1
|
Padula D, Mauro A, Maggioni P, Kurihara H, Di Sabatino A, Anderloni A. Practical approach to acute pancreatitis: from diagnosis to the management of complications. Intern Emerg Med 2024:10.1007/s11739-024-03666-9. [PMID: 38850357 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03666-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to provide a practical guide for the clinical care of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) from the management of the early phases of disease to the treatment of local complications. AP is one of the most frequent causes of gastroenterological admission in emergency departments. It is characterized by a dynamic and unpredictable course and in its most severe forms, is associated with organ dysfunction and/or local complications, requiring intensive care with significant morbidity and mortality. Initial therapy includes adequate fluid resuscitation, nutrition, analgesia, and when necessary critical care support. In recent years, the development of minimally invasive tailored treatments for local complications, such as endoscopic drainage, has improved patients' acceptance and outcomes. Despite this, the management of AP remains a challenge for clinicians. The present review was conducted by the authors, who formulated specific questions addressing the most critical and current aspects of the clinical course of AP with the aim of providing key messages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donatella Padula
- Emergency Department and Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via F Sforza 35, Milan, Italy
| | - Aurelio Mauro
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Paolo Maggioni
- Emergency Department and Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via F Sforza 35, Milan, Italy
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Medicina di Emergenza-Urgenza, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Hayato Kurihara
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via F. Sforza 35, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Sabatino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trikudanathan G, Yazici C, Evans Phillips A, Forsmark CE. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2024:S0016-5085(24)04916-3. [PMID: 38759844 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is increasing in incidence across the world, and in all age groups. Major changes in management have occurred in the last decade. Avoiding total parenteral nutrition and prophylactic antibiotics, avoiding overly aggressive fluid resuscitation, initiating early feeding, avoiding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the absence of concomitant cholangitis, same-admission cholecystectomy, and minimally invasive approaches to infected necrosis should now be standard of care. Increasing recognition of the risk of recurrence of AP, and progression to chronic pancreatitis, along with the unexpectedly high risk of diabetes and exocrine insufficiency after AP is the subject of large ongoing studies. In this review, we provide an update on important changes in management for this increasingly common disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guru Trikudanathan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Cemal Yazici
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Anna Evans Phillips
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Chris E Forsmark
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sissingh NJ, de Rijk FEM, Timmerhuis HC, Umans DS, Anten MPGF, Bouwense SAW, van Delft F, van Eijck BC, Erkelens WG, Hazen WL, Kuiken SD, Quispel R, Romkens TEH, Schwartz MP, Seerden TC, Spanier BWM, Verlaan T, Vleggaar FP, Voermans RP, Verdonk RC, van Hooft JE. Gallstones as a cause in presumed acute alcoholic pancreatitis: observational multicentre study. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae107. [PMID: 38713609 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on the incidence and clinical relevance of gallstones in patients with suspected acute alcoholic pancreatitis are lacking and are essential to minimize the risk of recurrent acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of gallstones and the associated rate of recurrent acute pancreatitis in patients with presumed acute alcoholic pancreatitis. METHODS Between 2008 and 2019, 23 hospitals prospectively enrolled patients with acute pancreatitis. Those diagnosed with their first episode of presumed acute alcoholic pancreatitis were included in this study. The term gallstones was used to describe the presence of cholelithiasis or biliary sludge found during imaging. The primary outcome was pancreatitis recurrence during 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 334 patients were eligible for inclusion, of whom 316 were included in the follow-up analysis. Gallstone evaluation, either during the index admission or during follow-up, was performed for 306 of 334 patients (91.6%). Gallstones were detected in 54 patients (17.6%), with a median time to detection of 6 (interquartile range 0-42) weeks. During follow-up, recurrent acute pancreatitis occurred in 121 of 316 patients (38.3%), with a significantly higher incidence rate for patients with gallstones compared with patients without gallstones (59% versus 34.2% respectively; P < 0.001), while more patients with gallstones had stopped drinking alcohol at the time of their first recurrence (41% versus 24% respectively; P = 0.020). Cholecystectomy was performed for 19 patients with gallstones (36%). The recurrence rate was lower for patients in the cholecystectomy group compared with patients who did receive inadequate treatment or no treatment (5/19 versus 19/34 respectively; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION Gallstones were found in almost one in every five patients diagnosed with acute alcoholic pancreatitis. Gallstones were associated with a higher rate of recurrent pancreatitis, while undergoing cholecystectomy was associated with a reduction in this rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor J Sissingh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Fleur E M de Rijk
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester C Timmerhuis
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Devica S Umans
