International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study

Surgical procedures and techniques in robot-assisted uterine artery-preserving radical trachelectomy

The aim of the study was to study robotic cervical radical trachelectomy, aimed at standardizing and optimizing surgical procedures, thereby facilitating the learning process. All surgical procedures were based on the anatomy of the embryonic compartments, which not only help prevent tumor spillage due to disruption of the embryonic compartments, but also maximize the avoidance of inadequate resection margins. Using robotics to perform radical trachelectomy, combined with the concept of membrane anatomy, not only enables a bloodless surgical process, but also streamlines and simplifies the procedure, making it more efficient and precise. Utilizing robotics for radical hysterectomy can lead to a more meticulous and refined outcome. Precise surgical techniques contribute to standardizing and optimizing surgical procedures, thereby facilitating the learning process.

A meta-analysis of treatment for early-stage cervical cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical trachelectomy

BACKGROUND

In previous systematic reviews, meta-analysis was lacking, resulting in the statistical difference between the data of different surgeries being impossible to judge. This meta-analysis aims to contrast the fertility results and cancer outcomes between open and minimally invasive surgery.

METHOD

We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus to collect studies that included open and minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. A random-effect model calculated the weighted average difference of each primary outcome via Review Manager V.5.4.

RESULT

Eight studies (1369 patients) were incorporated into our study. For fertility results, the Open group excels MIS group in pregnancies-Third trimester delivery [OR = 2.68; 95% CI (1.29, 5.59); P = 0.008]. Nevertheless, there is no statistical difference in clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and second-trimester rate. Concerning cancer outcomes, no difference was detected in the overall survival [OR = 1.56; 95% CI (0.70, 3.45); P = 0.27] and recurrence [OR = 0.63; 95% CI (0.35, 1.12); P = 0.12]. Concerning surgery-related outcomes, the comprehensive effects revealed that the estimated blood loss of the Open group was higher than that of the MIS group[MD = 139.40; 95% CI (79.05, 199.75); P < 0.0001]. However, there was no difference between the postoperative complication rate in the two groups [OR = 1.52; 95% CI (0.89, 2.60); P = 0.12].

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggested that the fertility result of the Open group may be better than the MIS group, while the MIS group has better surgery-related outcomes. Owing to the poor cases of our study, a more robust conclusion requires more relevant articles in the future.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022352999.

Tumor lesion detection in patients with cervical cancer by indocyanine green near-infrared imaging

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging for detecting the extent of tumor invasion in cervical cancer using indocyanine green (ICG).

METHODS

We enrolled 51 patients who were diagnosed with cervical cancer with FIGO stage IB1-IIA2 disease. Patients were administered indocyanine green (ICG) at a dose of 5 mg/kg 24 h prior to surgery. A customized near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging system was used to identify the extent of tumor invasion when radical hysterectomy specimens were harvested. The relationship between tumor fluorescence intensity and clinicopathological characteristics was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 51 enrolled patients, 3 patients did not have residual tumors after cervical conization, and tumor lesions were identified by NIRF imaging in all the remaining 48 patients. The results of NIRF imaging were in agreement with the postoperative pathological findings in 95.8% of the patients with stromal invasion, 100% of those with surgical margin invasion, 100% of those with parametrial tumor involvement, and 100% of patients with uterine corpus invasion. The mean signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of the cervical tumors was 2.91 ± 1.64, and the SBR was independent of clinicopathological characteristics. Fluorescence microscopy confirmed that ICG fluorescence was present in the tumor nests.

CONCLUSIONS

NIRF imaging enables objective, accurate, and safe identification of tumor invasion during cervical cancer surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04224467.

Fertility-Sparing Surgery versus Radical Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis and Noninferiority Study

