies are needed to assess their efficacy in treating opioid-induced bowel dysfunction.

Review article: endpoints used in functional dyspepsia drug therapy trials

BACKGROUND

The measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in treatment trials for functional gastrointestinal disorders is a matter of controversy.

AIM

To focus on instruments and endpoints that have been used to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic agents in functional dyspepsia (FD) trials, also considering the newly defined Rome III FD criteria.

METHODS

A Medline search was conducted to identify relevant studies pertaining to FD treatment, with particular emphasis on the studies to date which have used validated outcome measures.

RESULTS

Currently available outcome measures are heterogeneous across studies. They include global binary endpoints, analogue or categorical scoring scales, uni- or multi-dimensional disease specific questionnaires, global outcome evaluations and quality of life questionnaires. Across the available outcome measures, substantial heterogeneity is found, not only in the type of endpoint measure, but also in the number and types of symptoms that are considered to be part of the FD symptom complex. Especially based on content validity, none of the existing questionnaires or endpoints can be considered sufficiently validated to be recommended unequivocally as the primary outcome measure for FD trials according to the Rome III criteria. On the other hand, existing well-validated multi-dimensional questionnaires that include many non-FD symptoms can be narrowed down to evaluate only the cardinal symptoms according to Rome III.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an urgent need to develop Rome III-based patient-reported outcomes for functional dyspepsia. Well-validated multi-dimensional questionnaires may serve as a guidance for this purpose, and could also be considered for use in ongoing clinical trials.

Current medical treatments of dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome

Dyspepsia is a highly prevalent condition characterized by symptoms originating in the gastroduodenal region without underlying organic disorder. Treatment modalities include acid-suppressive drugs, gastroprokinetic drugs, Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, tricyclic antidepressants, and psychological therapies. Irritable bowel syndrome is a multifactorial, lower functional gastrointestinal disorder involving disturbances of the brain-gut axis. The pathophysiology provides the basis for pharmacotherapy: abnormal gastrointestinal motor functions, visceral hypersensitivity, psychosocial factors, intraluminal changes, and mucosal immune activation. Medications targeting chronic constipation or diarrhea may also relieve irritable bowel syndrome. Novel approaches to treatment require approval, and promising agents are guanylate cyclase cagonists, atypical benzodiazepines, antibiotics, immune modulators, and probiotics.

Novel pharmacology: asimadoline, a kappa-opioid agonist, and visceral sensation

Asimadoline is a potent kappa-opioid receptor agonist with a diaryl acetamide structure. It has high affinity for the kappa receptor, with IC(50) of 5.6 nmol L(-1) (guinea pig) and 1.2 nmol L(-1) (human recombinant), and high selectively with kappa : micro : delta binding ratios of 1 : 501 : 498 in human recombinant receptors. It acts as a complete agonist in in vitro assay. Asimadoline reduced sensation in response to colonic distension at subnoxious pressures in healthy volunteers and in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients without alteration of colonic compliance. Asimadoline reduced satiation and enhanced the postprandial gastric volume (in female volunteers). However, there were no significant effects on gastrointestinal transit, colonic compliance, fasting or postprandial colonic tone. In a clinical trial in 40 patients with functional dyspepsia (Rome II), asimadoline did not significantly alter satiation or symptoms over 8 weeks. However, asimadoline, 0.5 mg, significantly decreased satiation in patients with higher postprandial fullness scores, and daily postprandial fullness severity (over 8 weeks); the asimadoline 1.0 mg group was borderline significant. In a clinical trial in patients with IBS, average pain 2 h post-on-demand treatment with asimadoline was not significantly reduced. Post hoc analyses suggest that asimadoline was effective in mixed IBS. In a 12-week study in 596 patients, chronic treatment with 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg asimadoline was associated with adequate relief of pain and discomfort, improvement in pain score and number of pain-free days in patients with IBS-D. The 1.0 mg dose was also efficacious in IBS-alternating. There were also weeks with significant reduction in bowel frequency and urgency. Asimadoline has been well tolerated in human trials to date.

