1
|
Liu X, Tian W, Dai A, Li H, Zhu M, Zeng M, Feng R, Zhang Z, Jiang X, Wen Y, Wu T, Xiao Z. A comparative analysis of toxicity and treatment outcomes of adaptive radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in cervical cancer. Sci Rep 2025; 15:1609. [PMID: 39794450 PMCID: PMC11724102 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-85074-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) provides greater benefits than intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) regarding dosimetric outcomes in patients with cervical cancer. To investigate the clinical benefits of ART, we have collected data from 115 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical radiotherapy at our institution. Fifty-nine patients received a single course of IMRT. Fifty-six patients underwent offline ART, defined as the reduction of the gross tumor volume (GTV) by at least 30% after 30 Gy of radiotherapy, followed by a modified treatment plan for the second-stage. After treatment, 53 patients of ART group achieved a partial response (PR) or completement response (CR), resulting in an objective response rate (ORR) of 94.6% for the ART group, compared to 93.2% for the IMRT group. Patients in both groups exhibited no significant differences in acute toxicities. However, the incidence of chronic constipation was significantly higher in the IMRT group compared to the ART group (p = 0.021). With a median follow-up time of 27 months, the ART group experienced a higher mortality (10/56) than the IMRT group (6/59). However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. In summary, ART may be advantageous in reducing the incidence of chronic constipation among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, and both clinical prognosis and near-term survival are satisfactory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohan Liu
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Wei Tian
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Anli Dai
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Hui Li
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Mei Zhu
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Mengsi Zeng
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Ronghua Feng
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Zhenyu Zhang
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Xiaosong Jiang
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Yu Wen
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Tao Wu
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China.
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China.
| | - Zemin Xiao
- Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Renmin Road 818, Changde, 415000, China.
- The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caruso G, Wagar MK, Hsu HC, Hoegl J, Rey Valzacchi GM, Fernandes A, Cucinella G, Sahin Aker S, Jayraj AS, Mauro J, Pareja R, Ramirez PT. Cervical cancer: a new era. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:1946-1970. [PMID: 39117381 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, ranking as the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Depending on stage, histology, and patient factors, the standard management of cervical cancer is a combination of treatment approaches, including (fertility- or non-fertility-sparing) surgery, radiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy, and novel systemic therapies such as bevacizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. While ambitious global initiatives seek to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, the management of cervical cancer continues to evolve with major advances in imaging modalities, surgical approaches, identification of histopathological risk factors, radiotherapy techniques, and biomarker-driven personalized therapies. In particular, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has dramatically altered the treatment of cervical cancer, leading to significant survival benefits in both locally advanced and metastatic/recurrent settings. As the landscape of cervical cancer therapies continues to evolve, the aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive discussion of the current state and the latest practice-changing updates in cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Caruso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Matthew K Wagar
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Heng-Cheng Hsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jorge Hoegl
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecological Oncology, Clínica Maternidad Santa Ana, IVSS, Caracas, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
| | | | - Andreina Fernandes
- Laboratorio de Genética Molecular, Instituto de Oncología y Hematología, Caracas, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
| | - Giuseppe Cucinella
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Seda Sahin Aker
- Gynecologic Oncology, Kayseri City Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
- Clinical Anatomy, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aarthi S Jayraj
- South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, James Cook University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Jessica Mauro
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, Verduno, Italy
| | - Rene Pareja
- Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Clinica ASTORGA, Medellin, and Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dong B, Zhou SF. Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy as monotherapy in patients with recurrent intermediate/high-risk factors following radical hysterectomy for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis. BMC Womens Health 2024; 24:297. [PMID: 38762459 PMCID: PMC11102237 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03135-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy (CT) as a monotherapy in patients with recurrent intermediate/high-risk factors following radical hysterectomy for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of patients diagnosed with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy at the People's Hospital of Suzhou High-tech District between 2010 and 2020. A total of 66 patients with intermediate or high-risk factors for recurrence were treated exclusively with CT. This cohort included 42 patients in the intermediate-risk group and 24 in the high-risk group. Treatment protocols consisted of 4-6 cycles of paclitaxel and cisplatin drugs for the intermediate-risk group, and 6 cycles for the high-risk group. The relapse-free survival (RFS), recurrence rates, and common CT-related adverse reactions, including bone marrow suppression, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea, were assessed for both groups. RESULTS (1) The cumulative 3-year RFS rates for the intermediate-risk and high-risk groups were 97.3% (36/37) and 82.4% (14/17), respectively, with cumulative 5-year RFS rates of 97.1% (34/35) and 82.4% (14/17), respectively. The Log rank test revealed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05), (χ² = 2.718, P = 0.099). The 5-year recurrence rates in the intermediate-risk and high-risk groups were 2.38% (1/42) and 12.50% (3/24), respectively. (2) The incidence of grade III bone marrow suppression in the intermediate-risk and high-risk groups was 21.19% (11/42) and 25.00% (6/24), respectively, while the incidence of grade IV bone marrow suppression was 11.90% (5/42) and 8.33% (2/24), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in bone marrow suppression grades between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION CT with paclitaxel and cisplatin, administered as monotherapy post-radical hysterectomy for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer, demonstrates satisfactory survival benefits with an acceptable safety profile. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in prognosis or adverse reactions between the different risk groups treated solely with CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bei Dong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People's Hospital of Suzhou High-tech District, No. 95 of Hua-shan Road, High-tech District, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Su-Fang Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People's Hospital of Suzhou High-tech District, No. 95 of Hua-shan Road, High-tech District, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liang S, Dang B, Chen S, Mi H. Prognostic value and immunological role of cathepsin S gene in pan‑cancer. Oncol Lett 2024; 27:41. [PMID: 38108072 PMCID: PMC10722551 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.14175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The cathepsin S (CTSS) gene encodes a lysine cysteine protease and serves an important role in the development of autoimmune diseases, inflammation and nervous system diseases. Furthermore, CTSS is implicated in tumor invasion and metastasis by the induction of tumor angiogenesis and the degradation of the tumor extracellular matrix. Nevertheless, the precise impact of CTSS on predicting pan-cancer prognosis and its influence on the tumor microenvironment and immune infiltration in human cancers remains unknown. This present study employed a comprehensive array of bioinformatic methods to evaluate the expression of CTSS and its associations with prognosis, clinicopathological characteristics, tumor microenvironment, tumor immune infiltration, tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability across numerous cancer types. The current study demonstrated abnormal expression and distinct genomic alteration profiles of CTSS in many of the cancers tested. Furthermore, CTSS expression exhibited close associations with the prognosis of numerous cancers. High CTSS expression was significantly associated with better overall survival and disease-specific survival in bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) and skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) but worse outcomes in brain lower grade glioma (LGG) and uveal melanoma (UVM). Moreover, CTSS demonstrated significant correlations with tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability in 8 and 12 cancer types respectively, as well as different responses in immunotherapy sub-cohorts, especially in melanoma and bladder cancers. CTSS expression showed a positive correlation with stromal and immune cell scores in the four aforementioned cancers. Moreover, CTSS expression was correlated with the number of infiltrating CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells and macrophages. Conversely, CTSS was negatively associated with resting Mast cells, resting NK cells and resting memory CD4+ T cell infiltration in BLCA, SKCM and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC). Furthermore, CTSS expression was correlated with immune-related gene expression, notably PDCD1, LAG3, PDCD1 and TIGIT in BLCA, KIRC, SKCM, LGG and UVM. Functional enrichment analysis suggested that CTSS could drive a dynamic adjustment of biological functions and pathways in BLCA, SKCM, LGG and UVM, including immune response regulating signaling pathways, regulation of lymphocyte activation and T cell receptor singling pathways. The current study suggested that CTSS could be an essential biomarker for prognosis and immune infiltration features in multiple cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengsheng Liang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530021, P.R. China