Objective: Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is the treatment of choice for patients with early cervical cancer (ECC) and fertility desire, but survival rates compared to radical hysterectomy (RH) have been scarcely reported. The aim of this study was to analyse the oncological outcomes of FSS compared to a balanced group of standard RH. Methods: A retrospective multicentre study of ECC patients who underwent FSS or RH was carried out in 12 tertiary hospitals in Spain between January 2005 and January 2019. The experimental group included patients who underwent a simple and radical trachelectomy, and the control group included patients who underwent RH. Optimal 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching analysis was performed to balance the series. Results: The study included 222 patients with ECC; 111 (50%) were treated with FSS, and 111 (50%) were treated with RH. After PS matching, a total of 38 patients in the FSS group and 38 patients in the RH group were analysed. In both groups, the overall survival (HR 2.5; CI 0.89, 7.41) and recurrence rates (28.9% in the FSS group vs. 13.2% in RH group) were similar. The rate of disease-free survival at 5 years was 68.99% in the FSS group and 88.01% in the RH group (difference of −19.02 percentage points; 95% CI −32.08 to −5.96 for noninferiority). In the univariate analysis, only tumour size reached statistical significance. Conclusion: FSS offers excellent disease-free and overall survival in women with ECC with fertility desire and is not inferior compared to RH.

Tumor Size and Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer Treated by Fertility Preservation Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of tumor size > 2 cm on oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in early cervical cancer in a Spanish cohort. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study of early cervical cancer (stage IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion -IB1 (FIGO 2009)) patients with gestational desire who underwent FSS at 12 tertiary departments of gynecology oncology between 01/2005 and 01/2019 throughout Spain. Results: A total of 111 patients were included, 82 (73.9%) with tumors < 2 cm and 29 (26.1%) with tumors 2−4 cm. Patients’ characteristics were balanced except from lymphovascular space invasion. All were intraoperative lymph node-negative. Median follow-up was 55.7 and 30.7 months, respectively. Eleven recurrences were diagnosed (9.9%), five (6.0%) and six (21.4%) (p < 0.05). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 95.7% (95%CI 87.3−98.6) and 76.9% (95% CI 55.2−89.0) (p = 0.011). Only tumor size (<2 cm vs. 2−4 cm) was found to be significant for recurrence. After adjusting for the rest of the variables, tumor size 2−4 cm showed a Hazard Ratio of 5.99 (CI 95% 1.01−35.41, p = 0.036). Conclusions: Tumor size ≥ 2 cm is the most important negative prognostic factor in this multicenter cohort of patients with early cervical cancer and gestational desire who underwent FSS in Spain.

Management of stage I and II cervical cancer: a review

In the modern era, cervical cancer treatment has become more multidisciplinary in nature. Accurate and precise staging based on clinical and radiographic findings, as well as identification of pathologic and molecular risk factors, may alter treatment recommendations. Additionally, the body of evidence guiding optimal treatment recommendations continues to grow. Multiple specialists including gynecologic oncologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and other ancillary staff, often with subspecialty experience in gynecology or cancer care, now staff multidisciplinary gynecologic oncology teams. This review highlights the basis of multidisciplinary treatment of early-stage cervical cancer, with a focus on surgical interventions, the role of adjuvant therapy, and indications for definitive chemoradiation. We specifically focus on the treatment of cervical cancer from stage IA1 (microinvasive disease) to stage IIB (parametrial involvement without involvement of pelvic sidewall). The staging manuals referenced in this review include the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging as well as the updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 9th edition (2021).

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Prior Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Women with FIGO 2018 Stage IB2 Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

In order to provide our contribution to the knowledge of women affected by IB2 cervical cancer, who wish to preserve fertility, we revised and updated the available literature in the debated issue of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to fertility-sparing treatment. The effectiveness of preoperative chemotherapy in tumors larger than 2 cm virtually proposes a conservative opportunity to a broader group of women, while keeping low, and hopefully absent, the risk of local and distant relapse. Available studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to the fertility-sparing approach have shown that a suboptimal response at surgery seems to be an independent prognostic factor in poorer survival, and, therefore, the careful selection of patients and the surgical approach after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains crucial. Finally, we proposed an algorithm to be helpful in the decision-making process of that subgroup of patients.

Abstract

Nowadays, the optimal management of patients with cervical cancers measuring 2–4 cm desiring to maintain fertility is still uncertain. In this systematic review, we assessed the reliability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) prior to fertility-sparing (FS) surgery in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer, in terms of pathologic response, oncological and obstetric outcomes. The review of the literature was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data, using MEDLINE and PubMed, were searched for from 1 January 2005 up to 1 December 2020. We identified 20 articles and 114 women with IB2 disease, possible candidates for NACT prior to FS surgery. However, uterine conservation was achieved only in 76.7% of them. Patients reached optimal pathological response to NACT in 60.9% of cases and a TIP (cisplatin, ifosfamide and paclitaxel) regime was related to the best response. Suboptimal response to NACT appeared to be an independent negative prognostic factor. Up to 9.2% of patients recurred with a median 7.4-months DFS, and 4.6% of patients died of disease. Fifty percent of women tried to conceive after treatment and NACT prior to conization appeared to be the most promising alternative to upfront radical trachelectomy in terms of obstetric outcomes. In conclusion, NACT prior to FS surgery is an option, but the literature about this issue is still weak and FS should be carefully discussed with patients.

Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy has emerged as an alternative to open radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer desiring future fertility. Recent data suggest worse oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy than after open radical hysterectomy in stage I cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare 4.5-year disease-free survival after open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a collaborative, international retrospective study (International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study) of patients treated during 2005-2017 at 18 centers in 12 countries. Eligible patients had squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma; had a preoperative tumor size of ≤2 cm; and underwent open or minimally invasive (robotic or laparoscopic) radical trachelectomy with nodal assessment (pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or sentinel lymph node biopsy). The exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant chemotherapy or preoperative pelvic radiotherapy, previous lymphadenectomy or pelvic retroperitoneal surgery, pregnancy, stage IA1 disease with lymphovascular space invasion, aborted trachelectomy (conversion to radical hysterectomy), or vaginal approach. Surgical approach, indication, and adjuvant therapy regimen were at the discretion of the treating institution. A total of 715 patients were entered into the study database. However, 69 patients were excluded, leaving 646 in the analysis. Endpoints were the 4.5-year disease-free survival rate (primary), 4.5-year overall survival rate (secondary), and recurrence rate (secondary). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate disease-free survival and overall survival. A post hoc weighted analysis was performed, comparing the recurrence rates between surgical approaches, with open surgery being considered as standard and minimally invasive surgery as experimental.

RESULTS

Of 646 patients, 358 underwent open surgery, and 288 underwent minimally invasive surgery. The median (range) patient age was 32 (20-42) years for open surgery vs 31 (18-45) years for minimally invasive surgery (P=.11). Median (range) pathologic tumor size was 15 (0-31) mm for open surgery and 12 (0.8-40) mm for minimally invasive surgery (P=.33). The rates of pelvic nodal involvement were 5.3% (19 of 358 patients) for open surgery and 4.9% (14 of 288 patients) for minimally invasive surgery (P=.81). Median (range) follow-up time was 5.5 (0.20-16.70) years for open surgery and 3.1 years (0.02-11.10) years for minimally invasive surgery (P<.001). At 4.5 years, 17 of 358 patients (4.7%) with open surgery and 18 of 288 patients (6.2%) with minimally invasive surgery had recurrence (P=.40). The 4.5-year disease-free survival rates were 94.3% (95% confidence interval, 91.6-97.0) for open surgery and 91.5% (95% confidence interval, 87.6-95.6) for minimally invasive surgery (log-rank P=.37). Post hoc propensity score analysis of recurrence risk showed no difference between surgical approaches (P=.42). At 4.5 years, there were 6 disease-related deaths (open surgery, 3; minimally invasive surgery, 3) (log-rank P=.49). The 4.5-year overall survival rates were 99.2% (95% confidence interval, 97.6-99.7) for open surgery and 99.0% (95% confidence interval, 79.0-99.8) for minimally invasive surgery.

CONCLUSION

The 4.5-year disease-free survival rates did not differ between open radical trachelectomy and minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. However, recurrence rates in each group were low. Ongoing prospective studies of conservative management of early-stage cervical cancer may help guide future management.

Fertility-Sparing and Less Radical Surgery for Cervical Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with early-stage cervical cancer who desire future fertility may be candidates for less radical surgery. We review the literature supporting this approach in early-stage disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Retrospective data have shown that in carefully selected patients, the risk of parametrial involvement is less than 1%. This has led to interest in moving away from radical surgery towards more conservative approaches. Data from the newly published ConCerv trial, a prospective study evaluating the feasibility of conservative surgery in women with early-stage, low-risk cervical carcinoma, suggest that conservative surgery is feasible and safe in this patient population. Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being assessed as an option to extend fertility-sparing treatment to a larger group of women. Less radical surgery may be appropriate for carefully selected women with early-stage, low-risk cervical cancer, including those desiring future fertility.