Asimadoline, a kappa-opioid agonist, and satiation in functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Asimadoline, a kappa-opioid agonist, reduces visceral sensitivity in experimental animal models and may decrease satiation and postprandial fullness in healthy individuals. However, its effect on satiation in functional dyspepsia is unclear, and any symptom benefit has not been explored.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of asimadoline on satiation volume and postchallenge symptoms in functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind trial evaluated gastric satiation and symptoms before and after 8 weeks of asimadoline 0.5 mg (n = 13) or 1.0 mg (n = 13) or placebo (n = 14) b.d. in patients with functional dyspepsia (Rome II). Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and Nepean Dyspepsia Index were used to assess symptoms during the 8-week treatment.

RESULTS

Over 8 weeks of treatment, asimadoline had no significant effect on maximum-tolerated volume or aggregate symptom score with nutrient drink challenge, and on the mean of the total daily symptom severity score compared to placebo. In a post hoc analysis, asimadoline 0.5 mg significantly increased the maximum-tolerated volume (1217 mL +/- 90.2) compared to placebo (807 mL +/- 111.8) in patients with higher postprandial fullness scores (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Asimadoline overall did not significantly alter maximum-tolerated volume, symptoms postnutrient challenge or symptoms over 8 weeks in functional dyspepsia.

Opioid modulation of ferret vagal afferent mechanosensitivity

Despite universal use of opioids in the clinic to inhibit pain, there is relatively little known of their peripheral actions on sensory nerve endings, where in fact they may be better targeted with more widespread applications. Here we show differential effects of mu-, kappa-, and delta-opioids on mechanosensitive ferret esophageal vagal afferent endings investigated in vitro. The effects of selective agonists [d-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly-ol(5)]-enkephalin (DAMGO), 2-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methyl-N-[(1S)-1phenyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl) ethyl] acetamide hydrochlorine (ICI 199441), and (+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide (SNC-80), respectively, on mechanosensory stimulus-response functions were quantified. DAMGO (10(-7) to 10(-5) M) reduced the responses of tension receptors to circumferential tension (1-5 g) by up to 50%, and the responses of mucosal receptors to mucosal stroking (10-1,000 mg von Frey hair) by >50%. DAMGO effects were reversed by naloxone (10(-5) M). Tension/mucosal (TM) receptor responses to tension and stroking were unaffected by DAMGO. ICI 199441 (10(-6) to 10(-5) M) potently inhibited all responses except TM receptor responses to tension, and SNC-80 (10(-5) to 10(-3) M) had no effect other than a minor inhibition of mucosal receptor responses to intense stimuli at 10(-3) M. We conclude that mu- and kappa-opioids have potent and selective peripheral effects on esophageal vagal afferents that may have applications in treatment of disorders of visceral sensation.

Current treatments in functional dyspepsia

By nature of the definition of functional dyspepsia (FD), organic causes have to be ruled out before therapy can be directed. However, in uninvestigated dyspepsia in the absence of alarm features, Helicobacter pylori "test and treat" or an empiric trial of acid suppression therapy for 4 to 8 weeks is reasonable. If alarm symptoms or signs are present, or if the dyspepsia symptoms first occur in those aged greater than 55 years, prompt esophagogastroduodenoscopy is mandatory to exclude serious disease and positively diagnose FD. Empiric acid suppression with H(2)-receptor antagonists or proton-pump inhibitors is superior to placebo in treatment of FD, but those patients with meal-related symptoms are least likely to respond. Helicobacter pylori eradication in FD benefits a minority of cases but is worthwhile, as response may be maintained. There is increasing evidence that some prokinetics may be superior to placebo in treatment of FD, but probably only a minority respond; those with meal-related symptoms may have the best response. Antidepressant therapy may have a place in management of difficult cases, but adequate randomized controlled trials are unavailable.

Functional Dyspepsia: A New Rome III Paradigm

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a condition commonly seen in gastroenterological practice. With the introduction of Rome III criteria in 2006, a new approach for categorizing patients has been recommended. The diagnostic criteria suggest that meal-related and pain-predominant symptom groupings that presumably have distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms and potentially different therapeutic targets exist. The new classification is in the early stages of testing; in the meantime, the umbrella term of FD should continue to be utilized in clinical practice. Treatment of FD remains a major challenge. Unfortunately, most of the agents used in practice have limited or no evidence of efficacy, and the results typically are short-lived once therapy is ceased. Appropriate therapy currently is based on a consideration of putative pathophysiologic mechanisms. Testing for and eradicating Helicobacter pylori is a first-line strategy irrespective of the symptom pattern. In patients who have epigastric pain, antisecretory agents are recommended. Antacids, bismuth, and sucralfate seem to be no better than placebo. For meal-related symptoms such as postprandial fullness or early satiety, prokinetics may confer some benefit. However, few choices are available, and the efficacy for those drugs on the market is limited at best. Antidepressants are of uncertain efficacy but are widely used. Psychological therapies seem promising and may confer benefits on both pain and meal-related symptoms. Efficacy of complementary medicines has been suggested in controlled trials, but more data are needed. Emerging treatments include gastric fundus relaxors and visceral analgesics, although their application in FD is still in the preliminary stages.

