Class III Antiarrhythmics: put to the SWORD?

Phase 2 ventricular arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction: a neglected target for therapeutic antiarrhythmic drug development and for safety pharmacology evaluation

Ventricular fibrillation (VF), a cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI), remains a major therapeutic challenge. In humans, VF may occur within minutes or hours after the onset of chest pain, so its precise timing in relation to the onset of ischaemia is variable. Moreover, because VF usually occurs unobserved, out of hospital, and is usually lethal in the absence of intervention, its precise timing of onset is actually unknown in most patients. In animal models, the timing of susceptibility to VF is much better characterised. It occurs in two distinct phases. Early VF (defined as phase 1 VF, with possible subphases 1a and 1b in some animal species) occurs during the first 30 min of ischaemia when most myocardial injury is still reversible. Late VF, defined as phase 2 VF, occurs when myocardial necrosis is becoming established (after more than 90 min of ischaemia). Although much is known about the mechanisms and pharmacology of phase 1 VF, little is known about phase 2 VF. By reviewing a range of different types of data we have outlined the likely mechanisms and clinical relevance of phase 2 VF, and have evaluated possible future directions to help evolve a strategy for its suppression by drugs. The possibility that a proarrhythmic effect on phase 2 VF contributes to the adverse cardiac effects of certain cardiac and noncardiac drugs is also discussed in relation to the emerging field of safety pharmacology. It is concluded that suppression of phase 2 as well as phase 1 VF will almost certainly be necessary if drugs of the future are to achieve what drugs of the past and present have failed to achieve: full protection against SCD. Likewise, safety will require avoidance of exacerbation of phase 2 as well as phase 1 VF.

Electrophysiological effects of dofetilide in an in vitro model of "border zone" between normal and ischemic/reperfused myocardium

BACKGROUND

To evaluate both class III activity and antiarrhythmic action of dofetilide at the level of the "border zone," we investigated its electrophysiological effects on guinea pig ventricular strips submitted partly to normoxia (normal zone, NZ) and partly to simulated severe ischemia, then reperfusion (altered zone, AZ).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Because of the differential class III effects of dofetilide in normal and ischemic regions, the dispersion of the action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD(90)) between NZ and AZ was reduced by 5 nmol/L of drug during early ischemia (at 10 minutes, APD(90) NZ/APD(90) AZ was 1.68+/-0.22 versus 2.82+/-0.17 in control, P<0.05), whereas 50 nmol/L dofetilide worsened it during late ischemia (at 30 minutes, APD(90) NZ/APD(90) AZ was 4.62+/-0.76 versus 2.57+/-0.21 in control, P<0.05). Concomitantly, dofetilide at 5, 10, and 50 nmol/L abolished the early extrastimulus (ES)-induced arrhythmias, and at 10 and 50 nmol/L, it significantly enhanced the incidence of late spontaneous repetitive responses (in 86% and 75% of preparations treated with 10 and 50 nmol/L, respectively, versus 25% in control, P<0.05). During reperfusion, dofetilide at 5, 10, and 50 nmol/L exhibited concentration-dependent class III effects, as it did in the NZ, and did not modify the incidence of spontaneous arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

Dofetilide 5 nmol/L decreased APD(90) dispersion between NZ and AZ and reduced the early ES-induced arrhythmias. However, dofetilide 50 nmol/L increased APD(90) dispersion, and at 10 and 50 nmol/L, it increased the late spontaneous arrhythmias.

Inadequate ischaemia-selectivity limits the antiarrhythmic efficacy of mibefradil during regional ischaemia and reperfusion in the rat isolated perfused heart