| | - Bowen Dang
- Department of Urology, The First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 537000, P.R. China
| | - Shaohua Chen
- Department of Urology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530021, P.R. China
| | - Hua Mi
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530021, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Agustí N, Viveros-Carreño D, Mora-Soto N, Ramírez PT, Rauh-Hain A, Wu CF, Rodríguez J, Grillo-Ardila CF, Salazar C, Jorgensen K, Segarra-Vidal B, Chacón E, Melamed A, Pareja R. Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node frozen section analysis in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 177:157-164. [PMID: 37703622 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative SLN frozen section analysis compared with ultrastaging in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA checklist. MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception until February 2023. The inclusion criteria were patients with early-stage cervical cancer (2018 FIGO stage I-II), consisting of the histological subtype squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma (≥90% of the patients in each study), who underwent SLN detection (with any tracer) and intraoperative frozen section followed by SLN ultrastaging. Randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies were considered. The detection rates and measures of diagnostic accuracy were pooled using a random effects univariate model. A preplanned subgroup meta-analysis was conducted, with isolated tumor cells excluded as positive lymph nodes. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023397147). RESULTS The search identified 190 articles, with 153 studies considered potentially eligible after removing duplicates. Fourteen studies met the selection criteria, including a total of 1720 patients. Seven studies were retrospective, and the other seven were prospective. Frozen section analysis detected 159 of 292 (54.5%) patients with lymph node metastases. In 281 patients the type of volume metastasis was reported: 1 of 41 (2.4%) patients had isolated tumor cells, 21 of 78 (26.9%) patients had micrometastases, and 133 of 162 (82.1%) patients had macrometastases. The pooled sensitivity of intraoperative SLN frozen section analysis was 65% (95% CI, 51-77%) for macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells. When we excluded patients with isolated tumor cells, the pooled sensitivity increased to 72% (95% CI, 60-82%). CONCLUSION SLN frozen section detects 65% of lymph node metastases compared with SLN ultrastaging and may prevent unnecessary radical surgery in some patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria Agustí
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
| | - David Viveros-Carreño
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Clínica Universitaria Colombia and Centro de Tratamiento (e) Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo - CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Nathalia Mora-Soto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Pedro T Ramírez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Chi-Fang Wu
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Juliana Rodríguez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Catherin Salazar
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Kirsten Jorgensen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Blanca Segarra-Vidal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University General Hospital of Castellon, Castellon, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacón
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States of America; New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - René Pareja
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Clínica ASTORGA, Medellín, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fu C, Wang C, Qian Q, Zhang Y, Ma C, Miao L, Zhang G. A novel predictor for the use of concurrent chemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer with intermediate-risk factors. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2023; 48:101228. [PMID: 37389134 PMCID: PMC10300080 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective For early-stage cervical cancer patients experiencing radical surgery, postoperative radiotherapy was recommended for patients with a combination of intermediate-risk factors. However, there was no consensus on whether to administer concurrent chemotherapy. The aim of the study was to confirm the clinical value of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in guiding the use of concurrent chemotherapy during postoperative radiotherapy. Methods A total of 969 patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates between different group. A Cox proportional hazards regression test was used to conduct multivariate analyses. Results For the patients in the high CONUT group (≥3), the addition of concurrent chemotherapy had better 5-year DFS (91.2 % vs. 72.8 %, P = 0.005) and CSS (93.8 % vs. 77.4 %, P = 0.013) than those without it. Meanwhile, the patients with concurrent chemotherapy had less rate of locoregional recurrence (8.5 % vs 16.7 %, P = 0.034) and distant metastases (11.7 % vs 30.4 %, P = 0.015). The multivariate analysis showed that concurrent chemotherapy was detected to be a factor significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.011), local control (P = 0.041), distant metastasis (P = 0.005) and CSS (P = 0.023). For the patients in low CONUT group (<3), there was no difference in prognosis between patients. Conclusion Pretreatment CONUT score may be a predictive factor for the use of concurrent chemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer with intermediate-risk factors during postoperative radiotherapy, and it can be helpful to determine the adjuvant treatment scheme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunli Fu
