Laparoscopic fundoplication is the treatment of choice for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Antagonist

A double-blind sham-controlled study of the effect of radiofrequency energy on symptoms and distensibility of the gastro-esophageal junction in GERD

OBJECTIVES

Several studies have reported symptom relief in gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients treated with radiofrequency delivery (Stretta procedure) at the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ), but the mechanism underlying this improvement is unclear. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that Stretta alters GEJ resistance.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind randomized cross-over study of Stretta and sham treatment. Consecutive GERD patients were included in the study. The study was conducted in a tertiary care center. Patients underwent two upper gastrointestinal endoscopies with 3 months interval, during which active or sham Stretta treatment was performed in a randomized double-blind manner. Symptom assessment, endoscopy, manometry, 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, and a distensibility test of the GEJ were done before the start of the study and after 3 months.

RESULTS

Barostat distensibility test of the GEJ before and after administration of sildenafil was the main outcome measure. In all, 22 GERD patients (17 females, mean age 47±12 years) participated in the study; 11 in each group. Initial sham treatment did not affect any of the parameters studied. Three months after initial Stretta procedure, no changes were observed in esophageal acid exposure and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. In contrast, symptom score was significantly improved and GEJ compliance was significantly decreased. Administration of sildenafil, an esophageal smooth muscle relaxant, normalized GEJ compliance again to pre-Stretta level, arguing against GEJ fibrosis as the underlying mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

The limitation of this study was reflux evaluation did not include impedance monitoring. In this sham-controlled study, Stretta improved GERD symptoms and decreased GEJ compliance. Decreased GEJ compliance, which reflects altered LES neuromuscular function, may contribute to symptomatic benefit by decreasing refluxate volume.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

GERD is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder, and its prevalence in Asia is increasing. Classical symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation are common presentations. There is no standard criterion for the diagnosis of GERD, and 24-h pH monitoring lacks sensitivity in NERD. Furthermore, diagnostic studies for gastroesophageal reflux disease have several limitations. A short course of PPI is often used in clinical practice as a diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Elderly patients with GERD usually present with atypical manifestations, and they tend to develop more severe disease. PPI remains the mainstay of treatment for GERD. In a subset of patients who wish to discontinue maintenance treatment, anti-reflux surgery is a therapeutic option.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: medical or surgical treatment?

Background. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common condition with increasing prevalence worldwide. The disease encompasses a broad spectrum of clinical symptoms and disorders from simple heartburn without esophagitis to erosive esophagitis with severe complications, such as esophageal strictures and intestinal metaplasia. Diagnosis is based mainly on ambulatory esophageal pH testing and endoscopy. There has been a long-standing debate about the best treatment approach for this troublesome disease. Methods and Results. Medical treatment with PPIs has an excellent efficacy in reversing the symptoms of GERD, but they should be taken for life, and long-term side effects do exist. However, patients who desire a permanent cure and have severe complications or cannot tolerate long-term treatment with PPIs are candidates for surgical treatment. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery achieves a significant symptom control, increased patient satisfaction, and complete withdrawal of antireflux medications, in the majority of patients. Conclusion. Surgical treatment should be reserved mainly for young patients seeking permanent results. However, the choice of the treatment schedule should be individualized for every patient. It is up to the patient, the physician and the surgeon to decide the best treatment option for individual cases.

Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: update

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since the publication of the Asia-Pacific GERD consensus in 2004, more data concerning the epidemiology and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have emerged. An evidence based review and update was needed.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group developed consensus statements using the Delphi approach. Relevant data were presented, and the quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, and level of consensus were graded.

RESULTS

GERD is increasing in frequency in Asia. Risk factors include older age, male sex, race, family history, higher socioeconomic status, increased body mass index, and smoking. Symptomatic response to a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test is diagnostic in patients with typical symptoms if alarm symptoms are absent. A negative pH study off therapy excludes GERD if a PPI test fails. The role for narrow band imaging, capsule endoscopy, and wireless pH monitoring has not yet been undefined. Diagnostic strategies in Asia must consider coexistent gastric cancer and peptic ulcer. Weight loss and elevation of head of bed improve reflux symptoms. PPIs are the most effective medical treatment. On-demand therapy is appropriate for nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) patients. Patients with chronic cough, laryngitis, and typical GERD symptoms should be offered twice daily PPI therapy after excluding non-GERD etiologies. Fundoplication could be offered to GERD patients when an experienced surgeon is available. Endoscopic treatment of GERD should not be offered outside clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to clarify the role of newer diagnostic modalities and endoscopic therapy. Diagnostic strategies for GERD in Asia must consider coexistent gastric cancer and peptic ulcer. PPIs remain the cornerstone of therapy.