1. Mibefradil was compared with (+/-)-verapamil for effects on ischaemia- and reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF), and the role of ischaemia-selective L-channel block was examined. Langendorff perfused rat hearts (n=12/group) were used. 2. Neither drug at up to 100 nM reduced the incidence of VF during 30 min regional ischaemia. 300 and 600 nM (+/-)-verapamil abolished VF (P<0. 05); mibefradil was effective only at 600 nM (P<0.05). Reperfusion-induced VF incidence was reduced only by 600 nM (+/-)-verapamil (P<0.05). Both drugs at >/=100 nM increased coronary flow (P<0.05) with a similar potency and maximum effectiveness. 3. In separate hearts perfused with Krebs' solution containing 3 mM K+ (the same as that used for arrhythmia studies) neither drug at up to 600 nM affected ventricular contractility. With K+ raised to 6 mM, (+/-)-verapamil >/=30 nM reduced developed pressure (P<0.05); mibefradil did so only at 600 nM (P<0.05). With K+ raised to 10 mM the effects of (+/-)-verapamil were further increased (P<0.05) and mibefradil became active at >/=100 nM (P<0.05). Likewise both drugs impaired diastolic relaxation, with raised K+ exacerbating the effects and (+/-)-verapamil being more potent and its effects more greatly exacerbated by K+. In contrast, when K+ was normal (3 mM), coronary flow was increased by each drug at >/=30 nM (P<0.05) indicating a marked vascular : myocardial selectivity. 4. In conclusion, mibefradil differed from (+/-)-verapamil in its myocardial effects only in terms of its lower potency. As mibefradil is the more potent T-channel blocker, the T-channel is unlikely to represent the molecular target for these effects. The K+ elevations that occur in the ischaemic milieu determine the ability of both drugs to block myocardial L-channels; this is sufficient to account for the drugs' actions on VF. Neither drug possesses sufficient selectivity for ischaemic myocardium versus blood vessels to permit efficacy (VF suppression without marked vasodilatation) and so inappropriate hypotension is likely to preclude the safe use of mibefradil (or similar analogue) in VF suppression, and explains the lack of clinical effectiveness of (+/-)-verapamil.

Proarrhythmic effects of DL- and D-sotalol on the "border zone" between normal and ischemic regions of isolated ventricular myocardium and antiarrhythmic effects on reperfusion

Considering the Survival With ORal D-sotalol (SWORD) study results, in which mortality was higher in patients treated by the pure class III agent D-sotalol, we tested DL- and D-sotalol (5 and 10 microM) in an in vitro model of "border zone" arrhythmias. Isolated guinea-pig ventricular strips were partly exposed to normoxia ("Normal Zone," NZ) and partly to modified Tyrode's solution ("Ischemic Zone," IZ) for 15 or 30 min ("ischemia"), followed by return to normoxia for 30 min ("reperfusion"). Resting membrane potential, action potential (AP) amplitude, and maximal upstroke velocity of AP were not significantly modified. DL- And D-sotalol, 5 and 10 microM, lengthened AP duration 90% (APD90) in NZ (p < 0.05), whereas these drugs were unable to prevent ischemia-induced APD shortening. By using the accelerated failure time Weibull's model, and a large number of reference experiments to control random variability of analyzed covariates, DL- and D-sotalol increased significantly the incidence of spontaneous arrhythmias during ischemia (chi2 = 24.79; p = 0.0367): 83 (5 microM D- and DL-sotalol), 86, and 62% (10 microM D- and DL-sotalol, respectively) versus 32% of controls. During reperfusion, 10 microM DL-sotalol prevented the occurrence of spontaneous arrhythmias (chi2 = 46.74; p = 0.0001) similar to what seen with the beta-blocking agent propranolol (10 microM). These data, providing evidence for proarrhythmic effects of DL- and D-sotalol on border-zone arrhythmias, concomitant with differential class III actions on NZ versus IZ, might be considered for understanding the SWORD study results.

Drug-induced cardiac arrhythmias: incidence, prevention and management

Drugs can cause cardiac arrhythmias in a number of clinical situations, and many of the implicated agents are used to treat non-cardiac conditions. These adverse effects are frequently idiosyncratic, but are often mediated via triggered activity causing torsade de pointes. Drugs being used for treatment of cardiac conditions may promote arrhythmias by re-entrant mechanisms or via triggered activity. Many drugs may cause cardiac arrhythmic complications when taken in excessive amounts. Keys to reducing the incidence of drug-induced cardiac arrhythmias include increased awareness among the medical, pharmaceutical and nursing professions of the potential problems in using certain agents, especially in specific situations. Appropriate monitoring when such treatment is essential and, after diagnosis, prompt withdrawal of the offending agent and treatment for the arrhythmia should be initiated.