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Paule G F Anten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan A W Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Foke van Delft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Brechje C van Eijck
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien G Erkelens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd D Kuiken
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Romkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander MC, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - B W Marcel Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Verlaan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McDermott J, Kao LS, Keeley JA, Nahmias J, de Virgilio C. Management of Gallstone Pancreatitis: A Review. JAMA Surg 2024:2818236. [PMID: 38691369 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.8111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Importance Gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) is the leading cause of acute pancreatitis, accounting for approximately 50% of cases. Without appropriate and timely treatment, patients are at increased risk of disease progression and recurrence. While there is increasing consensus among guidelines for the management of mild GSP, adherence to these guidelines remains poor. In addition, there is minimal evidence to guide clinicians in the treatment of moderately severe and severe pancreatitis. Observations The management of GSP continues to evolve and is dependent on severity of acute pancreatitis and concomitant biliary diagnoses. Across the spectrum of severity, there is evidence that goal-directed, moderate fluid resuscitation decreases the risk of fluid overload and mortality compared with aggressive resuscitation. Patients with isolated, mild GSP should undergo same-admission cholecystectomy; early cholecystectomy within 48 hours of admission has been supported by several randomized clinical trials. Cholecystectomy should be delayed for patients with severe disease; for severe and moderately severe disease, the optimal timing remains unclear. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is only useful for patients with suspected cholangitis or biliary obstruction, although the concomitance of these conditions in patients with GSP is rare. Modality of evaluation of the common bile duct to rule out concomitant choledocholithiasis varies and should be tailored to level of concern based on objective measures, such as laboratory results and imaging findings. Among these modalities, intraoperative cholangiography is associated with reduced length of stay and decreased use of ERCP. However, the benefit of routine intraoperative cholangiography remains in question. Conclusions and Relevance Treatment of GSP is dependent on disease severity, which can be difficult to assess. A comprehensive review of clinically relevant evidence and recommendations on GSP severity grading, fluid resuscitation, timing of cholecystectomy, need for ERCP, and evaluation and management of persistent choledocholithiasis can help guide clinicians in diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James McDermott
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Lillian S Kao
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
| | - Jessica A Keeley
- Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Jeffry Nahmias
- Division of Trauma, Burns, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cadili L, Streith L, Segedi M, Hayashi AH. Management of complex acute biliary disease for the general surgeon: A narrative review. Am J Surg 2024; 231:46-54. [PMID: 36990834 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
Acute gallbladder diseases are a common surgical emergency faced by General Surgeons that can sometimes be quite challenging. These complex biliary diseases require multifaceted and expeditious care, optimized based on hospital facility and operating room (OR) resources and the expertise of the surgical team. Effective management of biliary emergencies requires two foundational principles: achieving source control while mitigating the risk of injury to the biliary tree and its blood supply. This review article highlights salient literature on seven complex biliary diseases: acute cholecystitis, cholangitis, Mirizzi syndrome, gallstone ileus with cholecystoenteric fistula, gallstone pancreatitis, gall bladder cancer, and post-cholecystectomy bile leak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Cadili
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Lucas Streith
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Maja Segedi
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Allen H Hayashi
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Island Health Authority, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Robertson FP, Dennison AR, Pandanaboyana S. Optimal Timing of Cholecystectomy for Severe Acute Pancreatitis and Understanding Complications and Comorbidities. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:465. [PMID: 38198168 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Francis P Robertson
- Department of HPB Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Division of Surgical and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ashley R Dennison
- Department of HPB Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
