1
|
Wong AKC, Kwok VWY, Wong FKY, Tong DWK, Yuen BMK, Fong CS, Chan ST, Li WC, Zhou S, Lee AYL. Improving post-acute stroke follow-up care by adopting telecare consultations in a nurse-led clinic: Study protocol of a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. J Adv Nurs 2024; 80:1222-1231. [PMID: 37950400 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and implementation strategies of telecare consultations in post-stroke nurse-led clinics. BACKGROUND Telecare consultations could be an alternative to conventional in-person consultations and improve continuity of care for stroke survivors following their discharge from hospital. Previous studies utilizing telecare consultations only focused on testing their clinical effectiveness on stroke survivors; the appropriateness and feasibility of adopting this new delivery modality in a real-world setting were not examined. DESIGN A Type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation design will be adopted. METHODS Eligible stroke survivor participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group (telecare consultation) or control group (usual in-person clinic consultation). Both groups will receive the same nursing intervention but delivered through different channels. The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework will be used to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and implementation outcomes. The primary outcome is the non-inferiority of the degree of disability between the two groups at 3 months into the intervention and at 3 months post-intervention. The paper complies with the SPIRIT guidelines for study protocols adapted for designing and reporting parallel group randomized trials. CONCLUSION The findings of this study will provide key insights into the processes for implementing and adopting telecare consultations into long-term services for post-stroke patients. IMPACT This study contributes to the translation of telecare consultations for stroke survivors into real-life settings. If effective, this program may provide guidance for expanding telecare consultations to other post-stroke nurse-led clinics or to patients with other chronic diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT05183672). Registered on 10 January 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Danny Wah Kun Tong
- Hospital Authority Head Office, Hospital Authority Building, Homantin, Hong Kong
| | | | - Ching Sing Fong
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hospital Authority, Homantin, Hong Kong
| | - Shun Tim Chan
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hospital Authority, Homantin, Hong Kong
| | - Wah Chun Li
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hospital Authority, Homantin, Hong Kong
| | - Shiyi Zhou
- School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wong AKC, Wong FKY, Liang J, Tong DWK, Chan ML, Chu TK, Wong BC, Chan RSY, Ho WH, Tang CYS, Chiang SC. Outcomes of a risk assessment and management program using telecare consultation among patients with diabetes mellitus in general out-patient clinic: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol. Ann Med 2023; 55:2262088. [PMID: 37748120 PMCID: PMC10521334 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2262088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease characterized by abnormally uncontrolled high blood glucose level. The Risk Assessment and Management Program (RAMP) in Hong Kong has been providing long-term face-to-face follow-up to DM patients in the government out-patient clinics since 2009. However, under the current outbreak of COVID-19, these face-to-face consultations were ceased over and over again to lower the risk of disease transmission. With the advancement in technology, the recent emergence of telecare has provided an alternative to replace the conventional consultations in the clinics. Its clinical effectiveness on DM patients has also been supported by numerous studies. Yet, there is only a paucity of literatures discussing the practicality of such implementation design in the real-world settings. This study aims at studying both the effectiveness and implementation outcomes of telecare in Hong Kong DM patients. It adopts a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. It will be conducted in seven government out-patient clinics in Hong Kong. The subjects will be randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group when they 1) are aged 18 or above, 2) have a confirmed diagnosis of diabetes, and 3) are having regular follow-up appointment in the clinic. Subjects in the intervention group will receive a 84-week Risk Assessment and Management Program (RAMP) in an alternate telecare and face-to-face consultations mode, while the control group will receive the same program but in usual face-to-face consultation mode. RE-AIM is employed as the implementation and effectiveness outcome evaluation framework. The primary outcome measure will be HbA1c. Data will be collected pre-intervention (T1), 42-week (T2), and 84-week (T3). The study will provide effectiveness-implementation assessment of telecare mode for DM patients in Hong Kong, as an alternative or in addition to conventional face-to-face consultations. It also aimed to provide insights for the future adoption in a broader health care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jun Liang
- New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Homantin, Hong Kong
| | | | - Man Li Chan
- New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Homantin, Hong Kong
| | - Tsun kit Chu
- New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Homantin, Hong Kong
| | - Bo Chu Wong
- New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Homantin, Hong Kong
| | - Rinis Sin Yi Chan
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| | - Wai Hing Ho
- New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Homantin, Hong Kong
| | | | - Sau Ching Chiang