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Proteomics of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Cong Wang
- Department of Gynecology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Qiuhong Qian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Youzhong Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Changdong Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Li Miao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Guangyu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Santana D, Gamboa OA, Saenz J, Esguerra JA, Guerrero E. Morbidity of adjuvant treatment in early cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study in a Latin American center. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:189-197. [PMID: 37456708 PMCID: PMC10348335 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node assessment is the standard of treatment in early cervical cancer. Adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy are offered to patients with risk factors for recurrence. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of severe (> G3) early or late morbidity related to treatment in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radical surgery with/without adjuvant treatment in a Latin American center. Materials and methods Retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer stage IA1 to IB1. Complications were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. The cumulative incidence of severe morbidity was estimated. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated to determine the factors associated with morbidity. Results 239 patients were included. 133 (55.6%) received only radical surgical management and 106 (44.4%) adjuvant treatment. The incidence of early morbidity was 18.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.6% to 26.5%] in the group without adjuvant treatment versus 21.7% (95% CI: 14.3% to 30.8%) in the adjuvant treatment group (p = 0.58). Late morbidity was 3% (95% CI: 1% to 7.5%) and 8.5% (95% CI: 4% to 15.5%), respectively (p = 0.063). No statistically significant differences regarding grade ≥ 3 morbidity between the groups was found (2.3% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.289). Complications during surgery is the only factor associated with postoperative morbidity related to treatment (RR = 4.1) (95% CI: 3% to 5.7%). Conclusion In our study, the addition of adjuvant treatment for early cervical cancer patients who underwent radical surgery did not increase the incidence of severe early or late morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Santana
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia, Oncology Gynecology, Bogotá D.C, Colombia
| | - Oscar Andrés Gamboa
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia, Radiation Oncology, Bogotá D.C, Colombia
| | - James Saenz
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia, Oncology Gynecology, Bogotá D.C, Colombia
| | | | - Eduardo Guerrero
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia, Radiation Oncology, Bogotá D.C, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arians N, Lindel K, Krisam J, Oelmann-Avendano JT, Meixner E, König L, Hoerner-Rieber J, Wark A, Forster T, Weykamp F, Lang K, Schneeweiss A, Ellerbrock M, Mielke T, Herfarth K, Debus J. Treatment Tolerability and Toxicity of Postoperative Proton Beam Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies: Results of the Prospective Phase 2 APROVE-trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00012-3. [PMID: 36642110 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The APROVE study is a prospective one-arm phase-2 study investigating the safety and treatment tolerability of postoperative proton beam therapy in women with uterine cervical or endometrial cancer. In this analysis, we report the primary study endpoint of safety and treatment tolerability as well as toxicity rates and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS 25 patients were treated with postoperative proton beam therapy with a total dose of 45 to 50.4 Gy (RBE) in 5 to 6 × 1.8 Gy (RBE) fractions weekly using active raster-scanning intensity modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT). Sequential or simultaneous platinum-based chemotherapy was administered if indicated. The primary endpoint was defined as the lack of any acute ≥grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) or urogenital (GU) toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 or premature treatment abortion. Secondary endpoints were clinical symptoms and toxicity, quality of life, and PFS. RESULTS All patients completed IMPT according to the protocol, with a median treatment duration of 43 days (range, 33 to 51 days). No patient developed gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity ≥grade 3, and the treatment tolerability rate was 100%. Therefore, the null hypothesis H0: Tolerability Rate ≤80% could be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis H1: Tolerability rate >80% using an exact binomial test with a one-sided significance level of α = 10% (one-sided P value P = .0059). The median follow-up time after the end of IMPT was 25.1 months (range, 20.2 to 50.3 months). 18 of 25 (75%) patients completed the study follow-up of 24 months. 7 patients had progressive disease. Kaplan-Meier-estimated mean PFS was 39.9 months (95% confidence interval: 33.37 to 46.5 months). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative IMPT is a safe treatment option for cervical and endometrial cancer patients, with only low-grade acute and late toxicities. Larger randomized trials are necessary to further assess the potential of IMPT and improve patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Katja Lindel
