FOXAI: a phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Development of Cytolytic Iridium-Complexed Octaarginine Peptide Albumin Nanomedicine for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment

Objective

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most challenging malignancies and has high incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided hepatic arterial infusion of the standard chemotherapeutic agent oxaliplatin (OXA) has the advantages of both precision and efficacy, making it an important therapeutic strategy for advanced-stage liver cancer. However, patients receiving this treatment still face severe systemic toxicity and poor tolerability of oxaliplatin.

Methods

In this study, we compared oxaliplatin with novel albumin-formulated oncolytic peptide nanoparticles, Ir-cR8 (abbreviated as iPep), in the treatment of orthotopic liver cancer in a mouse model by intravenous injection and in a rabbit model via DSA-guided hepatic arterial infusion.

Results

The results showed that intravenous Ir-cR8-BSA-NPs had enhanced inhibitory effects to the growth of H22 ectopic liver tumors in mice and also with reduced toxicity in animals compared to OXA treatment. Specifically, Ir-cR8-BSA-NPs-treated mice showed approximately 92% tumor growth inhibition compared to approximately 88% for OXA. In the rabbit VX2 ectopic hepatocellular carcinoma model, Ir-cR8-BSA-NPs demonstrated significantly stronger inhibition (P<0.01) of tumor size compared to OXA, as assessed by PET/CT imaging, with SUV values decreasing from 5.15±0.46 to 2.52±0.57, compared to OXA-treated group, which decreased from 5.44±0.43 to 3.90±0.24. Furthermore, Ir-cR8- BSA-NPs significantly improved stability by albumin encapsulation and reduced hemolytic toxicity (P<0.001), resulting in improved therapeutic efficacy.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the combined advantages of a novel membrane-active oncolytic peptide nanomedicine and precise drug delivery enabled by arterial infusion technology for the interventional treatment of liver cancer.

Risk Factors and Predictive Analysis of Acute Severe Abdominal Pain After Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To investigate the incidence patterns and risk factors of acute abdominal pain following hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in liver cancer patients and develop a preliminary prediction model for post-HAIC abdominal pain.

Patients and Methods

Four hundred hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent HAIC at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from January 2021 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were categorized into two groups (abdominal pain and no abdominal pain) based on the occurrence of acute moderate to severe abdominal pain within 24 h after HAIC. Univariate analysis was performed on data from the two groups. Statistically significant factors were subjected to logistic regression analysis to construct a preliminary prediction model, and the predictive performance was evaluated.

Results

A total of 358 hAIC procedures were performed in 242 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of the 242 eligible patients, 88 (36.4%) experienced moderate to severe abdominal pain, while 154 (63.6%) had no significant pain. Age, tumor diameter, distance between the tumor and liver capsule, presence of portal vein tumor thrombus, oxaliplatin preparation time, and oxaliplatin manufacturer were independent predictors of acute moderate to severe abdominal pain following HAIC. The final prediction model demonstrated good predictive ability with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.795 (95% confidence interval: 0.740-0.853).

Conclusion

The model developed in this study effectively predicted the risk of acute moderate to severe abdominal pain following HAIC and may provide a basis for more precise prevention and intervention strategies in clinical practice.

The Combination of D-TACE-HAIC, Lenvatinib, and PD-1 Inhibitors Shows Significant Clinical Efficacy in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

This study was developed to compare the efficacy of combined D-TACE-HAIC + lenvatinib + PD-1 inhibitor treatment to that of TACE + sorafenib treatment for patients with intermediate and advanced HCC.

Patients and Methods

Here, a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable HCC who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) from March 2018 to March 2022 at the our hospital was conducted. In total, 60 patients underwent treatment with drug-eluting beads-TACE-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (D-TACE-HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (Group A), while 21 underwent combined TACE and sorafenib treatment (Group B).

Results

In this study cohort, the rate of surgical conversion in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B (33.3% vs 9.5%). As per the Revised Evaluation Criteria for Clinical Efficacy in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria, the objective remission rate in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B (86.6% vs 33.4%). Group A also exhibited significantly higher rates of overall adverse events including hypertension, abdominal pain, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypoproteinemia as compared to Group B, although the incidence of hand-foot syndrome in Group A was significantly reduced as compared to Group B (13.3% vs 42.8%). The median progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) of patients in Group A were 13.2 and 28.8 months, with both being significantly higher than the corresponding intervals in Group B (5.7 and 10.8 months, respectively). Cox multivariate analyses identified combination D-TACE-HAIC + lenvatinib+ PD-1 inhibitor treatment as being independently associated with patient PFS and OS.

Conclusion

In summary, D-TACE-HAIC + lenvatinib + PD-1 inhibitor treatment exhibits a favorable safety profile, outperforming TACE + sorafenib treatment for unresectable HCC patients while improving overall rates of translational efficacy, increasing rates of surgical conversion, prolonging patient survival, and conferring long-term survival benefits.

Clinical Outcomes of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Plus Lenvatinib and Tislelizumab for Treating Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Type IV Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

Purpose

To assess the activity and toxicity of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC)+tislelizumab+lenvatinib (HAIC+tisle+len) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) type IV (Vp4 hCC) in a real-world context.

Methods

Fifty-five patients, with Vp4 hCC receiving HAIC+tisle+len therapy from April 2021 to December 2022, were analyzed retrospectively. Data on patient characteristics, adverse events (AEs), treatment, and survival were collected. Outcomes were disease control rate (DCR), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs).

Results

As of December 20, 2023, the median follow-up was 17.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.7-22.5). The ORR was 52.7% (3 complete response [CR], 26 partial response [PR]) as per RECIST v1.1 and 65.5% (12 CR, 24 PR) as per mRECIST. The DCR was 94.5% using both RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST. The median PFS and the median OS were 8.0 months (95% CI: 6.2-12.3) and 16.7 months (95% CI: 12.0-not reached), respectively. Additionally, PFS was independently predicted only by the best tumor response. In patients with the best tumor response (PR or CR), the median PFS was 11.7 months (95% CI: 8.02-not reached) by mRECIST and 15.4 months (95% CI: 7.39-not reached) by RECIST v1.1. Hypertension (14.5%), decreased albumin levels (10.9%) and anorexia (9.1%) were the most frequently observed grade 3-4 TRAEs.

Conclusion

HAIC+tisle+len regimen demonstrated a promising efficacy and favorable safety for patients with HCC and Vp4, providing valuable real-world evidence to complement the trial data for Vp4 hCC.

Efficiency and safety of HAIC combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter propensity score matching analysis

Purpose

The present work focused on assessing whether hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab was safe and effective on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) showing high tumor burden.

Methods

In the present multicenter retrospective study, treatment-naive advanced HCC patients (BCLC stage C) showing high tumor burden (maximum diameter of intrahepatic lesion beyond 7 cm) treated with lenvatinib and tislelizumab with or without HAIC were reviewed for eligibility from June 2020 to June 2023. Baseline differences between groups were mitigated by propensity score matching (PSM). Our primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); and secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, respectively.

Results

After eligibility reviewed, total 162 patients treated with lenvatinib and tislelizumab were enrolled: 63 patients with HAIC (HTP group), and the remaining 99 patients without HAIC (TP group). After PSM 1:1, 47 cases were evenly divided into each group. Of them, HTP group showed significant prolonged median OS compared with TP group (16.6 versus 21.0 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.98; p = 0.039), and median PFS of HTP group was also prolonged (8.9 versus 11.6 months; HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.87; p = 0.010). Higher DCR and ORR could be observed in HTP relative to TP groups (ORR: 53.2% versus 17.0%, p < 0.001; DCR: 87.2% versus 61.7%, p = 0.004). The severe AEs (grade 3/4) and all grades were comparable between the groups, while all of these AEs could be controlled, and AEs of grade 5 were not reported.

Conclusion

HAIC combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab is the candidate treatment for advanced HCC patients because of its improved prognosis and acceptable safety.

