Endoscopy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline update

Reproducibility of the AGREE II Tool for Assessing the Methodological Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing GI Endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) exist for the management of antithrombotic agents in the periendoscopic period; however, their methodological qualities vary. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool has been validated for the assessment of the methodological quality of CPGs; however, its reproducibility has not been assessed. The goal of this study was to assess the reproducibility of the AGREE II tool for CPGs published within the last 6 years for the management of antithrombotic agents in the periendoscopic period.

STUDY

A systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed to identify eligible CPGs published between January 1, 2016 and April 14, 2022. The quality of the CPG was independently assessed by 6 reviewers using the AGREE II instrument. The reproducibility was summarized as weighted κ statistic and intraclass correlation coefficient using the SPSS statistical analysis package.

RESULTS

The search yielded 343 citations with 7 CPGs from Europe, Asia, and the United States included in the critical appraisal. The overall mean weighted κ score across all guidelines was 0.300 (range, 0.093 to 0.384) indicating a fair agreement. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.462 (range, 0.175 to 0.570) for single measures and 0.837 (range, 0.560 to 0.888) for average measures indicating moderate reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows only a fair overall interobserver agreement in the methodological quality of the included CPGs. The results suggest the need for education and training of CPG raters to enhance the application of the AGREE II tool to improve its reproducibility.

Impact of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs on postoperative bleeding in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The decision to withdraw or continue antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs would be balanced on the bleeding risk and the cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study was to investigate perioperative bleeding in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to determine the impact of oral antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications in the absence of drug withdrawal. The hypothesis was that the continuation of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs would increase postoperative bleeding but to a limited extent.

METHODS

During the study period, RSA cases were prospectively included and retrospectively reviewed. Cases of revision for arthroplasty, proximal fracture, and cemented stem fixation were excluded. Cases with dual therapy of aspirin and clopidogrel and cases with heparin bridges were also excluded. Age, gender, height, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status anesthesia risk, smoking status, preoperative diagnosis, preoperative blood sampling data within one month of surgery (estimated glomerular filtration rate, Prothrombin Time-International Normalized Ratio, and activated partial thromboplastin time), surgical time, stem length (standard or short stem), and use of tranexamic acid were identified. The presence of diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypertension were confirmed as comorbidities. Hemoglobin and hematocrit (Hct) values were recorded preoperatively and on the third postoperative day, and estimated blood loss was calculated by Gross formula using the change in preoperative Hct and postoperative day 3 Ht values. Multiple regression models were used to determine predictors of the estimated blood loss. P values less than .5 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifteen RSA cases were analyzed (172 females, a mean age of 77.2 years). The estimated blood loss was 819 ml. The regression equation was statistically significant (P < .0001, R2 = 0.21), and aspirin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), tranexamic acid, height, and surgery time were statistically significant explanatory variables, showing the predicted changes in bleeding volume for each drug were +283 ml for aspirin, +180 ml for DOAC, and -237 ml for tranexamic acid, respectively. Warfarin and cilostazol were not employed due to P values and Akaike's Information Criterion. Two blood transfusions (without antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications) were administered. One patient on aspirin had a cardiovascular event.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed that the use of aspirin and DOAC were significant predictors of increased perioperative blood loss, but the amount of increase was in the acceptable range, suggesting that continued antiplatelet and anticoagulant were relatively safe in primary RSA. Administration of tranexamic acid was shown to reduce bleeding significantly.

Periendoscopic management of antithrombotic drugs: Is cold snare polypectomy the answer?

Patients undergoing colonoscopy are increasingly taking antithrombotic medication. These patients, who are generally older, also have a higher prevalence of colon polyps. Therefore, it is general practice to modify or discontinue antithrombotic treatment before colonoscopy, to reduce the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB). However, this modification increases the risk of thrombotic events. Currently, the main clinical guidelines recommend cold-snare resection for polyps smaller than 10mm because of its better safety profile, especially in reducing post-polypectomy bleeding. This reduced PPB rate could open the door to maintaining antithrombotic drugs in patients undergoing colonoscopy. This review aims to evaluate the evidence available so far that may support a modification of current guidelines on the management of antithrombotic drugs in the periendoscopic period.

Evaluating the efficacy of a novel hemostatic powder compared with traditional treatments in nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hemostatic powders have been rapidly developed and used to treat GI bleeding. We aimed to investigate the noninferiority of the newly developed hemostatic powder (CEGP-003; CGBio, Seongnam, South Korea) compared with conventional endoscopic treatments for nonvariceal upper GI bleeding (NVUGIB).

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted at 4 referral institutions. We enrolled consecutive patients who underwent emergency endoscopy for NVUGIB. The patients were randomly assigned to either the CEGP-003 group or the conventional treatment group. In the CEGP-003 group, the hemostatic powder was applied as a spray. Conventional endoscopic treatments included electrical coagulation and use of hemostatic clips.

RESULTS

Between November 2019 and June 2022, 218 patients were enrolled (CEGP-003 group, 108; conventional group, 110). Initial hemostasis was achieved in 104 of 108 patients (96.3%) in the CEGP-003 group and 101 of 110 patients (91.8%) in the conventional treatment group. The CEGP-003 group exhibited a significantly higher recurrent bleeding rate than the conventional treatment group. Multivariate analysis showed that age, duodenum and middle one-third of the stomach, and CEGP-003 use as the initial hemostatic treatment were independent risk factors for recurrent bleeding. No adverse events were associated with CEGP-003.

CONCLUSIONS

CEGP-003 demonstrates promise as an initial endoscopic therapy for NVUGIB. However, close monitoring is warranted because of the risk of recurrent bleeding. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0004655.).

First-intention EUS-guided transluminal drainage with LAMS: an effective and safe method for management of fluid collections after any kind of surgery

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic postoperative collections (PCs) frequently complicate surgery with significant morbidity and mortality. In contrast with pancreatic inflammatory collections, little is known about endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of PCs (EUS-PCD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-PCD using lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) as the first-line drainage approach for PCs of any kind.

METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective study. We retrieved all consecutive symptomatic PCs treated at our center between February 2019 and September 2024. All cases were considered suitable for EUS-PCD after multidisciplinary discussion. Rates of technical success, clinical success, and AEs were calculated.

RESULTS

We retrieved 66 PCs, mainly resulting from pancreatic and lower gastrointestinal tract surgery. The median size of collections was 7.6 cm and infection occurred in 54 of the cases. The median time from surgery to drainage was 19 days (IQR 13-29); in 10 cases, this occurred ≤ 7 days after surgery. 51 drainages were performed from the gastric/duodenal window, 15 transrectally. LAMS were removed after a median time of 18.5 days (IQR 12-27). After removal, double-pigtail stents were placed in 25 PCs and at least one necrosectomy session was performed in 13. Technical success was achieved in 97.0% of cases. Clinical success was achieved in 95.2%; in 3 cases, collection recurrence occurred and retreatment with LAMS was successful. Overall AEs rate was 9.1%, but only one was severe, requiring surgery. Rates of technical and clinical failure and AEs were not affected by surgery type (pancreatic, non-pancreatic), timing of drainage (≤ 7, 7-10, > 10 days), size of collections (≤ 4, 4-10, > 10 cm), and access window (transgastric/duodenal/rectal). Necrosectomy performance was the only predictor of AEs occurrence (OR 6.9, C.I.: 1.1-46.9, p = 0.048) at univariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

First-intention EUS-PCD seems to be a safe and effective treatment, regardless of the origin and size of the collection and drainage timing.

