1
|
Tacelli M, Celsa C, Magro B, Barresi L, Guastella S, Capurso G, Frulloni L, Cabibbo G, Cammà C. Risk Factors for Rate of Relapse and Effects of Steroid Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:1061-1072.e8. [PMID: 30312787 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Risk for relapse after induction of remission with steroid therapy has been studied extensively in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), but findings have been equivocal. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the relapse rate of AIP after initial remission after steroid treatment and to identify factors associated with relapse. METHODS Three reviewers searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EMBASE until July 2018 to identify studies on rate of relapse of AIP after induction of remission with steroid therapy. A pooled estimate was calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird method for a random-effects model. This study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The median follow-up time was 40.8 months. Fifty-two percent of patients were classified as having type 1 AIP. The pooled estimate of relapse rate was 33% (95% CI, 30%-37%). A higher proportion of patients with type 1 AIP had a relapse compared with patients with type 2 AIP (37.5% vs 15.9%; P < .001). We found significant heterogeneity among studies (P < .01). Long-term maintenance therapy with steroids and study quality were associated independently with AIP relapse, after we adjusted for year of publication by multivariate meta-regression. CONCLUSIONS In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that a large proportion of patients with AIP treated successfully with steroid induction therapy had a relapse (33%)-particularly patients with type 1 AIP (37%). Maintenance steroid therapy lasting longer than 1 year could reduce risk of relapse. However, the data characterizing relapse rates are of limited quality, indicating the need for randomized controlled trials and new immunosuppressive drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Tacelli
- Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ciro Celsa
- Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Bianca Magro
- Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Luca Barresi
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta Specializzazione (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies), Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Guastella
- Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- PancreatoBiliary Endoscopy and Endoscopic Ultrasonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Frulloni
- Department of Medicine, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cabibbo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Calogero Cammà
- Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Pretis N, Amodio A, Bernardoni L, Campagnola P, Capuano F, Chari ST, Crinò S, Gabbrielli A, Massella A, Topazian M, Frulloni L. Azathioprine Maintenance Therapy to Prevent Relapses in Autoimmune Pancreatitis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2017; 8:e90. [PMID: 28448071 PMCID: PMC5543465 DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2017.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 02/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Steroids are used to induce remission in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Low-dosage steroid therapy or immunosuppressant (IMs) has been proposed as maintenance therapy to prevent AIP relapse. Few and conflicting data have been published on the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA) in preventing AIP relapse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the indication and efficacy of AZA as maintenance therapy to prevent disease relapse in AIP. METHODS Patients suffering from AIP diagnosed according to the ICDC in type 1, type 2, and not otherwise specified (NOS) were divided in those treated with AZA (AZA+ group) as maintenance therapy and not treated with maintenance therapy (AZA- group). Exclusion criteria were: previous pancreatic surgery, other autoimmune diseases as indication for AZA treatment, and use of IMs different from AZA. Drug safety, clinical and instrumental outcome of AZA+ patients were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 23 patients (18 Males and 5 Females, mean age 54±11 years) in AZA+ group and 97 (58 Males and 39 Females, mean age 45±18 years) in AZA- group were compared. In AZA+ group, patients were significantly older (P=0.043), type 1 AIP was more frequently diagnosed (87 vs. 51%, P=0.006), sIgG4 higher (758±625 vs. 311±409 mg/dl, P<0.001), other organ involvement (OOI) more frequently observed (83 vs. 48%, P=0.002), with higher frequency of relapse before AZA treatment (78 vs. 14%, P<0.001). Three patients in AZA+ group required drug discontinuation because of adverse events. Twenty patients were therefore evaluated for outcome. Six out of 20 patients (30%) relapsed after 24±15 months (5 in pancreas and 1 on biliary tract). They were retreated with steroids and continued AZA. Two out of 6 patients (33%) had a second relapse,after respectively 11 months (in pancreas and kidney) and 22 months (in kidney). CONCLUSIONS AZA is an effective and safe treatment to prevent AIP relapses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò de Pretis
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Amodio
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Pietro Campagnola
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabiana Capuano
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Suresh T Chari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Stefano Crinò
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Arianna Massella
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Mark Topazian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Luca Frulloni
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|