Application of nanotechnology in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the predominant histologic variant of hepatic malignancy and has become a major challenge to global health. The increasing incidence and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma has created an urgent need for effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. This is despite the impressive results of multiple treatments in the clinic. However, the unique tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma increases the difficulty of treatment and immune tolerance. In recent years, the application of nanoparticles in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma has brought new hope for tumor patients. Nano agents target tumor-associated fibroblasts, regulatory T cells, myeloid suppressor cells, tumor-associated macrophages, tumor-associated neutrophils, and immature dendritic cells, reversed the immunosuppressive microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, he purpose of this review is to summarize the advantages of nanotechnology in guiding surgical excision, local ablation, TACE, standard chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, application of nano-vaccines has also continuously enriched the treatment of liver cancer. This study aims to investigate the potential applications of nanotechnology in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma, with the ultimate goal of enhancing therapeutic outcomes and improving the prognosis for patients affected by this malignancy.

FOLFOX-HAIC combined with targeted immunotherapy for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with the FOLFOX regimen has demonstrated efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The combined targeted and immunotherapy has emerged as a first-line treatment for liver cancer. In this study, we investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-HAIC in combination with targeted immunotherapy in patients with untreated, unresectable HCC.

Materials and methods

Data were collected from patients with initially unresectable HCC treated at Ruijin Hospital, affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, from June 2022 to June 2023. Tumor response and survival outcomes were assessed following the FOLFOX-HAIC combined with targeted immunotherapy, The safety was also evaluated through the incidence of related adverse events.

Results

A total of 51 eligible patients were recruited. The objective response rate (ORR) based on mRECIST and RECIST 1.1 criteria were 60.8% and 45.1%, respectively. The surgical conversion rate was 25.5%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.2 months. The 1-year overall survival rate was 88.2%. Adverse events were observed in 98% patients, with 23.5% experiencing grade 3 or 4 adverse events.

Conclusion

The FOLFOX-HAIC combined with targeted immunotherapy regimen is effective in patients with unresectable HCC, demonstrated by a high surgical conversion rate and manageable adverse effects. This regimen represents a potential novel first-line treatment option for HCC.

The Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Plus Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Combination with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objection

To report the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with bevacizumab plus anti-PD-1 (BP1) or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors (BPL) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) as a first-line treatment for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients with initially uHCC received either BP1-HAIC or BPL-HAIC as first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

Between January 2020 and December 2022, a total of 136 patients with initially uHCC received triple combination therapy, with 76 in the BP1-HAIC group and 60 in the BPL-HAIC group. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-13.7 months), and the median OS was 22.4 months (95% CI, 21.3- not reached). Comparative analysis revealed no significant differences in PFS (HR, 0.91, P = 0.69) or OS (HR, 0.71, P = 0.31) between the BP1-HAIC and BPL-HAIC groups. The ORR was 46.3% per RECIST v1.1 and 66.9% per mRECIST, with a DCR of 83.1% under both criteria. Common adverse events (AEs) included hypoalbuminemia and elevated aspartate/alanine aminotransferase, with 5.1% (7/136) experienced upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Multivariate Cox analysis identified tumor number and BCLC stage as independent prognostic factors for OS, and tumor number for PFS.

Conclusion

Triple combination therapy demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy and tumor response in initially uHCC. No notable differences in outcomes were observed between the BP1-HAIC and BPL-HAIC groups. AEs were manageable in clinical practice.

m6A-mediated lnc-OXAR promotes oxaliplatin resistance by enhancing Ku70 stability in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The escalating prevalence of metabolic diseases has led to a rapid increase in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (NASH-HCC). While oxaliplatin (OXA)-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has shown promise in advanced-stage HCC patients, its efficacy in NASH-HCC remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of OXA-based HAIC and elucidate the mechanisms underlying OXA resistance in NASH-HCC.

METHODS

The key lncRNAs were screened through RNA-seq analysis of NASH/non-NASH and OXA-sensitive/OXA-resistant (OXA-S/R) HCC tissues. The biological functions of the lnc-OXAR (OXA resistance-related lncRNA in NASH-HCC) in NASH-HCC were verified through a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments. The molecular mechanism of lnc-OXAR was elucidated by fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (FISH), Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry (IP-MS), RNA pulldown, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP), methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-Seq) and a dual-luciferase reporter assay.

RESULTS

NASH-HCC exhibited reduced responsiveness to OXA-based HAIC compared to non-NASH HCC. We identified and validated a novel transcript namedlnc-OXAR, which played a crucial role in conferring OXA resistance to NASH-HCC. Inhibition of lnc-OXAR suppressed HCC cell growth and restored OXA sensitivity both in NASH-HCC mouse models and in vitro. Mechanistically, lnc-OXAR recruited Ku70 and cystatin A (CSTA), preventing Ku70 degradation and facilitating DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, thereby promoting OXA resistance in NASH-HCC. Additionally, WTAP-mediated m6A modification enhanced the stability of lnc-OXAR in an IGF2BP2-dependent manner. Notably, silencing lnc-OXAR significantly enhanced the response to OXA in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models derived from NASH-HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduced responsiveness of NASH-HCC to OXA treatment can be attributed to the upregulation of lnc-OXAR. Our findings provide a rationale for stratifying HCC patients undergoing OXA-based HAIC based on etiology. Lnc-OXAR holds promise as a novel target for overcoming OXA resistance in NASH-HCC and improving prognosis.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis in the main trunk

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mFOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

Methods

This retrospective study included patients who received mFOLFOX-based HAIC combined with TKIs and ICIs from January 2021 to January 2023. The primary outcome was the objective response rate of PVTT response, and the secondary outcomes were 6-month, 1-year survival rate, overall survival (OS), and corresponding adverse events and complications were also evaluated. PVTT responses were assessed using ITK-SNAP software.

Results

A total of 37 patients were included in the analysis, 18.92% achieved a complete response and 56.76% achieved a partial response in PVTT response. The objective response rate (ORR) of PVTT was 75.68%. The 6-month survival rate was 89%, the 1-year survival rate was 66%, and the median OS was 15.8 months. In univariate analysis, Child-Pugh score (P=0.010) was important factor for predicting OS; in multivariate analysis, Child-Pugh score (P=0.015, HR= 3.089, 95%CI: 1.250-7.633) was the important factor for predicting OS. In terms of adverse reactions, the most common adverse reactions associated with HAIC are pain and thrombocytopenia associated with oxaliplatin.

Conclusion

FOLFOX-based HAIC combined with TKIs and ICIs induced an objective response rate of 75.68% in PVTT.

Clinical signicance

FOLFOX-based HAIC combined with TKIs and ICIs provides more treatment options for PVTT.

Prognostic Value of Alpha-Fetoprotein in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Lenvatinib and Camrelizumab

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) who underwent hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on patients with u-HCC receiving treatment with HAIC combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab. Early AFP response was defined as a >20% decrease in AFP within 4 weeks, and AFP response as a >75% decrease in AFP within 8 weeks. The correlation between early AFP response, AFP response, therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated.

Results

The study included 63 patients. AFP responders exhibited superior objective response rates compared to AFP non-responders, as determined by RECIST v1.1 or mRECIST criteria (45.5 vs. 18.2%, p=0.014, or 81.8 vs. 48.5%, p=0.013). Furthermore, early AFP responders demonstrated prolonged OS (not reached vs. 8.0 months, p<0.001) and PFS (13.3 vs. 3.0 months, p= 0.018) relative to early AFP non-responders. Similarly, AFP responders exhibited improved OS (not reached vs. 9.0 months, p<0.001) and PFS (19.3 vs. 5.1 months, p=0.002) compared to AFP non-responders. Multivariate analysis results indicated that both early AFP response and AFP response independently predicted OS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.963, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.333-6.585, p=0.008, and HR 6.182, 95% CI 1.780-21.466, p=0.004] and PFS (HR 2.186, 95% CI 1.107-4.318, p=0.024, and HR 3.078, 95% CI 1.407-6.730, p=0.005), serving as significant prognostic values.

