A prospective study of oesophageal function in patients with normal coronary angiograms and controls with angina

Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly (2023)

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the elderly is characterized by atypical symptoms, relatively severe esophageal injury, and more complications, and when GERD is treated, it is also necessary to fully consider the general health condition of the elderly patients. This consensus summarized the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis and treatment characteristics of GERD in the elderly, and provided relevant recommendations, providing guidance for medical personnel to correctly understand and standardize the diagnosis and treatment of GERD in the elderly.

Diagnosis and Management of Functional Chest Pain in the Rome IV Era

Functional chest pain accounts for about a third of the patients with noncardiac chest pain. It is a very common functional esophageal disorder that remains even today a management challenge to the practicing physician. Based on the definition offered by the Rome IV criteria, diagnosis of functional chest pain requires a negative workup of noncardiac chest pain patients that includes, proton pump inhibitor test or empirical proton pump inhibitor trial, endoscopy with esophageal mucosal biopsies, reflux testing, and esophageal manometry. The mainstay of treatment are neuromodulators that are primarily composed of anti-depressants. Alternative medicine and psychological interventions may be provided alone or in combination with other therapeutic modalities.

Acid reflux in patients with coronary artery disease and refractory chest pain

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of acid reflux on chest pain and ischemic events and the effects of cardiac drugs on acid reflux in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and refractory chest pain.

METHODS

Simultaneous 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and 24-hour continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) (Holter) results were obtained for 64 patients. Ischemic events and cardiac drug prescriptions were compared between the patients with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients fulfilling the GERD criteria received 14-day therapy with omeprazole at a dose of 20 mg bid. The results of the 24-hour pH monitoring, Holter and the SF-36 questionnaire were compared before treatment and again after two weeks of therapy.

RESULTS

GERD was identified in 38 (69%) patients, with 49% of all chest pain occurring in association with acid reflux. A higher incidence (p=0.033) and longer duration (p=0.040) of ischemic events were observed in the GERD (+) patients. More frequent combined use of cardiac drugs was found in the GERD (+) patients. However, fewer ischemic events and greater total SF-36 survey scores were noted after PPI therapy in the GERD (+) patients.

CONCLUSION

Acid reflux is common in patients with CAD and refractory chest pain. Refractory chest pain in patients with CAD can be partially noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) secondary to acid reflux. The combined use of common cardiac drugs may predispose or aggravate GERD. Short-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy not only restores a normal esophageal pH, but also significantly improves the general health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients.

Noncardiac chest pain: diagnostic evaluation

Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) is a common and challenging clinical problem. It is estimated that more than 70 million Americans (23% of the population) suffer from this condition yearly. Patients with NCCP represent a diagnostic dilemma. Their chest pain is often indistinguishable from cardiac pain leading to extensive and expensive evaluations. Once coronary artery disease and other cardiac and pulmonary sources of chest pain are excluded, patients are frequently referred to gastroenterologists to look primarily for esophageal sources of pain. A variety of diagnostic tests are available to the practicing clinician to identify the origin of pain, including ambulatory pH testing, esophageal motility, upper endoscopy, provocative testing and even therapeutic trials.

Chest pain of cardiac and noncardiac origin

Chest pain is one of the most common symptoms driving patients to a physician's office or the hospital's emergency department. In approximately half of the cases, chest pain is of cardiac origin, either ischemic cardiac or nonischemic cardiac disease. The other half is due to noncardiac causes, primarily esophageal disorder. Pain from either origin may occur in the same patient. In addition, psychological and psychiatric factors play a significant role in the perception and severity of the chest pain, irrespective of its cause. Chest pain of ischemic cardiac disease is called angina pectoris. Stable angina may be the prelude of ischemic cardiac disease; and for this reason, it is essential to ensure a correct diagnosis. In most cases, further testing, such as exercise testing and angiography, should be considered. The more severe form of chest pain, unstable angina, also requires a firm diagnosis because it indicates severe coronary disease and is the earliest manifestation of acute myocardial infarction. Once a diagnosis of stable or unstable angina is established, and if a decision is made not to use invasive therapy, such as coronary bypass, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or stent insertion, effective medical treatment of associated cardiac risk factors is a must. Acute myocardial infarction occurring after a diagnosis of angina greatly increases the risk of subsequent death. Chest pain in women warrants added attention because women underestimate their likelihood to have coronary heart disease. A factor that complicates the clinical assessment of patients with chest pain (both cardiac and noncardiac in origin) is the relatively common presence of psychological and psychiatric conditions such as depression or panic disorder. These factors have been found to cause or worsen chest pain; but unfortunately, they may not be easily detected. Noncardiac chest pain represents the remaining half of all cases of chest pain. Although there are a number of causes, gastroesophageal disorders are by far the most prevalent, especially gastroesophageal reflux disease. Fortunately, this disease can be diagnosed and treated effectively by proton-pump inhibitors. The other types of non-gastroesophageal reflux disease-related noncardiac chest pain are more difficult to diagnose and treat. In conclusion, the cause of chest pain must be accurately diagnosed; and treatment must be pursued according to the cause, especially if the cause is of cardiac origin.