Fertility Sparing Treatment in Gastric-Type Endocervical Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Due to a trend toward late childbearing, fertility preservation has become a major issue in young patients with gynecological cancer. Surgical fertility sparing management is universally acknowledged as an acceptable option in eligible patients with cervical cancer. Excisional cone biopsy or trachelectomy are now standard surgical procedures offered to selected patients with gynecological malignancies who wish to preserve their fertility. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is another therapeutic option studied currently in numerous clinical trials. However, fertility preserving treatment is generally not recommended in rare histological types of cervical cancer, including clinically aggressive gastric-type endocervical carcinoma. Due to controversies in this emerging topic, a review of literature and international database was carried out, in search of solid evidence on fertility sparing management in gastric-type endocervical carcinoma.

Abstract

Fertility sparing management of cancer is one of the main components of quality-of-life issues. Early-stage cervical cancer, frequently diagnosed in women of reproductive age, can potentially be treated conservatively. However, some rare histological types of cervical cancer present with aggressive clinical behavior. Particularly, in the newly introduced concept of gastric-type endocervical carcinoma, fertility sparing management is ‘a priori’ not recommended. Even so, this issue remains undocumented. For this reason, a selected review of the current literature on gastric type endocervical carcinoma was carried out through PubMed. The keywords included “gastric-type cervical cancer”, “gastric-type endocervical carcinoma”, “conservative surgery”, “conservative treatment”, “fertility sparing surgery”, “radical trachelectomy”, “laparoscopic trachelectomy”, “robotic trachelectomy”, “laparotomic trachelectomy”, “abdominal trachelectomy”, “trachelectomy”, “neoadjuvant chemotherapy”, “conisation”, and “cone resection”. A search in the European Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) database was performed. The rarity of gastric-type endocervical carcinoma does not allow for conclusions on fertility sparing management with solid evidence. However, diffuse character of the disease and aggressive clinical behavior contraindicate a conservative treatment in young women with gastric type cervical cancer.

Radical vaginal trachelectomy

Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) is the oldest fertility-sparing procedure for stage 1b cervical cancer. For that reason, there are more published data for RVT than for all the other radical trachelectomy approaches. However, there are no randomised controlled studies between RVT and radical hysterectomy proving the comparability of survival and no randomised controlled studies comparing a vaginal approach with open, standard laparoscopy and robotic approaches. This article intends to describe the case selection, the procedure and outcomes for RVT.

Overview of fertility sparing treatments for cervical cancer

Until the late 1980s, the mainstay of treatment for cervical cancer has been either hysterectomy or radiotherapy. From the mid to late 1990s, surgical treatments have been focussed more on sparing fertility by preserving the corpus of the womb with trachelectomy or even conserving part of the cervical stroma with a cone biopsy. In carefully selected cases, less radical treatment that preserves the uterus has been considered safe. However, these approaches can be associated with specific operative and obstetric complications such as stitch ulceration, cervical stenosis, late miscarriage, and premature labour. Most guidelines agree that the management of such patients should be centralised in a unit with specialist gynaecological oncology, radiology, and histopathology services supported by specialist cancer nurses.

Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery for Endometrial and Cervical Cancer

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has many benefits, in the form of reduced postoperative morbidity, improved recovery and reduced inpatient stay. It is imperative, however, when new techniques are adopted, in the context of treating oncology patients, that the oncological efficacy and safety are established rigorously rather than assumed based on first principles. Here we have attempted to provide a comprehensive review of all the contentious and topical themes surrounding the use of MIS in the treatment of endometrial and cervix cancer following a thorough review of the literature. On the topic of endometrial cancer, we cover the role of laparoscopy in both early and advanced disease, together with the role and unique benefits of robotic surgery. The surgical challenge of patients with a raised body mass index and the frail and elderly are discussed and finally the role of sentinel lymph node assessment. For cervical cancer, the role of MIS for staging and primary treatment is covered, together with the interesting and highly specialist topics of fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian transposition and the live birth rate associated with this. We end with a discussion on the evidence surrounding the role of adjuvant hysterectomy following radical chemoradiation and pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer. MIS is the standard of care for endometrial cancer. The future of MIS for cervix cancer, however, remains uncertain. Current recommendations, based on the available evidence, are that the open approach should be considered the gold standard for the surgical management of early cervical cancer and that MIS should only be adopted in the context of research. Careful counselling of patients on the current evidence, discussing in detail the risks and benefits to enable them to make an informed choice, remains paramount.