Safety of cold snare resection techniques for removal of polyps in the small colon in patients taking clopidogrel and aspirin: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Polypectomy is a procedure associated with a high risk of bleeding. Guidelines recommend uninterrupted aspirin use during polypectomy, whereas cessation of clopidogrel 5 to 7 days before polypectomy is recommended. The cold snare resection (CSR) technique, with or without submucosal injection, is considered safer than conventional polypectomy using electrocoagulation for postpolypectomy bleeding. In this study, we compared the bleeding adverse events associated with CSR between clopidogrel and aspirin users.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted in 5 academic hospitals in Korea and included clopidogrel and aspirin users who underwent polypectomy. Antiplatelet agents were used without interruption, with ≤3 days of interruption defined as continuous use. The primary endpoint was delayed bleeding, which was defined as bleeding occurring several hours after polypectomy, whereas immediate bleeding was defined as bleeding requiring hemostasis 2 minutes after polypectomy. Risk factors for immediate bleeding were investigated for each polyp.

RESULTS

Finally, 263 patients (509 polyps) were included, including those receiving clopidogrel (n=129) and aspirin (n=134). The rates of delayed bleeding per patient in the clopidogrel and aspirin groups were .8% and .7%, respectively, meeting noninferiority (rate difference, .03%; 95% confidence interval, -2.07 to 2.13). A total of 100 cases of hemostasis (19.8%) were performed in 68 patients after polypectomy. Immediate bleeding risk factors were female sex, end-stage renal disease, submucosal injection before resection, and polyp size ≥5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter prospective study demonstrated the safety of CSR in patients treated with uninterrupted clopidogrel and aspirin. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04328987.).

Impact of margin thermal ablation after cold-forceps avulsion with snare-tip soft coagulation for nonlifting large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps

Nonlifting large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (NL-LNPCPs) account for 15% of LNPCPs and are effectively managed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with adjunctive cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare-tip soft coagulation (CAST). Recurrence rates >10% at surveillance colonoscopy are however a significant limitation. We aimed to compare the outcomes of CAST plus margin thermal ablation (MTA) versus CAST alone for NL-LNPCPs.Prospective observational data on consecutive patients with NL-LNPCPs treated by EMR and CAST at a single tertiary center were retrospectively evaluated. Two cohorts were established: the pre-MTA period (January 2012-June 2017) and the MTA period (July 2017-October 2023). The primary outcome was the residual/recurrent adenoma (RRA) rate at first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1). Secondary outcomes included the RRA rate at SC2 and adverse events.Over 142 months, 300 patients underwent EMR and CAST for LNPCP: 103 lesions pre-MTA and 197 with MTA. At SC1 and SC2, recurrence was lower in the MTA cohort compared with the pre-MTA cohort (5.0% vs. 18.8% and 0.8% vs. 10.0%, respectively; both P<0.001). Adverse events were similar between the two cohorts for deep mural injury types III-V (pre-MTA 2.9% vs. MTA 5.6%; P=0.29) and delayed bleeding (pre-MTA 8.7% vs. MTA 7.1%; P=0.49). On multivariate analysis, MTA was the only variable independently associated with a reduced likelihood of recurrence (odds ratio 0.20, 95%CI 0.07-0.54; P=0.001).For NL-LNPCPs, MTA in combination with CAST is safe and effective and reduces recurrence at SC1 in comparison with CAST alone.

Machine Learning Models With Prognostic Implications for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Guiding Personalized Medicine: Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a serious adverse event of coronary artery bypass grafting and lacks tailored risk assessment tools for personalized prevention.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop and validate predictive models to assess the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding after coronary artery bypass grafting (GIBCG) and to guide personalized prevention.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from 4 medical centers, including a prospective cohort and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. From an initial cohort of 18,938 patients, 16,440 were included in the final analysis after applying the exclusion criteria. Thirty combinations of machine learning algorithms were compared, and the optimal model was selected based on integrated performance metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the Brier score. This model was then developed into a web-based risk prediction calculator. The Shapley Additive Explanations method was used to provide both global and local explanations for the predictions.

RESULTS

The model was developed using data from 3 centers and a prospective cohort (n=13,399) and validated on the Drum Tower cohort (n=2745) and the MIMIC cohort (n=296). The optimal model, based on 15 easily accessible admission features, demonstrated an AUROC of 0.8482 (95% CI 0.8328-0.8618) in the derivation cohort. In external validation, the AUROC was 0.8513 (95% CI 0.8221-0.8782) for the Drum Tower cohort and 0.7811 (95% CI 0.7275-0.8343) for the MIMIC cohort. The analysis indicated that high-risk patients identified by the model had a significantly increased mortality risk (odds ratio 2.98, 95% CI 1.784-4.978; P<.001). For these high-risk populations, preoperative use of proton pump inhibitors was an independent protective factor against the occurrence of GIBCG. By contrast, dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulants were identified as independent risk factors. However, in low-risk populations, the use of proton pump inhibitors (χ21=0.13, P=.72), dual antiplatelet therapy (χ21=0.38, P=.54), and oral anticoagulants (χ21=0.15, P=.69) were not significantly associated with the occurrence of GIBCG.

CONCLUSIONS

Our machine learning model accurately identified patients at high risk of GIBCG, who had a poor prognosis. This approach can aid in early risk stratification and personalized prevention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Registry Center ChiCTR2400086050; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=226129.

Delayed bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients receiving anticoagulants

Delayed bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) constitutes a significant adverse event, occurring in ~0.5-5% of patients. The number of patients receiving anticoagulants to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease has increased with the aging society worldwide; however, anticoagulants (direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs] and warfarin) are one of the most major risk factors for postprocedure bleeding. This review investigated post-EST bleeding in anticoagulant users, focusing on risk factors, clinical guidelines, pharmacological characteristics, and the future of post-EST bleeding. Several clinical guidelines for antithrombotic drug users have been established to prevent postprocedure bleeding; nevertheless, the risk of bleeding is believed to be several times higher than for nondrug users, regardless of clinical guideline compliance. The major problem in this field is that patients who experience delayed bleeding are often receiving multiple antithrombotic drugs, and no parameters that can accurately monitor the anticoagulant effect of DOACs have been identified. Therefore, identifying patients with a generally high-risk of postprocedure bleeding is crucial. Recently, the plasma level and antifactor Xa activity of factor Xa inhibitors have been investigated in relation to the risk of major bleeding in users. Similar to the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio for warfarin, plasma levels, and antifactor Xa activity may be useful parameters for monitoring the anticoagulant effect and identifying DOAC users at higher risk of postprocedure bleeding, including post-EST bleeding. Future studies should stratify the risk of post-EST delayed bleeding based on a scoring system to prevent this complication.

Timing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Resumption Following Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Nationwide Study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), managing these agents around endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is crucial. However, due to the need for a large number of cases, studies examining the timing of resumption are lacking, resulting in varied recommendations across international guidelines. We aimed to perform a comparative study about the resumption timing of DOACs after colorectal ESD using a nationwide database in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on colorectal ESD using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 2012 to 2023. Patients using anticoagulants other than DOACs were excluded, and only those who resumed DOACs within 3 days were included. From eligible patients, we divided them into early (the day after ESD) and delayed (2-3 days after ESD) resumption groups. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to assess the delayed bleeding and thromboembolic events within 30 days. Delayed bleeding was defined as bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis or blood transfusion after ESD.

RESULTS

Of 176,139 colorectal ESDs, 3,550 involved DOAC users, with 2,698 (76%) categorized as early resumption and 852 (24%) categorized as delayed resumption groups. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the early resumption group did not significantly increase delayed bleeding compared with the delayed resumption group (odds ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.42; P = 0.73). However, it significantly reduced the risk of thromboembolic events (odds ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.82; P < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Resuming DOACs the day after colorectal ESD was associated with reduced thromboembolic events without significant increase in risk of delayed bleeding.

