A decision aid for women at increased risk for ovarian cancer

Decision Aids for Preventive Treatment Alternatives for BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: a Systematic Review

Introduction Women with a pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation have a markedly increased lifetime risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer. The current preventive treatment alternatives that are offered are an intensified breast cancer screening programme and risk-reducing operations. Before deciding on one option, medical and personal factors such as life situation and individual preferences must be weighed carefully. Decision aids are used internationally to support BRCA1/2 mutation carriers during their decision-making process. In this study these are analysed structurally for the first time and their applicability to the German context is examined.

Material and Methods A systematic literature search in five electronic databases and a manual search were performed. The identified decision aids were evaluated with regard to formal criteria, medical content and quality. The qualitative assessment used the criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration (IPDASi v4.0), which examined various dimensions (e.g., information, probabilities, values).

Results Twenty decision aids, which were published between 2003 and 2019 in Australia (n = 4), the United Kingdom (n = 3), Canada (n = 2), the Netherlands (n = 2) and the USA (n = 9), were included. Nine focus on BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and eleven include other risk groups. Eighteen include risk-reducing operations as decision options, 14 list screening methods for breast and/or ovarian cancer, and 13 describe the possibility of pharmacological prevention by means of selective oestrogen receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitors. Nine of the 20 decision aids meet fundamental quality criteria (IPDASi v4.0 qualification criteria).

Conclusion International decision aids can serve formally as a basis for a German decision aid for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Some of them differ markedly in content from the recommendations of German guidelines. Only a few achieve a high quality.

Development and Testing of a Decision Aid for Unaffected Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation

For women who are unaffected carriers of a pathogenic BRCA mutation, cancer risk management requires ongoing education, counseling, and support from an interdisciplinary team of medical specialists, genetic counselors, and nurses specializing in genomics. The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot test an educational, patient-focused decision aid to facilitate shared decision making. A steering committee developed the prototype aid after an extensive review of the literature. The aid was designed at the ninth-grade reading level, to be consistent with internationally accepted clinical guidelines and inclusive of all risk management options and psychosocial issues important to cancer risk management decision making. The aid was tested with 23 participants: eight experts and 15 end users. Eleven survey items were asked related to organization, clarity, usefulness, comprehensiveness, ease of understanding, and relevance to the cancer risk management decision-making process. Mean scores were 3 or higher on Likert scales of 1-4 (high) for each of the 11 items. Two open-ended questions elicited general comments and suggestions for additions, deletions, or revisions to the decision aid. The steering committee made final revisions to the aid based on participant feedback and committee consensus.

Decisions and outcomes of genetic testing for inherited breast cancer risk

Since the discovery of breast cancer susceptibility genes and the availability of genetic testing, a substantial amount of research has been conducted to evaluate rates of genetic test acceptance and to understand the psychological and behavioral impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genetic test results. This article explores findings related to genetic test acceptance for inherited breast cancer risk and the impact of genetic test results on psychological functioning, cancer prevention and control behaviors, and family communication about genetic testing. Overall, rates of genetic test acceptance were lower than anticipated based on interest in genetic testing reported in early research. While there is limited evidence that genetic testing generates adverse psychological effects, receiving positive BRCA1/2 test results may cause emotional reactions and concerns that are specific to such results. Although early reports suggested that receiving positive BRCA1/2 test results may have a limited impact on cancer screening or prevention behaviors, recent studies have shown that genetic testing for inherited breast cancer risk may increase screening behaviors among mutation carriers. However, utilization of some screening tests remains low among mutation carriers. Additional studies are needed to identify subgroups of participants in genetic testing who may be vulnerable to experiencing testing-specific concerns, and to evaluate the effects of interventions designed to promote behavioral change and address other concerns that may be generated by receiving positive BRCA1/2 test results.

Improving information to Italian cancer patients: results of a randomized study

BACKGROUND

It has been widely shown that the provision of adequate levels of information to patients does have a positive effect on quality of life by reducing anxiety and depression levels. The aim of this study was to show how Italian cancer patients rate the information they are given and whether the use of booklets and videotapes can improve their quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cancer patients aged between 18 and 80 years who were about to receive their first chemotherapy course were randomized to fill in questionnaires on perceived quality of information, level of psychological distress, perceived severity and curability of the disease, and quality of life. The results were evaluated by means of statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Out of 328 consecutive patients enrolled in 21 cancer centers, 86-93% considered the booklets either "very useful" or "useful". The videotape was regarded as "quite" or "much" more complete than the booklets (87%). According to 81%/87% of patients, the information that had been given had improved their knowledge of the disease/chemotherapy either "a lot" or "enough".

CONCLUSIONS

The information patients receive from the oncologist was rated the highest, as long as they were devoted enough time. Booklets and videotapes can partially overcome the lack of oral information given by medical doctors. A better informed patient does help the oncologist save time.