Abdominal radical trachelectomy as fertility-sparing management for early stages of cervical cancer: Our experience in 18 cases

The aim of this study was to present our experience of 18 cases of abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART), including 5 performed during pregnancy, analyzing patient selection, surgical complications, and oncological and obstetrical outcomes. This reproductive study included all early stage cervical cancer patients referred for ART at the 1st Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic of the Emergency Clinical County Hospital Targu Mures, between 2010 and 2020. A total of 19 women were considered for ART, and only 1 case required conversion to radical hysterectomy. The patient mean age was 31 years (range 24-38 years), and 66.67% of the patients were nulliparous. Six women (33.33%) had stage IA2, 4 (22.22%) had stage IB1, 5 (27.78%) had stage IB2, and 4 (22.22%) had stage IB3 disease. One intraoperative complication occurred in this series, which consisted in both right ureteral and bladder injuries. Early postoperative complications were represented by urinary bladder dysfunction (33.33%), symptomatic pelvic lymphocele (11.1%), peritonitis (5.5%), and wound infection (5.5%). Late postoperative complications included cervical stenosis (5.5%), amenorrhea (11.1%), and pelvic abscess (5.5%). Four out of the 18 patients were operated on during pregnancy between 14 and 20 weeks; 2 of them gave birth at term, 2 of them aborted shortly after the surgery. Two vaginal recurrences were recorded; both were managed by hysterectomy, partial colpectomy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. At this moment, all patients are alive with no evidence of disease and 3 of them managed to conceive. In conclusion, ART should be recommended as a fertility-preserving procedure for women in their reproductive age. In selected cases, ART can be performed during pregnancy with encouraging results.

Radical trachelectomy

Radical trachelectomy is the 'cornerstone' of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with early-stage cervical cancer wishing to preserve fertility. Growing evidence has demonstrated the oncologic safety and subsequent favorable pregnancy outcomes in well-selected cases. In the absence of prospective trials, the decision on the appropriate surgical approach (vaginal, open, or minimally invasive surgery) should be based on local resources and surgeons' preferences. Radical trachelectomy has the potential to preserve fertility in a large proportion of women with early-stage cervical cancer. However, prematurity and premature rupture of membranes are common obstetric complications after radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial to optimize the balance between oncologic and obstetric outcomes. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated overview of the technical, oncologic, and obstetric aspects of radical trachelectomy.

Uterus transplantation for fertility preservation in patients with gynecologic cancer

Cervical and endometrial cancer may impact women interested in future fertility in approximately 5-25% of cases. The recommended treatment for patients with early stage disease is hysterectomy and/or radiation leading to infertility. This is referred to as absolute uterine factor infertility. Such infertility was considered untreatable until 2014, when the first child was born after uterus transplantation. Thereafter, multiple births have been reported, mainly from women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, with congenital uterine absence, although also from a patient with iatrogenic uterine factor infertility caused by radical hysterectomy secondary to an early stage cervical cancer 7 years before uterus transplantation. A live birth after uterus transplantation may be considered promising for many who may not otherwise have this option.Uterus transplantation is a complex process including careful patient selection in both recipients and donors, in vitro fertilization, and complex surgery in the organ procurement procedure including harvesting the vessel pedicles with the thin-walled veins. Thereafter, the transplantation surgery with anastomosis to ensure optimal blood inflow and outflow of the transplanted organ. Knowledge regarding immunosuppression and pregnancy is essential. Lastly there is the hysterectomy component as the uterus must be removed. Multidisciplinary teams working closely are essential to achieve successful uterus transplantation and, ultimately, delivery of a healthy child. Both the living and deceased donor concept may be considered and we address both the advantages and disadvantages. This review summarizes the animal research thus far published on uterus transplantation, the suggested recipient selections including former gynecologic cancer patients, the living and deceased donor uterus transplantation concepts with reported results, and updated fertility outcomes.

Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy: Considerations on surgical approach

Current evidence supports that radical trachelectomy is a safe and feasible alternative to patients with early-stage cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility. In addition, published retrospective literature supports that oncologic outcomes are equivalent to those of radical hysterectomy. First published as a vaginal approach, a number of other approaches have been reported including laparotomic, laparoscopic, and robotic. In 2018, the first ever prospective randomized trial (LACC) comparing open vs. minimally invasive radical hysterectomy showed worse disease-free and overall survival for the minimally invasive (both laparoscopic and robotic) approach than the open approach. This landmark publication raised concerns regarding the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. In the United States, minimally invasive became the dominant approach by 2011 for radical trachelectomy. Given that radical trachelectomy is an infrequent performed procedure, only small retrospective studies, systematic reviews, and large database studies have been published. These studies are limited by their retrospective nature, small sample size, patient selection bias, unbalanced groups, and sequential surgical approach comparisons. However, the available evidence thus far shows that oncologic outcomes for both open and minimally invasive radical trachelectomy are equivalent. Given the rarity of the procedure and the low recurrence and death rates of patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical trachelectomy, a prospective randomized trial seems unlikely. A multi-institutional international registry study (International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment - IRTA - study) has been recently completed evaluating open vs. minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. There are three ongoing prospective studies evaluating the possibility of less radical surgery in a low-risk early-stage cervical cancer population, ConCerv, SHAPE, and GOG 278. We look forward to the final results of these studies that will hopefully shed light on the optimal treatment option for patients with early-stage cervical cancer wishing to preserve fertility. This article will review the most impacting publications comparing open vs. minimally invasive radical trachelectomy and analyze the limitations of the current available literature.

The Double Life-Saving Approach of Abdominal Radical Trachelectomy during Pregnancy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer-An Overview of the Literature and Our Institutional Experience

(1) Background: Cervical cancer is the most common type of cancer encountered during pregnancy, with a frequency of 0.8–1.5 cases per 10,000 births. It is a dire condition endangering patients’ lives and pregnancy outcomes, and jeopardizing their fertility. However, there is a lack of current evidence and consensus regarding a standard surgical technique for pregnant patients who suffer from this condition during pregnancy. The study aims to comprehensively update all published data, evaluating the obstetrical and oncological results of pregnant patients who underwent abdominal radical trachelectomy during early stages of cervical cancer. (2) Methods: A literature search on the Medline, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases was performed, including all articles in question up to July 2020. This study presents an overview of the literature and our institutional experience. (3) Results: A total of 25 cases of abdominal radical trachelectomy were performed during pregnancy for early cervical cancer, including the five cases managed by the authors. Of these, 81% (19 patients) gave birth to live newborns through elective C-section, and 19% (6 patients) experienced miscarriage shortly after the procedure. None of the 25 patients (100%) reported disease recurrence. (4) Conclusions: The results of the current study were satisfactory. However, abdominal radical trachelectomy does not represent the current standard of care for cervical cancer during pregnancy, but it could play an important role if more evidence on its effectiveness will be provided.

Fertility-sparing Surgery for Patients with Cervical, Endometrial, and Ovarian Cancers

OBJECTIVE

Nearly 10% of the 1.3 million women living with a gynecologic cancer are aged <50 years. For these women, although their cancer treatment can be lifesaving, it's also life-altering because traditional surgical procedures can cause infertility and, in many cases, induce surgical menopause. For appropriately selected patients, fertility-sparing options can reduce the reproductive impact of lifesaving cancer treatments. This review will highlight existing recommendations as well as innovative research for fertility-sparing treatment in the 3 major gynecologic cancers.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

For early-stage cervical cancers, fertility-sparing surgeries include cold knife conization, simple hysterectomy with ovarian preservation, or radical trachelectomy with placement of a permanent cerclage. In locally advanced cervical cancer, ovarian transposition before radiation therapy can help preserve ovarian function. For endometrial cancers, fertility-sparing treatment includes progestin therapy with endometrial sampling every 3 to 6 months. After cancer regression, progestin therapy can be halted to allow attempts to conceive. Hysterectomy with ovarian preservation can also be considered, allowing for fertility using assisted reproductive technology and a gestational carrier. For ovarian cancers, fertility-sparing surgery includes unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (with lymphadenectomy and staging depending on tumor histology). With higher-risk histology or higher early-stage disease, adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended-however, this carries a 3% to 10% risk of ovarian failure. Use of oocyte or embryo cryopreservation in patients with early-stage ovarian malignancy remains an area of ongoing research.

CONCLUSION

Overall, fertility-sparing management of gynecologic cancers is associated with acceptable rates of progression-free survival and overall survival and is less life-altering than more radical surgical approaches.

