Ultrasound features and clinical outcome of patients with malignant ovarian masses diagnosed during pregnancy: experience of a gynecological oncology ultrasound center

Ultrasound Features and Clinical Outcome of Patients with Ovarian Masses Diagnosed during Pregnancy: Experience of Single Gynecological Ultrasound Center

(1) Background: The number of adnexal masses detected during pregnancy has increased due to the use of first-trimester screening and increasingly advanced maternal age. Despite their low risk of malignancy, other risks associated with these masses include torsion, rupture and labor obstruction. Correct diagnosis and management are needed to guarantee both maternal and fetal safety. Adnexal masses may be troublesome to classify during pregnancy due to the increased volume of the uterus and pregnancy-related hormonal changes. Management should be based on ultrasound examination to provide the best treatment. The aim of this study was to describe the ultrasound features of ovarian masses detected during pregnancy and to optimize and personalize their management with the expertise of gynecologists, oncologists and sonographers. (2) Methods: Clinical, ultrasound, histological parameters and type of management (surveillance vs. surgery) were retrospectively retrieved. Patient management, perinatal outcomes and follow-up were also evaluated. (3) Results: according to the literature, these masses are most frequently benign, ultrasound follow-up is the best management, and obstetric outcomes are not considerably influenced by the presence of adnexal masses. (4) Conclusions: the management of patients with ovarian masses detected during pregnancy should be based on ultrasound examination, and a centralization in referral centers for ovarian masses should be considered.

Psychological Nursing Effect of Patients with Gynecological Malignant Tumor

Objective

To analyze the psychological nursing effect of patients with gynecological malignant tumor.

Method

A total of 104 patients with gynecological malignant tumor receiving chemotherapy in our hospital from December 2019 to November 2020 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group with 52 cases each. Patients in the control group were treated with routine nursing of gynecological malignant tumor chemotherapy. The observation group applied psychological nursing methods on the basis of the control group, and psychological status, quality of sleep, quality of life, treatment coordination, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no difference in anxiety and depression scores (P > 0.05), the postintervention score was lower than the preintervention score, and the reduction was more significant in the observation group (P < 0.05). After intervention, PSQI scores of the two groups of subjects were significantly lower than before intervention (P < 0.05), subjects in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After intervention, the total score of FACT-B scale was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After the implementation of psychological nursing, the degree of tumor treatment cooperation of observation group was higher than the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in hematology, allergic reaction, or hair loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of gastrointestinal and neurological adverse events in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The psychological state of patients with gynecological malignant tumor mainly included anxiety and terror and so on. Through psychological counseling, it could effectively alleviate the abovementioned bad psychology, improve the cooperation of patients with tumor treatment, and reduce the occurrence of patients' adverse reactions.

Efficacy and Safety of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Based on the available data on ovarian cancer during pregnancy, we performed a review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy against ovarian cancer during pregnancy.

Methods

We systematically searched three databases including the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published from January 1986 to December 2020 using the following terms: “ovarian tumors OR ovarian carcinoma OR adnexal masses OR ovarian cancer” AND “pregnancy” AND “chemotherapy.” Two authors (Yaping Pei and Yuanfeng Gou) independently searched the literature and extracted data from each eligible study. The outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The OS and PFS of all patients were estimated by Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank tests.

Results

A total of 43 studies including 55 cases of ovarian cancer during pregnancy were selected. Forty-eight patients were comprehensively staged using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. Twenty-six of the 48 patients (54.17%) were diagnosed with early-stage disease, while the remaining had advanced stages (II, III, and IV). The mean age at diagnosis was 29.31 years. The majority of patients in this meta-analysis were diagnosed at a mean gestational age of 16.05 weeks. The mean GA at chemotherapy administration was 17.42 weeks. Overall, 55 women gave birth to 56 newborns, including a pair of twins. At the end of follow-up (median 10 months, range 0–73 months), all the children were healthy, except for one child who died 5 days after delivery due to a congenital abnormality. During 2–204 months of follow-up, there were five cases of recurrence, with no evidence of recurrence in the remaining cases. Unfortunately, one patient died 29 months after diagnosis. Neither median overall survival nor median progression-free survival was obtained.

Conclusion

Platinum-based chemotherapy may be a good choice for pregnant women with ovarian cancer who want to continue their pregnancy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40487-021-00179-9.