- New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Homantin, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Collombon EHGM, Bolman CAW, Peels DA, de Bruijn GJ, de Groot RHM, Lechner L. Adding Mobile Elements to Online Physical Activity Interventions Targeted at Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: Protocol for a Systematic Design. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e31677. [PMID: 35819820 PMCID: PMC9328785 DOI: 10.2196/31677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity (PA) can increase mental and physical health in adults aged 50 years and older. However, it has been shown that PA guidelines are often not met within this population. Therefore, our research group developed 2 computer-tailored intervention programs in the last decade to stimulate PA: Active Plus and I Move. Although these programs were proven effective, positive effects diminished over time and attrition rates were relatively high. To respond to this, we will integrate 3 interactive mobile elements into the existing programs: activity tracker, ecological momentary intervention program, and virtual coach app. OBJECTIVE The goal of the research is to define systematic and evidence-based steps for extending our online computer-based PA intervention programs with 3 interactive mobile elements. METHODS Components often included in other (eHealth) design models were identified as key components and served as a base for the definition of systematic steps: exploration of context, involvement of the target population, prototype and intervention testing, and implementation. Based on these key components, 10 systematic steps were defined. The initial step is a literature search, with the results serving as a base for development of the low-fidelity prototypes in step 2. The pilot phase comprises the 3rd to 6th steps and includes semistructured interviews, pilot tests, and adaptations of the prototypes with intensive involvement of the target population of adults aged 50 years and older, where particular attention will be paid to lower educated persons. The 7th step is an effect evaluation in the form of a randomized controlled trial. During the 8th step, the most effective intervention programs will be selected and reinforced. These reinforced intervention programs will be used during the design of an implementation plan in the 9th step and the subsequent field study in the 10th step. RESULTS The project will be executed from December 2019 to December 2023. During this period, the systematic approach presented will be practically executed according to the methodological procedures described. CONCLUSIONS Based on the 4 identified key components, we were able to design an evidence-based systematic design approach for separately adding 3 mobile elements to our existing online PA intervention programs. The 10 steps are presented as a useful approach to guide future eHealth design studies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/31677.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Denise A Peels
- Faculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Netherlands
| | - Gert-Jan de Bruijn
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Communication Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Lilian Lechner
- Faculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scott IA, Sullivan C, Staib A. Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation. AUST HEALTH REV 2020; 43:302-313. [PMID: 29792259 DOI: 10.1071/ah17153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective In an era of rapid digitisation of Australian hospitals, practical guidance is needed in how to successfully implement electronic medical records (EMRs) as both a technical innovation and a major transformative change in clinical care. The aim of the present study was to develop a checklist that clearly and comprehensively defines the steps that best prepare hospitals for EMR implementation and digital transformation. Methods The checklist was developed using a formal methodological framework comprised of: literature reviews of relevant issues; an interactive workshop involving a multidisciplinary group of digital leads from Queensland hospitals; a draft document based on literature and workshop proceedings; and a review and feedback from senior clinical leads. Results The final checklist comprised 19 questions, 13 related to EMR implementation and six to digital transformation. Questions related to the former included organisational considerations (leadership, governance, change leaders, implementation plan), technical considerations (vendor choice, information technology and project management teams, system and hardware alignment with clinician workflows, interoperability with legacy systems) and training (user training, post-go-live contingency plans, roll-out sequence, staff support at point of care). Questions related to digital transformation included cultural considerations (clinically focused vision statement and communication strategy, readiness for change surveys), management of digital disruption syndromes and plans for further improvement in patient care (post-go-live optimisation of digital system, quality and benefit evaluation, ongoing digital innovation). Conclusion This evidence-based, field-tested checklist provides guidance to hospitals planning EMR implementation and separates readiness for EMR from readiness for digital transformation. What is known about the topic? Many hospitals throughout Australia have implemented, or are planning to implement, hospital wide electronic medical records (EMRs) with varying degrees of functionality. Few hospitals have implemented a complete end-to-end digital system with the ability to bring about major transformation in clinical care. Although the many challenges in implementing EMRs have been well documented, they have not been incorporated into an evidence-based, field-tested checklist that can practically assist hospitals in preparing for EMR implementation as both a technical innovation and a vehicle for major digital transformation of care. What does this paper add? This paper outlines a 19-question checklist that was developed using a formal methodological framework comprising literature review of relevant issues, proceedings from an interactive workshop involving a multidisciplinary group of digital leads from hospitals throughout Queensland, including three hospitals undertaking EMR implementation and one hospital with complete end-to-end EMR, and review of a draft checklist by senior clinical leads within a statewide digital healthcare improvement network. The checklist distinguishes between issues pertaining to EMR as a technical innovation and EMR as a vehicle for digital transformation of patient care. What are the implications for practitioners? Successful implementation of a hospital-wide EMR requires senior managers, clinical leads, information technology teams and project management teams to fully address key operational and strategic issues. Using an issues checklist may help prevent any one issue being inadvertently overlooked or underemphasised in the planning and implementation stages, and ensure the EMR is fully adopted and optimally used by clinician users in an ongoing digital transformation of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian A Scott