Minimally invasive versus open radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China

Background

There are limited data comparing the oncologic and fertility outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer (CC) treated by minimally invasive radical trachelectomy (MIRT) or abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART). The purpose of this multicenter study is to compare the oncologic and fertility outcomes of patients treated by MIRT or ART in a randomized controlled manner in China.

Methods

This is a noninferiority, randomized controlled trial performed at 28 Chinese centers; the study is designed to compare the oncologic and fertility outcomes of patients treated by MIRT (robot-assisted or laparoscopic RT) or ART. Patients will be recruited if they have been diagnosed with stage IA1 (with lymphovascular space invasion), IA2, or IB1 CC (with a maximum tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm) in the FIGO 2009 staging system and histological subtypes of squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma and if they are also aged 18 to 40 years. These candidates will be randomly assigned to undergo MIRT or ART. The primary endpoint will be disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints will consist of overall and disease-free survival rates, fertility outcomes, and quality of life. A total of 414 patients are needed to accomplish the study goal, with 90.1% power at a 0.050 significance level to detect an equivalence hazard ratio of 0.75 in the ART group, considering 20% loss to follow-up.

Discussion

The results of the trial should provide robust evidence to surgeons regarding options for the surgical approach in patients with early-stage CC who have a strong willingness to preserve fertility.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03739944. Registered on November 14, 2018

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-020-04938-3.

Radical Trachelectomy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To assess surgical, oncologic, and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing radical vaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic trachelectomy for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer, using a methodic review of published literature.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library sources, including ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched from 1990-2019 with terms "cervical cancer" and "(vaginal, abdominal, open, minimally invasive, or laparoscopic) radical trachelectomy." Grey literature and unpublished data were omitted.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

After removal of duplicates from a combined EndNote library of results, 490 articles were reviewed using Covidence software. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and then screened full texts. Selection criteria included articles that reported radical trachelectomy with lymph node assessment as primary therapy for cervical carcinoma, with stated follow-up intervals and recurrences.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Variables of interest were manually extracted into an electronic database. A total 47 articles that reported on 2,566 women met inclusion criteria. Most tumors were of squamous histology (68.5%), stage IB1 (74.8%), 2 cm or less (69.2%), and without lymphovascular invasion (68.8%). Of planned trachelectomies, 9% were converted intraoperatively to hysterectomy. Separated by route of trachelectomy, 58.1%, 37.2%, and 4.7% were performed using radical vaginal, abdominal, and laparoscopic approaches, respectively. With median follow-up of 48 months (range 2-202 months) across studies, median recurrence rate was 3.3% (range 0-25%); median time to recurrence was 26 months (range 8-44 months). Median 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival were 94.6% (range 88-97.3%) and 97.4% (range 95-99%), respectively. The posttrachelectomy pregnancy rate was 23.9%, with a live-birth rate of 75.1%.

CONCLUSION

Radical trachelectomy for fertility-preserving treatment of cervical cancer is widely reported in the literature, though publications are mainly limited to case reports and case series. Reported follow-up periods infrequently meet standard oncologic parameters but show encouraging recurrence-free and overall survival rates and pregnancy outcomes. Higher-level evidence needed for meta-analysis is lacking.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42019132443.

Modification of Dargent's radical vaginal trachelectomy to facilitate ureteral dissection: description of technique

OBJECTIVE

Radical vaginal trachelectomy is the fertility-preserving surgery for patients with early stage cervical cancer. However, it has not gained widespread approval by gynecologic oncologists because of difficulties in the dissection of the bladder pillars and identification of the ureter during the vaginal portion of the surgery.

METHOD

We describe a modification of radical vaginal trachelectomy for easier dissection of the bladder pillar. Following pelvic lymphadenectomy, the vesicovaginal space is widely opened laparoscopically. After identification of the uterine arteries, one should proceed along the course of the arteries laterally and, thus, visualize the overcrossing of the artery with the ureter. The medial aspect of the supraureteric bladder pillar is transected and the ureter marked with vessel loops on both sides close to its entry into the bladder. The lateral portion of the supraureteric bladder pillar remains intact. During the vaginal part of radical vaginal trachelectomy, the ureter may be easily found by grasping the formerly placed vessel loop and dissection of the infraureteric bladder pillar may be done without risk of ureteral injury.