Observation of symptomatic thromboembolic events in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography patients with interruption of antithrombotic therapies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

An increasing number of patients with antithrombotic therapies are undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Interruption of antithrombotic therapies may be associated with a higher risk of symptomatic thromboembolic (TE) events. We aimed to investigate the risk of symptomatic TE events among patients undergoing ERCP.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study on patients at risk for symptomatic TE events who had undergone ERCP from January 2016 to October 2023 was conducted. A total of 2,482 patients who had undergone ERCP were included in this study. We compared the risk of symptomatic TE events within 30 days after ERCP between the group treated with antithrombotic agent and the group not treated with antithrombotic agent using multivariate regression analysis adjusted for covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients (0.60%, 15/2,482) developed symptomatic TE events within 30 days after ERCP. The symptomatic TE event rate in subjects on any antithrombotic drug was 1.46% with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.267 (n = 689, 95% CI 1.79-15.46, p = 0.002), compared with those not treated with antithrombotic drugs (n = 1,793). The symptomatic TE event rate in subjects on temporary interruption of antithrombotic drugs was 1.48% with an OR of 5.36 (n = 677, 95% CI 1.83-15.74, p = 0.002), compared with those not treated with antithrombotic drugs (n = 1,793). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that patients with high-risk conditions had a significantly higher risk of post-ERCP symptomatic TE events (adjusted OR 11.73, 95% CI 2.23-61.70).

CONCLUSION

Interruption of antithrombotic drugs is associated with higher post-ERCP symptomatic TE events, particularly in high-risk conditions.

Prediction and prevention of post-procedural bleedings in patients with cirrhosis

Although post-procedural bleedings are infrequent in patients with cirrhosis, they are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, predicting and preventing such bleedings is important. Established predictors of post-procedural bleeding include high-bleeding risk procedure, severe cirrhosis and high body mass index; prognostic value of anemia, acute kidney injury and bacterial infection is more uncertain. While prothrombin time and international normalized ratio do not predict post-procedural bleeding, some evidence suggests that platelet count, whole blood thrombin generation assay and viscoelastic tests may be helpful in this context. Prevention of postprocedural bleeding involves careful management of antithrombotic drugs during the periprocedural period. Patients with cirrhosis present unique challenges due to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antithrombotic drugs, but there is a lack of dedicated studies specifically focused on this patient population. Guidelines for periprocedural management of antithrombotic drugs developed for patients without liver disease are thus applied to those with cirrhosis. Some technical aspects may decrease the risk of post-procedural bleeding, namely ultrasoundguidance, opting for transjugular route rather than percutaneous route, and the level of expertise of the operator. The effectiveness of platelet transfusions or thrombopoietin-receptor agonists remains uncertain. Transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma, of fibrinogen, and administration of tranexamic acid are not recommended for reducing post-procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. In conclusion, prediction of post-procedural requires a global approach taking into account the patients characteristics, the risk of the procedure, and the platelet count. There is little data to support prophylactic correction of hemostasis, and dedicated studies are needed.

Prophylactic clip closure in preventing delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients on anticoagulants: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan

BACKGROUND

 The effectiveness of prophylactic clip closure in reducing the risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is uncertain among patients on anticoagulants. We therefore aimed to assess this effectiveness using data from a large multicenter study.

METHODS

 We used the ABCD-J study database to analyze delayed bleeding among 34 455 colorectal ESD cases from 47 Japanese institutions. Delayed bleeding rates among the no/partial and complete closure groups were compared in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin. Propensity score matching was used for baseline characteristics to reduce the effects of selection bias.

RESULTS

 Overall, data from 1478 patients on anticoagulants who underwent colorectal ESD were examined. After propensity score matching, the complete and no/partial closure groups were compared in 212 patients on DOACs and 82 on warfarin. The complete closure group showed a significantly lower delayed bleeding rate in patients receiving DOACs (10.8 % vs. 5.2 %, absolute risk reduction [ARR] 5.7 %, P = 0.048) and warfarin (17.1 % vs. 6.1 %, ARR 11.0 %, P = 0.049). Additionally, complete closure significantly reduced the risk of delayed bleeding among patients taking DOACs for right-sided lesions (ARR 6.7 %, P = 0.04), whereas no risk reduction was observed for left-sided (P > 0.99) or rectal (P = 0.50) lesions. A similar trend was observed among patients on warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

 Prophylactic complete clip closure after colorectal ESD significantly reduced the delayed bleeding rate in patients receiving DOACs or warfarin. It should be performed after ESD, particularly for right-sided lesions.

Impact of introducing transnasal endoscopy on expanding diagnostic endoscopy services

INTRODUCTION

Demand for endoscopic services is outstripping capacity in the UK. Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) utilises a narrow calibre endoscope to pass through the nasal passages, thereby reducing retching and discomfort. It is better tolerated compared with standard transoral endoscopy (TOE) but is still rarely used as a diagnostic modality. There is still uncertainty about how well it performs against TOE in diagnostic ability, cost and efficiency.

METHODS

We explored utilising TNE to deal with the growing demand for endoscopy. We compared findings to TOE procedures undertaken during the same time period. We evaluated cost differences, duration/time in the department for procedures as well as quality of procedures (both in terms of performance indicators as well as image quality using the validated POLPREP score).

RESULTS

A total of 241 upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures were evaluated (100 TNE and 141 matched TOE) between December 2021 and February 2022. TNE outperformed TOE in obtaining >95% success rate in nationally approved key performance indicators (retroflexion and duodenal intubation, both p=0.026). It also was associated with better image quality in the oesophagus with a POLPREP A3 Score (excellent image quality) in 36/98 available images compared with 26/136 TOE (p=0.028) and was equivalent to TOE in the stomach and duodenum. TNE was identified as having a key role in facilitating complex cases, previously failed via the TOE route with a success rate in 11/12 (91.7%) of such cases. TNE also shows promise in correcting misdiagnoses of short-segment Barrett's oesophagus (39%) compared with TOE (14.8%) (p=0.087).

CONCLUSION

TNE is an emerging endoscopic modality, which shows great promise in replacing TOE in most diagnostic circumstances. In a modern healthcare service, TNE is cheaper, better tolerated and outperforms TOE in multiple domains.

Characteristics and Risk Factors for Postoperative Bleeding Following Endoscopic Resection of Esophageal Squamous Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Reports on postoperative bleeding after esophageal endoscopic resection are limited.

AIMS

This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and risk factors for postoperative bleeding following endoscopic resection of esophageal neoplasms.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or squamous intraepithelial neoplasm between January 2018 and December 2022. We investigated the incidence, timing, severity, and risk factors for postoperative bleeding.

RESULTS

Of 1288 patients, 1062 (82%) underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, and 226 (18%) underwent endoscopic mucosal resection. Postoperative bleeding occurred in seven (0.5%) patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-1.1%; median postoperative day 8 [range, 4-17 days]). In these seven patients, hemoglobin concentration decreased by a median of 3.0 g/dL (range, 1.6-6.8 g/dL). Antithrombotic agent use, resection wound circumference, and specimen size were significantly associated with postoperative bleeding (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, and P = 0.024, respectively). Among 43 patients who received direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), postoperative bleeding occurred in four (9%) patients (95% CI 2.6-22.1%). DOACs were significantly associated with postoperative bleeding even after propensity score matching (4/40 [10%] vs. 0/80 [0%], respectively; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall bleeding rate following esophageal endoscopic resection was 0.5%, with a delayed onset, leading to anemia. DOACs emerged as the most significant risk factor for postoperative bleeding.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis

With technological advances in endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) was introduced as a treatment option for acute cholecystitis. Recently, new studies have emerged, suggesting that EUS-GBD has a lower adverse event rate and reintervention rate, when compared to percutaneous drainage and endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage. There is growing interest in the different technical aspects of EUS-GBD, such as the puncture approach, choice of stents, and long-term management. There are also cohorts on performing EUS-GBD in potential surgical candidates. This review article gathers the latest evidence on EUS-GBD, including its indications, procedural techniques, choice of equipment, outcomes, postprocedural care, and the controversial extended indications.

Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors in the Western Setting

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) is established as the primary treatment modality for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs), but recently underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR) has emerged as a potential alternative. The majority of previous studies focused on Asian populations and small lesions (≤20 mm). We aimed to compare the efficacy and outcomes of U-EMR vs C-EMR for SNADETs in a Western setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multinational study from 10 European centers that performed both C-EMR and U-EMR between January 2013 and July 2023. The main outcomes were the technical success, procedure-related adverse events (AEs), and the residual/recurrent adenoma (RRA) rate, evaluated on a per-lesion basis. We assessed the association between the type of endoscopic mucosal resection and the occurrence of AEs or RRAs using mixed-effects logistic regression models (propensity scores). Sensitivity analyses were performed for lesions ≤20 mm or >20 mm.

RESULTS

A total of 290 SNADETs submitted to endoscopic resection during the study period met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed (C-EMR: n = 201, 69.3%; U-EMR: n = 89, 30.7%). The overall technical success rate was 95.5% and comparable between groups. In logistic regression models, compared with U-EMR, C-EMR was associated with a significantly higher frequency of overall delayed AEs (odds ratio [OR], 4.95; 95% CI, 2.87-8.53), postprocedural bleeding (OR, 7.92; 95% CI, 3.95-15.89), and RRAs (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.49-5.37). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results when solely considering either small (≤20 mm) or large (>20 mm) lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with C-EMR, U-EMR was associated with a lower rate of overall AEs and RRAs, regardless of lesion size. Our results confirm the possible role of U-EMR as an effective and safe technique in the management of SNADETs.

Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent superficial rectal neoplastic lesions after transanal microsurgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent rectal neoplastic lesions after transanal microsurgery of superficial rectal neoplasms.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective study.

MAIN OUTCOMES

recurrence at first endoscopic follow-up, En bloc, R0 and curative resections.

RESULTS

39 patients were included. 71 % percent of lesions were located in the lower rectum, 57 % reached the pectineal line. 67 % were laterally spreading tumor granular type, 33 % were protruding lesions. Median size was 41 mm (IQR 30 - 60). Median operation time was 70 min (IQR 35 - 97). 92 % were successfully resected en bloc. R0 and curative resection rates were 77 % and 71 %, respectively. Perirectal fat was visualized in 10 patients, none of them required surgery. One significant hematochezia (3 %), two stenosis (6 %) and one untreatable anal incontinence (3 %) occurred. Median hospital stay after endoscopic submucosal dissection was 2 days (IQR 1-2). Median period for the first endoscopy follow-up was 6 months (IQR 4-8). A single post endoscopic submucosal dissection recurrence adenoma was found during follow-up (3 %), occurring after a non-en bloc resection.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a good option for safely achieving high rates of complete en bloc resection in cases of recurrent superficial rectal tumor after transanal microsurgery.

Management and outcomes of antithrombotic therapy in EUS-guided gallbladder drainage

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is increasingly used for the management of gallbladder disease in patients at high risk for cholecystectomy. These patients often have underlying medical comorbidities requiring anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet therapy. We evaluated the safety, management, and outcomes of EUS-GBD in patients being treated with antithrombotic therapy (ATT).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing EUS-GBD between 2018 and 2023 within Geisinger Health System. Outcomes were analyzed between patients previously on ATT but held for the procedure compared with no ATT. Primary outcomes were bleeding within 48 hours and 30 days. Secondary outcomes were risk of thrombotic events, length of stay, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 177 patients undergoing EUS-GBD, 118 patients were on ATT. No statistical difference was found for EUS-GBD-related bleeding for patients on ATT compared with no ATT within 48 hours (.9% vs 0%, P > .999) or within 30 days (3.5% vs 0%, P = .302). Overall, 5 patients (2.9%) had bleeding related to the EUS-GBD procedure. There was no difference between the groups for secondary outcomes: thrombotic events (2.5% vs 3.4%), length of stay (7 days vs 5 days), and 30-day mortality (11% vs 10.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing EUS-GBD who require ATT did not have any immediate or delayed increased risk of bleeding, thrombotic events, length of stay, or mortality when the medication was appropriately held.

Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in HIV patients

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion, a routine procedure for long-term enteral nutrition, serves as a crucial intervention for patients who are incapable of tolerating oral intake or meeting adequate nutritional requirements. PEG tube placement carries complications like bleeding and infection. Impact of PEG tubes on the 30-day and long-term mortality in HIV patients is unknown. Despite the ongoing utilization of PEG tubes in HIV patients, a comprehensive exploration of its outcomes is yet to be explored. We intended to study the impact of HIV positive status on post-PEG mortality and review other PEG tube related complications.

METHODS

Our study comprised a total of 639 PEG tubes placed on 461 unique patients, from which 85 patients (n = 18%) were HIV positive. We reviewed all these PEG tube patients at our institution and compared their complications and mortality outcome between the two groups of HIV positive as against HIV negative.

RESULTS

Our findings reveal a statistically significant increase (p-value 0.001) in post-PEG insertion site bleeding in the HIV group (15.3%) compared to the non-HIV group (4.5%). This difference occurred despite no notable variations in laboratory parameters such as platelet count and (international normalized ratio), as well as similar usage of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications between the two groups. Notably, the 1-year mortality rate in the HIV group stands at 37.6% (p < 0.001), contrasting sharply with the non-HIV group's rate of 17.8%.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the need for heightened vigilance and tailored management strategies when considering PEG tube procedures in the context of HIV, given the observed elevated bleeding risks and increased 1-year mortality rates in this patient population. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying factors contributing to these outcomes, facilitating the development of targeted interventions to optimize the care of HIV patients undergoing PEG placement.

Factors Associated with the Severity of ERCP-Related Complications: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study

Objectives: Risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications have been extensively studied and are well established; most complications are mild and self-limiting. This study aims to identify patients at risk of severe early post-ERCP complications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with data from 2810 ERCP procedures performed at Ghent University Hospital between 2016 and 2022. Patient records and a maintained ERCP registry were used to identify all ERCP-related complications and possible risk factors. The AGREE classification was used to determine the severity of the complication. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of severe complications. Results: Out of 2810 procedures, 223 cases (7.9%) had post-ERCP complications, with severe complications occurring in 20.3% of cases. The most common severe complication was haemorrhage (22/49 severe complications, 44.9%), with perforation having the highest probability of being severe (10/15 cases, 67%). Independent predictors of severe complications included anticoagulative therapy (OR 6.3, 95% CI 1.4-28.3, p = 0.016) and high procedural difficulty (Schutz category 3: OR 11.5, 95% CI 2.4-54.6, p = 0.002; category 4: OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.4-23.5, p = 0.012). Conclusions: Patients on anticoagulation and those undergoing complex ERCP procedures (Schutz 3 or 4) are at particular risk of severe procedure-related complications.

Recurrence rate and management after endoscopic papillectomy in a tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is considered a safe procedure for ampullary lesions. Few data are available on management of residual and recurrent adenomas. The aims of the present study were to evaluate long-term recurrence rate, median time-to-recurrence after EP and treatment of both residual and recurrent adenomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent EP of major and minor papilla at our endoscopy center between 2011 and 2022 were enrolled. Residual adenoma was defined as the endoscopic evidence of adenomatous tissue after EP. Recurrent adenoma was defined as the presence of adenomatous tissue after the first endoscopic follow-up and complete adenoma resection.

RESULTS

95 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Pathology after resection showed adenoma with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in 52 patients, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in 25 patients, adenocarcinoma in 6 patients, NET in 4 patients and not-neoplastic duodenal mucosa in 8 patients. Adverse events occurred in 25 % of patients. The median follow-up after EP was 22.5 months. Local residual was observed in 27 patients (28,4 %) and recurrence after the endoscopic retreatments occurred in 11 patients (11,6 %). Furthermore, recurrence occurred in 16 of 68 patients with adenoma-free after a first endoscopic follow-up and 9 patients developed at least a second recurrence. All the recurrences but one were endoscopically treated.

CONCLUSIONS

EP and its ancillary treatments for residual and recurrent adenomas is an effective treatment for ampullary tumors. Long-term surveillance demonstrates that recurrences can be mainly treated endoscopically.