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
| | - Clair Sullivan
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
| | - Andrew Staib
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yakovchenko V, Hogan TP, Houston TK, Richardson L, Lipschitz J, Petrakis BA, Gillespie C, McInnes DK. Automated Text Messaging With Patients in Department of Veterans Affairs Specialty Clinics: Cluster Randomized Trial. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e14750. [PMID: 31444872 PMCID: PMC6729116 DOI: 10.2196/14750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Acceptability of mobile phone text messaging as a means of asynchronous communication between health care systems and patients is growing. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has adopted an automated texting system (aTS) for national rollout. The aTS allows providers to develop clinical texting protocols to promote patient self-management and allows clinical teams to monitor patient progress between in-person visits. Texting-supported hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment has not been previously tested. Objective Guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), we developed an aTS HCV protocol and conducted a mixed methods, hybrid type 2 effectiveness implementation study comparing two programs supporting implementation of the aTS HCV protocol for medication adherence in patients with HCV. Methods Seven VA HCV specialty clinics were randomized to usual aTS implementation versus an augmented implementation facilitation program. Implementation process measures included facilitation metrics, usability, and usefulness. Implementation outcomes included provider and patient use of the aTS HCV protocol, and effectiveness outcomes included medication adherence, health perceptions and behaviors, and sustained virologic response (SVR). Results Across the seven randomized clinics, there were 293 facilitation events using a core set of nine implementation strategies (157 events in augmented implementation facilitation, 136 events in usual implementation). Providers found the aTS appropriate with high potential for scale-up but not without difficulties in startup, patient selection and recruitment, and clinic workflow integration. Patients largely found the aTS easy to use and helpful; however, low perceived need for self-management support contributed to high declination. Reach and use was modest with 197 patients approached, 71 (36%) enrolled, 50 (25%) authenticated, and 32 (16%) using the aTS. In augmented implementation facilitation clinics, more patients actively used the aTS HCV protocol compared with usual clinic patients (20% vs 12%). Patients who texted reported lower distress about failing HCV treatment (13/15, 87%, vs 8/15, 53%; P=.05) and better adherence to HCV medication (11/15, 73%, reporting excellent adherence vs 6/15, 40%; P=.06), although SVR did not differ by group. Conclusions The aTS is a promising intervention for improving patient self-management; however, augmented approaches to implementation may be needed to support clinician buy-in and patient engagement. Considering the behavioral, social, organizational, and technical scale-up challenges that we documented, successful and sustained implementation of the aTS may require implementation strategies that operate at the clinic, provider, and patient levels. Trial Registration Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03898349; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03898349
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Yakovchenko
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - Timothy P Hogan
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.,Division of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States
| | - Thomas K Houston
- Division of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Amherst, MA, United States
| | - Lorilei Richardson
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - Jessica Lipschitz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Beth Ann Petrakis
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - Chris Gillespie
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - D Keith McInnes
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.,Department of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics. Int J Telemed Appl 2018; 2018:3932643. [PMID: 29713341 PMCID: PMC5866865 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3932643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Telemedicine applications offer innovative approaches for treating and reducing the effects of substance use disorders (SUDs). This analysis assessed the interest in and use of 11 telemedicine applications in a sample of 363 SUD organizations in the United States of America. Fifty percent of the organizations expressed high rates of interest in seven of the telemedicine applications, demonstrating the appeal of telemedicine within this field. The top three self-reported telemedicine applications being used were (1) computerized screening/assessments (44.6%), (2) telephone-based recovery supports (29.5%), and (3) telephone-based therapy (28.37%). The greatest gaps between interest and use were for (1) texting appointment reminders (55.2% differential), (2) mobile apps for posttreatment recovery (46.6% differential), and (3) recovery support chats (46.6% differential). A Latent Class Analysis (LCA) of the organizations' telemedicine use behavior identified three groupings: “Innovators” that were using a range of technologies (n = 27, 7.4%); “Technology Traditionalists” that limited their use to telephone, video, and web portal technologies (n = 101, 27.8%); and “Low Tech” that had low overall technology use (n = 235, 64.7%). Future studies should build on how telemedicine could be applied in SUD settings, organizational behaviors towards its adoption, and telemedicine's effect on treatment adherence and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