Exercise-provoked esophageal motility disorder in patients with recurrent chest pain

AIM: To investigate the relationship between exercise-provoked esophageal motility disorders and the prognosis for patients with chest pain.

METHODS: The study involved 63 subjects with recurrent angina-like chest pain non-responsive to empirical therapy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI). In all, a coronary artery angiography, panendoscopy, 24-h esophageal pH-metry and manometry, as well as a treadmill stress test with simultaneous esophageal pH-metry and manometry monitoring, were performed. Thirty-five subjects had no significant coronary artery lesions, and 28 had more than 50% coronary artery narrowing. In patients with hypertensive esophageal motility disorders, a calcium antagonist was recommended. The average follow-up period was 977 ± 249 d.

RESULTS: The prevalence of esophageal disorders, such as gastroesophageal reflux or diffuse esophageal spasm, was similar in patients both with and without significant coronary artery narrowing. Exercise prompted esophageal motility disorders, such as a decrease in the percentage of peristaltic and effective contractions and their amplitude, as well as an increase in the percentage of simultaneous and non-effective contractions. In 14 (22%) patients the percentage of simultaneous contractions during the treadmill stress test exceeded the value of 55%. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the proportional hazard Cox regression model, it was shown that the administration of a calcium channel antagonist in patients with such an esophageal motility disorder significantly decreased the risk of hospitalization as a result of a suspicion of acute coronary syndrome after the 2.7-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION: In patients with chest pain non-responsive to PPIs, a diagnosis of exercise-provoked esophageal spasm may have the effect of lowering the risk of the next hospitalization.

Quality of life and psychological impact in patients with noncardiac chest pain

BACKGROUND

Chest pain is common and data regarding noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) in Asia are lacking.

AIM

To determine the differences in clinical presentations, psychologic impact, and quality of life between patients with NCCP and cardiac chest pain (CCP), and to identify any factors that impacted on these patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for the evaluation of chest pain were recruited in Hong Kong and Wuhan, China. One hundred and forty patients with abnormal and 141 patients with normal angiography were included in the study. The validated gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale, and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were used for assessment.

RESULTS

NCCP patients reported similar days-off work and impairment of their social life compared with those with CCP. No difference was found in the anxiety and depression scores between the 2 groups. NCCP patients with reflux symptoms had higher anxiety score (7.19 vs. 5.74, P=0.044), reported more interruption of their social life (26% vs. 5%, P<0.0001), and had taken more sick leaves (17% vs. 5%, P=0.018) compared with those without gastroesophageal reflux disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of life and psychologic impact of patients with NCCP were as significant as those with CCP. NCCP patients with reflux symptoms were more anxious and were impaired in their productivity and social life.

[Approach to thoracic pain from the gastroenterologist's point of view]

Chest pain is common in medical consultations. One of the most frequent and serious causes is acute ischemic heart disease, which must be ruled out. The gold standard is coronary angiography. Noncardiac recurrent chest pain has a favorable prognosis. The most frequent cause is esophageal disease, with a prevalence of between 20% and 50%. The most frequent form is gastroesophageal reflux disease followed by esophageal motor disorders. Empirical treatment with high-dose proton pump inhibitors should be considered as a diagnostic-therapeutic test before performing exhaustive complementary investigations of esophageal function. Among complementary tests, manometry combined with 24-hour pH-metry has the highest diagnostic yield. Antidepressants are an acceptable therapeutic option in patients with esophageal visceral hyperalgesia.

Does gastro-esophageal reflux provoke the myocardial ischemia in patients with CAD?

