1
|
Hainsworth R, Thompson AJ, Guthrie B, Payne K, Rogers G. International Systematic Review of Utility Values Associated with Cardiovascular Disease and Reflections on Selecting Evidence for a UK Decision-Analytic Model. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:217-234. [PMID: 38174427 PMCID: PMC10865747 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231214782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluating interventions for cardiovascular disease (CVD) requires estimates of its effect on utility. We aimed to 1) systematically review utility estimates for CVDs published since 2013 and 2) critically appraise UK-relevant estimates and calculate corresponding baseline utility multipliers. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and Embase (April 22, 2021) using CVD and utility terms. We screened results for primary studies reporting utility distributions for people with experience of heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, stable angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or unstable angina. We extracted characteristics from studies included. For UK estimates based on the EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) measure, we assessed risk of bias and applicability to a decision-analytic model, pooled arms/time points as appropriate, and estimated baseline utility multipliers using predicted utility for age- and sex- matched populations without CVD. We sought utility sources from directly applicable studies with low risk of bias, prioritizing plausibility of severity ordering in our base-case model and highest population ascertainment in a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Most of the 403 studies identified used EQ-5D (n = 217) and most assessed Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development populations (n = 262), although measures and countries varied widely. UK studies using EQ-5D (n = 29) produced very heterogeneous baseline utility multipliers for each type of CVD, precluding meta-analysis and implying different possible severity orderings. We could find sources that provided a plausible ordering of utilities while adequately representing health states. CONCLUSIONS We cataloged international CVD utility estimates and calculated UK-relevant baseline utility multipliers. Modelers should consider unreported sources of heterogeneity, such as population differences, when selecting utility evidence from reviews. HIGHLIGHTS Published systematic reviews have summarized estimates of utility associated with cardiovascular disease published up to 2013.We 1) reviewed utility estimates for 7 types of cardiovascular disease published since 2013, 2) critically appraised UK-relevant studies, and 3) estimated the effect of each cardiovascular disease on baseline utility.Our review 1) recommends a consistent and reliable set of baseline utility multipliers for 7 types of cardiovascular disease and 2) provides systematically identified reference information for researchers seeking utility evidence for their own context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Hainsworth
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexander J. Thompson
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bruce Guthrie
- Advanced Care Research Centre, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gabriel Rogers
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
England RW, Sheikhbahaei S, Solomon AJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, Solnes LB, Bronner J, Johnson PT. When More Is Better: Underused Advanced Imaging Exams That Can Improve Outcomes and Reduce Cost of Care. Am J Med 2021; 134:848-853.e1. [PMID: 33819488 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Appropriate use of resources is a tenet of care transformation efforts, with a national campaign to reduce low-value imaging. The next level of performance improvement is to bolster evidence-based screening, imaging surveillance, and diagnostic innovation, which can avert more costly, higher-risk elements of unnecessary care like emergent interventions. Clinical scenarios in which underused advanced imaging can improve outcomes and reduce total cost of care are reviewed, including abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance, coronary artery disease diagnosis, and renal mass characterization. Reliable abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance imaging reduces emergency surgery and can be driven by radiologists incorporating best practice standardized recommendations in imaging interpretations. Coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with stable and unstable chest pain can reduce downstream resource use while improving outcomes. Preoperative 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reliably distinguishes oncocytoma from renal cell carcinoma to obviate unnecessary nephrectomy. As technological advances in diagnostic, molecular, and interventional radiology improve our ability to detect and cure disease, analyses of cost effectiveness will be critical to radiology leadership and sustainability in the transition to a value-based reimbursement model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Armin Arbab-Zadeh
- Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | | | - Jay Bronner
- Radiology Partners Research Institute, El Segundo, Calif
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cardiac-CT and cardiac-MR cost-effectiveness: a literature review. Radiol Med 2020; 125:1200-1207. [PMID: 32970273 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01290-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are still among the first causes of death worldwide with a huge impact on healthcare systems. Within these conditions, the correct diagnosis of coronary artery disease with the most appropriate imaging-based evaluations is of utmost importance. The sustainability of the healthcare systems, considering the high economic burden of modern cardiac imaging equipments, makes cost-effective analysis an important tool, currently used for weighing different costs and health outcomes, when policy makers have to allocate funds and to prioritize interventions, getting the most out of their financial resources. This review aims at evaluating cost-effective analysis in the more recent literature, focused on the role of Calcium Score, coronary computed tomography angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance.