7
|
Quanbeck A, Gustafson DH, Marsch LA, Chih MY, Kornfield R, McTavish F, Johnson R, Brown RT, Mares ML, Shah DV. Implementing a Mobile Health System to Integrate the Treatment of Addiction Into Primary Care: A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e37. [PMID: 29382624 PMCID: PMC5811649 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the near ubiquity of mobile phones, little research has been conducted on the implementation of mobile health (mHealth) apps to treat patients in primary care. Although primary care clinicians routinely treat chronic conditions such as asthma and diabetes, they rarely treat addiction, a common chronic condition. Instead, addiction is most often treated in the US health care system, if it is treated at all, in a separate behavioral health system. mHealth could help integrate addiction treatment in primary care. OBJECTIVE The objective of this paper was to report the effects of implementing an mHealth system for addiction in primary care on both patients and clinicians. METHODS In this implementation research trial, an evidence-based mHealth system named Seva was introduced sequentially over 36 months to a maximum of 100 patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) in each of three federally qualified health centers (FQHCs; primary care clinics that serve patients regardless of their ability to pay). This paper reports on patient and clinician outcomes organized according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. RESULTS The outcomes according to the RE-AIM framework are as follows: Reach-Seva reached 8.31% (268/3226) of appropriate patients. Reach was limited by our ability to pay for phones and data plans for a maximum of 100 patients per clinic. Effectiveness-Patients who were given Seva had significant improvements in their risky drinking days (44% reduction, (0.7-1.25)/1.25, P=.04), illicit drug-use days (34% reduction, (2.14-3.22)/3.22, P=.01), quality of life, human immunodeficiency virus screening rates, and number of hospitalizations. Through Seva, patients also provided peer support to one another in ways that are novel in primary care settings. Adoption-Patients sustained high levels of Seva use-between 53% and 60% of the patients at the 3 sites accessed Seva during the last week of the 12-month implementation period. Among clinicians, use of the technology was less robust than use by patients, with only a handful of clinicians using Seva in each clinic and behavioral health providers making most referrals to Seva in 2 of the 3 clinics. Implementation-At 2 sites, implementation plans were realized successfully; they were delayed in the third. Maintenance-Use of Seva dropped when grant funding stopped paying for the mobile phones and data plans. Two of the 3 clinics wanted to maintain the use of Seva, but they struggled to find funding to support this. CONCLUSIONS Implementing an mHealth system can improve care among primary care patients with SUDs, and patients using the system can support one another in their recovery. Among clinicians, however, implementation requires figuring out how information from the mHealth system will be used and making mHealth data available in the electronic health (eHealth) record. In addition, paying for an mHealth system remains a challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Quanbeck
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - David H Gustafson
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Lisa A Marsch
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States
| | - Ming-Yuan Chih
- College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Rachel Kornfield
- School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Fiona McTavish
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Roberta Johnson
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Randall T Brown
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Marie-Louise Mares
- College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Dhavan V Shah
- School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Salloum RG, Shenkman EA, Louviere JJ, Chambers DA. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2017; 12:140. [PMID: 29169397 PMCID: PMC5701380 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background One of the key strategies to successful implementation of effective health-related interventions is targeting improvements in stakeholder engagement. The discrete choice experiment (DCE) is a stated preference technique for eliciting individual preferences over hypothetical alternative scenarios that is increasingly being used in health-related applications. DCEs are a dynamic approach to systematically measure health preferences which can be applied in enhancing stakeholder engagement. However, a knowledge gap exists in characterizing the extent to which DCEs are used in implementation science. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search (up to December 2016) of the English literature to identify and describe the use of DCEs in engaging stakeholders as an implementation strategy. We searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Econlit, PsychINFO, and the CINAHL using mesh terms. Studies were categorized according to application type, stakeholder(s), healthcare setting, and implementation outcome. Results Seventy-five publications were selected for analysis in this systematic review. Studies were categorized by application type: (1) characterizing demand for therapies and treatment technologies (n = 32), (2) comparing implementation strategies (n = 22), (3) incentivizing workforce participation (n = 11), and (4) prioritizing interventions (n = 10). Stakeholders included providers (n = 27), patients (n = 25), caregivers (n = 5), and administrators (n = 2). The remaining studies (n = 16) engaged multiple stakeholders (i.e., combination of patients, caregivers, providers, and/or administrators). The following implementation outcomes were discussed: acceptability (n = 75), appropriateness (n = 34), adoption (n = 19), feasibility (n = 16), and fidelity (n = 3). Conclusions The number of DCE studies engaging stakeholders as an implementation strategy has been increasing over the past decade. As DCEs are more widely used as a healthcare assessment tool, there is a wide range of applications for them in stakeholder engagement. The DCE approach could serve as a tool for engaging stakeholders in implementation science. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzi G Salloum
- Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
| | - Elizabeth A Shenkman
- Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Jordan J Louviere
- Institute for Choice, School of Marketing, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - David A Chambers
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Benzer JK, Charns MP, Hamdan S, Afable M. The role of organizational structure in readiness for change: A conceptual integration. Health Serv Manage Res 2016; 30:34-46. [PMID: 28166670 DOI: 10.1177/0951484816682396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to extend extant conceptualizations of readiness for change as an individual-level phenomenon. This review-of-reviews focuses on existing conceptual frameworks from the dissemination, implementation, quality improvement, and organizational transformation literatures in order to integrate theoretical rationales for how organization structure, a key dimension of the organizational context, may impact readiness for change. We propose that the organization structure dimensions of differentiation and integration impact readiness for change at the individual level of analysis by influencing four key concepts of relevance, legitimacy, perceived need for change, and resource allocation. We identify future research directions that focus on these four key concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin K Benzer
- 1 Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA, USA.,2 Department of Veterans Affairs, VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning Veterans, Waco, TX, USA.,3 Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Martin P Charns
- 1 Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA, USA.,4 Department of Health Policy, Law, and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sami Hamdan
- 1 Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA, USA.,5 School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa Afable
- 1 Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA, USA.,4 Department of Health Policy, Law, and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Attieh R, Gagnon MP, Estabrooks CA, Légaré F, Ouimet M, Vazquez P, Nuño R. Organizational readiness for knowledge translation in chronic care: a Delphi study. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:534. [PMID: 25380653 PMCID: PMC4226850 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0534-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2014] [Accepted: 10/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health-care organizations need to be ready prior to implement evidence-based interventions. In this study, we sought to achieve consensus on a framework to assess the readiness of health-care organizations to implement evidence-based interventions in the context of chronic care. Methods We conducted a web-based modified Delphi study between March and May 2013. We contacted 76 potentially eligible international experts working in the fields of organizational readiness (OR), knowledge translation (KT), and chronic care to comment upon the 76 elements resulting from our proposed conceptual map. This conceptual map was based on a systematic review of the existing frameworks of Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) in health-care. We developed a conceptual map that proposed a set of core concepts and their associated 17 dimensions and 59 sub-dimensions. Experts rated their agreement concerning the applicability and importance of ORC elements on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates total disagreement and 5 indicates total agreement. Two rounds were needed to get a consensus from the experts. Consensus was a priori defined as strong (≥75%) or moderate (60-74%). Simple descriptive statistics was used. Results In total, 14 participants completed the first round and 10 completed the two rounds. Panel members reached consensus on the applicability and importance of 6 out of 17 dimensions and 28 out of 59 sub-dimensions to assess OR for KT in the context of chronic care. A strong level of consensus (≥75%) was attained on the Organizational contextual factors, Leadership/participation, Organizational support, and Motivation dimensions. The Organizational climate for change and Change content dimensions reached a moderate consensus (60-74%). Experts also reached consensus on 28 out of 59 sub-dimensions to assess OR for KT. Twenty-one sub-dimensions reached a strong consensus (≥75%) and seven a moderate consensus (60-74%). Conclusion This study results provided the most important and applicable dimensions and sub-dimensions for assessing OR-KT in the context of chronic care. They can be used to guide the design of an assessment tool to improve knowledge translation in the field of chronic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randa Attieh
- Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Hôpital St-François d'Assise, 45 rue Leclerc, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
| | - Marie-Pierre Gagnon
- Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Hôpital St-François d'Assise, 45 rue Leclerc, Quebec City, QC, Canada. .,Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
| | - Carole A Estabrooks
- Faculty of Nursing and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - France Légaré
- Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Hôpital St-François d'Assise, 45 rue Leclerc, Quebec City, QC, Canada. .,Department of Family Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
| | - Mathieu Ouimet
- Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Hôpital St-François d'Assise, 45 rue Leclerc, Quebec City, QC, Canada. .,Department of Political Science, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
| | - Patricia Vazquez
- Fundacion Vasca de Innovacion e Investigacion Sanitarias, Bilbao, Spain.
