Safety of an intravenous second generation contrast agent in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

Safety of Lumason® (SonoVue®) in special populations and critically ill patients

Evidence for the safe use of Lumason® (SonoVue®), an ultrasound enhancing agent (UEA), in special patient populations is critical to enable healthcare professionals to make informed decisions concerning its use in such patients. Herein, we provide insight on the safety and tolerability of Lumason® in special patient populations. Findings are presented from clinical pharmacology studies conducted in patients with compromised cardiopulmonary conditions, from a retrospective study performed in critically ill patients, and from post-marketing surveillance data from over 20 years of market use of Lumason® (SonoVue®). No detrimental effects of Lumason® on cardiac electrophysiology were observed in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and no significant effects on pulmonary hemodynamics were noted in patients with pulmonary hypertension or congestive heart failure. Similarly, no effects on several assessments of pulmonary function (e.g., FVC) were observed in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and no clinically meaningful changes in O2 saturation or other safety parameters were observed after administration of Lumason® to patients with diffuse interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (DIPF). The retrospective study of critically ill patients revealed no significant difference for in-hospital mortality between patients administered Lumason® for echocardiography versus those who had undergone echocardiography without contrast agent. Post-marketing surveillance revealed very low reporting rates (RR) for non-serious and serious adverse events and that serious hypersensitivity reactions were rare. These findings confirm that Lumason® is a safe and well tolerated UEA for use in special populations and critically ill patients.

Clinical practice of contrast echocardiography: recommendation by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) 2017

Contrast echocardiography is widely used in cardiology. It is applied to improve image quality, reader confidence and reproducibility both for assessing left ventricular (LV) structure and function at rest and for assessing global and regional function in stress echocardiography. The use of contrast in echocardiography has now extended beyond cardiac structure and function assessment to evaluation of perfusion both of the myocardium and of the intracardiac structures. Safety of contrast agents have now been addressed in large patient population and these studies clearly established its excellent safety profile. This document, based on clinical trials, randomized and multicentre studies and published clinical experience, has established clear recommendations for the use of contrast in various clinical conditions with evidence-based protocols.

Safety With Echocardiographic Contrast Agents

In October 2007, the Food and Drug Administration mandated significant revisions to product labeling for the commercially available echocardiographic contrast agents (ECA) Definity and Optison after spontaneous healthcare provider reports of 4 patient deaths and ≈190 severe cardiopulmonary reactions occurring in close temporal relationship to ECA administration. Since then, multiple large ECA safety studies have been published and have included outpatients, hospitalized patients (including the critically ill), patients undergoing stress echocardiography, and patients with pulmonary hypertension. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration has convened 2 Advisory Committee meetings and the product labels for Optison and Definity have been substantially revised with a softening of safety restrictions. In this review, we will address the safety of ECA use in patients with serious cardiopulmonary conditions, patients with intracardiac shunts, and special patient populations including pulmonary hypertension, pediatrics, and pregnancy. In addition, we will discuss the confounding role of pseudocomplication in attribution of adverse events during diagnostic testing, the current status of the ECA Black Box Warning, and recommended safety precautions during ECA administration.

Effect of Optison on pulmonary artery systolic pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance

Ultrasound contrast agent safety has received recent attention based on reports of associated serious adverse events. The US Food and Drug Administration requested this postmarketing study of the effects of Optison on pulmonary hemodynamics. The aim of this study was to compare Optison and a placebo for effects on pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) during right-sided cardiac catheterization. This was a single-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of Optison in subjects referred for clinically indicated cardiac catheterization. Based on screening echocardiographic PASP, subjects were assigned to 1 of 2 strata (1 = normal PASP [≤35 mm Hg] and 2 = elevated PASP [>35 mm Hg]), in which they were randomized to treatment arm A (intravenous 0.5 ml Optison and then intravenous 0.5 ml placebo [5% dextrose] 15 minutes later) or arm B (intravenous 0.5 ml placebo [5% dextrose] and then 0.5 ml Optison 15 minutes later). Baseline pulmonary hemodynamics were obtained within 60 minutes before the first injection and 2, 6, and 10 minutes after each injection. Thirty patients each received their assigned treatments. There were no clinically relevant increases from baseline in mean PASP or PVR (Wood units) in either stratum alone or the combined strata. There were no serious adverse events. In conclusion, there is no change in PASP or PVR after intravenous injection of Optison at a clinically relevant dose in patients with normal or elevated baseline PASP.

The acute effect of an echo-contrast agent on right ventricular dimensions and contractility in pigs

BACKGROUND

: The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of the second-generation ultrasound contrast agent (2nd GUCA) SonoVue on right ventricular (RV) dimensions and contractility and to investigate whether a dose-related interaction exists between the contrast agent and RV function.

METHODS

: Twenty-eight pigs were randomly assigned to 3 groups for intravenous administration: a low-dose group (0.5 cc of SonoVue), a high-dose group (1 cc of SonoVue), and a control group (2 cc of normal saline). RV end-diastolic (EDD) and end-systolic dimension (ESD) and pulmonary pressure (PP) were measured, and the fractional shortening (FS%) was calculated before the administration of SonoVue or normal saline and after the return of the RV-EDD or PP to the baseline value. The time to reach maximal RV-EDD or PP value and the time until the return of RV-EDD or PP to the baseline value were also measured.

RESULTS

: Contrast agent infusion was followed by an acute transient increase of RV-EDD, RV-ESD, FS, and PP in both the low-dose and high-dose groups, but the increase was greater in the high-dose group. FS and PP did not change significantly in the control group. A dose-dependent delay in the time from baseline to maximum RV-EDD and PP was detected in the high-dose group (P < 0.001 for both) as well as a delay in the return from maximum to the baseline values (P < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

: Administration of the 2nd GUCA SonoVue is associated with an acute, transient, dose-dependent RV dilatation and an increase in pulmonary pressure with a consequent impact on RV contractility.

Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Evolving as a Clinically Feasible Technique for Accurate, Rapid, and Safe Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion

Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a recently developed technique for assessment of myocardial perfusion. Up to now, many studies have demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of qualitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by MCE in patients with acute and chronic ischemic heart disease are comparable with other techniques such as cardiac scintigraphy and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Furthermore, quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion derived from MCE correlate well with the current clinical standard for this purpose, positron emission tomography. Myocardial contrast echocardiography provides a promising and valuable tool for assessment of myocardial perfusion. Although MCE has been primarily performed for medical research, its implementation in routine clinical care is evolving. This article is intended to give an overview of the current status of MCE.