Conclusion

Early AFP response and AFP response serve as predictive biomarkers for the effectiveness of HAIC combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab in patients with u-HCC.

Association of serum AFP trajectories and hepatocellular carcinoma outcomes after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy: A longitudinal, multicenter study

AIM

This study aims to investigate α-fetoprotein (AFP) trajectories for prediction of survival outcomes after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) treatment in large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

From May 2014 to June 2020, 889 eligible patients with large HCC underwent HAIC were retrospectively enrolled from five hospitals. A latent class growth mixed (LCGM) model was applied to distinguish potential AFP level dynamic changing trajectories. Inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted (IPTW) analyses were performed to eliminate unmeasured confounders through marginal structural models. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to determine the overall survival (OS) in patients with large HCC. Performance of these serum markers for survival prediction was compared by areas under receiver operating characteristic analysis with the Delong test.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 23.7 (interquartile range, 3.8-115.3). A total of 1009 patients with large HCC, who underwent HAIC with AFP repeatedly measured 3-10 times, were enrolled in the study. Three distinct trajectories of these serum AFP were identified using the LCGM model: high stable (37.0%; n = 373), low stable (15.7%; n = 159), and sharp-falling (47.3%; n = 477). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses found that ALBI stage 2-3, BCLC-C stage and high-stable AFP trajectories were associated with OS. AFP trajectories yield the optimal predictive performance in all risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The AFP trajectories based on longitudinal AFP change showed outstanding performance for predicting survival outcomes after HAIC treatment in large HCC, which provide a potential monitoring tool for improving clinical decision-making.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with the FOLFOX regimen for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and literature review

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of primary liver cancer (PLC) has experienced a significant global increase, primarily attributed to the rise in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unfortunately, HCC is often diagnosed in advanced stages, leaving patients with limited treatment options. Therefore, transformation therapy is a crucial approach for long-term survival and radical resection in patients with advanced HCC. Conversion therapy has demonstrated promise in the treatment of advanced HCC. When integrated with the FOLFOX regimen, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) can significantly improve tumor response efficiency, leading to high conversion and resection rates.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed landmark trials of HAIC in combination with different drugs or means for the treatment of HCC to determine the clinical value of HAIC-centric translational therapies in HCC treatment. Furthermore, we specifically emphasize the advantages associated with employing FOLFOX-HAIC in the treatment of advanced HCC.

EXPERT OPINION

The combination of HAIC with the FOLFOX regimen can help prevent the low intratumoral accumulation and high adverse reaction rate caused by the FOLFOX alone, holding significant potential in the comprehensive treatment of future HCC patients.

Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy plus immunotherapy combined with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (FOLFOX) for unresectable hepatocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The advent of cutting-edge systemic therapies has driven advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and therapeutic strategies with multiple modes of delivery have been shown to be more efficacious than monotherapy. However, the mechanisms underlying this innovative treatment modality have not been elucidated.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of targeted therapy plus immunotherapy combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of FOLFOX in patients with unresectable HCC.

METHODS

We enrolled 53 patients with unresectable HCC who received a combination of targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and HAIC of FOLFOX between December 2020 and June 2021 and assessed the efficacy and safety of the treatment regimen.

RESULTS

The objective response rate was 60.4% (32/53), complete response was 24.5% (13/53), partial response was 35.9% (19/53), and stable disease was 39.6% (21/53). The median duration of response and median progression-free survival were 9.1 and 13.9 months, respectively. The surgical conversion rate was 34.0% (18/53), and 1-year overall survival was 83.0% without critical complicating diseases or adverse events (AEs).

CONCLUSION

The regimen of HAIC of FOLFOX, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy was curative for patients with unresectable HCC, with no serious AEs and a high rate of surgical conversion.

Efficacy and Safety of Conversion Surgery for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of conversion surgery for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).

Patients and Methods

Data from 172 HCC patients treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2016 and June 2021 with effective assessment of HAIC treatment response were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical pathological data, treatment process, survival, and occurrence of adverse events were recorded. Patients were grouped according to whether they achieved imaging remission after HAIC, underwent conversion surgery, and met the surgical resection criteria. Efficacy and safety were analyzed.

Results

The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the imaging remission group were 8.6 months and 26.3 months, respectively, which were longer than the 4.6 months (P<0.05) and 15.6 months (P<0.05) in the nonremission group. Compared with 6.7 months and 18.9 months in the HAIC maintenance group, the median PFS and median OS in the conversion surgery group were 16.5 months (P<0.05) and 45.0 months (P<0.05), but there was a higher risk of treatment-related hemoglobin decrease, alanine aminotransferase increase, aspartate aminotransferase increase, and total bilirubin increase (P<0.05). The risk of biliary fistula, abdominal hemorrhage and ascites in the HAIC conversion surgery group was higher than that of the single surgery group (P<0.05). Compared with the conversion surgery group, the median PFS and median OS of patients in the HAIC maintenance group who met the resection criteria were shorter: 7.1 months (P<0.05) and 21.7 months (P<0.05), respectively. All adverse events during the study were less than moderate, and no toxicity-related deaths occurred during follow-up.

Conclusion

HAIC-based conversion therapy had acceptable toxic effects and could effectively stabilize intrahepatic lesions in advanced HCC, improve the survival benefit of patients, and provide some patients with the opportunity for conversion surgery to further improve prognosis.

Pseudo-capsulated Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for cases with single pseudo-capsuled hepatocellular carcinoma (pHCC), as well as their survival outcomes, were investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 196 cases with single pHCC (diameter >5 cm) receiving initial HAIC (n = 92) and TACE (n = 104) were enrolled. The propensity score match (PSM) approach based on Cox models was employed to tune any possible imbalance in treatment assignment. The overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and partial response rate (PRR) of the subjects were investigated using the log-rank test. The independent risk factors for outcomes were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses, and the results were analyzed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of the subjects was 22.3 months. After PSM, no significant difference was found in the OS of the HAIC and TACE groups (OS, 12.0 vs. 16.8 months; P = .267), while the median PFS of the TACE group was prolonged compared with the HAIC group (PFS, 5.7 vs. 2.8 months; P = .003). Moreover, PRR and ORR of the TACE group were prolonged compared with the HAIC group (PRR, 34.6% vs. 21.7%; P = .046; ORR, 35.6% vs. 21.7%; P = .033). The nomogram model showed high predictive accuracy and significant discrimination.

CONCLUSION

TACE therapy could delay tumor progression compared with HAIC for cases with a single pHCC.

Arterial chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: consensus recommendations

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) treatment is widely accepted as one of the alternative therapeutic modalities for HCC owing to its local control effect and low systemic toxicity. Nevertheless, although accumulating high-quality evidence has displayed the superior survival advantages of HAIC of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (HAIC-FOLFOX) compared with standard first-line treatment in different scenarios, the lack of standardization for HAIC procedure and remained controversy limited the proper and safe performance of HAIC treatment in HCC. Therefore, an expert consensus conference was held on March 2023 in Guangzhou, China to review current practices regarding HAIC treatment in patients with HCC and develop widely accepted statements and recommendations. In this article, the latest evidence of HAIC was systematically summarized and the final 22 expert recommendations were proposed, which incorporate the assessment of candidates for HAIC treatment, procedural technique details, therapeutic outcomes, the HAIC-related complications and corresponding treatments, and therapeutic scheme management.

Compound Kushen injection combined with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: An evidence map and overview of systematic reviews

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

For the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), compound Kushen injection (CKi) is commonly used in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

AIMS OF THE STUDY

Our objective was to evaluate the reporting quality, methodological quality, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence for CKi combined with TACE for the treatment of patients with HCC by conducting systematic reviews (SRs). The purpose of this study was to improve the clinical application of CKis, strengthen clinical decision-making regarding CKis, and inform future research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used eight databases to systematically search SRs of CKi combined with TACE for HCC through February 21, 2023. The quality of reporting of SRs was evaluated using the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, methodological quality using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2, risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Review, and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment. Finally, the assessment results were visualized by the evidence mapping method. This overview has been registered on PROSPERO with the registration title "Compound Kushen injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: An overview of systematic reviews" and registration number CRD42022369120.