BACKGROUND

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) may cause chest pain. The aim was to determine the correlation between ischemia and gastro-esophageal reflux in patients with CAD and to assess the influence of short-term "anti-reflux" therapy on the ischemia in patients with GERD and CAD.

METHODS

Fifty patients with angiographically proven CAD underwent simultaneous 24-h continuous ECG and esophageal pH monitoring. We assessed the number of ST-segment depression episodes (ST dep.) and total duration of ischemic episodes, expressed as total ischemic burden (TIB). In pH-metry, we assessed: time percentage of pH lower than 4, total time of pH lower than 4 and the number of pathological refluxes (PR). Patients fulfilling the GERD criteria received a 7-day therapy with omeprazole 20 mg bid. On the 7th day of therapy, simultaneous Holter and esophageal pH monitoring was repeated.

RESULTS

Total number of 224 PRs in 42 patients (84%) was recorded during esophageal pH-metry. GERD criteria were fulfilled in 23 patients (46%). Out of 218 episodes of ST dep., 45 (20.6%) correlated with PR. GERD patients had larger TIB and higher number of ST dep. (p<0.015 and p<0.035, respectively). The anti-reflux therapy reduced all analyzed parameters of esophageal pH monitoring (p<0.0022) as well as the number of ST dep. (p<0.012) and TIB (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease is common in patients with CAD and may provoke myocardial ischemia. Short-term proton pump inhibitors therapy that restores normal esophageal pH significantly reduces myocardial ischemia, possibly due to elimination of acid-derived esophago-cardiac reflex compromising coronary perfusion-the phenomenon known as "linked angina".

The heart and the oesophagus: intimate relations

The close anatomical relations of the heart and oesophagus, and the similarity of symptoms attributable to disorders of either organ, often lead to diagnostic difficulty in patients with chest pain. A definitive diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain attributable to oesophageal reflux or spasm is hampered, both by the need for prolonged ambulatory monitoring of pH, manometry, and endoscopy, and by the common occurrence of asymptomatic reflux and spasm, and the corresponding difficulty in linking an episode of reflux or spasm with an episode of pain. Moreover, some patients with non-cardiac chest pain and normal tests of oesophageal structure and function have centrally mediated hypersensitivity, both within and without the oesophagus. Rather than proceed with investigations, in the absence of symptoms to suggest structural disease of the oesophagus, it would be reasonable to attempt symptomatic treatment with a proton pump inhibitor or an antidepressant.

Chest pain from gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with coronary artery disease

Management of patients with coronary artery disease is a major challenge for physicians, patients, and the healthcare system. Chest pain experienced by patients with coronary disease can be of noncardiac origin, and symptoms frequently related to gastroesophageal etiologies. The distal esophagus and the heart share a common afferent nerve supply, suggesting that location and radiation of perceived pain may be identical. In addition, there is substantial overlap between the prevalence of coronary disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Many physicians, including cardiologists, prescribe acid-reducing therapy to coronary patients. However, no prospective, randomized studies to date have evaluated the potential benefit of such treatments to prevent chest pain symptoms for these patients. We review the studies on noncardiac chest pain demonstrating reflux in patients with and without coronary disease. Also, the association of reflux with exertional chest pain and cardiac syndrome X is discussed. A rationale is presented for prevention of noncardiac chest pain in coronary patients, and the potential role of acid-suppressive therapy in managing these patients is discussed.

[Role of esophageal provocative tests in the investigation of patients with chest pain of undetermined origin]

BACKGROUND

Traditional methods employed in esophageal investigation of patients with chest pain of undetermined origin includes upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. These methods many times disclose abnormalities that can only be enrolled as the possible cause of chest pain. Provocative tests can reproduce pain in the laboratory, establishing its esophageal origin.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the positivity of acid perfusion test, edrophonium and balloon distension in patients with chest pain of undetermined origin and compare with results of traditional exams, establishing the gain for the diagnosis of esophageal pain.