Peripheral opioid analgesia: from experimental to clinical studies

Previous experimental findings demonstrating that the local administration of opioids produces dose-dependent and naloxone-reversible analgesic effects, which are restricted to the periphery, have now been confirmed in clinical studies. Accordingly, opioid receptors have been identified on peripheral sensory neurons of animals and humans. In addition to their efficacy in somatic pain, peripheral opioids potently inhibit visceral pain. These effects are enhanced under inflammatory conditions. Initial clinical trials have now examined local opioid effects in chronic inflammatory states such as arthritis. They demonstrated surprisingly long-lasting analgesic effects, probably caused by additional anti-inflammatory effects. The introduction of a new generation of opioids that act selectively in the periphery may open a novel approach to treating pain effectively without undesirable central side-effects such as respiratory depression and addiction.

Recent insights into digestive motility in functional dyspepsia

Functional gastrointestinal disorders, such as functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome, are common pathologies of the gut. FD is a clinical syndrome defined as chronic or recurrent pain or discomfort of unknown origin in the upper abdomen. The pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for FD have not been fully elucidated, but new ideas regarding its pathophysiology and the significance of the pathophysiology with respect to the symptom pattern of FD have emerged. In particular, there is growing interest in alterations in gastric motility, such as accommodation to a meal or gastric emptying, and visceral sensation in FD. The mechanisms underlying impaired gastroduodenal motor function are unclear, but possible factors include abnormal neurohormonal function, autonomic dysfunction, visceral hypersensitivity to acid or mechanical distention, Helicobacter pylori infection, acute gastrointestinal infection, psychosocial comorbidity, and stress. Although the optimum treatment for FD is not yet clearly established, acid-suppressive drugs, prokinetic agents, eradication of H. pylori, and antidepressants have been widely used in the management of patients with FD. The therapeutic efficacy of prokinetics such as itopride hydrochloride and mosapride citrate in the treatment of FD is supported by the results of relatively large and well-controlled studies. In addition, recent research has yielded new therapeutic agents and modalities for dysmotility in FD, including agonists/antagonists of various sensorimotor receptors, activation of the nitrergic pathway, kampo medicine, acupuncture, and gastric electric stimulation. This review discusses recent research on the pathophysiology of and treatment options for FD, with special attention given to digestive dysmotility.

Review article: current and emerging therapies for functional dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia represents a heterogeneous group of gastrointestinal disorders marked by the presence of upper abdominal pain or discomfort. Although its precise definition has evolved over the last several decades, this disorder remains shrouded in controversy. The symptoms of functional dyspepsia may overlap with those of other functional bowel disorders including irritable bowel syndrome and non-erosive reflux disease. There may be coexistent psychological distress or disease complicating its presentation and response to therapy. Given the prevalence and chronicity of functional dyspepsia, it remains a great burden to society. Suspected physiological mechanisms underlying functional dyspepsia include altered motility, altered visceral sensation, inflammation, nervous system dysregulation and psychological distress. Yet the exact pathophysiological mechanisms that cause symptoms in an individual patient remain difficult to delineate. Numerous treatment modalities have been employed including dietary modifications, pharmacological agents directed at various targets within the gastrointestinal tract and central nervous system, psychological therapies and more recently, complementary and alternative treatments. Unfortunately, to date, all of these therapies have yielded only marginal results. A variety of emerging therapies are being developed for functional dyspepsia. Most of these therapies are intended to normalize pain perception and gastrointestinal motor and reflex function in this group of patients.

Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic aspects of functional gastrointestinal disorders

Medications are commonly used for the treatment of patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. The general goal of this report is to review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacology of medications used in functional gastrointestinal disorders. Methods included literature review, consensus evaluation of the evidence for each topic assigned originally to 1 or 2 authors, and broader review at a harmonization session as part of the Rome III process. This report reviews the animal models that have been validated for the study of effects of pharmacologic agents on sensation and motility; the preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology usually required for introduction of novel therapeutic agents; the biomarkers validated for studies of sensation and motility end points with experimental medications in humans; the pharmacogenomics applied to these medications and disorders; and the pharmacology of agents that are applied or have potential for treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders, including psychopharmacologic agents. Clinician and basic investigators involved in the treatment or investigation of functional gastrointestinal disorders or disease models need to have a comprehensive understanding of a vast range of medications. It is anticipated that the interaction between investigators of basic science, basic and applied pharmacology, and clinical trials will lead to better treatment of these disorders.

Treatment of functional dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common reason a patient presents with upper gastrointestinal symptoms for medical care. Although treatment of FD remains expensive, the agents are rarely used in a systematic manner; the majority of treatments are empirical and the results short lived once therapy is ceased. This is partly due to the lack of consistent pathophysiologic markers in FD, so therapy is symptom driven. This review appraises the best evidence on available interventions. A structured scheme for deciding on appropriate therapies is to consider the possible putative pathophysiologic mechanisms. Eradicating Helicobacter pylori, if present, is a first-line strategy. In patients who have symptoms suggesting excessive gastric acid secretion, particularly epigastric pain, antisecretory agents are recommended. Prokinetics may confer benefits on symptoms suggestive of upper gastrointestinal dysmotility, like fullness or early satiety. However, their use is limited due to availability issues. The expanding field of psychologic therapies provides a promising avenue of treatment. Complementary medicines are now widely use and their benefits have been suggested in recent controlled trials. Emerging treatments include cholecystokinin 1 blockers, opioid receptor agonists, and serotonergic agents, although their application in FD is in the preliminary stages.

Drugs affecting visceral sensitivity: ready for the prime time?

Visceral sensitivity has been recognized over the last decade as a frequent pathophysiological component of functional bowel disorders. Studies in animals and humans have identified numerous neurotransmitters involved in the processing of sensations from the gut to the brain. However, up to now none of them has actually been proven to have a marked clinical efficacy and the benefit comes rather from their action of bowel disturbances. Reproducible tests are lacking to detect visceral hypersensitivity in humans and distension tests are difficult to undertake in a clinical setting. Therefore, abnormal visceral sensitivity may not be regarded as a tool to select IBS patients as candidates for a given treatment.

Peripheral opioids for functional GI disease: a reappraisal

Opioids have been used medicinally and recreationally for thousands of years. The clinical use of opioids for gastrointestinal conditions has been limited by central nervous system side effects. A new generation of peripheral opioid receptor ligands free of central nervous system side effects is being developed. Clinical trials with the peripherally acting mu opioid receptor antagonists' alvimopan and N-methylnaltrexone show promise for improving postoperative ileus- and opioid-induced constipation. Likewise, preliminary studies with the peripherally acting kappa opioid agonist fedotozine showed promise in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia. Further studies are on hold presumably due to lack of efficacy in subsequent studies. However, clinical studies are underway for newer kappa opioid agonists such as asimadoline and ADL 10-0101.

Opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction

Use of opioid analgesics is associated with a number of side effects, especially opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction. The extensive use of these compounds and the significant negative impact of the resulting gastrointestinal dysfunction on patients' quality of life make it an important clinical issue. In recent years our understanding of the mechanisms of opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction has advanced greatly. This article reviews the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of specific gastrointestinal adverse effects of opioids. The role of endogenous opioid peptides in certain gastrointestinal diseases is also discussed. A better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction should lead to the development of newer opioid analgesics and improved regimens resulting in reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects.

Functional dyspepsia pathogenesis and therapeutic options--implications for management

Functional dyspepsia is far more common than dyspepsia due to organic disease, both in the community and general practice. Proposed aetiopathogenic factors include gastric acid, Helicobacter pylori infection, delayed emptying, hypersensitivity or impaired accommodation of the stomach, dysfunction of the duodenum or brain-gut axis, psychosocial morbidity and post-infective mucosal damage. More effective therapy will depend on the development of drugs targeted at these putative pathophysiological mechanisms. On current evidence tricyclic antidepressants appear to be more effective than either acid suppressants or H. pylori eradication.