RESULTS

A total of 12 SRs meeting the inclusion criteria were included. In terms of reporting quality, 42% of SRs reported relatively complete reports and 58% had certain deficiencies. The methodological quality of all SRs was " critically low". The risk of bias was evaluated as low in 33% of SRs and high in 67% of SRs. The results of the evidence synthesis showed that, in the "moderate" level of evidence, CKi combined with TACE resulted in a 12.7%-21.5% benefit for one-year survival rate, 11.7%-17.2% benefit for objective response rate (ORR), 20.5%-27.1% benefit for quality of life, 22.2% benefit for nausea and vomiting, and 24.7%-27.4% benefit for leukopenia in HCC patients.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, CKi combined with TACE improved survival, ORR and quality of life in patients with HCC, and reduced adverse events. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the low methodological quality of the included SRs. The clinical efficacy of CKis must be confirmed in a large number of randomized controlled trials.

Techniques and status of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for primary hepatobiliary cancers

Primary hepatobiliary cancers (PHCs), which mainly include hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancers (BTCs), are mostly diagnosed in the advanced stage and are not candidates for curative surgery or ablation, resulting in a dismal prognosis. Targeted therapies with or without programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors have been incorporated into first-line treatments for advanced HCC. Systemic chemotherapy is still the mainstay treatment for advanced BTCs, and combining it with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has resulted in prolonged patient survival. Intra-arterial therapies, including trans-arterial chemoembolization, selective internal radiation therapy, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), have been explored and used for advanced hepatobiliary cancers for many years with positive results, particularly when combined with systemic treatments. Recently, an increasing number of phase II/III trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of HAIC for the treatment of advanced HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis and/or a large tumor burden, for the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of HCC with high-risk factors, and for treating advanced intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, the techniques and regimens used for HAIC are diverse and differ greatly between various regions and centers worldwide. This review focuses on these diverse techniques and regimens, as well as the updated evidence on HAIC regarding the treatment of PHCs.

Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters: a novel efficacy predictor of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) is a novel vascular pattern structurally and functionally distinct from microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to explore the prognostic value of VETC in patients receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for unresectable HCC.

METHODS

From January 2016 to December 2017, 145 patients receiving HAIC as the initial treatment for unresectable HCC were enrolled and stratified into two groups according to their VETC status. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into two groups: VETC+ (n = 31, 21.8%) and VETC- (n = 114, 78.2%). The patients in the VETC+ group had worse ORR and DCR than those in the VETC- group (RECIST: ORR: 25.8% vs. 47.4%, P = 0.031; DCR: 56.1% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.007; mRECIST: ORR: 41.0% vs. 52.6%, P = 0.008; DCR: 56.1% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.007). Patients with VETC+ had significantly shorter OS and PFS than those with VETC- (median OS: 10.2 vs. 21.6 months, P < 0.001; median PFS: 3.3 vs. 7.2 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed VETC status as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.46-3.94; P = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.20-3.22; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

VETC status correlates remarkably well with the tumor response and long-term survival in patients undergoing HAIC. It may be a promising efficacy predictor and help identify patients who will benefit from HAIC.

Cost-effectiveness and prognostic model of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden and/or Vp4 tumor thrombus compared with sorafenib: a post-hoc analysis of the FOHAIC-1 trial

OBJECTIVES

The phase III FOHAIC-1 trial revealed that hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy (HAIC) improved overall survival compared to sorafenib in the high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study therefore set out to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and establish a prognostic clinico-radiological score of HAIC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 409 patients with high-risk HCC who received HAIC between 2014 and 2020 were included. A Markov model was applied in the cost-effectiveness analysis using data from the FOHAIC-1 trial. In prognosis analysis, a clinico-radiological score was developed using a Cox-regression model and subsequently confirmed in the internal validation and test cohorts. The area under the curve from receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to assess the performance of the clinico-radiological score.

RESULTS

HAIC resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $10190.41/quality-adjusted life years compared to sorafenib, which was lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicted a ≥99.9% probability that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was below the willingness-to-pay. The Cox analysis identified five factors, namely extrahepatic metastasis (m), arterial enhancing type (a), tumor number (nu), albumin-bilirubin index (a), and involved lobe (l), which together comprise the clinico-radiological score (HAIC-manual). Patients were classified into three groups based on the number of factors present, with cutoffs at 2 and 4 factors. The stratified median overall survival for these groups were 21.6, 10.0, and 5.9 months, respectively ( P <0.001). These findings were verified through internal validation and test cohorts with a significance level of P ≤0.01. The time-dependent area under the curve from receiver operator characteristic for the ability of the HAIC-manual to predict survival in 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.71, 0.76, and 0.78, which significantly outperformed existing staging systems.

CONCLUSION

HAIC is a promising and cost-effective strategy for patients with high-risk HCC. The clinico-radiological score may be a simple prognostic tool for predicting HAIC treatment.

Systemic Inflammation Score Using Pretherapeutic Inflammatory Markers to Predict Prognosis for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients After Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy

Purpose

To assess the clinical value of the pretherapeutic systemic inflammation score (SIS) in predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).

Methods

From February 2016 to April 2021, 415 advanced HCC patients who underwent HAIC at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were randomly divided into training (n = 277) and validation cohorts (n = 138) and analyzed. The aspartate aminotransferase-alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR), lymphocyte × albumin (L × A), and neutrophil × monocyte (N × M) were used to construct the SIS score based on a multivariate Cox analysis in the training cohort. A nomogram consisting of the SIS score was created and evaluated by calibration plot, areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses revealed that the SIS score was an independent predictor of OS. A high SIS score was associated with large tumor size (P < 0.05), multiple lesions (P < 0.01), high AFP level (P < 0.01), extrahepatic metastasis (P < 0.05), and advanced BCLC stage (P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the patients with a high SIS had shorter OS than those with a low SIS in both the non-PD (p = 0.015) and PD group (p = 0.023). The calibration plots showed good concordance between the nomogram's prediction and the actual observations in both the training and validation cohorts. In the training cohort, the AUCs of the nomogram predicting the 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 0.749 and 0.739, respectively; in the validation cohort, they were 0.760 and 0.681, respectively. Based on the AUC and DCA, the nomogram showed better predictive ability than other predictors.

Conclusion

The pretherapeutic SIS score is a potential prognostic predictor for HCC patients undergoing HAIC.

A multitask deep learning radiomics model for predicting the macrotrabecular-massive subtype and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The macrotrabecular-massive (MTM) is a special subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which has commonly a dismal prognosis. This study aimed to develop a multitask deep learning radiomics (MDLR) model for predicting MTM and HCC patients' prognosis after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).

METHODS

From June 2018 to March 2020, 158 eligible patients with HCC who underwent surgery were retrospectively enrolled in MTM related cohorts, and 752 HCC patients who underwent HAIC were included in HAIC related cohorts during the same period. DLR features were extracted from dual-phase (arterial phase and venous phase) contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the entire liver region. Then, an MDLR model was used for the simultaneous prediction of the MTM subtype and patient prognosis after HAIC. The MDLR model for prognostic risk stratification incorporated DLR signatures, clinical variables and MTM subtype.

FINDINGS

The predictive performance of the DLR model for the MTM subtype was 0.968 in the training cohort [TC], 0.912 in the internal test cohort [ITC] and 0.773 in the external test cohort [ETC], respectively. Multivariable analysis identified portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) (p = 0.012), HAIC response (p < 0.001), HAIC sessions (p < 0.001) and MTM subtype (p < 0.001) as indicators of poor prognosis. After incorporating DLR signatures, the MDLR model yielded the best performance among all models (AUC, 0.855 in the TC, 0.805 in the ITC and 0.792 in the ETC). With these variables, the MDLR model provided two risk strata for overall survival (OS) in the TC: low risk (5-year OS, 44.9%) and high risk (5-year OS, 4.9%).