Effectiveness of endoscopic papillectomy with stent placement in pancreatic and bile ducts for treating duodenal papillary adenoma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Duodenal papillary adenoma, a potentially malignant benign tumor is primarily treated with endoscopic papillectomy. Despite its efficacy, endoscopic papillectomy has a high complication rate. This study investigates whether pancreatic duct and common bile duct stent placement can mitigate these complications.

METHODS

In a retrospective observational analysis, 79 patients with duodenal papillary adenoma, treated with endoscopic papillectomy at our center, were studied. The cohort included patients who underwent endoscopic papillectomy with no stents placement, common bile duct stent placement alone, pancreatic duct stent placement alone, or stents placement in both ducts. We assessed the outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy, including complete resection rate and recurrence rate as the primary and secondary outcomes respectively. In the meantime, the incidence of complications were also analysed as the safety outcomes.

RESULTS

Complete resection rates did not significantly differ between patients with or without stent placement (85.7% P group vs. 89.2% N-P group, P = 0.64). Early complication rates were similar across groups. However, significant reduction in common bile duct stenosis was observed in the stenting group (0% B group vs. 10.5% N-B group, P = 0.03). Furthermore, stent placement correlated with lower adenoma recurrence rates during follow-up (2.4% P group vs. 16.2% N-P group, P = 0.03; 2.4% B group vs. 15.8% N-B group, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic duct and common bile duct stent placement in endoscopic papillectomy may decrease late complications, particularly common bile duct stenosis, and reduce the recurrence of duodenal papillary adenoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of Beijing Friendship Hospital (Approval No. BFHHZS20230203), and retrospectively registered in www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT06301048, Initial Release date: 02/18/2024, Last Public Release date: 03/03/2024).

[Quality Indicators of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Korea]

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a procedure that requires abundant clinical experience and endoscopic skills, and can lead to various complications, some of which may progress to life-threatening conditions. With expanding indications and technological advancements, ERCP is widely utilized, enhancing procedural accessibility. However, without proper quality management, the procedure can pose significant risks. Quality management in ERCP is essential to ensure safe and successful procedures and meet societal demands for improved healthcare competitiveness. To address these concerns, the Korean Society of Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy has developed a Korean-specific ERCP quality indicator reflecting domestic medical environments and realities. Initially, based on a review of foreign ERCP quality indicators and related literatures, key questions were formulated for five pre-procedural items, three intra-procedural items, and four post-procedural items. Descriptions and recommendations for each item were selected through peer evaluation. The developed Korean-specific ERCP quality indicator was reviewed by external experts based on the latest evidence and consensus in this fields. This Korean-specific indicator is expected to significantly contribute to improving ERCP quality in Korea, as it is tailored to local needs.

A Tool Integrated into the Electronic Health Record to Guide Proper Decision-Making Regarding Peri-Endoscopic Anticoagulant Management: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background-Anticoagulants, such as vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), are widely used among patients who undergo endoscopic procedures. To balance between bleeding and thromboembolic risks, careful decisions must be made about whether and for how long anticoagulants have to be stopped peri-endoscopically and if bridging is necessary. We created a tool in the electronic health records system (EHR) HIX (Microsoft) for invasive procedures to aid this decision-making. By selecting the anticoagulant indication or thrombo-embolic risk and the bleeding risk of the procedure, the tool automatically generates advice for periprocedural anticoagulant management. Objectives-This study assesses whether the tool is used properly peri-endoscopically. Secondly, it examines how many bleeding and thromboembolic events have occurred since the implementation of the tool. Methods-This retrospective study included all orders placed for endoscopies for patients using VKA or DOAC between 2018 and 2021. Results-In total, 986 endoscopies were included for analysis. In 89%, the tool was used correctly; the main error was selecting the wrong bleeding risk (7.5%). The cumulative incidence for moderate or severe bleeding events for DOAC and VKA was 2 (0.5%) and 0, respectively. The cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events for DOAC and VKA was 1 (0.2%) for each. Conclusions-This study evaluates the use of an EHR-integrated decision-making tool to aid peri-endoscopic anticoagulant management. By analysing the usage of the tool, we formulated several suggestions to improve the tool. Although this study is not a comparative one, we can conclude that the thromboembolic and major bleeding risks were low.

Cold Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Randomized Controlled German CHRONICLE Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is standard therapy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm. It has been suggested recently that polyp resection without current (cold resection) may be superior to the standard technique using cutting/coagulation current (hot resection) by reducing adverse events (AEs), but evidence from a randomized trial is missing.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled multicentric trial involving 19 centers, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm were randomly assigned to cold or hot EMR. The primary outcome was major AE (eg, perforation or postendoscopic bleeding). Among secondary outcomes, major AE subcategories, postpolypectomy syndrome, and residual adenoma were most relevant.

RESULTS

Between 2021 and 2023, there were 396 polyps in 363 patients (48.2% were female) enrolled for the intention-to-treat analysis. Major AEs occurred in 1.0% of the cold group and in 7.9% of the hot group (P = .001; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.54). Rates for perforation and postendoscopic bleeding were significantly lower in the cold group, with 0% vs 3.9% (P = .007) and 1.0% vs 4.4% (P = .040). Postpolypectomy syndrome occurred with similar frequency (3.1% vs 4.4%; P = .490). After cold resection, residual adenoma was found more frequently, with 23.7% vs 13.8% (P = .020; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.12-3.38). In multivariable analysis, lesion diameter of ≥4 cm was an independent predictor both for major AEs (OR, 3.37) and residual adenoma (OR, 2.47) and high-grade dysplasia/cancer for residual adenoma (OR, 2.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Cold resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps appears to be considerably safer than hot EMR; however, at the cost of a higher residual adenoma rate. Further studies have to confirm to what extent polyp size and histology can determine an individualized approach. German Clinical Trials Registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien), Number DRKS00025170.

A dynamic online nomogram for predicts delayed postoperative bleeding after colorectal polyp surgery

This study aims to analyze the risk factors associated with delayed postoperative bleeding (DPPB) following colorectal polyp surgery, develop a dynamic nomogram and evaluate the model efficacy, provide a reference for clinicians to identify the patients at high risk of DPPB. Retrospective study was done on patients who underwent endoscopic colorectal polypectomy at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2020 to March 2023. Differences between the group with and without DPPB were compared, and independent risk factors for DPPB occurrence were identified through univariate analysis and combination LASSO and logistic regression. A dynamic nomogram was constructed based on multiple logistic regression to predict DPPB following colorectal polyp surgery. Model evaluation included receiver operating characteristic (ROC), Calibration curve, Decision curve analysis (DCA). DPPB occurred in 38 of the 1544 patients included. multivariate analysis showed that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), polyp location in the right hemi colon, polyp diameter, drink, and prophylactic hemoclips were the independent risk factors for DPPB and dynamic nomogram were established. Model validation indicated area under the ROC curve values of 0.936, 0.796, and 0.865 for the training set, validation set, and full set, respectively. The calibration curve demonstrated a strong alignment between the predictions of the column-line diagram model and actual observations. The decision curve analysis (DCA) displayed a significant net clinical benefit across the threshold probability range of 0-100%. The dynamic nomogram aids clinicians in identifying high-risk patients, enabling personalized diagnosis and treatment.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnostic value of focal liver lesions: A systematic analysis of 88 cases (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an important diagnostic tool for suspected parenchymal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EUS-FNA in focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHOD

Data from 88 patients diagnosed with FLLs by imaging who underwent EUS-FNA from 1 January 2017 to 31 August 2022 were reviewed in our retrospective study at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Ruijin Hospital of the School of Medicine of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The EUS-FNA biopsy results were compared with the final diagnosis to evaluate diagnostic value. The relevant factors were analysed to determine their influence on EUS-FNA biopsy results.