Frontiers in functional dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia (FD) refers to unexplained pain or discomfort in the upper abdomen and is commonly seen in gastroenterology practice. The underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with FD are unclear, although traditionally, delayed gastric emptying, visceral hypersensitivity to acid or mechanical distention, and impaired gastric accommodation have been implicated as putative physiologic disturbances. It also remains uncertain whether FD and irritable bowel syndrome are different presentations of the same disorder. Recent data on pathophysiologic mechanisms of FD have focused on postprandial motor disturbances (accelerated gastric emptying, antral-fundic incoordination, and abnormal phasic contractions), alterations of neurohormonal mechanisms in response to a meal, and previous acute infection. Pharmacologic therapies for FD may be guided by these novel mechanisms, as current available therapeutic options are limited. Novel prokinetics and gastric accommodation modulators, visceral analgesics, and agents targeting the neurohormonal response to food ingestion are the next therapeutic frontiers in FD. This review summarizes traditional knowledge and more recent advances in the pathophysiology of FD and potential therapeutic opportunities.

New and emerging treatments for irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia

The symptomatic management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia, which often overlap, can be frustrating and difficult. Education and reassurance remain central for management although controlled trials are lacking. Psychological interventions may be useful in select patients but methodological inadequacies in clinical trials limit their interpretability. For symptom exacerbations, drug treatment is reasonable but no current treatment successfully targets the full symptom complex. Bulking agents are not of proven efficacy in IBS; they may improve constipation but worsen bloating and pain. Anticholinergics are of uncertain value in IBS. A meta-analysis of trials of smooth muscle relaxants for IBS has been reported to be positive but the quality of the trials included was poor. Antidepressants for IBS and functional dyspepsia appear to be efficacious based on the limited published evidence; both global symptoms and abdominal pain improve. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are of uncertain efficacy but anecdotally appear to be useful. Laxatives are not of proven efficacy in IBS. Loperamide improves diarrhea, but not abdominal pain in IBS. No drug is of proven efficacy for bloating. Acid suppression remains the mainstay of therapy for functional dyspepsia but the majority of patients do not have an adequate response. Promising drugs include new prokinetics for constipation-predominant IBS (e.g., tegaserod, a partial 5-HT4 agonist, prucalopride, a full 5-HT4 agonist, and dexloxiglumide, a cholecystokinin1 antagonist), agents for diarrhea-predominant IBS (e.g., 5-HT3 antagonists, alpha2 receptor agonists and corticotrophin receptor-1 antagonists), other visceral analgesics (e.g. tachykinin antagonists, opioid agonists) and in dyspepsia fundus relaxing agents (e.g., 5-HT1 agonists, tegaserod).

Review article: drugs interfering with visceral sensitivity for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders--the clinical evidence

At present, the concept of visceral hypersensitivity provides the leading hypothesis regarding the generation of symptoms in functional gastrointestinal disorders. This paper discusses the current clinical evidence for drugs that have been proposed to interfere with visceral sensitivity in functional gastrointestinal disorders. Several possible pharmacological targets have been identified to reduce visceral pain and to reverse the processes underlying the persistence of visceral hypersensitivity. However, most of the available evidence comes from experimental animal models and cannot simply be extrapolated to patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. In this review, we selected five drug classes that have been shown to exhibit visceral analgesic properties in experimental studies, and of which data were available regarding their clinical efficacy. These included opioid substances, serotonergic agents, antidepressants, somatostatin analogues and alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists. Although clinical trials show a limited benefit, in particular for serotonergic agents, the evidence illustrating that these effects result from normalization of visceral sensation is currently lacking. Therefore, we conclude that the concept of targeting visceral hypersensitivity as a treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders is still controversial. Future evaluations require patient selection based on the presence of visceral hypersensitivity and application of compounds that exhibit 'true' viscerosensory effects.

Functional dyspepsia: drugs for new (and old) therapeutic targets

The therapeutic management of functional dyspepsia remains a major challenge for the gastroenterologist. Current therapies available are based on putative underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, including gastric acid sensitivity, slow gastric emptying and Helicobacter pylori infection, but only a small proportion of patients achieve symptomatic benefit from these therapeutic approaches. Relatively novel mechanistic concepts under testing include impaired gastric accomodation, visceral hypersensitivity, and central nervous system dysfunction. Serotonergic modulators (e.g. the 5-HT4 agonist tegaserod, the 5-HT3 antagonist alosetron and the 5-HT1P agonist sumatriptan), CCK-1 antagonists (e.g. dexloxiglumide), opioid agonists (e.g. asimadoline), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists (e.g dextromethorphan), neurokinin antagonists (e.g. talnetant), capsaicin-like agents and antidepressants are among the agents currently under investigation. It seems unlikely, however, that targeting a single mechanism with an individual drug will result in complete symptom remission in most cases.