INTERPRETATION

A tool based on MDLR was developed to consider that the MTM is an important prognosis factor for HCC patients. MDLR showed outstanding performance for the prognostic risk stratification of HCC patients who underwent HAIC and may help physicians with therapeutic decision making and surveillance strategy selection in clinical practice.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed versus oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated promising benefits in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In China, the most frequently used HAIC regimen is oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX). However, arterial infusion of fluorouracil over 46 h was not convenient. Raltitrexed, another antimetabolic agent with a long plasma half-life, allows for shorter infusion durations. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with HAIC with raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin (RALOX) or FOLFOX in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 82 eligible patients from February 2019 to December 2021. Forty patients were treated with FOLFOX HAIC (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 administered on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 infusion for 46 h, every 3 weeks) combined with TKIs and ICIs. Forty-two patients received RALOX HAIC (oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) combined with TKIs and ICIs. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile.

RESULTS

ORR was similar between the FOLFOX HAIC and RALOX HAIC groups (42.5% vs 42.5%, P = 0.974). DCR also showed no significant difference between the two groups (87.5% vs 85.7%, P = 0.813). Median PFS was 10.7 months in the FOLFOX HAIC group versus 10.2 months in the RALOX HAIC group (P = 0.41). Median OS was 20.3 months in the FOLFOX HAIC group, compared to 17.7 months in the RALOX HAIC group (P = 0.50). Both groups had similar profiles of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events, including thrombocytopenia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alanine aminotransferase, and leukocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness and safety of HAIC with RALOX were comparable to HAIC with FOLFOX in intermediate and advanced HCC patients.

Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy

Purpose

The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF in HBV-related advanced HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC.

Methods

A total of 683 patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC and received TDF or ETV between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), HBV reactivation, and liver function of patients were compared between the ETV and TDF groups by propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

In the PSM cohort, for all patients and patients with ≥ 4 cycles of FOLFOX-HAIC, the median OS in the ETV group (15.2 months, 95% CI: 13.0-17.4 months; 16.6 months, 95% CI: 14.8-18.5 months; respectively) was shorter than that in the TDF group (23.0 months, 95% CI: 10.3-35.6 months; 27.3 months, 95% CI: 16.5-NA months; p=0.024, p=0.028; respectively). The median PFS in the ETV group (8.7 months, 95% CI: 7.9-9.5 months; 8.9 months, 95% CI: 8.0-9.8 months; respectively) was also shorter than that in the TDF group (11.8 months, 95% CI: 8.0-15.6 months; 12.7 months, 95% CI: 10.8-14.6 months; p=0.036, p=0.025; respectively). The rate of HBV reactivation in the ETV group was higher than that in the TDF group (12.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.040; 16.5% vs 6.2%, p=0.037, respectively). For liver function, the rate of ALBI grade that remained stable or improved in the ETV group was lower than that in the TDF group (44.6% vs 57.6%, p=0.006; 37.2% vs 53.8%, p=0.019, respectively).

Conclusion

Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a better prognosis, lower proportion of HBV reactivation, and better preservation of liver function in advanced HBV-HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC, especially those who received ≥ 4 cycles.

Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Lenvatinib and Camrelizumab

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) treated with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with u-HCC who underwent HAIC combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab. Patients were stratified into two cohorts using the median NLR as the cutoff point. We then assessed treatment response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events in these patient groups.

Results

Between October 2020 and April 2022, a total of 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The overall cohort exhibited a median PFS of 7.9 months, while the median OS was not reached, and a median NLR of 3.46. Notably, the group with NLR<3.46 demonstrated significantly superior OS (not reached vs 9.6 months, p = 0.017) and PFS (18.3 vs 5.3 months, p = 0.0015) compared to the NLR≥3.46 group. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 400 ng/mL [hazard ratio (HR), 2.133; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.102-4.126; p = 0.024], Barcelona Clinical Hepatocellular Carcinoma (BCLC) stage C (HR, 2.319; 95% CI, 1.128-4.764; p = 0.022), and NLR ≥3.46 (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.239-4.494; p = 0.009) were identified as independent risk factors for OS. Additionally, multivariate analysis demonstrated that AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL, BCLC stage C, and NLR ≥ 3.46 were independent negative factors of PFS.

Conclusion

NLR can be associated with outcomes in patients with u-HCC treated with HAIC combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab.

The worthy role of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in combination with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Systemic therapy remains the primary therapeutic approach for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nonetheless, its efficacy in achieving control of intrahepatic lesions is constrained. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a therapeutic approach that combines localized treatment with systemic antitumor effects, which aim is to effectively manage the progression of cancerous lesions within the liver, particularly in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Combining HAIC with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monoclonal antibody (mAb) immunotherapy is anticipated to emerge as a novel therapeutic approach aimed at augmenting the response inside the localized tumor site and achieving prolonged survival advantages. In order to assess the effectiveness, safety, and applicability of various therapeutic modalities and to address potential molecular mechanisms underlying the efficacy of HAIC-sensitizing immunotherapy, we reviewed the literature about the combination of HAIC with anti-PD-1 mAb therapies.

Comparable Clinical Outcomes Between Transarterial Chemoembolization or Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and PD-1 Inhibitors in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To compare the treatment efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and Methods

81 unresectable HCC patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 30 or 51 patients treated with either TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors combined with TACE (TTP) or HAIC (HTP), respectively. Tumor response and survival outcomes were compared.

Results

The median overall survival (mOS) was 21.0 months in the TTP group and 15.0 months in the HTP group (P = 0.525; HR = 1.23; 95% CI 0.66-2.29). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.7 months in the TTP group and 9.9 months in the HTP group (P = 0.160; HR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.42-1.16). After Propensity Score Matching (PSM), the mOS was 21.0 months in the TTP group and 18.0 months in the HTP group (P = 0.644; HR = 1.20; 95% CI 0.56-2.58). The mPFS was 6.4 months in the TTP group and 15.0 months in the HTP group (P = 0.028; HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.93). The disease control rate in overall response (90.2% vs 76.7%, P = 0.116, before PSM; 91.7% vs 75.0%, P = 0.121, after PSM) and intrahepatic response (94.1% vs 80.0%, P = 0.070, before PSM; 91.7% vs 79.2%, P = 0.220, after PSM) were higher in the HTP group than in the TTP group.

Conclusion

Though including more advanced tumors, the clinical outcomes of HAIC combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors are comparable to TACE-based combination therapy for unresectable HCC. Nevertheless, HTP significantly improved the PFS benefits in HCC patients with with large tumor burden or vascular invasion.

Survival benefit of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Background/purpose: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is generally poor and hepatectomy is optional for these patients. This study aims to explore the survival benefits of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for resectable HCC with PVTT. Methods: This retrospective study included 120 resectable HCC patients with PVTT who underwent hepatectomy, from January 2017 to January 2021 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Of these patients, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 55 patients who received hepatectomy alone (Surgery group) and 65 patients who received neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy (HAIC-Surgery group) were compared. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to develop a model predicting the response to neoadjuvant HAIC. Results: The OS rates for the HAIC-Surgery group at 1, 3, and 5 years were 94.9%, 78%, and 66.4%, respectively, compared with 84.6%, 47.6%, and 37.2% in the Surgery group (p < 0.001). The RFS rates were 88.7%, 56.2%, and 38.6% versus 84.9%, 38.3%, and 22.6% (p = 0.002). The subgroup analysis revealed that the survival benefit of neoadjuvant HAIC was limited to patients who responded to it. The logistic model, consisting of AFP and CRP, that predicted the response to neoadjuvant HAIC performed well, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.756. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy is associated with a longer survival outcome than hepatectomy alone for HCC patients with PVTT and the survival benefit is limited to patients who respond to neoadjuvant FOLFOX-HAIC.