RESULTS

The 88 patients analysed in this study resulted in a final diagnosis of 86 malignant and two benign cases. The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA in FLLs was 93.18 % (82/88; 95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 87.9-98.5), with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 93.02 % (80/86; 95 %CI, 87.6-98.4), 100 % (2/2; 95 %CI, 100-100), 100 % (80/80; 95 %CI, 100-100), and 25 % (2/8; 95 %CI, -5-55.0), respectively. The parameters related to lesion and procedure were not significantly different between these two groups (p > 0.05). The number of puncture needles in the groups showed a statistically significant difference between multiple and single punctures (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data revealed that EUS-FNA is a safe and reliable diagnostic method for FLLs that shows high accuracy.

Prospective multicenter study to identify optimal target population for motorized spiral enteroscopy

Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) enhances small bowel exploration, but the optimal target population for this technique is unknown. We aimed to identify the target population for MSE by evaluating its efficacy and safety, as well as detecting predictors of efficacy. A prospective multicenter observational study was conducted at 9 tertiary hospitals in Spain, enrolling patients between June 2020-2022. Analyzed data included demographics, indications for the procedure, exploration time, depth of maximum insertion (DMI), technical success, diagnostic yield, interventional yield, and adverse events (AE) up to 14 days from enteroscopy. Patients with prior gastrointestinal surgery, unsuccessful balloon enteroscopy and small bowel strictures were analyzed. A total of 326 enteroscopies (66.6% oral route) were performed in 294 patients (55.1% males, 65 years ± 21). Prior abdominal surgery was present in 50% of procedures (13.5% gastrointestinal surgery). Lower DMI (162 vs 275 cm, p = 0.037) and diagnostic yield (47.7 vs 67.5%, p = 0.016) were observed in patients with prior gastrointestinal surgery. MSE showed 92.2% technical success and 56.9% diagnostic yield after unsuccessful balloon enteroscopy (n = 51). In suspected small bowel strictures (n = 49), the finding was confirmed in 23 procedures (46.9%). The total AE rate was 10.7% (1.8% classified as major events) with no differences related to prior gastrointestinal/abdominal surgery, unsuccessful enteroscopy, or suspected small bowel strictures. The study demonstrates that MSE has a lower diagnostic yield and DMI in patients with prior gastrointestinal surgery but is feasible after unsuccessful balloon-enteroscopy and in suspected small bowel strictures without safety concerns.

Quality Indicators of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Korea

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a procedure that requires significant experiences and skills and has various procedure-related complications, some of which can be severe and even result in the death of patients. Expanding ERCP availability has the advantage of increasing accessibility for patients. However, ERCP poses a substantial risk if performed without proper quality management. ERCP quality management is essential for both ensuring safe and successful procedures and meeting the social demands for enhanced healthcare competitiveness and quality assurance. To address these concerns, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association established a task force to develop ERCP quality indicators (QIs) tailored to the Korean medical environment. Key questions for five pre-procedure, three intra-procedure, and four post-procedure measures were formulated based on a literature search related to ERCP QIs and a comprehensive clinical review conducted by experts. The statements and recommendations regarding each QI item were selected through peer review. The developed ERCP QIs were reviewed by external experts based on the latest available evidence at the time of development. These domestically tailored ERCP QIs are expected to contribute considerably to improving ERCP quality in Korea.

Emergency medicine updates: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding

INTRODUCTION

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a condition commonly seen in the emergency department. Therefore, it is important for emergency medicine clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of this disease.

OBJECTIVE

This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning LGIB for the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

LGIB is most commonly due to diverticulosis or anorectal disease, though there are a variety of etiologies. The majority of cases resolve spontaneously, but patients can have severe bleeding resulting in hemodynamic instability. Initial evaluation should focus on patient hemodynamics, the severity of bleeding, and differentiating upper gastrointestinal bleeding from LGIB. Factors associated with LGIB include prior history of LGIB, age over 50 years, and presence of blood clots per rectum. Computed tomography angiography is the imaging modality of choice in those with severe bleeding to diagnose the source of bleeding and guide management when embolization is indicated. Among stable patients without severe bleeding, colonoscopy is the recommended modality for diagnosis and management. A transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL hemoglobin is recommended based on recent data and guidelines (8 g/dL in those with myocardial ischemia), though patients with severe bleeding and hemodynamic instability should undergo emergent transfusion. Anticoagulation reversal may be necessary. If bleeding does not resolve, embolization or endoscopic therapies are necessary. There are several risk scores that can predict the risk of adverse outcomes; however, these scores should not replace clinical judgment in determining patient disposition.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of literature updates can improve the care of patients with LGIB.

Emergency medicine updates: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding

INTRODUCTION

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a condition commonly seen in the emergency department (ED). Therefore, it is important for emergency clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of this disease.

OBJECTIVE

This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning UGIB for the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

UGIB most frequently presents with hematemesis. There are numerous causes, with the most common peptic ulcer disease, though variceal bleeding in particular can be severe. Nasogastric tube lavage for diagnosis is not recommended based on the current evidence. A hemoglobin transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL is recommended (8 g/dL in those with myocardial ischemia), but patients with severe bleeding and hemodynamic instability require emergent transfusion regardless of their level. Medications that may be used in UGIB include proton pump inhibitors, prokinetic agents, and vasoactive medications. Antibiotics are recommended for those with cirrhosis and suspected variceal bleeding. Endoscopy is the diagnostic and therapeutic modality of choice and should be performed within 24 h of presentation in non-variceal bleeding after resuscitation, though patients with variceal bleeding may require endoscopy within 12 h. Transcatheter arterial embolization or surgical intervention may be necessary. Intubation should be avoided if possible. If intubation is necessary, several considerations are required, including resuscitation prior to induction, utilizing preoxygenation and appropriate suction, and administering a prokinetic agent. There are a variety of tools available for risk stratification, including the Glasgow Blatchford Score.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of literature updates can improve the ED care of patients with UGIB.

Results of the COLDWATER randomized controlled trial: enhanced performance of underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps 5-10 mm, independent of endoscopist experience

Background

The wide range of R0 resection rates (R0RR) and incomplete resection rates (IRR) observed with conventional cold snare polypectomy (CCSP) emphasizes the necessity for technique enhancement. The COLDWATER study aimed to compare underwater cold snare polypectomy (UCSP) to CCSP for 5-10-mm colorectal polyps, focusing on comprehensive histopathological evaluation, efficacy, and safety.

Methods

This was a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial comparing UCSP to CCSP for non-pedunculated colorectal polyps of size 5-10 mm. The primary outcome was to report differences in the muscularis mucosa resection ratio. The secondary outcomes focused on differences in depth of excision, R0-RR, IRR, en bloc resection rate, adverse events, and recurrence rate.

Results

The COLDWATER study found higher muscularis mucosa resection in UCSP (81.72±62.81% vs. CCSP: 72.33±22.33%, P=0.003) with comparable submucosa presence (UCSP: 16.6%, CCSP: 12.5%, P=0.25). UCSP showed better outcomes regarding IRR (3.5% vs. 8.5%, P=0.05) and en bloc resection (98% vs. 93.5%, P=0.04). In CCSP, expert endoscopists achieved higher R0RR than non-experts, while UCSP showed no significant difference in R0RR across endoscopist's experience levels.

Conclusions

UCSP achieves a more extensive excision of the muscularis mucosa compared to CCSP, even though it does not attain a deeper excision. Additionally, UCSP shows a higher en bloc resection rate, with lower rates of IRR, and emerges as a promising technique for training inexperienced endoscopists in polypectomy, given its experience-independent success in achieving R0 resection.

Anticoagulants Are a Risk Factor for Delayed Bleeding after Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A HASID Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Delayed bleeding is an important adverse event following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, whether anticoagulants are risk factors for delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD remains debatable.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1,708 patients who underwent colorectal ESDs between January 2015 and December 2020 at five academic medical centers in South Korea. We aimed to identify the risk factors for delayed bleeding in patients after colorectal ESD and, in particular, to evaluate the effect of anticoagulants.