| | - Roberto Nuño
- Fundacion Vasca de Innovacion e Investigacion Sanitarias, Bilbao, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Quanbeck AR, Gustafson DH, Marsch LA, McTavish F, Brown RT, Mares ML, Johnson R, Glass JE, Atwood AK, McDowell H. Integrating addiction treatment into primary care using mobile health technology: protocol for an implementation research study. Implement Sci 2014; 9:65. [PMID: 24884976 PMCID: PMC4072605 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2014] [Accepted: 05/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Healthcare reform in the United States is encouraging Federally Qualified Health Centers and other primary-care practices to integrate treatment for addiction and other behavioral health conditions into their practices. The potential of mobile health technologies to manage addiction and comorbidities such as HIV in these settings is substantial but largely untested. This paper describes a protocol to evaluate the implementation of an E-Health integrated communication technology delivered via mobile phones, called Seva, into primary-care settings. Seva is an evidence-based system of addiction treatment and recovery support for patients and real-time caseload monitoring for clinicians. Methods/Design Our implementation strategy uses three models of organizational change: the Program Planning Model to promote acceptance and sustainability, the NIATx quality improvement model to create a welcoming environment for change, and Rogers’s diffusion of innovations research, which facilitates adaptations of innovations to maximize their adoption potential. We will implement Seva and conduct an intensive, mixed-methods assessment at three diverse Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers in the United States. Our non-concurrent multiple-baseline design includes three periods — pretest (ending in four months of implementation preparation), active Seva implementation, and maintenance — with implementation staggered at six-month intervals across sites. The first site will serve as a pilot clinic. We will track the timing of intervention elements and assess study outcomes within each dimension of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework, including effects on clinicians, patients, and practices. Our mixed-methods approach will include quantitative (e.g., interrupted time-series analysis of treatment attendance, with clinics as the unit of analysis) and qualitative (e.g., staff interviews regarding adaptations to implementation protocol) methods, and assessment of implementation costs. Discussion If implementation is successful, the field will have a proven technology that helps Federally Qualified Health Centers and affiliated organizations provide addiction treatment and recovery support, as well as a proven strategy for implementing the technology. Seva also has the potential to improve core elements of addiction treatment, such as referral and treatment processes. A mobile technology for addiction treatment and accompanying implementation model could provide a cost-effective means to improve the lives of patients with drug and alcohol problems. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01963234).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Quanbeck
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Deal K, Keshavjee K, Troyan S, Kyba R, Holbrook AM. Physician and patient willingness to pay for electronic cardiovascular disease management. Int J Med Inform 2014; 83:517-28. [PMID: 24862891 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2013] [Revised: 03/10/2014] [Accepted: 04/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important target for electronic decision support. We examined the potential sustainability of an electronic CVD management program using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Our objective was to estimate physician and patient willingness-to-pay (WTP) for the current and enhanced programs. METHODS Focus groups, expert input and literature searches decided the attributes to be evaluated for the physician and patient DCEs, which were carried out using a Web-based program. Hierarchical Bayes analysis estimated preference coefficients for each respondent and latent class analysis segmented each sample. Simulations were used to estimate WTP for each of the attributes individually and for an enhanced vascular management system. RESULTS 144 participants (70 physicians, 74 patients) completed the DCE. Overall, access speed to updated records and monthly payments for a nurse coordinator were the main determinants of physician choices. Two distinctly different segments of physicians were identified - one very sensitive to monthly subscription fee and speed of updating the tracker with new patient data and the other very sensitive to the monthly cost of the nurse coordinator and government billing incentives. Patient choices were most significantly influenced by the yearly subscription cost. The estimated physician WTP was slightly above the estimated threshold for sustainability while the patient WTP was below. CONCLUSION Current willingness to pay for electronic cardiovascular disease management should encourage innovation to provide economies of scale in program development, delivery and maintenance to meet sustainability thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Deal
- DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4M4.
| | - Karim Keshavjee
- CEO, InfoClin Inc, 567 College St., Suite 201, Toronto, ON, Canada M6G 3W9.
| | - Sue Troyan
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, McMaster University, c/o St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 4A6.