Survival benefit of preoperative hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin followed by hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) demonstrated promising efficacy against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as an alleviative treatment. We aimed to explore the survival benefit of preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC and establish a predictive nomogram. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed data from 1251 HCC patients who underwent liver resection. 1027 patients received liver resection alone (LR group), and 224 patients were treated with FOLFOX-HAIC followed by liver resection (HLR group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted between the two groups. The nomogram was established based on the findings of the multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: After Propensity score matching according to initial tumor characteristics, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 85.4, 72.0, and 67.2% in the LR group and 95.2, 84.7, and 75.9% in the HLR group, respectively (p = 0.014). After PSM according to preoperative tumor characteristics, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 87.9, 76.6, and 72.3% in the LR group and 95.4, 84.4, and 75.1% in the HLR group, respectively (p = 0.24). Harrell's C-indexes of the nomogram for OS prediction in patients with preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC were 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86) in the training cohort and 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.93) in the validation cohort and the nomogram performed well-fitted calibration curves. Conclusion: Preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC is associated with a longer survival outcome for HCC patients. The novel nomogram efficiently predicted the OS of patients who underwent preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with or without lenvatinib for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center retrospective study

Aim

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX) plus lenvatinib and FOLFOX-HAIC alone in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

Patients & methods

Retrospective analysis of patients receiving FOLFOX-HAIC with or without lenvatinib.

Results

Forty-one patients were included, with 22 patients receiving HAIC alone and 19 patients receiving HAIC plus lenvatinib. Combination treatment significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival compared with HAIC alone. Grade 1-2 adverse events were more frequent in the combination group but manageable. No severe AEs or treatment-related deaths were reported.

Conclusion

FOLFOX-HAIC plus lenvatinib has the potential to be a treatment option for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?

Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effective interventional treatment for HCC. In recent years, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gained increasing attention as an application-regulated modality for TAI. Owing to the current debate in the medical community regarding the use of HAIC and TACE for the treatment of HCC, the application of both approaches should be considered at a higher level, with a broader perspective and a more normative aspect. Accordingly, we aimed to define the rational combination of liver cancer TAI/HAIC with TACE as infusion transcatheter chemoembolization (iTACE), which suggests that the two interventions are not superior but lead to a mutually beneficial situation. In this review, we sought to discuss the development, specification, application, challenge and innovation, debate, and union of TAI/HAIC and TACE, and the clinical application and latest research on iTACE. We aimed to introduce new concepts of iTACE and expect new breakthroughs in the treatment of liver cancer owing to the combined use of the two major interventional tools.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and molecularly targeted agents for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a real world study

BACKGROUND

Molecular targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy significantly improves the prognosis of patients with advanced liver cancer. Additionally, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) can improve the prognosis of patients with advanced liver cancer. This real-world study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of primary unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

METHODS

A total of 135 patients with uHCC were enrolled in this study. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. The efficacy of the combination therapy was assessed based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) guidelines. Overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs) and surgical conversion rate were the secondary endpoints. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to examine independent prognostic factors. For sensitivity analysis, inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to balance the influence of the tested confounding factors between groups to verify the robustness of conversion surgery for survival benefits. The E-values were estimated to assess robustness to unmeasured confounders.

RESULTS

The median number of therapies was three. Approximately 60% of the patients had portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT). The most common targeted drugs were lenvatinib and bevacizumab, whereas the most common immunotherapy drug was sintilimab. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 54.1%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 94.6%. A total of 97 (72%) patients experienced AEs of grades 3-4. Fatigue, pain and fever were the most common symptoms of grade 3-4 AEs. The median PFS was 28 months and 7 months in the successful and unsuccessful conversion groups, respectively. The median OS was 30 months and 15 months in the successful and unsuccessful conversion groups, respectively. Successful conversion surgery, sex, hapatic vein invasion, BCLC stage, baseline tumour size, AFP levels and maximum therapeutic response were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Successful conversion surgery, number of interventions, hapatic vein invasion and total bilirubin levels were independent prognostic factors for OS. After IPTW, no standardised differences exceeding 0.1 were found. IPW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that successful conversion surgery was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. The E-values of successful conversion surgery were 7.57 and 6.53 for OS and PFS, respectively, which indicated a relatively robust impact of successful conversion surgery on the prognosis of patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with primary uHCC undergoing HAIC combined with immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy have a higher tumour regression rate and the side effects are manageable. Patients undergoing surgery after combination therapy have survival benefits.

Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Stand and Perspectives

Hepatocellular carcinoma often develops in the context of chronic liver disease. It is the sixth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although the mainstay of therapy is surgical resection, most patients are not eligible because of liver dysfunction or tumor extent. Sorafenib was the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor that improved the overall survival of patients who failed to respond to local therapies or had advanced disease, and for many years, it was the only treatment approved for the first-line setting. However, in recent years, trials have demonstrated an improvement in survival with treatments based on immunotherapy and new targeting agents, thereby extending the treatment options. A phase III trial showed that a combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy, including atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, improved survival in the first-line setting, and is now considered the new standard of care. Other agents and combinations are being tested, including the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and tremelimumab plus durvalumab, and they reportedly have clinical benefits. The aim of this manuscript is to review the latest approved therapeutic options in first- and second-line settings for advanced HCC and discuss future perspectives.

Chemosaturation for primary and secondary liver malignancies: A comprehensive update of current evidence

Regional therapies for primary and secondary liver tumors have garnered interest in recent years and several types of treatment approaches have been pursued to control disease, palliate symptoms, and extend survival. Chemosaturation is an innovative way to deliver high-dose chemotherapy to the liver via the hepatic artery. Within the last decade, "isolated hepatic perfusion" (IHP) has evolved from an open surgical approach to a minimally invasive procedure, now termed "chemosaturation" (CS) with "percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP)". The most conclusive data on CS-PHP is currently available for patients with hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma (UM) - a rare but devastating disease with a poor long-term survival rate. A global phase-3 study and several cohort studies have provided compelling evidence that CS-PHP is an effective salvage treatment for liver-dominant metastatic UM in institutions with appropriate expertise. In this review we provide an overview on the technique, available clinical data, including safety and efficacy, and potential indications for CS-PHP.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: A bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gained popularity in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Although several studies have been published, no bibliometric analysis have been conducted on this topic.

OBJECTIVES

To understand the development status and future trends in the application of HAIC, we conducted bibliometric analysis to examine the cooperation and influence among countries, institutions, authors, and journals.

METHODS

All relevant articles and reviews on the use of HAIC in HCC treatment were retrieved from the Web of Science database. A bibliometric analysis of countries, institutions, journals, authors, and keywords related to this field was performed using R and VOSviewer software. The main aspects analyzed were the research status and key fields of HAIC in HCC treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 1026 articles published in 292 journals by 4937 authors from 959 institutions between 1974 and 2021 were retrieved. A rapid increase in articles published after 1990 was observed, which reached the peak in 2021. Japan had the most publications and citations. Yonsei University, Sun Yat-sen University, and Hiroshima University were the three leading institutions in research on this topic. Kwang-Hyub Han and Masatoshi Kudo have the greatest academic influence in this field. Most publications were made in the Hepato-Gastroenterology, whereas cancer had the most citations. The main aspects of HAIC treatment of HCC include HAIC and TACE, chemotherapy drug selection, HAIC and targeted therapy and immunotherapy, HAIC and surgery, and hepatotoxicity. Keywords such as FOLFOX, lenvatinib, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy are hot words in this field in recent years.

CONCLUSION

The research on the use of HAIC in the treatment of HCC has been on the rise. Currently, HAIC combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy has attracted significant attention.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus programmed death-1 inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization

Background

The subsequent therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still controversial. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy comprising hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), lenvatinib, and programmed death-1 inhibitors relative to HAIC combined with lenvatinib.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed data from HCC patients with refractory to TACE from June 2017 to July 2022. Primary study outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events.