RESULTS

Between October 2018 and August 2019 our group has performed radical vaginal trachelectomy using this modified ureteral dissection in 12 patients. Median operation time was 239 min (range 127-290) and median blood loss was 25 mL (range 10-100). No intra- or post-operative urologic complication occurred. Median time to normal bladder function was 4 days (range 3-13).

CONCLUSION

The vaginal portion of radical vaginal trachelectomy may be simplified using this technique, especially when difficult circumstances such as endometriosis, prior operations, or unusual anatomy in nulliparous women are encountered.

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina)

BACKGROUND

The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial demonstrated a higher rate of disease recurrence and worse disease-free survival in patients who underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate surgical and oncological outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy performed at Hospital Italiano in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients with cervical cancer, 2009 FIGO stage IA1, with lymphovascular invasion to IB1 (<4 cm) who underwent a laparoscopic radical hysterectomy between June 2010 and June 2015. Patients were eligible if they had squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma, and no lymph node involvement by imaging. Patients must have undergone a type C1 radical hysterectomy. Only patients who were treated by a laparoscopic approach were included. Patients were excluded if histopathology showed a component of neuroendocrine carcinoma before or after surgery; if they had synchronous primary tumors, history of abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy, or were operated on at an outside institution; and if they had only surgery and no follow-up in our institution. Relapse rate and disease-free survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were evaluated. The median age was 41 years (range 27-70). Distribution of histologic sub-types was squamous carcinoma in 77 patients (71%), adenocarcinoma in 27 patients (25%), and adenosquamous carcinoma in four patients (4%). Ninety-nine patients (92%) had stage IB1 tumors and 58 (54%) patients had tumors ≤2 cm. The median surgical time was 240 min (range 190-290), the median estimated blood loss was 140 mL (range 50-500) and the transfusion rate was 3.7%. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-11). The median follow-up time was 39 months (range 11-83). The global recurrence rate after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was 15% (16/108). According to tumor size, the recurrence rate was 12% in patients with tumors ≤2 cm (7/58) and 18% in patients with tumors >2 cm (9/50) (OR=0.76; 95% CI 0.26 to 2.22; p=0.62) The 3- and 5-year relapse rate was 17% (95% CI 11% to 27%). The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was 81% (95% CI 71% to 88%) and 70% (95% CI 43% to 86%), respectively. Overall survival at 3 years was 87% (95% CI 76% to 93%).

CONCLUSION

The recurrence rate after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was 15%, and in tumors ≤2 cm it was 12%. The 3-year disease-free survival was 81%. Given these results our hospital has changed the approach to open radical hysterectomy.

Association between hospital surgical volume and perioperative outcomes of fertility-sparing trachelectomy for cervical cancer: A national study in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between hospital surgical volume and perioperative outcomes for fertility-sparing trachelectomy performed for cervical cancer.

METHODS

This is a population-based retrospective observational study utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2001 to 2011. Women aged ≤45 years with cervical cancer who underwent trachelectomy were included. Annualized hospital surgical volume was defined as the average number of trachelectomies a hospital performed per year in which at least one case was performed. Perioperative outcomes were assessed based on hospital surgical volume in a weighted model, specifically comparing the top-decile centers to the lower volume centers.

RESULTS

There were a total of 815 trachelectomies performed at 89 centers, and 76.4% of the trachelectomy-performing centers had a minimum surgical volume of one trachelectomy per year. The top-decile group had a higher rate of lymphadenectomy performance compared to the lower volume group (96.4% versus 82.4%, odds ratio [OR] 5.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.81-11.4, P < 0.001). There was a significant inverse linear association between annualized surgical volume and the number of perioperative complications (P = 0.020). The top-decile group also had a lower rate of perioperative complications (9.7% versus 21.0%, P < 0.001) and prolonged hospital stay ≥7 days (2.0% versus 6.5%, P = 0.006) compared to the lower volume group. In a multivariable analysis, the top-decile group had a 65% relative decrease in perioperative complication risk compared to the lower volume group (adjusted-OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.20-0.59, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Fertility-sparing trachelectomy for young women with cervical cancer is a rare surgical procedure; <90 centers performed this procedure from 2001 to 2011 and most hospitals perform a small number of cases annually. Higher hospital surgical volume for trachelectomy may be associated with reduced perioperative morbidity.