The evaluation of pulmonary vein isolation and wide-area left atrial ablation to treat atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted permanent pacemakers: the Previously Paced Pulmonary Vein Isolation Study

Rhythm Control in Heart Failure Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

AF and heart failure (HF) commonly coexist. Left atrial ablation is an effective treatment to maintain sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with AF. Recent evidence suggests that the use of ablation for AF in patients with HF is associated with an improved left ventricular ejection fraction and lower death and HF hospitalisation rates. We performed a systematic search of world literature to analyse the association in more detail and to assess the utility of AF ablation as a non-pharmacological tool in the treatment of patients with concomitant HF.

EHRA White Paper: knowledge gaps in arrhythmia management—status 2019

Clinicians accept that there are many unknowns when we make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Acceptance of uncertainty is essential for the pursuit of the profession: bedside decisions must often be made on the basis of incomplete evidence. Over the years, physicians sometimes even do not realize anymore which the fundamental gaps in our knowledge are. As clinical scientists, however, we have to halt and consider what we do not know yet, and how we can move forward addressing those unknowns. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) believes that scanning the field of arrhythmia / cardiac electrophysiology to identify knowledge gaps which are not yet the subject of organized research, should be undertaken on a regular basis. Such a review (White Paper) should concentrate on research which is feasible, realistic, and clinically relevant, and should not deal with futuristic aspirations. It fits with the EHRA mission that these White Papers should be shared on a global basis in order to foster collaborative and needed research which will ultimately lead to better care for our patients. The present EHRA White Paper summarizes knowledge gaps in the management of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/sudden death and heart failure.

Persistent atrial fibrillation is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with atrioventricular block and dual-chamber pacemaker

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of development of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block and dual chamber (DDD) pacemakers has not been separately investigated. We sought to determine whether persistent AF influences clinical outcome in these patients.

METHODS

Three hundred-eight consecutive patients with second- or third-degree AV block and implanted a DDD pacemaker were followed for 36 ± 20 months and retrospectively divided into two groups. Thirty-four patients who developed persistent AF formed persistent AF group, and 278 patients who remained free of this arrhythmia control group. Clinical and outcome data of the two groups were compared. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

The primary outcome occurred more often among the patients in the persistent AF group (6.8% per year) than among those in the control group (2.9% per year; P = 0.028). This difference was primarily because of higher rate of heart failure-related deaths in the persistent AF group (P = 0.009). Secondary outcomes, hospitalization for heart failure and paroxysmal AF episode ≥5 minutes, occurred also more often among the patients in the persistent AF group (P = 0.008 and P < 0.001, respectively), although the risk of nonfatal stroke was similar in both groups (P = 0.628).

CONCLUSION

In patients with second- or third-degree AV block and DDD pacemaker, the development of persistent AF is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure.

Use of an Implantable Monitor to Detect Arrhythmia Recurrences and Select Patients for Early Repeat Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Background—

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has proved effective in curing highly symptomatic patients with paroxysmal AF. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to identify the optimal treatment of patients with AF recurrences after the first ablation.

Methods and Results—

Two hundred eighty-six patients with paroxysmal AF underwent ablation (circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with linear lesions) and were monitored with an implantable cardiac monitor (Reveal XT, Medtronic). Patients without AF recurrences during the 3-month postablation period were assigned to group 1; those with AF recurrences to group 2. Patients in group 2 were randomly assigned to group 3 or group 4. Group 3 patients were treated only with antiarrhythmic drugs for 6 weeks, with no early reablation during the 3-month postablation period. In the case of AF recurrence after the 3-month postablation period, patients underwent reablation. Group 4 patients were treated according to the onset mechanism of AF recurrences, as detected and stored by the implantable cardiac monitor: antiarrhythmic drug therapy, but no reablation if AF was not preceded by triggers; early reablation if premature atrial beats or atrial tachycardias or flutter triggered AF. All patients were followed up for 1 year to assess maintenance of sinus rhythm in each group. On 12-month follow-up examination, of the 119 (42%) patients in group 1, 112 (94%) had no AF recurrences. Among the 83 patients in group 3, only 27 (33%) had no recurrences. Of the 84 group 4 patients, 67 (80%) had no AF recurrences ( P <0.0001 versus group 3).

Conclusions—

Patients with recurrences after the first AF ablation are likely to respond to a second early ablation when AF is triggered by supraventricular arrhythmias or premature contractions.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01164319.

The efficacy of intraoperative atrial radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation during concomitant cardiac surgery-the Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Suppression (SAFS) Study

INTRODUCTION

Studies assessing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) performed at the time of concomitant cardiac surgery have reported high success rates. The efficacy of this treatment has primarily been determined by a single electrocardiogram (ECG) or 24-h Holter monitor at follow-up. We sought to assess the true efficacy of this procedure using prolonged cardiac rhythm monitoring.

METHODS

One hundred patients with paroxysmal (n = 47) and persistent AF (n = 53) requiring cardiac surgery were enrolled. Patients were clinically reviewed 6 weeks post-operatively and were monitored with 7-day Holter with full disclosure, 6 months post-surgery. A cohort of 50 patients also underwent 7 day Holter monitoring preoperatively. AF recurrence was defined as >30 s of AF.

RESULTS

At 6 months, 75% of patients were in sinus rhythm according to a single ECG. However, only 62% of patients were free from AF on 7-day Holter; all AF episodes in these patients were asymptomatic. The procedure resulted in a significant decrease in AF burden from 56.2% at baseline to 27.5% at 6 months follow-up, (p < 0.001). Predictors of AF recurrence were (1) pre-operative AF duration; (2) persistent compared with paroxysmal AF; (3) increasing left atrial diameter and (4) requirement for mitral valve surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical RFA for the treatment of AF, during concomitant cardiac surgery, is a successful procedure and significantly reduces AF burden. However, 13% of patients have asymptomatic AF episodes only identified with continuous monitoring. This has important implications for post-operative anti-arrhythmic and anticoagulant management and for the definition of surgical AF ablation success.