How to improve drug development for functional disorders

Although several studies and publications have been devoted to the evaluation of novel pharmacotherapeutic approaches in functional bowel disorders, the number of successful drug development programs has been disappointingly small. The difficulties of adequate drug development are related to the heterogeneity of the functional disorders, the lack of understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, and the lack of short-term mechanistic studies that predict clinical outcome. When drugs address a single pathophysiological mechanism, the heterogeneity has a negative impact on the possible margin when patients are not selected on the basis of the specific pathophysiological disorder. Although mechanistic studies may provide a rationale for drug development, they do not predict symptomatic success and do not identify the most appropriate dose for clinical trials. Further mechanistic studies are badly needed to improve our understanding of the pathophysiological basis of functional disorders. Future studies might aim at the development of non-invasive test that identify relevant pathophysiological mechanisms, at refining assessment of symptom pattern and at the development of short-term therapeutic trials.

Effect of asimadoline, a kappa opioid agonist, on pain induced by colonic distension in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Visceral hypersensitivity plays a major role in irritable bowel syndrome pathophysiology. Opioid kappa receptors on afferent nerves may modulate it and be the target for new irritable bowel syndrome treatments.

AIM

This study evaluated the effect of the kappa opioid agonist asimadoline on perception of colonic distension and colonic compliance in irritable bowel syndrome patients.

METHOD

Twenty irritable bowel syndrome female patients (Rome II criteria; 40 +/- 13 years) and hypersensitivity to colonic distension (Pain threshold < or = 32 mmHg) were included in a randomized double-blind cross-over trial comparing the effect of a single oral dose of asimadoline 0.5 mg or placebo on sensory thresholds (defined as a constant and sustained sensation) elicited by left colon phasic distension (5 mmHg steps, 5 min) up to a sensation of abdominal pain. Colonic compliance was compared by the slope of the pressure-volume curves.

RESULTS

On asimadoline, pain threshold (mean +/- s.d.) (29.8 +/- 7.2 mmHg) was higher than on placebo (26.3 +/- 7.8 mmHg), difference not statistically significant (P = 0.1756, ANOVA). Area under curve of pain intensity rated at each distension step was significantly lower on asimadoline (89.3 +/- 33.9, ANOVA) than on placebo (108.1 +/- 29.7) (P = 0.0411). Thresholds of perception of nonpainful distensions were not altered on asimadoline, as compared with placebo. Colonic compliance was not different on placebo and asimadoline.

CONCLUSION

Asimadoline decreases overall perception of pain over a wide range of pressure distension of the colon in irritable bowel syndrome patients, without altering its compliance. These data suggest that further studies should explore the potential benefit of asimadoline in treatment of pain in irritable bowel syndrome patients.

Functional dyspepsia: motor abnormalities, sensory dysfunction, and therapeutic options

Functional dyspepsia is a common condition, but as yet, the underlying etiology is unclear. In this article, upper gastrointestinal motor and sensory physiology are reviewed and the current evidence for motor and/or sensory functional abnormalities causing dyspeptic symptoms is presented. The complex interrelationship between abnormal motor activity and sensation is explored, as well as the potential roles for autonomic dysfunction and psychological state in modulating gastrointestinal sensation and motor function. Finally, based on clinical trial evidence, a treatment pathway for functional dyspepsia is suggested.

Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia is a common chronic condition. It can have a major impact on quality of life and remains a large burden on healthcare resources. Its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood and therapies are mainly empirical. In this review, we summarize the best evidence on available therapeutic interventions in functional dyspepsia. Helicobacter pylori eradication, for those infected, is likely a safe and cost-effective strategy but benefits only a minority. Antisecretory agents such as proton-pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists have shown some benefit and are recommended as the first-line option in the absence of H. pylori infection. There is a lack of strong evidence of benefit from prokinetic agents, and cisapride, the most studied agent, is largely unavailable. Antidepressants need to be adequately tested in functional dyspepsia, but both psychotherapy and hypnotherapy interventions have shown promising results. Herbal therapies need further study in these patients. 5-Hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT(3)) and 5-HT(4) receptor antagonists, and cholecystokinin type A and neurokinin receptor antagonists remain promising emerging therapies.