- Municipal Hospital Karlsruhe, Department of Radiation Oncology, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Johannes Krisam
- Institute for Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Wark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Malte Ellerbrock
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Mielke
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported symptoms after postoperative proton beam radiotherapy of cervical and endometrial cancer: 2-year results of the prospective phase II APROVE-trial. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:5. [PMID: 36624483 PMCID: PMC9827629 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02198-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The APROVE-trial investigated the tolerability of postoperative proton beam therapy in women with cervical or endometrial cancer. The present analysis evaluated the secondary endpoints of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and patient-reported symptoms. METHODS 25 patients were included in this prospective phase-II-trial and treated with postoperative radiotherapy using protons alone or in combination with chemotherapy. To attain general and gynecologic-specific HRQOL measures, the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaires combined with -QLQ-CX24 for cervical and -QLQ-EN24 for endometrial cancer were assessed at baseline, at the end of RT and up to 2 years after radiotherapy. The results were compared to an age-matched norm reference population. Symptoms were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and institutional patient-reported symptoms grading. RESULTS Scores regarding global health status were markedly impaired at baseline (mean: 58.0 ± 20.1) compared to reference population data, but significantly (p = 0.036) improved and evened out to comparable norm values 2 years after proton therapy (mean: 69.9 ± 19.3). Treatment caused acute and long-term worsening of pain (p = 0.048) and gastrointestinal symptoms (p = 0.016) for women with endometrial cancer, but no higher-grade CTCAE ≥ 3° toxicity was observed. Dosimetric evaluation of rectum, sigmoid, large and small bowel showed no correlation with the reported gastrointestinal symptoms. After 2 years, fatigue had significantly improved (p = 0.030), whereas patients with cervical cancer experienced more often lymphedema (p = 0.017). Scores for endometrial cancer pertaining to sexual activity (p = 0.048) and body image (p = 0.022) had improved post treatment; in the latter this effect persisted after 2 years. CONCLUSION Proton beam therapy in the adjuvant setting was well tolerated with only low-grade side effects concerning gastrointestinal symptoms, lymphedema and pain. Overall quality of life was impaired at baseline, but patients were able to recover to values comparable to norm population 2 years after proton therapy. Larger studies are needed to confirm whether the benefit of proton therapy translates into a clinical effect. Sexual dysfunction remains an important issue. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03184350, 09th June 2017).
Collapse
|
10
|
Sensitization of cervical cancer cells to radiation by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib. MEDICAL ONCOLOGY (NORTHWOOD, LONDON, ENGLAND) 2022; 40:68. [PMID: 36586018 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-022-01890-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Dinaciclib is a selective cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, but its radiosensitizing effect remains unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the radiosensitizing effect of Dinaciclib on cervical cancer cells. Two cervical cancer cell lines, Hela and Siha, were selected, and the IC50 was determined by CCK8. The radiosensitizing effect of Dinaciclib was verified by plate cloning assay, and the G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis of IR cells were verified by flow cytometry. Immunofluorescence assay was used to verify the formation of γH2AX foci following DNA damage. Western blot was performed to detect cell cycle, apoptosis, autophagy, and DNA damage-related pathways. Dinaciclib increased the cell sensitivity to IR. IR induced G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis, and Dinaciclib enhanced this effect. Further, Dinaciclib delayed DNA repair, including non-homologous end joining repair and homologous recombination repair, and reduced the expression of DNA repair proteins Ku80 (SiHa cells), Ku70, and RAD51, as well as the expression of apoptotic marker Bcl-2. The expression of autophagy marker Beclin1 induced tumor cell death and increased the formation of DNA damage marker γH2AX foci. Dinaciclib improves the sensitivity of cervical cancer cells to IR by inducing cell cycle arrest, delaying DNA repair, and increasing apoptosis. However, further research is needed to unravel the complexity of DNA repair pathways.