RESULTS

Forty patients with chest pain of undetermined origin (normal coronary angiography), 80% female, mean age of 54.7 years were submitted to traditional exams and provocative tests. Upper endoscopy disclosed erosive esophagitis in two (5%) and peptic ulcer in one (2.5%), esophageal manometry was abnormal in 60%. pH monitoring was abnormal in 14 (35%) with a positive symptom index in 7. Chest pain was considered of proved esophageal origin by traditional exams in 7 (17.5%) patients with a positive symptom index and of probable esophageal origin in 19 (47.5%) being 8 with gastroesophageal reflux disease and 11 abnormal esophageal motility. In 14 (35%) an esophageal origin could not be demonstrated. The acid perfusion test was positive in 10 (25%), edrophonium test in 8 (20%) and balloon distension test in 15 (37.5%) and at least one provocative test was positive in 23 (57.5%) patients. The introduction of provocative tests allowed the diagnosis of proved esophageal pain in 12 of 19 (63.1%) patients with probable esophageal pain and in 6 of 14 (42.8%) with normal or inconclusive traditional exams what represented a diagnostic gain of 45% (18/40). Two patients had negative provocative tests and a positive symptom index, making a total of 25 (62.5%) patients with proved esophageal pain.

Sensory testing of the esophagus

Originally, sensory testing of the esophagus included the acid perfusion test and the edrophonium test, which were developed to assess patients with non-cardiac chest pain. In the last 2 decades interest in functional esophageal disorders has increased and thus further understanding of the underlying mechanisms of esophageal pain required development of new sensory testing techniques. Balloon distension using a computerized electronic device, electrical stimulation and impedance planimetry have generated important information about esophageal sensory thresholds for pain in different disease states. Intraluminal ultrasonography has been used to determine the physiologic changes of the muscle wall of the esophagus during perception of typical esophageal symptoms. Central evaluation of patients undergoing esophageal stimulation has recently been introduced to assess cerebral activation in different esophageal disorders. However, many studies using esophageal sensory testing are afflicted with significant design flaws, making interpretation of the results very difficult. This is primarily due to lack of recognition of factors that can modulate esophageal sensation.

Unusual case of a large midoesophageal diverticulum mimicking unstable angina pectoris

We describe a 77-year-old lady who presented with progressive retrosternal pain radiating to the left arm and the back. After exclusion of cardiac causes a large midoesophageal diverticulum was found on oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. Importantly, the retrosternal pain completely disappeared after endoscopic removal of impacted food from the diverticulum. After the surgical resection the patient became fully asymptomatic. This is the first example of angina-like chest pain which definitively resulted from a midoesophageal diverticulum. Therefore, midoesophageal diverticula should be considered as a rare differential diagnosis of exercise-induced retrosternal pain.

Noncardiac chest pain

GOALS

Review of research directions in the etiology, evaluation, and treatment of patients with noncardiac chest pain. The author proposes a combined practical approach to noncardiac chest pain that incorporates these findings, which is useful in a clinical practice setting.

BACKGROUND

Several major schools of thought have emerged in the etiology of noncardiac chest pain: acid reflux, motor disorder, altered pain threshold/hypersensitivity, and association with psychiatric dysfunction. There is significant overlap among these. Occult gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is more common than motor disorders and is found in 30% to 40% of these patients; a subset has hypersensitivity, with a normal pH profile. Esophageal motility testing and endoscopy have a more limited role than 24-hour pH testing. Impedance planimetry and balloon sensory provocative testing remain research tools. Provocative testing with hydrochloric acid or edrophonium is less helpful than pH monitoring. Gastroesophageal reflux disease-induced chest pain requires high-dose long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): at least 4 to 8 weeks. Psychotropics are superior to placebo, both in patients with and without psychiatric dysfunction.

RESULTS

The author found combined PPIs and psychotropics helpful in patients with esophageal hypersensitivity and GERD, although supporting data is scant.

CONCLUSIONS

A brief 1-week high-dose PPI challenge, i.e., omeprazole test, may be cost-effective in a primary care setting. However, this approach may not be useful in a referral setting, where pH data and diary assessment of associated symptoms provide useful management help. A behavioral model approach, with early emphasis on patient education, integrated with physiologic data helps the most.

Chest pain of esophageal origin

The treatment of patients with unexplained chest pain is difficult and challenging. After a cardiac etiology has been ruled out, a diligent search for an esophageal etiology-gastroesophageal reflux disease, motility abnormalities, or esophageal hypersensitivity-should be undertaken with judicious use of a diagnostic (therapeutic) trial of therapy, ambulatory pH monitoring, or esophageal manometry. The recent literature discusses the use of high-dose omeprazole in diagnosing and treating chest pain associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease, correlates abnormal ambulatory pH monitoring with response to omeprazole, and provides additional insights into the pathogenesis of esophageal chest pain.