Effect of speed humps on injury consequences on trunk roads traversing towns in Ghana: A quasi-experimental study

Helmet utilisation and its associated factors among motorcyclists in northern Ghana: an analytical cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Motorcycle crashes are a major source of road traffic deaths in northern Ghana. Helmet use has been low. The last time it was formally assessed (2010), helmet use was 30.0% (34.2% for riders and 1.9% for pillion riders). We sought to determine the current prevalence of helmet use and its associated factors among motorcyclists in northern Ghana.

METHODS

Cross-sectional observations of motorcycle helmet use were conducted among 3853 motorcycle riders and 1097 pillion riders in the Northern Region at 12 different locations near intersections, roundabouts and motorcycle bays. Modified Poisson regression was used to assess the factors associated with helmet use.

RESULTS

The prevalence of helmet use was 22.1% overall: 26.7% among motorcycle riders and 5.7% among pillion riders. On the multivariable regression analysis, the prevalence of helmet use among motorcycle riders was 69% higher during the day compared with the night, 58% higher at weekend compared with weekday, 46% higher among males compared with females, but it was 18% lower on local roads compared with highways, 67% lower among young riders compared with the elderly and 29% lower when riding with pillion rider(s).

CONCLUSION

Despite small increases in motorcycle helmet use among pillion riders, helmet use has declined overall over the past decade. Immediate actions are needed to promote helmet use among motorcyclists in northern Ghana. This calls for a multisectoral approach to address the current low helmet use, targeting young riders, female riders, pillion riders, evening riding and riding on local roads.

Spherical Cap Studs: A novel speed bump alternative to reduce discomfort with effective speed reduction

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the potential of Spherical Cap Studs (SCS) as a substitute for conventional speed bumps, with a focus on limiting two wheeler speed while minimizing discomfort to riders by comparing the speed reduction capabilities and discomfort levels associated with SCS and speed bumps.

METHODS

The study uses experimental approach to compare the speed limiting ability and discomfort caused to rider by the proposed SCS and a standard speed bump. Speed profiles were developed for two wheelers passing over both SCS and speed bump. The parameter employed to compare speed profiles is the Mean Absolute Percentage Difference (MAPD), offering valuable insights into how effectively the two traffic calming measures reduce two wheeler speeds. To compare discomfort, the study calculates the 'Vibration Dose Value' (VDV) experienced by riders when traversing both speed bump and SCS. Additionally, 'Static Compressive Stress' (Se) applied to the spinal cord is also calculated in both scenarios.

RESULTS

The analysis of speed profiles reveals an MAPD value of 13.70% indicating that SCS exhibits speed reduction capabilities comparable to traditional speed bump. In terms of discomfort, the VDV for two wheelers passing over a speed bump is measured at 5.92 m/s1.75, whereas the VDV for SCS is found to be 5.16 m/s1.75. Similarly, the Static Compressive Stress (Se) experienced at a speed bump is 0.60 MPa, in contrast to the 0.33 MPa recorded for SCS. This data underscores a noteworthy 12.8% reduction in VDV and a substantial 45.57% reduction in Se.

CONCLUSION

The study's findings support the potential adoption of SCS as an effective alternative to conventional speed bumps for controlling two wheeler speeds. SCS demonstrate a speed reduction capability similar to that of traditional speed bumps while significantly alleviating discomfort for riders. SCS is expected to be a promising solution for traffic calming purposes in various settings, such as markets, residential areas, institutional campuses, and parking lots.