- University of Leicester Medical School, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Rijk F, Sissingh NJ, Boel TT, Timmerhuis HC, de Jong M, Pauw HS, van Veldhuisen CL, Hallensleben ND, Anten M, Brink MA, Curvers WL, van Duijvendijk P, Hazen WL, Kuiken SD, Poen AC, Quispel R, Römkens T, Spanier B, Tan A, Vleggaar FP, Voorburg A, Witteman B, Ali UA, Issa Y, Bouwense S, Voermans RP, van Wanrooij R, Stommel M, van Hooft JE, de Jonge PJ, van Goor H, Boermeester MA, Besselink MG, Bruno MJ, Verdonk RC, van Santvoort HC. Development of pancreatic diseases during long-term follow-up after acute pancreatitis: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:674-684. [PMID: 38191176 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM More insight into the incidence of and factors associated with progression following a first episode of acute pancreatitis (AP) would offer opportunities for improvements in disease management and patient counseling. METHODS A long-term post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with AP (2008-2015) was performed. Primary endpoints were recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and pancreatic cancer. Cumulative incidence calculations and risk analyses were performed. RESULTS Overall, 1184 patients with a median follow-up of 9 years (IQR: 7-11) were included. RAP and CP occurred in 301 patients (25%) and 72 patients (6%), with the highest incidences observed for alcoholic pancreatitis (40% and 22%). Pancreatic cancer was diagnosed in 14 patients (1%). Predictive factors for RAP were alcoholic and idiopathic pancreatitis (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.51-4.82 and OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.40-3.02), and no pancreatic interventions (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.10-3.01). Non-biliary etiology (alcohol: OR 5.24, 95% CI 1.94-14.16, idiopathic: OR 4.57, 95% CI 2.05-10.16, and other: OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.11-7.94), RAP (OR 4.93, 95% CI 2.84-8.58), prior pancreatic interventions (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.20-8.02), smoking (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.14-4.78), and male sex (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.05-4.05) were independently associated with CP. CONCLUSION Disease progression was observed in a quarter of pancreatitis patients. We identified several risk factors that may be helpful to devise personalized strategies with the intention to reduce the impact of disease progression in patients with AP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fem de Rijk
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N J Sissingh
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T T Boel
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - H C Timmerhuis
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Mjp de Jong
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H S Pauw
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - C L van Veldhuisen
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N D Hallensleben
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mpgf Anten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Franciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A Brink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - W L Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - W L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - S D Kuiken
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A C Poen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - R Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Teh Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Bwm Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Acitl Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - F P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Amcj Voorburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bjm Witteman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - U Ahmed Ali
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Y Issa
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Saw Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R P Voermans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rlj van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mwj Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P J de Jonge
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Song Y, Lee SH. Recent Treatment Strategies for Acute Pancreatitis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:978. [PMID: 38398290 PMCID: PMC10889262 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13040978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a leading gastrointestinal disease that causes hospitalization. Initial management in the first 72 h after the diagnosis of AP is pivotal, which can influence the clinical outcomes of the disease. Initial management, including assessment of disease severity, fluid resuscitation, pain control, nutritional support, antibiotic use, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in gallstone pancreatitis, plays a fundamental role in AP treatment. Recent updates for fluid resuscitation, including treatment goals, the type, rate, volume, and duration, have triggered a paradigm shift from aggressive hydration with normal saline to goal-directed and non-aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer's solution. Evidence of the clinical benefit of early enteral feeding is becoming definitive. The routine use of prophylactic antibiotics is generally limited, and the procalcitonin-based algorithm of antibiotic use has recently been investigated to distinguish between inflammation and infection in patients with AP. Although urgent ERCP (within 24 h) should be performed for patients with gallstone pancreatitis and cholangitis, urgent ERCP is not indicated in patients without cholangitis. The management approach for patients with local complications of AP, particularly those with infected necrotizing pancreatitis, is discussed in detail, including indications, timing, anatomical considerations, and selection of intervention methods. Furthermore, convalescent treatment, including cholecystectomy in gallstone pancreatitis, lipid-lowering medications in hypertriglyceridemia-induced AP, and alcohol intervention in alcoholic pancreatitis, is also important for improving the prognosis and preventing recurrence in patients with AP. This review focuses on recent updates on the initial and convalescent management strategies for AP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sang-Hoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Palumbo R, Schuster KM. Contemporary management of acute pancreatitis: What you need to know. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2024; 96:156-165. [PMID: 37722072 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Acute pancreatitis and management of its complications is a common consult for the acute care surgeon. With the ongoing development of both operative and endoscopic treatment modalities, management recommendations continue to evolve. We describe the current diagnostic and treatment guidelines for acute pancreatitis through the lens of acute care surgery. Topics, including optimal nutrition, timing of cholecystectomy in gallstone pancreatitis, and the management of peripancreatic fluid collections, are discussed. Although the management severe acute pancreatitis can include advanced interventional modalities including endoscopic, percutaneous, and surgical debridement, the initial management of acute pancreatitis includes fluid resuscitation, early enteral nutrition, and close monitoring with consideration of cross-sectional imaging and antibiotics in the setting of suspected superimposed infection. Several scoring systems including the Revised Atlanta Criteria, the Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis score, and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade have been devised to classify and predict the development of the severe acute pancreatitis. In biliary pancreatitis, cholecystectomy prior to discharge is recommended in mild disease and within 8 weeks of necrotizing pancreatitis, while early peripancreatic fluid collections should be managed without intervention. Underlying infection or ongoing symptoms warrant delayed intervention with technique selection dependent on local expertise, anatomic location of the fluid collection, and the specific clinical scenario. Landmark trials have shifted therapy from maximally invasive necrosectomy to more minimally invasive step-up approaches. The acute care surgeon should maintain a skill set that includes these minimally invasive techniques to successfully manage these patients. Overall, the management of acute pancreatitis for the acute care surgeon requires a strong understanding of both the clinical decisions and the options for intervention should this be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Palumbo
- From the Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sirtl S, Orgler E, Vielhauer J, Beyer G, Mayerle J. [Acute pancreatitis - diagnosis and management]. MMW Fortschr Med 2023; 165:52-57. [PMID: 37919589 DOI: 10.1007/s15006-023-3007-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Sirtl
- LMU Klinikum München, Medizinische Klinik undPoliklinik II, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
| | - Elisabeth Orgler
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Campus Großhadern | LMU Klinikum, Marchioninstr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - Jakob Vielhauer
- LMU Klinikum München, Medizinische Klinik undPoliklinik II, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - Georg Beyer
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Campus Großhadern | LMU Klinikum, Marchioninstr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum Großhadern der LMU-München, Marchionistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Di Martino M, Ielpo B, Pata F, Pellino G, Di Saverio S, Catena F, De Simone B, Coccolini F, Sartelli M, Damaskos D, Mole D, Murzi V, Leppaniemi A, Pisanu A, Podda M. Timing of Cholecystectomy After Moderate and Severe Acute Biliary Pancreatitis. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:e233660. [PMID: 37610760 PMCID: PMC10448376 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Importance Considering the lack of equipoise regarding the timing of cholecystectomy in patients with moderately severe and severe acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), it is critical to assess this issue. Objective To assess the outcomes of early cholecystectomy (EC) in patients with moderately severe and severe ABP. Design, Settings, and Participants This cohort study retrospectively analyzed real-life data from the MANCTRA-1 (Compliance With Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines in the Management of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis) data set, assessing 5304 consecutive patients hospitalized between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, for ABP from 42 countries. A total of 3696 patients who were hospitalized for ABP and underwent cholecystectomy were included in the analysis; of these, 1202 underwent EC, defined as a cholecystectomy performed within 14 days of admission. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic factors of mortality and morbidity. Data analysis was performed from January to February 2023. Main Outcomes Mortality and morbidity after EC. Results Of the 3696 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [17.8] years; 1907 [51.5%] female) included in the analysis, 1202 (32.5%) underwent EC and 2494 (67.5%) underwent delayed cholecystectomy (DC). Overall, EC presented an increased risk of postoperative mortality (1.4% vs 0.1%, P < .001) and morbidity (7.7% vs 3.7%, P < .001) compared with DC. On the multivariable analysis, moderately severe and severe ABP were associated with increased mortality (odds ratio [OR], 361.46; 95% CI, 2.28-57 212.31; P = .02) and morbidity (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.35-5.19; P = .005). In patients with moderately severe and severe ABP (n = 108), EC was associated with an increased risk of mortality (16 [15.6%] vs 0 [0%], P < .001), morbidity (30 [30.3%] vs 57 [5.5%], P < .001), bile leakage (2 [2.4%] vs 4 [0.4%], P = .02), and infections (12 [14.6%] vs 4 [0.4%], P < .001) compared with patients with mild ABP who underwent EC. In patients with moderately severe and severe ABP (n = 108), EC was associated with higher mortality (16 [15.6%] vs 2 [1.2%], P < .001), morbidity (30 [30.3%] vs 17 [10.3%], P < .001), and infections (12 [14.6%] vs 2 [1.3%], P < .001) compared with patients with moderately severe and severe ABP who underwent DC. On the multivariable analysis, the patient's age (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.36; P = .03) and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (OR, 5.91; 95% CI, 1.06-32.78; P = .04) were associated with mortality; severe complications of ABP were associated with increased mortality (OR, 50.04; 95% CI, 2.37-1058.01; P = .01) and morbidity (OR, 33.64; 95% CI, 3.19-354.73; P = .003). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study's findings suggest that EC should be considered carefully in patients with moderately severe and severe ABP, as it was associated with increased postoperative mortality and morbidity. However, older and more fragile patients manifesting severe complications related to ABP should most likely not be considered for EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Di Martino