Influence of radiofrequency energy delivery at the gastroesophageal junction (the Stretta procedure) on symptoms, acid exposure, and esophageal sensitivity to acid perfusion in gastroesophagal reflux disease

Several studies have demonstrated that radiofrequency energy delivery at the gastroesophageal junction (the Stretta procedure) induces symptom relief in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), although improvement of acid exposure on pH monitoring was usually limited. A role for decreased esophageal sensitivity has been suggested. Our aim was to evaluate the influence of Stretta on symptoms, acid exposure, and sensitivity to esophageal acid perfusion in GERD. Thirteen patients with established proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent GERD (three males; mean age, 51+/-10 years) participated in the study. Before and 6 months after the procedure symptom score, pH monitoring and Bernstein acid perfusion test were performed. The latter was done by infusing HCl (pH 0.1) at a rate of 6 ml/min 15 cm proximal to the gastroesophageal junction for a maximum of 30 min or until the patients experienced heartburn. Results were compared by Student's t-test. Stretta procedure time was 51+/-4 min and no complications occurred. After 6 months, the symptom score was significantly improved (12.5+/-2.0 to 7.5+/-2.1; P<0.05), seven patients no longer needed daily PPI, and acid exposure was significantly decreased (11.6%+/-1.6% to 8.5%+/-1.8% of time pH<4; P<0.05). The time needed to induce heartburn during acid perfusion decreased from 9.5+/-2.3 to 18.1+/-3.4 min (P=0.01), and five patients became insensitive to 30-min acid perfusion, versus none at baseline (P=0.04). In conclusion, the Stretta procedure induces subjective improvement of GERD symptoms and decreases esophageal acid exposure. In addition, esophageal acid sensitivity is decreased 6 months after the Stretta procedure. The mechanism underlying this finding and its relevance to symptom control require further studies.

A one-year follow-up study of endoluminal gastroplication (Endocinch) in GERD patients refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy

In a subset of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), symptoms persist in spite of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Endoscopic gastroplication (EG) was reported to provide a novel therapeutic option in GERD. To evaluate symptomatic and objective outcome of EG in PPI refractory GERD, consecutive GERD patients with persisting reflux symptoms during at least 2 months double dose PPI were recruited for EG (Endocinch). Exclusion criteria were high-grade esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and hiatal hernia > 3 cm. Symptoms and PPI use were evaluated before and 1, 3, and 12 months after the EG; 24-hr pH monitoring off PPI was performed before and after 3 and 12 months. All data are given as mean +/- SD and were analyzed by Student's t test. Twenty patients (10 females; mean age, 45 +/- 11 years) were recruited. Under conscious sedation with midazolam (6 +/- 2 mg) and pethidine (53 +/- 5 mg), a mean of 2.0 +/- 0.2 sutures was applied during a procedure time of 33 +/- 6 min. Throat ache and mild epigastric pain for up to 3 days after the procedure were the only adverse events. At 3 and 12 months symptom score (11.6 +/- 6 vs. 6.4 +/- 3.7 [P < 0.01] and 7.1 +/- 4.5 [P < 0.05]) as well as pH monitoring (% time pH < 4: 17.0 +/- 11.1 vs. 8.1 +/- 5.7% [P < 0.01] and 9.8 +/- 4.1% [P < 0.01]) significantly improved. Ph monitoring was normalized (< 4% of time) in seven patients after 3 months. PPIs could be stopped in 13 patients, with 2 patients still using H2-blockers and 1 using cisapride after 3 months. After 12 months only six patients were free of PPI use and pH monitoring was normalized in six patients. We conclude that EG provides short- and medium-term symptomatic and objective relief to a subset of GERD patients refractory to high-dose PPI.

Non-pharmacologic treatment strategies in gastroesophageal reflux disease

In the West, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common and well-recognized disease. Lately, it has been described as an emerging problem in the East as well. While it is not a rapidly fatal illness, it causes a myriad of disturbing symptoms that remarkably reduce the patients' quality of life (QOL). The economic impact that results from multiple consultations, diagnostic investigations, and administration of a variety of treatment regimens, including surgery, is enormous. The operative management for GERD is fundoplication, for example Toupet (270 degree wrap of the distal esophagus) and Nissen (360 degree wrap of the distal esophagus). These surgical procedures are aimed at permanently controlling acid reflux by reconstructing the gastroesophageal junction. Currently, the ease, aesthetic advantages, and the comparable outcomes achieved by minimally invasive laparoscopic fundoplication have rekindled interest in the operative alternatives of GERD management. Fundoplication controls or diminishes considerably the severity of the symptoms associated with GERD. However, appearance of new symptoms i.e. dysphagia, 'gas-bloat syndrome', etc. as postoperative events have been reported. Recently, several innovative endoluminal treatment modalities have been introduced, namely; endoscopic plicator/suturing devices, bulking injections, and radiofrequency treatment. They are focused on enhancing the performance of a malfunctioning lower esophageal sphincter. While results of several case series reflect substantial improvements in GERD-HRQL scores, lack of long-term durability data is a major concern when recommending these novel, relatively simple, peroral techniques to a long suffering patient. It is clear that these therapies are still evolving and long-term outcomes of properly designed comparative efficacy trials are awaited.

Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: an individualized approach

Until the 1990s, most therapeutic trials in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) focussed upon endoscopic lesions. In fact the correlation between patient symptoms and both the presence and grade of esophagitis is very poor. The classical criteria for the assessment of therapeutic efficacy in GERD have therefore been revised, and there is now a consensus that the relief of symptoms and the long-term control of the disease are the primary aims of therapy for the majority of patients. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represent the mainstay of therapy for patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) as well as esophagitis. Although a stepwise strategy has been recommended in the past, a step-down strategy (starting with a full-dose PPI) appears to be a more cost-effective approach. There are as yet insufficient data to establish the clear superiority of one PPI over others. PPIs have a number of limitations. Symptom relief is significantly inferior in NERD than in erosive esophagitis. The heterogeneity of the NERD group may be one of the most influential factors, but the role of esophageal hypersensitivity has been suggested especially in patients with normal acid exposure. The role of non-acid reflux should also be scrutinized. Long-term control of the disease can be achieved by drug therapy, anti-reflux surgery and now with a variety of endoscopic procedures. The different drug management strategies can be divided into (i) continuous maintenance therapy and (ii) discontinuous therapy which can again be divided into two categories, intermittent and on-demand drug therapy. A case-by-case approach is recommended to determine the personal therapeutic needs and preferences of each individual. Many patients with NERD or mild esophagitis do not require continuous maintenance therapy and recent studies have shown excellent results with different PPI on-demand therapy regimens. Finally when making a choice between different long-term strategies both the clinician and the informed patient have to consider efficacy, safety, tolerability and cost. The potential efficacy of new drugs, especially the GABA(B) agonists and the fast onset acid suppressors, as well as the cost-effectiveness of non-drug strategies (surgery and endoluminal therapies) should be further evaluated.

Endoluminal therapies for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

CONTEXT

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common chronic disorder that has severe impact on quality of life and often requires continuous acid-suppression therapy. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are extremely effective but expensive, and do not restore the normal antireflux barrier at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Antireflux surgery, even with the laparoscopic approach, has not proven more cost-effective than maintenance therapy with PPIs. Postoperative morbidity is substantial, especially when procedures are done outside expert centres. In the past few years several endoscopic techniques have been developed to treat chronic GORD on an outpatient basis. These techniques include radiofrequency-energy delivery and endoscopic suturing, although other approaches are now under development. STARING POINT: Two prospective open-label studies have recently reported 1-year follow-up of GORD patients treated either by radiofrequency-energy delivery (G Triadafilopoulos and colleagues Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:149-56) or endoscopic suturing (Z Mahmood and colleagues Gut 2003; 52:34-39). In a US multicentre trial, Triadafilopoulos and colleagues delivered radiofrequency energy to the cardia and distal oesophagus in patients with chronic heartburn, regurgitation or both (the Stretta procedure). All patients were on continuous acid-suppression therapy, but none had severe oesophagitis or hiatus hernia of more than 2 cm. At 12 months, 94 patients available for follow-up showed significant improvement in GORD symptoms, quality of life, and oesophageal acid-exposure. The need for PPI therapy fell from 98% to 30% of patients. In the Mahmood study, 26 similar patients had endoscopic suturing in a single centre. After 1 year, symptoms and quality of life improved and the need for PPIs was reduced to 36% from 100%. In both studies, only minor complications occurred, none of which required specific therapeutic intervention. WHERE NEXT? An effective outpatient procedure to treat chronic GORD would represent a major step forward. However, further studies are needed before an endoscopic approach can be adopted, as none of the published trials are well-controlled studies. Longer follow-up is needed to ensure that relapses do not occur rapidly, complications do not occur more frequently with less skilled operators, or that endoscopic-induced changes do not complicate or compromise subsequent antireflux surgery. Comparative studies of the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic therapy should also include medical strategies such as intermittent or on-demand PPI therapy.