Sonographic Assessment of Complex Ultrasound Morphology Adnexal Tumors in Pregnant Women with the Use of IOTA Simple Rules Risk and ADNEX Scoring Systems

Background: To evaluate the accuracy of subjective assessment (SA), the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group Simple Rules Risk (SRR) and the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model for the preoperative differentiation of adnexal masses in pregnant women. Methods: The study population comprised 36 pregnant women (median age: 28.5 years old, range: 20–42 years old) with a mean gestation age of 13.5 (range: 8–31) weeks at diagnosis. Tumors were prospectively classified by local sonographers as probably benign or probably malignant using SA. Final tumor histological diagnosis was used as the reference standard in all cases. Logistic regression SRR and ADNEX models were used to obtain a risk score for every case. Serum CA125 and human epidydimis protein 4 (HE4) concentrations were also retrieved and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) value was calculated. The calculated predictive values included positive and negative likelihood ratios of ultrasound and biochemical tests. Results: Final histology confirmed 27 benign and 9 malignant (including 2 borderline) masses. The highest sensitivity (89%) and specificity (70%) were found for the subjective tumor assessment. Although no malignancy was classified as benign using the SRR criteria (sensitivity = 100%), the specificity of this scoring system was only 37%. At the cut-off risk level of >20%, the ADNEX model had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 70%. Serum levels of CA125, HE4 and the ROMA risk model correctly identified adnexal malignant tumors with a sensitivity of 67%, 25% and 25%, respectively. Corresponding specificities were 72%, 100% and 100%, respectively. The highest positive and negative likelihood ratios were found for SA (LR+ = 3.0 and LR− = 0.16, respectively). Overall diagnostic accuracy of all predictive methods used in this study were similar (range: 70–75%) except for SRR (53%). Conclusion: Subjective assessment remains the best predictive method in complex adnexal masses found at prenatal ultrasound in pregnant women. For less experienced sonographers, both the SRR and ADNEX scoring systems may be also used for the characterization of such tumors, while serum tumor markers CA125 and HE4, along with the ROMA algorithm appear to be less accurate.

Primary and recurrent serous borderline tumors during pregnancy: a case report and literature review

The diagnosis and management of borderline ovarian tumors during pregnancy are still not standardized, because these tumors are rarely encountered. We report the case of a 27-year-old pregnant woman who presented with an ovarian mass in her first trimester. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a multilocular cystic component with papillary lesions in the background of endometriosis, suggesting a seromucinous borderline tumor or ovarian cancer. A right salpingo-oophorectomy and partial omentectomy were performed at 7 weeks of gestation. Pathological examination demonstrated a serous borderline tumor. The subsequent pregnancy course was uneventful, and she gave birth to a healthy baby at 39 weeks of gestation. She wanted to retain fertility, and close follow-up was performed. Four years later, she became pregnant, and a lesion suggesting recurrence in the left ovary was detected. An abdominal left ovarian cystectomy was performed at 13 weeks of gestation, which demonstrated recurrence of the serous borderline tumor. She gave birth to a healthy baby at 39 weeks of gestation. Two months after delivery, she underwent total abdominal hysterectomy with left salpingo-oophorectomy, which revealed no malignant findings. We also reviewed 10 reports that included 58 cases of borderline ovarian tumors diagnosed during pregnancy. The borderline ovarian tumors diagnosed during pregnancy exhibited different characteristics according to each subtype, suggesting the importance of diagnosing borderline ovarian tumor subtypes preoperatively.

The Case of a Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumor in a 15-Year Old Pregnant Adolescent: Sonographic Characteristics and Surgical Management

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe a rare case of a serous borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) diagnosed during pregnancy in a 15-year old adolescent.

RESULTS

The suspect of BOT was raised at a transvaginal ultrasound scan in early first trimester (at 5 weeks of amenorrhea), due to the presence of a moderately vascularized irregular papilla in the context of a unilocular low-level right ovarian cyst. The patient and her parents required termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the diagnosis of an ovarian lesion. After termination of pregnancy, the patient underwent laparoscopic enucleation of the ovarian mass, omentectomy, and peritoneal biopsies. No intra-abdominal spillage of the ovarian mass occurred, and the surgical specimens were put in an endobag and extracted transvaginally. Final pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of a serous borderline ovarian tumor. The patient of free of disease after 8 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although rare, borderline ovarian tumors can be diagnosed in an adolescent during pregnancy. The combination of specific sonographic assessment and minimally invasive conservative surgery appears as a very effective approach in this type of patient.

KEY POINTS

· BOTs can occur in pregnant adolescents.. · Transvaginal ultrasound is crucial to suspect BOT.. · Laparoscopic conservative treatment is feasible..