Current concepts in diabetic gastroparesis

Diabetic gastroparesis is a common and debilitating condition affecting millions of patients with diabetes mellitus worldwide. Although gastroparesis in diabetes has been known clinically for more than 50 years, treatment options remain very limited. Until recently, the scientific literature has offered few clues regarding the precise aetiology of gastric dysfunction in diabetes.Up to 50% of patients with diabetes may experience postprandial abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and bloating secondary to gastric dysfunction. There is no clear association between length of disease and the onset of delayed gastric emptying. Gastroparesis affects both type 1 (insulin dependent) and type 2 (non- insulin dependent) forms of diabetes. Diagnosis requires identifying the proper symptom complex, while excluding other entities (peptic ulcer disease, rheumatological diseases, medication effects). The diagnosis of gastroparesis may be confirmed by demonstrating gastric emptying delay during a 4-hour scintigraphic study. Treatment options are limited and rely on dietary modifications, judicious use of available pharmacological agents, and occasionally surgical or endoscopic placement of gastrostomies or jejunostomies. Gastric pacing offers promise for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis but awaits further investigation. Current pharmacological agents for treating gastroparesis include metoclopramide, erythromycin, cisapride (only available via a company-sponsored programme) and domperidone (not US FDA approved). All of these drugs act as promotility agents that increase the number or the intensity of gastric contractions. These medications are not uniformly effective and all have adverse effects that limit their use. Cisapride has been removed from the open market as a result of over 200 reported cases of cardiac toxicity attributed to its use. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of clinical studies that clearly define the efficacy of these agents in diabetic gastroparesis and there are no studies that compare these drugs to each other. The molecular pathophysiology of diabetic gastroparesis is unknown, limiting the development of rational therapies. New studies, primarily in animals, point to a defect in the enteric nervous system as a major molecular cause of abnormal gastric motility in diabetes. This defect is characterised by a loss of nitric oxide signals from nerves to muscles in the gut resulting in delayed gastric emptying. Novel therapies designed to augment nitric oxide signalling are being studied.

Current concepts in diabetic gastroparesis

Diabetic gastroparesis is a common and debilitating condition affecting millions of patients with diabetes mellitus worldwide. Although gastroparesis in diabetes has been known clinically for more than 50 years, treatment options remain very limited. Until recently, the scientific literature has offered few clues regarding the precise aetiology of gastric dysfunction in diabetes.Up to 50% of patients with diabetes may experience postprandial abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and bloating secondary to gastric dysfunction. There is no clear association between length of disease and the onset of delayed gastric emptying. Gastroparesis affects both type 1 (insulin dependent) and type 2 (non- insulin dependent) forms of diabetes. Diagnosis requires identifying the proper symptom complex, while excluding other entities (peptic ulcer disease, rheumatological diseases, medication effects). The diagnosis of gastroparesis may be confirmed by demonstrating gastric emptying delay during a 4-hour scintigraphic study. Treatment options are limited and rely on dietary modifications, judicious use of available pharmacological agents, and occasionally surgical or endoscopic placement of gastrostomies or jejunostomies. Gastric pacing offers promise for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis but awaits further investigation. Current pharmacological agents for treating gastroparesis include metoclopramide, erythromycin, cisapride (only available via a company-sponsored programme) and domperidone (not US FDA approved). All of these drugs act as promotility agents that increase the number or the intensity of gastric contractions. These medications are not uniformly effective and all have adverse effects that limit their use. Cisapride has been removed from the open market as a result of over 200 reported cases of cardiac toxicity attributed to its use. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of clinical studies that clearly define the efficacy of these agents in diabetic gastroparesis and there are no studies that compare these drugs to each other. The molecular pathophysiology of diabetic gastroparesis is unknown, limiting the development of rational therapies. New studies, primarily in animals, point to a defect in the enteric nervous system as a major molecular cause of abnormal gastric motility in diabetes. This defect is characterised by a loss of nitric oxide signals from nerves to muscles in the gut resulting in delayed gastric emptying. Novel therapies designed to augment nitric oxide signalling are being studied.