Results

We enrolled 149 patients finally, including 75 patients who received HAIC combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors therapy (HAIC+L+P group) and 74 patients who received HAIC combined with lenvatinib therapy (HAIC+L group). The median OS in the HAIC+L+P group (16.0; 95% CI: 13.6~18.3 months) was significantly higher compared to the HAIC+L group (9.0; 95% CI: 6.5~11.4 months) (p = 0.002), while the median PFS in the HAIC+L+P group (11.0; 95% CI: 8.6~13.3 months) was significantly higher compared to the HAIC+L group (6.0; 95% CI: 5.0~6.9 months) (p < 0.001). Significant between-group differences in DCR (p = 0.027) were found. Additionally, 48 pairs of patients were matched after propensity matching analysis. The survival prognosis between two groups before propensity matching is similar to that after propensity matching. Moreover, the percentage of patients with hypertension in the HAIC+L+P group was significantly higher compared to the HAIC+L group (28.00% vs. 13.51%; p = 0.029).

Conclusions

A combination therapy of HAIC, lenvatinib, and programmed death-1 inhibitors significantly improved oncologic response and prolonged survival duration, showing a better survival prognosis for HCC patients with refractory toTACE.

Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is expected to exert a synergistic anticancer effect. We conducted this systematic review to examine the efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus HAIC vs sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library with the following search terms: "sorafenib," "hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy," "HAIC," "advanced," "hepatocellular carcinoma," and "HCC." Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and we calculated the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs for objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

We found that sorafenib plus HAIC was associated with significantly better OS (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.83; P < 0.01), PFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.72; P < 0.01), and ORR (RR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.87-7.58; P < 0.01) than sorafenib alone in advanced HCC. Grade 3/4 AEs were more frequent in the sorafenib plus HAIC group, including leukopenia (RR, 4.54; 95% CI, 1.77-11.64; P < 0.01), neutropenia (RR, 7.81; 95% CI, 3.36-18.16; P < 0.01), thrombocytopenia (RR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.98-4.46; P < 0.01), anemia (RR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.22-4.09; P < 0.01), anorexia (RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.07-5.27; P = 0.03), nausea (RR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.19-7.42; P = 0.02), and vomiting (RR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.14-14.01; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Sorafenib plus HAIC improved OS, PFS, and ORR compared with sorafenib alone in advanced HCC, with acceptable safety profile.

One day versus two days of hepatic arterial infusion with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil was effective in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The program of FOLFOX-HAIC in HCC was performed for 1 day (HAIC 1d) or 2 days (HAIC 2d). We hereby retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety between these two treatment regimens and explored the predictive power of thymidylate synthase (TYMS), an enzyme involved in the DNA synthesis process and metabolism of fluorouracil.

METHODS

This study included patients with a primary diagnosis of unresectable HCC. These patients received HAIC for 1 day or 2 days. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events were compared. The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. Peripheral blood samples before the treatments were collected and used to measure the concentration of TYMS through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ELISA was performed according to the manufacturers' guidelines.

RESULTS

We included 368 patients for this study: 248 in the HAIC 1d group and 120 in the HAIC 2d group. There was no significant difference of OS between the two groups (14.5 for HAIC 1d vs 15.3 months for HAIC 2d, p=0.46). Compared with the HAIC 1d group, the HAIC 2d group did not prolong the PFS (7.3 vs 7.5 months, p=0.91) or elevate the tumor response (42.5% vs 39.1%, p=0.53) per RECIST 1.1. In the PSM cohort, the efficacy between the two groups was similar. The total frequencies of grade 3-4 events were higher with the HAIC 2d group than with the HAIC 1d group, especially in the PSM cohort (p=0.043). Additionally, patients with TYMS low level might benefit longer OS from the HAIC 2d group (18.7 vs 13.6 months, p=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

There was not much of a difference in efficacy between the two groups, but the HAIC for 1 day might be safer, which needed further research. The level of TYMS might be the predictive biomarkers.

Case report: Conversion therapy to permit resection of initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are diagnosed when the disease is already at an advanced stage, so they are not eligible for resection and their prognosis is poor. The combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with immune checkpoint inhibitors or tyrosine kinase inhibitors can improve unresectable HCC to the point that patients can be treated with surgery. Here we describe two cases of such “conversion therapy”. One patient was a 52-year-old man in Child-Pugh class A with treatment-naive HCC whose 11.3-cm tumor had invaded the middle hepatic vein and right branch of the portal vein. He was treated with TACE plus camrelizumab, and radical resection was performed 3 months later. No evidence of recurrence was observed during 5-month follow-up. The other patient was a 42-year-old man in Child-Pugh class A with HCC involving a 11.4-cm tumor and severe liver cirrhosis. The patient was treated with TACE and lenvatinib, but the embolic effect after one month was unsatisfactory, so the regional treatment was changed to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial embolization. Radical resection was performed 2 months later, and no recurrence was evident at 1-month follow-up. These cases demonstrate two conversion therapies that may allow patients with initially unresectable HCC to benefit from resection.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Background: Interest has revived in the use of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) while transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been a longstanding loco-regional therapy.

Aim: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with unresectable HCC treated with HAIC or TACE to look for differences in survival, adverse events, mortality and downstaging.

Methods: All studies published before 29 July 2022 were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases for patients with unresectable HCC and received HAIC or TACE as initial treatment. Data extracted from studies was statistically analysed using RevMan5.3 software.

Results: A total of one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 7 cohort studies (5 retrospective, 2 prospective) including 1,060 (TACE group: 534, HAIC group: 526) patients were screened. Compared with the TACE group, patients who received HAIC as initial therapy had better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.53, 95%CI [0.40, 0.69]) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.54, 95%CI [0.40, 0.72]). Further subgroup analysis revealed that HAIC showed priority over TACE on prognosis outcome regardless of tumour stage, especially in patients with advanced portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT). Utilization of port system will not boost the efficacy of HAIC whereas using a replaced-microcatheter for each procedure could better reduce the progressive disease (PD) rate (RR = 0.55, 95%CI [0.40, 0.76]). The pooled RR favoured the HAIC group with regard to partial response (PR) (RR = 2.87, 95%CI [2.18, 3.78]) and this was validated by both GRADE summary and trial sequential analysis. The rate of resection after treatment was higher in the HAIC group (RR = 2.37, 95%CI [1.54, 3.66]), whilst no difference was found with procedure-related mortality (RR = 0.56, 95%CI [0.13, 2.38]) between two groups. Compared with the traditional chemotherapy regimen (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) FOLFOX-HAIC appears to be better in improving the treatment efficacy.

Conclusion: Patients with unresectable HCC could potentially benefit more from HAIC rather than standard TACE treatment. A re-evaluation of HAIC as a treatment option in intermediate and advanced HCC is warranted.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Oxaliplatin Plus Raltitrexed as an Alternative Option in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Failure of, or Unsuitability for, Transarterial Chemoembolization

Background and Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed (HAICROX) as an alternative treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are ineligible for, or failed, the transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment. Materials and Methods: From July 2020 to November 2021, a total of 35 HCC patients were enrolled and received HAIC with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed. The overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. The tumor response was assessed by the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST), and the adverse events were investigated using the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 5.0 (CTCAE 5.0). Results: The median OS and TTP were 10 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.5-14.6) and 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.7), respectively. By means of multivariate analysis, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) immunotherapy was found to be an independent prognostic factor for better survival. No patients experienced toxicity-related death. Thrombocytopenia, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation were the most common toxicities. No grade 3 or higher adverse events related to HAICROX were observed. Conclusion: HAICROX showed valuable efficacy and tolerable toxicity in advanced HCC patients who progressed on TACE or were ineligible for TACE. HAICROX is a promising treatment for advanced-stage HCC patients with TACE failure or ineligibility.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy as a Timing Strategy for Conversion Surgery to Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Real-World Study

Objective

To evaluate whether surgery-related complications are increased after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin for conversion compared with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection and the optimal timing of conversion surgery (CS).

Background

HAIC has been widely used for advanced HCC, especially initially unresectable HCC, to facilitate conversion to curative-intent resection in approximately 23.8% of cases. However, the optimal timing of surgery to reduce surgical complications must be clarified.