RESULTS

Delayed bleeding occurred in 40 of 1,708 patients (2.3%). The risk factors for delayed bleeding were antithrombotic agents (odds ratio [OR], 6.155; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.201-11.825; p < 0.001), antiplatelet agents (OR, 4.609; 95% CI, 2.200-9.658; p < 0.001), anticoagulants (OR, 8.286; 95% CI, 2.934-23.402; p < 0.001), and tumor location in the rectum (OR, 2.055; 95% CI, 1.085-3.897; p = 0.027). In the analysis that excluded patients taking antiplatelet agents, the delayed bleeding rate was higher in patients taking anticoagulants (1.6% no antithrombotic agents vs. 12.5% taking anticoagulants, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the delayed bleeding rate (4.2% direct oral anticoagulants vs. 25.0% warfarin, p = 0.138) or clinical outcomes according to the type of anticoagulant used.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulants use was a risk factor for delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD, and there was no difference in the risk of delayed bleeding based on the type of anticoagulant used. Colorectal ESD in patients receiving anticoagulants requires careful observation and management for delayed bleeding.

Acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding management in older people taking or not taking anticoagulants: a literature review

Acute upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding may be a potentially life-threatening event that requires prompt recognition and an early effective management, being responsible for a considerable number of hospital admissions. Methods. We perform a clinical review to summarize the recent international guidelines, helping the physician in clinical practice. Older people are a vulnerable subgroup of patients more prone to developing GI bleeding because of several comorbidities and polypharmacy, especially related to an increased use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs. In addition, older patients may have higher peri-procedural risk that should be evaluated. The recent introduction of reversal strategies may help the management of GI bleeding in this subgroup of patients. In this review, we aimed to (1) summarize the epidemiology and risk factors for upper and lower GI bleeding, (2) describe treatment options with a focus on pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of different proton pump inhibitors, and (3) provide an overview of the clinical management with flowcharts for risk stratification and treatment. In conclusion, GI is common in older patients and an early effective management may be helpful in the reduction of several complications.

Association of direct oral anticoagulant and delayed bleeding with pharmacokinetics after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pharmacokinetic parameters, such as drug plasma level at trough, time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), and coagulation factor Xa (FXa) activity generally predict factors for the anticoagulant effects of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Although GI bleeding is a major adverse event after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), little is known about the association between post-ESD bleeding in patients taking DOACs and the pharmacologic parameters. This study aimed to evaluate pharmacologic risk factors for post-ESD bleeding in patients taking DOACs.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the incidence of post-ESD bleeding in patients taking DOACs between April 2018 and May 2022 at 21 Japanese institutions and investigated the association with post-ESD bleeding and pharmacologic factors, including plasma concentration and FXa activity at trough and Tmax.

RESULTS

The incidence of post-ESD bleeding was 12.8% (14 of 109; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2-20.6). Although plasma DOAC concentration and plasma level/dose ratio at trough and Tmax varied widely among individuals, a significant correlation with plasma concentration and FXa activity was observed (apixaban: correlation coefficient, -0.893; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, risk factors for post-ESD bleeding in patients taking DOACs were higher age (odds ratio [OR], 1.192; 95% CI, 1.020-1.392; P = .027) and high anticoagulant ability analyzed by FXa activity at trough and Tmax (OR, 6.056; 95% CI, 1.094-33.529; P = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of post-ESD bleeding in patients taking DOACs was high, especially in older patients and with high anticoagulant effects of DOACs. Measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters of DOACs may be useful in identifying patients at higher risk of post-ESD bleeding.

A systematic critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines of antithrombotic agents in gastrointestinal endoscopy using the AGREE II tool

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has not been systematically appraised. The goal of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of CPGs for the management of antithrombotic agents in periendoscopic period published within last 6 years.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed to identify eligible CPGs published between January 1, 2016, and April 14, 2022, addressing the management of antithrombotic agents in the periendoscopic period. The quality of the CPG was independently assessed by six reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Domain scores were considered of sufficient quality when > 60% and of good quality when > 80%.

RESULTS

The search yielded 343 citations, of which seven CPGs published by the gastroenterology associations in Asia (n = 3), Europe (n = 2), and North America (n = 2) were included for the critical appraisal. The overall median score for the AGREE II domains was 93% (interquartile range [IQR] 11%) for scope and purpose, 79% (IQR 61%) for stakeholder involvement, 79% (IQR 36%) for rigor of development, 100% (IQR 14%) for clarity of presentation, 32% (IQR 36%) for applicability, 93% (IQR 29%) for editorial independence, and 86% (IQR 29%) for overall assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings show that the overall methodological quality of the CPGs for the management of antithrombotic agents in the periendoscopic period varies across the domains. There is significant scope for improvement in the methodological rigor and applicability of CPGs.

Glucose and lactate levels are lower in EUS-aspirated cyst fluid of mucinous vs non-mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing mucinous (M) pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) from non-mucinous (NM) is challenging but crucial. Low intracystic glucose level has shown diagnostic tool promise, however further investigation is needed to understand metabolic processes.

AIMS

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of intracystic glucose and CEA levels in a large cohort and explore lactate levels as potential marker.

METHODS

PCNs≥15 mm which underwent EUS-fine needle aspiration were prospectively enrolled. Glucose, CEA and lactate levels were measured. Diagnostic accuracy for M-PCN diagnosis was evaluated using surgical/cytology reports or multidisciplinary evaluations.

RESULTS

169 PCNs were included (64 % M-PCNs). Median intracystic glucose was significantly lower in M-PCNs (1 mg/dL) compared to NM-PCNs (101 mg/dL); mean intracystic CEA was significantly higher in M-PCNs (152.5 ng/mL) compared to NM-PCNs (0.3 ng/mL). ROC curve analysis revealed best glucose cut-off ≤58 mg/dL (accuracy 93.5 %) and CEA cut-off >2.5 ng/mL (accuracy 90.5 %) for M-PCNs. Intracystic lactates were significantly lower in M-PCNs correlating directly with glucose. Single glucose dosage evidenced best diagnostic accuracy respect markers combination.

CONCLUSION

Intracystic glucose demonstrated high diagnostic utility for M-PCNs differentiation, surpassing CEA. Lactate levels correlated with glucose, suggesting their uptake by M-PCNs cells. These findings contribute to a better metabolic landscape understanding glucose use as diagnostic marker.

Periprocedural Anticoagulation Management of Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy with Polypectomy

Introduction/Objective  Colonoscopy with polypectomy is an integral component of colorectal cancer screening. There are limited data and consensus on periprocedural anticoagulation management, especially regarding bleeding risk with uninterrupted anticoagulation and thromboembolic risk with interruption. Our aim was to determine the incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic complications among colon screening participants undergoing colonoscopy following implementation of a novel patient care pathway for standardized periprocedural anticoagulation management. Methods  We conducted a retrospective study including all participants (age 50-74) on an oral anticoagulant (e.g., vitamin K antagonists, direct oral anticoagulants) referred to the British Columbia Colon Screening Program for colonoscopy following abnormal fecal immunochemical test in a 6-month period (March-August 2022). Data relating to their specific periprocedural anticoagulant management and colonoscopy results including method of polypectomy were obtained. Primary outcomes were major bleeding and arterial or venous thromboembolic events from time of oral anticoagulant interruption until 14 days of postcolonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included nonmajor and minor bleeding, acute coronary syndrome, emergency room visit, hospital admission, and death due to any cause. Results  Over the 6-month period, 162 participants completed standardized periprocedural anticoagulation management, colonoscopy ± polypectomy, and 14-day follow-up. One (0.6%) had a major bleeding event and one (0.6%) had an arterial thromboembolic event. Conclusions  A novel patient care pathway for standardized periprocedural anticoagulation management with a multidisciplinary team is associated with low rates of major bleeding and thrombotic complications after colonoscopy with polypectomy.