Effects of asimadoline, a kappa-opioid agonist, on satiation and postprandial symptoms in health

AIM

To evaluate the effect of single administrations of asimadoline, a kappa-opioid agonist, on satiation volume, postprandial symptoms and gastric volumes.

METHODS

Healthy subjects received oral placebo, or 0.5 or 1.5 mg asimadoline in a randomized, double-blind fashion 1 h prior to testing. We assessed effects on the volume of Ensure to achieve full satiation and postprandial symptoms 30 min after meal, and on gastric volume (fasting and postprandial) measured by 99mTc-single photon emission tomography (SPECT) imaging.

RESULTS

Thirteen healthy subjects were studied in each treatment arm. Compared to placebo, asimadoline 0.5 mg decreased postprandial fullness (P = 0.027) without affecting the volume ingested at full satiation (P = 0.6). Asimadoline 1.5 mg decreased satiation during meal, allowing increased satiation volumes (P = 0.008) and tended to decrease postprandial fullness (P = 0.067), despite higher volumes ingested. There was a significant treatment-gender interaction in the effect of asimadoline on gastric volumes (P < 0.05). Asimadoline 0.5 mg (not 1.5 mg) increased fasting (P = 0.047) and postprandial (P = 0.009) gastric volumes in females but decreased fasting volumes in males (P = 0.008). The effect of asimadoline on gastric volume did not explain the effect observed on satiation volume (P = 0.371) or postprandial fullness (P = 0.399).

CONCLUSION

A single oral administration of asimadoline decreases satiation and postprandial fullness in humans independently of its effects on gastric volume.

Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia

Because there is currently no universally effective treatment for functional dyspepsia, a stepwise approach is useful. The initial steps should include 1) making a firm clinical diagnosis and providing the patient with appropriate information and reassurance; 2) ascertaining the reason for referral/consultation, as this determines what the patient will regard as a satisfactory outcome; 3) informing the patient that there is no universally effective drug treatment; and 4) giving dietary and general lifestyle advice, such as ingestion of smaller, more frequent meals, a low-fat diet, avoidance of certain foods that may exacerbate symptoms, limiting coffee and alcohol intake, smoking cessation, and stress management techniques. If the initial approach does not provide a satisfactory outcome, the following approaches may be helpful. Psychologic treatment approaches, such as hypnotherapy and/or antidepressants, have shown very encouraging results in recent studies and deserve active consideration. In patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia, the "test and treat" strategy for Helicobacter pylori is a cost-effective approach. Prokinetics are of possible benefit in subjects with delayed gastric emptying; however, the relationship between improvement of gastric emptying and symptom alleviation is weak. Furthermore, it needs to be recognized that treatments directed at acid suppression are generally of little sustained benefit, and that there is ongoing controversy as to whether H. pylori eradication is of direct benefit.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic gastroparesis and chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction

Chronic gastroparesis and CIP are debilitating disorders that are difficult to treat with currently available therapies. Failure of proper migration and differentiation of enteric neurons or ICC can result from specific genetic mutations and lead to phenotypes of CIP with or without concomitant gastroparesis. Intestinal dysfunction in diabetes may reflect a depletion of NO production (and perhaps other neurotransmitters or modulators), which is manifest as a syndrome of gastroparesis, diarrhea, or constipation in individual patients. As the key molecular changes underlying these disorders are defined, clinicians will begin to understand their precise etiology and rational medical therapy may become possible. In the future, testable hypotheses regarding the etiology of other functional bowel disorders (e.g., functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and so forth) may be developed.

Functional dyspepsia: evaluation and treatment

Functional dyspepsia is one of the most common disorders seen in general practice and by gastroenterologists. New concepts regarding the pathophysiology and its role for the symptom pattern have emerged during the last few years. This is of importance for development of new treatment alternatives in the near future. At the moment, however, empirical treatment with acid-suppressive agents and prokinetics is the recommended therapeutic approach in the management of these patients, despite limited efficacy. Identification and treatment of H pylori infection has been recommended for uninvestigated dyspepsia, because it may cure underlying peptic ulcer disease, but is unlikely to provide symptomatic benefit to patients with functional dyspepsia. Refractory patients may respond to antidepressants or to psychologic treatments, but proof of efficacy is limited. New and more effective approaches are badly needed for functional dyspepsia.