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, A.O.R.N. Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Benedetto Ielpo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Pata
- Department of Surgery, Nicola Giannettasio Hospital, Corigliano-Rossano, Italy
- Department of Pharmacy, Health, and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania, Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of Surgery, Madonna del Soccorso Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy/Saint Germain en Laye, Poissy Cedex, France
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency, and Trauma Surgery Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Dimitrios Damaskos
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Damian Mole
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Valentina Murzi
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Ari Leppaniemi
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Adolfo Pisanu
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bruno MJ. Endoscopy in Gallstone Pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:701-707. [PMID: 37709405 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
The root cause for biliary pancreatitis is a transient impediment of the outflow of secretion from the pancreatic duct due to gallstones and sludge obstructing the ampulla of Vater. Based on meta-analyses and recent studies, clear recommendations can be formulated when and when not to perform an ERC in patients with biliary pancreatitis. ERC is indicated urgently in patients with biliary pancreatitis and concomitant cholangitis. Urgent ERC is not indicated in patients with predicted mild or severe biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis, even when stones or sludge are proven on EUS imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review provides insight into the recent advancements in the management of acute pancreatitis. RECENT FINDINGS Moderate fluid resuscitation and Ringer's lactate has advantages above aggressive fluid resuscitation and normal saline, respectively. A normal "on-demand" diet has a positive effect on recovery from acute pancreatitis and length of hospital stay. A multimodal pain management approach including epidural analgesia might reduce unwarranted effects of opiate use. A more targeted use of antibiotics is starting to emerge. Markers such as procalcitonin may be used to limit unwarranted antibiotic use. Conversely, many patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis can be treated with only antibiotics, although the optimal choice and duration is unclear. Delay of drainage as much as is possible is advised since it is associated with less procedures. If drainage is required, clinicians have an expanding arsenal of interventional options to their disposal such as the lumen-apposing metal stent for transgastric drainage and (repeated) necrosectomy. Immunomodulation using removal of systemic cytokines or anti-inflammatory drugs is an attractive idea, but up to now the results of clinical trials are disappointing. No additional preventive measures beside non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be recommended for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. SUMMARY More treatment modalities that are less invasive became available and a trend towards less aggressive treatments (fluids, starvation, interventions, opiates) of acute pancreatitis is again emerging. Despite recent advancements, the pathophysiology of specific subgroup phenotypes is still poorly understood which reflects the disappointing results of pharmacological and immunomodulatory trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fons F. van den Berg
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology & Infection prevention
| | - Marja A. Boermeester
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9
- Amsterdam institute for Infection and Immunity
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hallensleben ND, Stassen PMC, Schepers NJ, Besselink MG, Anten MPGF, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL, da Costa DW, van Dijk SM, van Dullemen HM, Dijkgraaf MGW, van Eijck B, van Eijck CHJ, Erkelens W, Erler NS, Fockens P, van Geenen EJM, van Grinsven J, Hazen WL, Hollemans RA, van Hooft JE, Jansen JM, Kubben FJGM, Kuiken SD, Poen AC, Quispel R, de Ridder RJ, Römkens TEH, Schoon EJ, Schwartz MP, Seerden TCJ, Smeets XJNM, Spanier BWM, Tan ACITL, Thijs WJ, Timmer R, Umans DS, Venneman NG, Verdonk RC, Vleggaar FP, van de Vrie W, van Wanrooij RLJ, Witteman BJ, van Santvoort HC, Bouwense SAW, Bruno MJ. Patient selection for urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography by endoscopic ultrasound in predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis (APEC-2): a multicentre prospective study. Gut 2023:gutjnl-2022-328258. [PMID: 36849226 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Routine urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (ES) does not improve outcome in patients with predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis. Improved patient selection for ERCP by means of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for stone/sludge detection may challenge these findings. DESIGN A multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients with predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis. Patients underwent urgent EUS, followed by ERCP with ES in case of common bile duct stones/sludge, within 24 hours after hospital presentation and within 72 hours after symptom onset. The primary endpoint was a composite of major complications or mortality within 6 months after inclusion. The historical control group was the conservative treatment arm (n=113) of the randomised APEC trial (Acute biliary Pancreatitis: urgent ERCP with sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment, patient inclusion 2013-2017) applying the same study design. RESULTS Overall, 83 patients underwent urgent EUS at a median of 21 hours (IQR 17-23) after hospital presentation and at a median of 29 hours (IQR 23-41) after start of symptoms. Gallstones/sludge in the bile ducts were detected by EUS in 48/83 patients (58%), all of whom underwent immediate ERCP with ES. The primary endpoint occurred in 34/83 patients (41%) in the urgent EUS-guided ERCP group. This was not different from the 44% rate (50/113 patients) in the historical conservative treatment group (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.29; p=0.65). Sensitivity analysis to correct for baseline differences using a logistic regression model also showed no significant beneficial effect of the intervention on the primary outcome (adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.90, p=0.92). CONCLUSION In patients with predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis, urgent EUS-guided ERCP with ES did not reduce the composite endpoint of major complications or mortality, as compared with conservative treatment in a historical control group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN15545919.