Collapse
|
4
|
In-Hospital Cost Comparison of Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Acute Chest Pain. J Thorac Imaging 2020; 35:198-203. [PMID: 32032251 DOI: 10.1097/rti.0000000000000474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utilization of invasive and noninvasive tests and compare cost in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department (ED) who underwent either triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography (TRO-CTA) or standard of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of 2156 ED patients who presented with acute chest pain with a negative initial troponin and electrocardiogram for myocardial injury. Patient cohorts matched by patient characteristics who had undergone TRO-CTA as a primary imaging test (n=1139) or standard of care without initial CTA imaging (n=1017) were included in the study. ED visits, utilization of tests, and costs during the initial episode of hospital care were compared. RESULTS No significant differences in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, pulmonary embolism, or aortic dissection were observed. Median ED waiting time (4.5 vs. 7.0 h, P<0.001), median total length of hospital stay (5.0 vs. 32.0 h, P<0.001), hospital admission rate (12.6% vs. 54.2%, P<0.001), and ED return rate to our hospital within 30 days (3.5% vs. 14.6%, P<0.001) were significantly lower in the TRO-CTA group. Moreover, reduced rates of additional testing and invasive coronary angiography (4.9% vs. 22.7%, P<0.001), and ultimately lower total cost per patient (11,783$ vs. 19,073$, P<0.001) were observed in the TRO-CTA group. CONCLUSIONS TRO-CTA as an initial imaging test in ED patients presenting with acute chest pain was associated with shorter ED and hospital length of stay, fewer return visits within 30 days, and ultimately lower ED and hospitalization costs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee SP, Seo JK, Hwang IC, Park JB, Park EA, Lee W, Paeng JC, Lee HJ, Yoon YE, Kim HL, Koh E, Choi I, Choi JE, Kim YJ. Coronary computed tomography angiography vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with intermediate risk chest pain: a randomized clinical trial for cost-effectiveness comparison based on real-world cost. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 20:417-425. [PMID: 30052964 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jey099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To compare the cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with stable intermediate risk chest pain. METHODS AND RESULTS Non-acute patients with 10-90% pre-test probability of coronary artery disease from three high-volume centres in Korea (n = 965) were randomized 1:1 to CCTA or myocardial SPECT as the initial non-invasive imaging test. Medical costs after randomization, the downstream outcome, including all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident, repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, and significant bleeding following the initial test and the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained by the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire was compared between the two groups. In all, 903 patients underwent the initially randomized study (n = 460 for CCTA, 443 for SPECT). In all, 65 patients underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the CCTA and 85 in the SPECT group, of which 4 in the CCTA and 30 in the SPECT group demonstrated no stenosis on ICA [6.2% (4/65) vs. 35.3% (30/85), P-value < 0.001]. There was no difference in the downstream clinical events. QALYs gained was higher in the SPECT group (0.938 vs. 0.955, P-value = 0.039) but below the threshold of minimal clinically important difference of 0.08. Overall cost per patient was lower in the CCTA group (USD 4514 vs. 5208, P-value = 0.043), the tendency of which was non-significantly opposite in patients with 60-90% pre-test probability (USD 5807 vs. 5659, P-value = 0.845). CONCLUSION CCTA is associated with fewer subsequent ICA with no difference in downstream outcome. CCTA may be more cost-effective than SPECT in Korean patients with stable, intermediate risk chest pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Pyo Lee
- Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Internal Medicine, National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Kyung Seo
- Division for Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - In-Chang Hwang
- Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Internal Medicine, National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun-Bean Park
- Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Internal Medicine, National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun-Ah Park
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Whal Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Chul Paeng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun-Ju Lee
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeonyee E Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea.,Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, 82 Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Hack-Lyoung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea.,Cardiovascular Center, SNU-SMG Boramae Medical Center, 20 Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eunbee Koh
- Division for Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Insun Choi
- Division for Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Eun Choi
- Division for Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong-Jin Kim
- Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Internal Medicine, National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gottlieb I, Bittencourt MS, Rochitte CE, Cavalcante JL. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Takes the Center Stage and Here is Why. Arq Bras Cardiol 2019; 112:104-106. [PMID: 30673022 PMCID: PMC6317632 DOI: 10.5935/abc.20190003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Illan Gottlieb
- Casa de Saúde São José - Radiologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil
| | | | - Carlos Eduardo Rochitte
- Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina Hospital das Clinicas Instituto do Coração, São Paulo, SP - Brazil
| | - João L Cavalcante
- Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota - USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
What Is the Utility of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Compared With Standard of Care for the Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain? Ann Emerg Med 2018; 72:550-552. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
8
|