| | - Robert Kyba
- Strategic Global Counsel, 52 Fairfield Road, Toronto, ON, Canada M4P 1T2.
| | - Anne Marie Holbrook
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, McMaster University, c/o St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 4A6.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xiao N, Mahajan S, Kishore R, Venkata VM, Shaik NA, Anand EJ, Singh R. Successful Implementation of eRx Systems: Creating Technology–Organization Alignment using the Strategy-Map Approach. INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT 2014. [DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2014.890427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
14
|
Elwyn G, Scholl I, Tietbohl C, Mann M, Edwards AGK, Clay C, Légaré F, Weijden TVD, Lewis CL, Wexler RM, Frosch DL. "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S14. [PMID: 24625083 PMCID: PMC4044318 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 318] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two decades of research has established the positive effect of using patient-targeted decision support interventions: patients gain knowledge, greater understanding of probabilities and increased confidence in decisions. Yet, despite their efficacy, the effectiveness of these decision support interventions in routine practice has yet to be established; widespread adoption has not occurred. The aim of this review was to search for and analyze the findings of published peer-reviewed studies that investigated the success levels of strategies or methods where attempts were made to implement patient-targeted decision support interventions into routine clinical settings. METHODS An electronic search strategy was devised and adapted for the following databases: ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, HMIC, Medline, Medline-in-process, OpenSIGLE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Social Services Abstracts, and the Web of Science. In addition, we used snowballing techniques. Studies were included after dual independent assessment. RESULTS After assessment, 5322 abstracts yielded 51 articles for consideration. After examining full-texts, 17 studies were included and subjected to data extraction. The approach used in all studies was one where clinicians and their staff used a referral model, asking eligible patients to use decision support. The results point to significant challenges to the implementation of patient decision support using this model, including indifference on the part of health care professionals. This indifference stemmed from a reported lack of confidence in the content of decision support interventions and concern about disruption to established workflows, ultimately contributing to organizational inertia regarding their adoption. CONCLUSIONS It seems too early to make firm recommendations about how best to implement patient decision support into routine practice because approaches that use a 'referral model' consistently report difficulties. We sense that the underlying issues that militate against the use of patient decision support and, more generally, limit the adoption of shared decision making, are under-investigated and under-specified. Future reports from implementation studies could be improved by following guidelines, for example the SQUIRE proposals, and by adopting methods that would be able to go beyond the 'barriers' and 'facilitators' approach to understand more about the nature of professional and organizational resistance to these tools. The lack of incentives that reward the use of these interventions needs to be considered as a significant impediment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glyn Elwyn
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Isabelle Scholl
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D - 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Tietbohl
- Department of Health Services Research, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 795 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, California, 94301, USA
| | - Mala Mann
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Adrian GK Edwards
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Catharine Clay
- Office of Professional Education and Outreach, The Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 203, Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03766, USA
| | - France Légaré
- Knowledge Transfer and Health Technology Assessment Research Group, Research Centre of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Hôpital Saint-François D'Assise, 10, rue de l’Espinay, Québec, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of General Practice, School CAPHRI, Peter Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen L Lewis
- University of North Carolina, Campus Box 7110, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
| | - Richard M Wexler
- Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, 40 Court Street, Suite 300, Boston, Massachusetts, 02108, USA
| | - Dominick L Frosch
- Department of Health Services Research, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 795 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, California, 94301, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Attieh R, Gagnon MP, Estabrooks CA, Légaré F, Ouimet M, Roch G, Ghandour EK, Grimshaw J. Organizational readiness for knowledge translation in chronic care: a review of theoretical components. Implement Sci 2013; 8:138. [PMID: 24283365 PMCID: PMC4222028 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2013] [Accepted: 11/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the persistent gaps between research and practice in healthcare systems, knowledge translation (KT) has gained significance and importance. Also, in most industrialized countries, there is an increasing emphasis on managing chronic health conditions with the best available evidence. Yet, organizations aiming to improve chronic care (CC) require an adequate level of organizational readiness (OR) for KT. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to review and synthesize the existing evidence on conceptual models/frameworks of Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) in healthcare as the basis for the development of a comprehensive framework of OR for KT in the context of CC. DATA SOURCES We conducted a systematic review of the literature on OR for KT in CC using Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Sciences (SCI and SSCI), and others. Search terms included readiness; commitment and change; preparedness; willing to change; organization and administration; and health and social services. STUDY SELECTION The search was limited to studies that had been published between the starting date of each bibliographic database (e.g., 1964 for PubMed) and November 1, 2012. Only papers that refer to a theory, a theoretical component from any framework or model on OR that were applicable to the healthcare domain were considered. We analyzed data using conceptual mapping. DATA EXTRACTION Pairs of authors independently screened the published literature by reviewing their titles and abstracts. Then, the two same reviewers appraised the full text of each study independently. RESULTS Overall, we found and synthesized 10 theories, theoretical models and conceptual frameworks relevant to ORC in healthcare described in 38 publications. We identified five core concepts, namely organizational dynamics, change process, innovation readiness, institutional readiness, and personal readiness. We extracted 17 dimensions and 59 sub-dimensions related to these 5 concepts. CONCLUSION Our findings provide a useful overview for researchers interested in ORC and aims to create a consensus on the core theoretical components of ORC in general and of OR for KT in CC in particular. However, more work is needed to define and validate the core elements of a framework that could help to assess OR for KT in CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randa Attieh
- Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Hôpital St-François D'Assise, 45 rue Leclerc, Québec, (QC), Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
MacFarlane A, Clerkin P, Murray E, Heaney DJ, Wakeling M, Pesola UM, Waterworth EL, Larsen F, Makiniemi M, Winblad I. The e-Health Implementation Toolkit: qualitative evaluation across four European countries. Implement Sci 2011; 6:122. [PMID: 22098945 PMCID: PMC3283514 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2011] [Accepted: 11/19/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation researchers have attempted to overcome the research-practice gap in e-health by developing tools that summarize and synthesize research evidence of factors that impede or facilitate implementation of innovation in healthcare settings. The e-Health Implementation Toolkit (e-HIT) is an example of such a tool that was designed within the context of the United Kingdom National Health Service to promote implementation of e-health services. Its utility in international settings is unknown. METHODS We conducted a qualitative evaluation of the e-HIT in use across four countries--Finland, Norway, Scotland, and Sweden. Data were generated using a combination of interview approaches (n = 22) to document e-HIT users' experiences of the tool to guide decision making about the selection of e-health pilot services and to monitor their progress over time. RESULTS e-HIT users evaluated the tool positively in terms of its scope to organize and enhance their critical thinking about their implementation work and, importantly, to facilitate discussion between those involved in that work. It was easy to use in either its paper- or web-based format, and its visual elements were positively received. There were some minor criticisms of the e-HIT with some suggestions for content changes and comments about its design as a generic tool (rather than specific to sites and e-health services). However, overall, e-HIT users considered it to be a highly workable tool that they found useful, which they would use again, and which they would recommend to other e-health implementers. CONCLUSION The use of the e-HIT is feasible and acceptable in a range of international contexts by a range of professionals for a range of different e-health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne MacFarlane
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Pauline Clerkin
- Discipline of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- e-Health Unit, Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Upper Floor 3, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK
| | - David J Heaney
- Centre for Rural Health, University of Aberdeen, Inverness, UK
| | - Mary Wakeling
- Centre for Rural Health, University of Aberdeen, Inverness, UK
| | | | | | - Frank Larsen
- Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Minna Makiniemi
- Oulu University Hospital, Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District, Oulu, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bergman DA, Beck A. Moving from research to large-scale change in child health care. Acad Pediatr 2011; 11:360-8. [PMID: 21783449 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2011] [Revised: 05/30/2011] [Accepted: 06/05/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
There is a large and persistent failure to achieve widespread dissemination of evidence-based practices in child health care. Too often studies demonstrating evidence for effective child health care practices are not brought to scale and across different settings and populations. This failure is not due to a lack of knowledge, but rather a failure to bring to bear proven methods in dissemination, diffusion, and implementation (DD&I) science that target the translation of evidence-based medicine to everyday practice. DD&I science offers a framework and a set of tools to identify innovations that are likely to be implemented, and provides methods to better understand the capabilities and preferences of individuals and organizations and the social networks within these organizations that help facilitate widespread adoption. Successful DD&I is dependent on making the intervention context sensitive without losing fidelity to the core components of the intervention. The achievement of these goals calls for new research methods such as pragmatic research trials that combine hypothesis testing with quality improvement, participatory research that engages the target community at the beginning of research design, and other quasi-experimental designs. With the advent of health care reform, it will be extremely important to ensure that the ensuing large demonstration projects that are designed to increase integrated care and better control costs can be rapidly brought to scale across different practices settings, and health plans and will be able to achieve effectiveness in diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Bergman
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California , USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|