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora D Hallensleben
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline M C Stassen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolien J Schepers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Paule G F Anten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Franciscus Vlietland Groep, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf J Bakker
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas L Bollen
- Department of Radiology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - David W da Costa
- Department of Radiology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Sven M van Dijk
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik M van Dullemen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Universtiy of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
- Methodology department, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Brechje van Eijck
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien Erkelens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert A Hollemans
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology, OLVG, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J G M Kubben
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd D Kuiken
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander C Poen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier J de Ridder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Gastroenterology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Xavier J N M Smeets
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - B W Marcel Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Willem J Thijs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robin Timmer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Devica S Umans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Niels G Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wim van de Vrie
- Department of Gastroenterology and Heptatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Ben J Witteman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan A W Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Importance For decades, infected or symptomatic pancreatic necrosis was managed by open surgical necrosectomy, an approach that has now been largely supplanted by an array of techniques referred to as the step-up approach. Observations This review describes the evidence base behind the step-up approach, when to use the different techniques, and their technical basics. The most common treatment strategies are included: percutaneous drainage, video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement, sinus tract endoscopy, endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy, and surgical transgastric necrosectomy. Also included is the evidence base around management of common complications that can occur during step-up management, such as hemorrhage, intestinal fistula, and thrombosis, in addition to associated issues that can arise during step-up management, such as the need for cholecystectomy and disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. Conclusions and Relevance The treatment strategies highlighted in this review are those most commonly used during step-up management, and this review is designed as a guide to the evidence base underlying these strategies, as surgeons tailor their therapeutic approach to individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia R Maurer
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Peter J Fagenholz
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Authors' Reply: Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World J Surg 2022; 46:2541-2542. [PMID: 35854012 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06673-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
17
|
[Temporal sequence of bile duct clearance with simultaneous cholecystolithiasis or choledocholithiasis-Preoperative, intraoperative or postoperative?]. Chirurg 2022; 93:542-547. [PMID: 35107623 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01583-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 10% of patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis also have choledocholithiasis. The probability of this can be estimated on the basis of sonographic and laboratory chemistry parameters. If the probability is high, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) or cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be performed and if the probability is low, cholecystectomy can be performed without further diagnostics. If the findings are equivocal, further work-up should be performed to detect or exclude choledocholithiasis by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). If choledocholithiasis is detected, it can be treated by ERC preoperatively, intraoperatively or postoperatively or alternatively by laparoscopic cholangiography. Regarding the temporal sequence, there is no clear advantage of a specific time point; however, considering the high availability of ERCP in German-speaking countries, preoperative clearance of choledocholithiasis seems reasonable. With respect to the time interval between clearance of choledocholithiasis and cholecystectomy, a number of multicenter studies and a meta-analysis have shown that a short time interval or a procedure during the same period of hospitalization is advantageous.
Collapse
|