Zhou A, Yousem DM, Alvin MD. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Radiology: A Systematic Review. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:1536-1546. [PMID: 30057243 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Revised: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) have become more prevalent in radiology. However, the lack of standard methodology may lead to conflicting conclusions on the cost-effectiveness of an imaging modality and hinder CEA-based policy recommendations. This study reviews recent CEAs to identify areas of methodological variation, explore their impact on interpretation, and discuss optimal strategies for performing CEAs in radiology. METHODS We performed a systematic review for cost-utility analyses in radiology from 2013 to 2017. Cost and quality-of-life methods were analyzed and compared using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. RESULTS Eighty cost-utility studies met our inclusion criteria. A payer perspective was the most common (70%) and hospital perspective the least common (5%). Fourteen studies (17.5%) did not report perspective, and 12 (15%) reported a perspective inconsistent with their performed analysis. Cost inclusion varied greatly between studies; adverse effects of imaging (20.5%) and hospitalization (34.6%) were the least frequently included direct costs. Studies that measured their own utilities most commonly used the EuroQol-5D and Short Form-6D questionnaires; however, most studies (80%) cited utilities from previous literature. Seventy-two studies (90%) used willingness-to-pay thresholds, and 30 used cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (41.7%). CONCLUSION We observed statistically significant methodological variation indicating the need for a standardized, accurate means of performing and presenting CEAs within radiology. We make several recommendations to address key problems regarding study perspective, cost inclusion, and use of willingness-to-pay thresholds. Further work is required to ensure comparability and transparency between studies such that policymakers are properly informed when utilizing CEA results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Zhou
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David M Yousem
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew D Alvin
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dewey M, Rief M, Martus P, Kendziora B, Feger S, Dreger H, Priem S, Knebel F, Böhm M, Schlattmann P, Hamm B, Schönenberger E, Laule M, Zimmermann E. Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with atypical angina or chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2016; 355:i5441. [PMID: 27777234 PMCID: PMC5076567 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether invasive coronary angiography or computed tomography (CT) should be performed in patients clinically referred for coronary angiography with an intermediate probability of coronary artery disease. DESIGN Prospective randomised single centre trial. SETTING University hospital in Germany. PARTICIPANTS 340 patients with suspected coronary artery disease and a clinical indication for coronary angiography on the basis of atypical angina or chest pain. INTERVENTIONS 168 patients were randomised to CT and 172 to coronary angiography. After randomisation one patient declined CT and 10 patients declined coronary angiography, leaving 167 patients (88 women) and 162 patients (78 women) for analysis. Allocation could not be blinded, but blinded independent investigators assessed outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The primary outcome measure was major procedural complications within 48 hours of the last procedure related to CT or angiography. RESULTS Cardiac CT reduced the need for coronary angiography from 100% to 14% (95% confidence interval 9% to 20%, P<0.001) and was associated with a significantly greater diagnostic yield from coronary angiography: 75% (53% to 90%) v 15% (10% to 22%), P<0.001. Major procedural complications were uncommon (0.3%) and similar across groups. Minor procedural complications were less common in the CT group than in the coronary angiography group: 3.6% (1% to 8%) v 10.5% (6% to 16%), P=0.014. CT shortened the median length of stay in the angiography group from 52.9 hours (interquartile range 49.5-76.4 hours) to 30.0 hours (3.5-77.3 hours, P<0.001). Overall median exposure to radiation was similar between the CT and angiography groups: 5.0 mSv (interquartile range 4.2-8.7 mSv) v 6.4 mSv (3.4-10.7 mSv), P=0.45. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, major adverse cardiovascular events had occurred in seven of 167 patients in the CT group (4.2%) and six of 162 (3.7%) in the coronary angiography group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 2.69, P=0.86). 79% of patients stated that they would prefer CT for subsequent testing. The study was conducted at a University hospital in Germany and thus the performance of CT may be different in routine clinical practice. The prevalence was lower than expected, resulting in an underpowered study for the predefined primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS CT increased the diagnostic yield and was a safe gatekeeper for coronary angiography with no increase in long term events. The length of stay was shortened by 22.9 hours with CT, and patients preferred non-invasive testing.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00844220.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Dewey
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Rief
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Martus
- Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Kendziora
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Sarah Feger
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Henryk Dreger
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Sascha Priem
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Knebel
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Marko Böhm
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Schlattmann
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Documentation, Jena, Germany
| | - Bernd Hamm
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Schönenberger
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Laule
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Elke Zimmermann
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aghayev A, Murphy DJ, Keraliya AR, Steigner ML. Recent developments in the use of computed tomography scanners in coronary artery imaging. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016; 13:545-53. [PMID: 27140944 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1184968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Within the past decade, substantial evolution of Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA) has affected evaluation and management of coronary artery disease. In particular, technical advancement of hardware technology and image reconstruction of CT scanners have played an important role in this context making it possible to acquire abundant data with excellent temporal and spatial resolution within a shorter scan time. In addition, a concern related to the high radiation exposure in the initial noninvasive coronary artery imaging has triggered improvement in dose reduction techniques. AREAS COVERED In this review article, we have focused on recent technological developments in CT scanners and the impact of these developments on CCTA parameters. Expert Commentary: CCTA plays an important role in coronary artery disease management, and technical development of the CT scanners can be expected to address and remedy technical limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayaz Aghayev
- a Department of Radiology , Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston , MA , USA
| | - David J Murphy
- a Department of Radiology , Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Abhishek R Keraliya
- a Department of Radiology , Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Michael L Steigner
- a Department of Radiology , Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston , MA , USA
| |
Collapse
|