International Consensus Recommendations for Safe Use of LAMS for On- and Off-Label Indications Using a Modified Delphi Process

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to develop international consensus recommendations on the safe use of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) for on- and off-label indications.

METHODS

Based on the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: general safety measures, peripancreatic fluid collections, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-biliary drainage, EUS-gallbladder drainage, EUS-gastroenterostomy, and gastric access temporary for endoscopy. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology.International LAMS experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When no 80% consensus was reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback. Statements were rejected if no consensus was reached after the third Delphi round.

RESULTS

Fifty-six (93.3%) of 60 formulated statements were accepted, of which 35 (58.3%) in the first round. Consensus was reached on the optimal learning path, preprocedural imaging, the need for airway protection and essential safety measures during the procedure, such as the use of Doppler, and measurement of the distance between the gastrointestinal lumen and the target structure. Specific consensus recommendations were generated for the different LAMS indications, covering, among others, careful patient selection, the preferred size of the LAMS, the need for antibiotics, the preferred anatomic location of the LAMS, the need for coaxial pigtail placement, and the appropriate management of LAMS-related adverse events.

DISCUSSION

Through a modified international Delphi process, we developed general and indication-specific experience- and evidence-based recommendations on the safe use of LAMS.

Updates on the Prevention and Management of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding in the Colon

Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) remains a significant procedure-related complication, with multiple risk factors determining the risk including patient demographics, polyp characteristics, endoscopist expertise, and techniques of polypectomy. Immediate PPB is usually treated promptly, but management of delayed PPB can be challenging. Cold snare polypectomy is the optimal technique for small sessile polyps with hot snare polypectomy for pedunculated and large sessile polyps. Topical hemostatic powders and gels are being investigated for the prevention and management of PPB. Further studies are needed to compare these topical agents with conventional therapy.

BEST-J Score: Validation of a Predicting Model for Delayed Bleeding After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection on a European Sample

BACKGROUND

Delayed bleeding (DB) is a possible adverse event following gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The BEST-J score was created as a risk prediction model for DB following gastric ESD, but is yet to be validated in Western populations.

AIMS

We aimed to validate the BEST-J score on a European sample and to perform a subgroup analysis according to histological classification.

METHODS

Retrospective study of all consecutive patients undergoing gastric ESD on a European Endoscopic Unit. DB was defined as hemorrhage with clinical symptoms and confirmed by emergency endoscopy from the time of completion to 28 days after ESD. BEST-J score was calculated in each patient and confronted with the outcome (DB).

RESULTS

Final sample included 161 patients. From these, 10 (6.2%) presented DB following ESD, with a median time to bleeding of 7 days (IQR 6.8). BEST-J score presented an excellent accuracy predicting DB in our sample, with an AUC = 0.907 (95%CI 0.801-1.000; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by histological classification proved that the discriminative power was still excellent for each grade: low-grade dysplasia-AUC = 0.970 (p < 0.001); high-grade dysplasia-AUC = 0.874 (p < 0.001); early gastric cancer-AUC = 0.881 (p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value to predict DB was a BEST-J score ≥ 3, which matches the cut-off value for high-risk of bleeding in the original investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

The BEST-J score still presents excellent accuracy in risk stratification for post-ESD bleeding in European individuals. Thus, this score may help to guide which patients benefit the most from prophylactic therapies following gastric ESD in this setting.

Validation and update of a clinical score model to predict technical difficulty of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Zhongshan colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (CR-ESD) score model was proposed to grade the technical difficulty of CR-ESD. The objective of this study was to prospectively validate and update the score model.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort analysis of CR-ESD was conducted. Individual data on patients, lesions, and outcomes of CR-ESD were used to validate the original model and further refine the difficulty of the prediction model. Data were randomly divided into discovery and internal validation cohorts. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted on the discovery cohort to develop an updated risk-scoring system, which was then validated.

RESULTS

Five hundred forty-eight patients with 565 colorectal lesions treated by ESD from 4 hospitals were included. In the prospective validation cohort, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the original model was .707. Six risk factors were identified and assigned point values: tumor size (2 points for 30-50 mm, 3 points for ≥50 mm), at least two-thirds circumference of the lesion (3 points), tumor location in the cecum (2 points) or flexure (2 points), laterally spreading tumor-nongranular lesions (1 point), preceding biopsy sampling (1 point), and NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic type 3 (3 points). The updated model had an area under the ROC curve of .738 in the discovery cohort and of .782 in the validation cohort. Cases were categorized into easy (score = 0-1), intermediate (score = 2-3), difficult (score = 4-6), and very difficult (score ≥7) groups. Satisfactory discrimination and calibration were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The original model achieved an acceptable level of prediction in the prospective cohort. The updated model exhibited superior performance and can be used in place of the previous version. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100047087.).

Risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: the Limoges Bleeding Score

BACKGROUND

Clinically significant delayed bleeding (CSDB) is a frequent, and sometimes severe, adverse event after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We evaluated risk factors of CSDB after colorectal ESD.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective registry of 940 colorectal ESDs performed from 2013 to 2022. The incidence of bleeding was evaluated up to 30 days. Risk factors for delayed bleeding were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. A Korean scoring model was tested, and a new risk-scoring model was developed and internally validated.

RESULTS

CSDB occurred in 75 patients (8.0%). The Korean score performed poorly in our cohort, with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.567. In the multivariate analysis, risk factors were age ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.63; 95%CI 0.97-2.73; 1 point), use of antithrombotics (OR 1.72; 95%CI 1.01-2.94; 1 point), rectal location (OR 1.51; 95%CI 0.92-2.48; 1 point), size >50 mm (OR 3.67; 95%CI 2.02-7.14; 3 points), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III or IV (OR 2.26; 95%CI 1.32-3.92; 2 points). The model showed fair calibration and good discrimination, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.751 (95%CI 0.690-0.812). The score was used to define two groups of patients, those with low-medium risk (0 to 4 points) and high risk (5 to 8 points) for CSDB (respective bleeding rates 4.1% and 17.5%).

CONCLUSION

A score based on five simple and meaningful variables was predictive of CSDB.

Risks, indications and technical aspects of colonoscopy in elderly or frail patients. Position paper of the Societat Catalana de Digestologia, the Societat Catalana de Geriatria i Gerontologia and the Societat Catalana de Medicina de Familia i Comunitaria

Colonoscopy (CS) is an invasive diagnostic and therapeutic technique, allowing the study of the colon. It is a safe and well tolerated procedure. However, CS is associated with an increased risk of adverse events, insufficient preparation and incomplete examinations in the elderly or frail patient (PEA/F). The objective of this position paper was to develop a set of recommendations on risk assessment, indications and special care required for CS in the PEA/F. It was drafted by a group of experts appointed by the SCD, SCGiG and CAMFiC that agreed on eight statements and recommendations, between them to recommend against performing CS in patients with advanced frailty, to indicate CS only if the benefits clearly outweigh the risks in moderate frailty and to avoid repeating CS in patients with a previous normal procedure. We also recommended against performing screening CS in patients with moderate or advanced frailty.

How to implement adverse events as a quality indicator in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Quality improvement through the registration of endoscopy-related adverse events (AEs) has been recognized by major international endoscopy societies as an important quality indicator. The theory behind this is easier to approve than its implementation in daily practice. The results of many valuable attempts have been published in the literature, mainly highlighting the diverse hurdles trying to capture events related to endoscopy and the sedation used for endoscopic procedures. The current review discusses the difficulties encountered attempting to register AEs and incidents related to endoscopic procedures. Government-driven and financed health-care databases with automated coupling of specific data seem the only efficient way to implement endoscopy-related AEs and outcomes on a prospective and complete basis. This will not only allow continuous confidential feedback to endoscopists in relation to the pooled national benchmark data, but also follow-up in time through data-driven credentialing aiming to progressively optimize these benchmark data.