Collapse
|
11
|
Rodriguez J, Viveros-Carreño D, Pareja R. Adjuvant treatment after radical surgery for cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors: is it time for an update? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:1219-1226. [PMID: 36511890 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. The preferred treatment for early stage cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node assessment, and adjuvant therapy is suggested according to histopathological risk factors. A landmark study was published in 1999 that established 'intermediate risk' criteria for relapse, showing a benefit in recurrence free rate in patients that received pelvic radiotherapy. Furthermore, in the presence of parametrial, nodal, or vaginal margin involvement, another key study found that the addition of concurrent cisplatin based chemotherapy to radiation therapy improved progression free and overall survival for 'high risk' early cervical cancer. With the advancement in treatment modalities in surgery and radiotherapy, and the improved identification of prognostic histopathological factors, several authors have reconsidered the role of adjuvant therapy after radical hysterectomy in the presence of intermediate risk criteria. Here we review the literature on the evolution of adjuvant therapy for intermediate risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Rodriguez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, section of Gynecologic Oncology, Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - David Viveros-Carreño
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia
- Gynecologic Oncology, Clínica Universitaria Colombia And Clínica Los Nogales, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Rene Pareja
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia
- Gynecologic Oncology, Clinica Astorga, Medellin, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mittal P, Chopra S, Charnalia M, Dora T, Engineer R, Mulani J, Scaria L, Prajapati K, Kannan S, Gurram L, Mahantshetty U, Gupta S, Shrivastava SK. Patterns of relapse after adjuvant (chemo)radiation for cervical cancer in a phase III clinical trial (PARCER): an evaluation of updated NRG Oncology /RTOG target delineation guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:369-378. [PMID: 35157993 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIM NRG Oncology/RTOG recently published updated contouring guidelines for intensity modulated radiotherapy in postoperative treatment for endometrial and cervical cancer. The present study was designed to evaluate the implications of newly published guidelines. METHODS Patients (n = 300) recruited in Phase III RCT of adjuvant (chemo)RT for cervical cancer (NCT01279135) were included for understanding patterns of relapse. For those with pelvic relapse, RT structure sets, treatment plans and diagnostic images at relapse were imported on the treatment planning system. Rigid registration was performed with treatment planning images that contained the delineated PTV and radiation dose information. Gross tumor volume at time of relapse was delineated on the diagnostic scans and superimposed on the radiotherapy treatment scans. The site of pelvic relapse was categorized as "within field of old RTOG/PARCER target delineation guidelines" or/and "within field of new NRG/RTOG guidelines" and proportions of recurrences contained within the two guidelines were compared. p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Additionally, IMRT treatment plans were generated based on the new guidelines for a limited set of patients to see if these new guidelines increased the organ at risk doses. RESULTS Most common form of relapse was distant metastasis (15%). Pelvic relapse rate in our study was 8%. Overall 9/19 relapses were encompassed in the old RTOG/PARCER contouring guidelines while 12/19 were encompassed within the new RTOG 2021 contouring guidelines. This corresponded to a further 1% reduction in local relapses (p 0.007). Dose to rectum was marginally increased with the new contouring, with no difference in other organs at risk. Salvage treatment was offered in 25/60 patients who relapsed. In patients who received local treatment after relapse had a mean survival after relapse of 27.2 months compared to 8 months who received supportive care alone. CONCLUSION Our study supports the use of newly published NRG/RTOG contouring guidelines in patients with cervical cancer who have undergone hysterectomy. Further data is needed to ascertain if anterior extension of the CTV is needed as in PARCER trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prachi Mittal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Mayuri Charnalia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Tapas Dora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Sangrur, Punjab, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jaahid Mulani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Libin Scaria
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kunal Prajapati
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sadhana Kannan
- Epidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, Advanced Centre for Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Lavanya Gurram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Umesh Mahantshetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sudeep Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shyam Kishore Shrivastava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gauci PA, Kee DLC, Thamphya B, Schiappa R, Delotte J, Chand-Fouche ME, Hannoun-Levi JM. Preoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy for high-risk early-stage cervical cancer: Long-term clinical outcome analysis. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:273-282. [PMID: 35094933 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report long-term oncological and toxicity outcomes after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDB) followed by oncologic surgery for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 2005 to 2019, all patients treated with preoperative HDB at Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center for early-stage (IB1-IB2-IIA - FIGO 2018) cervical cancer with local relapse risk factors were included. HDB was performed followed by hysterectomy. Oncological and toxicity outcomes were evaluated prospectively. RESULTS We identified 61 patients, with a median follow-up of 84 months. Posthysterectomy complete pathological response was observed in 46 patients (75.4%). Six patients (9.8%) experienced recurrence, including 4 local relapses (6.6%), and 2 deaths (3.3%) due to cervical cancer. Five-year local, nodal and metastatic relapse-free survivals were 94% (95% CI 87-100%), 96% (95% CI 90-100%) and 93% (95% CI 86-100%) respectively. Five-year overall survival was 98% (95% CI 95-100%). No grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity was observed, and 3 patients (4.9%) experienced grade 2 acute toxicity. One patient presented grade 4 late digestive toxicity, and 6 patients had grade 2 late toxicity. Only 1 patient still had grade 2 toxicity, after 9 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, we are reporting the longest follow-up of a preoperative HDB cohort. With similar oncological outcomes and less morbidity compared to primary surgery treatment followed more or less by adjuvant radiotherapy, HDB followed by hysterectomy could be a promising therapeutic option for early-stage cervical cancers with poor prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Alexis Gauci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine, CHU de Nice, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Daniel Lam Cham Kee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France
| | - Brice Thamphya
- Department of Statistics, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center - University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Renaud Schiappa
- Department of Statistics, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center - University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Jerome Delotte
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine, CHU de Nice, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Marie-Eve Chand-Fouche
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France
| | - Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Meixner E, Hoeltgen L, Hoegen P, König L, Arians N, Michel LL, Smetanay K, Fremd C, Schneeweiss A, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Age-Dependent Hematologic Toxicity Profiles and Prognostic Serologic Markers in Postoperative Radiochemotherapy Treatment for Uterine Cervical Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338221118188. [PMID: 35950239 PMCID: PMC9379804 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221118188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In the adjuvant setting for cervical cancer, classical
risk factors for postoperative radiochemotherapy have been established. However,
data on laboratory changes during therapy and the prognostic value of
serological markers are limited and further knowledge is needed to optimize the
toxic trimodal regimen. Methods: We retrospectively identified 69
women who underwent weekly postoperative radiochemotherapy with
40 mg/m2 of cisplatin for cervical cancer between 2010 and 2021
at a single center. Laboratory parameters were recorded before, at each cycle
and after radiochemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used to
calculate and compare survival, groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney
U, χ2, and variance tests. Results:
With a median follow-up of 17.7 months, the 1- and 5-year local control rates
were 94.0% and 73.7%, respectively, with significantly better rates for more
chemotherapy cycles and negative resection margins. Only 68.1% of patients
completed all cycles. The most common reasons for early discontinuation were
persistent asymptomatic leukopenia in women aged ≤ 50 years, and limiting
infections in women aged > 50 years. Leukopenia was more likely to occur
after the third cycle. Significantly worse survival was observed for
post-radiochemotherapy elevated C-reactive-protein and lactate dehydrogenase
levels, low pre-radiochemotherapy nutritional index, and raised
C-reactive-protein-levels; the latter were also predictable for local control.
The Glasgow prognostic score did not reliably predict survival.
Conclusion: Incomplete application of simultaneous chemotherapy
leads to inferior local control, and age-dependent limiting factors should be
identified at an early stage. In addition to classical risk factors, serological
markers (C-reactive-protein, lactate dehydrogenase, nutritional index) show
prognostic significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 27178Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 27178Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 27178Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 27178Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 27178Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura L Michel
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 9144Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Smetanay
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 9144Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carlo Fremd
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 9144Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 9144Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 27178Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 27178Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|