Methods

Data from 320 HCC patients, including 107 initially unresectable patients in the HAIC-Surgery group and 213 patients in the Surgery group, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Survival outcomes and the incidence of surgery-related complications were compared.

Results

There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the HAIC-Surgery group and the Surgery group (HR: 1.140, 95% CI: 0.8027-1.618, p=0.444). The HAIC-Surgery group had a higher incidence of surgery-related complications than the Surgery group [biliary leakage (10.3% vs 4.2%, p=0.035), abdominal bleeding (10.3% vs 3.8%, p=0.020), pleural effusion (56.1% vs 23.0%, p<0.0001) and ascites effusion (17.8% vs 5.2%, p<0.0001)]. In the HAIC-Surgery group, postoperative liver function decreased and abdominal bleeding increased with more preoperative HAIC cycles (Spearman=0.229, p=0.042, Spearman=0.198, p=0.041, respectively). The pathological complete remission (pCR) rate after 3-5 HAIC cycles was significantly higher than that after 1-2 cycles (29.4% vs 13.2%, p=0.043).

Conclusion

The prognosis of advanced HCC after conversion surgery is comparable to that after direct surgery. Rather than increasing pCR, more HAIC cycles can exacerbate liver dysfunction and surgery-related complications.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sequential ablation treatment in large hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

To investigate the individualized survival benefit of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sequential ablation treatment in large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

Between February 2016 and December 2020, a total of 228 HCC patients (diameter > 5 cm) who underwent HAIC alone (HAIC group, n = 135) or HAIC and sequential ablation (HAIC-ablation group, n = 93) treatment were reviewed. We applied the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for potential bias of two treatment groups. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared with Kaplan-Meier curves. The Cox regression model was used to identify independent prognostic factors. And a prediction nomogram based on these independent prognostic factors was built, aiming to make probabilistic survival predictions and estimate personalized ablation benefits.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 17.9 months, HCC patients in the HAIC-ablation group have longer significantly OS and PFS than those in the HAIC alone group (median OS: 22.2 months vs. 14.5 months; median PFS: 8.5 months vs. 4.6 months; both, p < 0.001). The IPTW-adjusted analysis revealed similar findings (both, p < 0.001). Tumor size, tumor number, and treatment modality were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. The nomogram based on these factors showed favorable discrimination and well calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC and sequential ablation provided significant survival benefits in patients with large HCC. The nomogram could help predict individual survival probabilities and estimate personalized sequential ablation benefits.

Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has been proved to have promising antitumor activity and tolerable safety in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) also demonstrated high response rates and favorable survival for patients with advanced HCC. This study aimed to explore the preliminary clinical efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with HAIC for patients with treatment-naive advanced HCC.

Methods

Between October 2020 and September 2021, patients with advanced HCC who initially received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with HAIC of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) from three hospitals in China were reviewed for eligibility. The efficacy was evaluated by tumor response rate and survival, and the safety was evaluated by the frequency of key adverse events (AEs).

Results

In total, 52 eligible patients with advanced HCC who received triple therapy were included in this study. The objective response rates (ORRs) based on mRECIST and RECIST1.1 criteria were 67.3% and 44.2%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients was 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.37–13.8), and the overall survival (OS) was not reached. Extrahepatic metastasis was an independent risk factor associated with PFS. All AEs were controlled and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with HAIC-FOLFOX had a significant therapeutic effect and manageable AEs in patients with advanced HCC, which may be a potential treatment option for advanced HCC.

Mediastinal Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma Treated With Arterial Interventional Therapy: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) is an extremely rare extrahepatic carcinoma, which is pathologically featured by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and marked by producing alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). HAC of mediastinum is extremely rare. For inoperable patients, the curative treatment options have not been established, and the outcome of HAC is usually poor. Here, we present a case of mediastinal HAC with normal serum AFP level who achieved well-controlled and good response after local–regional interventional approach combined with systemic PD-1 inhibitor. A 53-year-old male who complained of chest pain was admitted to our hospital in February 2021. A chest CT scan revealed several tumors in his mediastinum. The laboratory data showed normal serum AFP level. HAC was diagnosed through pathological assessment of biopsy. Surgery was not available due to the infiltration of sternum. Local regional FOLFOX chemotherapy was given by transarterial infusion, followed by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and thereafter combined with systemic anti-PD-1 treatment. The patient achieved favorable disease control and apparent symptom relief. So transarterial interventional therapy combined immunotherapy may be a possible and promising treatment for mediastinal HAC.

Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Versus Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy

Aims

To compare the effectiveness, safety, and survival outcomes in patients with infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods

A total of 160 patients with infiltrative HCCs who underwent initial TACE (n = 68) and HAIC (n = 92) treatment from January 2016 to March 2020. We applied the propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for potential imbalances. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were compared between two groups. Multivariate analysis was evaluated through the forward stepwise Cox regression model and β coefficients was applied for the nomogram construction.

Results

The median follow-up duration for the study population was 20.8 months. After PSM, the median OS and PFS in the HAIC group were significantly higher than those in the TACE group (OS, 13.3 vs 10.8 months; p = 0.043; PFS, 7.8 vs 4.0 months; p = 0.035) and the ORR and DCR in the HAIC group were significantly higher than those in the TACE group (ORR, 34.8% vs 11.8%; p = 0.001; DCR, 54.3% vs 36.8%; p = 0.028). A nomogram model comprising albumin-bilirubin grade, treatment responses, sessions, and treatment modalities, showed good predictive accuracy and discrimination (training set, concordance index [C-index] of 0.789; validation set, C-index of 0.757), which outperformed other staging systems and conventional indices.

Conclusion

HAIC improve significantly survival compared to TACE in patients with infiltrative HCC. A prospective randomized trial is ongoing to confirm this finding.

Arterial Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin Plus Fluorouracil Versus Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Biomolecular Exploratory, Randomized, Phase III Trial (FOHAIC-1)

PURPOSE

Interventional hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (HAIC-FO) displayed an encouraging safety profile and antitumor activity in a previous phase II trial and a propensity-score-matching study involving patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

In this open-label, phase III trial, patients with advanced HCC, previously untreated with systemic therapy, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive HAIC-FO or sorafenib. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. An exploratory model for predicting the efficacy of HAIC-FO on the basis of genomic sequencing was developed.

RESULTS

Between May 2017 and May 2020, 262 patients were randomly assigned. The median tumor size was 11.2 cm (interquartile range, 8.5-13.7 cm). Macrovascular invasion was present in 65.6%, and the percentage of patients with > 50% tumor volume involvement of the liver and/or Vp-4 portal vein tumor thrombosis was 49.2%. At data cutoff (October 31, 2020), median OS was 13.9 months for HAIC-FO and 8.2 for sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.408; 95% CI, 0.301 to 0.552; P < .001). Tumor downstaging occurred in 16 (12.3% of 130) patients receiving HAIC-FO, including 15 receiving curative surgery or ablation, and finally achieving a median OS of 20.8 months, with a 1-year OS rate of 93.8%. In high-risk subpopulations, OS was significantly longer with HAIC-FO than with sorafenib (10.8 months v 5.7 months; HR 0.343; 95% CI, 0.219 to 0.538; P < .001). A newly developed 15-mutant-gene prediction model identified 83% of patients with response to HAIC-FO. HAIC-FO responders had longer OS than HAIC-FO nonresponders (19.3 months v 10.6 months; HR 0.323; 95% CI, 0.186 to 0.560; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

HAIC-FO achieved better survival outcomes than sorafenib in advanced HCC, even in association with a high intrahepatic disease burden.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Is a Feasible Treatment Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A New Update

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is one option for treating massive tumors and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is a lack of remedial treatment after these treatments are ineffective or failed.

Summary

Some studies have discovered that HAIC has greater survival in patients with advanced HCC. A previous study has shown that HAIC is effective in the treatment of advanced HCC, and the data on randomized clinical trials are limited and unclear.

Key Message

More clinical trials and research are needed in order to make HAIC a standard and recommended therapy for advanced HCC. Our review focuses on the clinical applications of hepatic artery infusion treatment.