TargetPlex FFPE-Direct DNA Library Preparation Kit for SiRe NGS panel: an international performance evaluation study

Biologics for novel driver altered non-small cell lung cancer: potential and pitfalls

Precision medicine has revolutionized clinical paradigm of lung cancer (LC) patients optimizing therapeutical options on the basis of molecular fingerprinting of tumor cells. The advent of the genomic era contributed to the widespread diffusion of sequencing technologies laying the basis for the approval of an increasing number of clinically relevant predictive biomarkers in clinical settings. In the rapidly evolving scenario of predictive biomarkers, mandatory testing genes demonstrated a statistically significant clinical benefit in LC patients elected to molecular tests, but emerging biomarkers are under investigation to raise the bar in the clinical management of LC patients. To date, promising IHC-based predictive biomarkers emerged as potentially integrative tools in the panel of clinically approved biomarkers. On this basis, genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data are gaining ground toward "3D" biology" supporting the need of a multidimensional analysis of tumor cells to clinically stratify LC patients. Here we sought to overview the most promising biomarkers investigated in clinical trials to be integrated into diagnostic panel of predictive biomarkers tools for NSCLC patients.

Recent advances in the use of liquid biopsy for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In the era of precision medicine, liquid biopsy rapidly emerges as an integrative diagnostic tool to successfully stratify solid tumor patients in accordance with molecular fingerprinting. As the matter of fact, a plethora of analytes may be isolated from liquid biosources supporting the potential application of liquid biopsy in several clinical scenarios. Despite this promising role, liquid biopsy is drastically affected by low abundance of analytes in biological matrix requiring highly sensitive technologies, trained personnel, and optimized diagnostic procedures to successfully administrate this revolutionary diagnostic tool in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to investigate the recent advancements in technical approaches available to manage liquid biopsy samples, particularly focusing on their application in LC diagnosis and treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

The rapidly evolving scenario of liquid biopsy-based approaches is revolutionizing clinical administration of lung cancer patients. Of note, the integration of genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic markers lays the basis for 'comprehensive' molecular fingerprinting of lung cancer patients. Here, the next-generation technologies are fundamental in molecular profiling in diagnostic routine biofluids.

Clinical utility of ctDNA by amplicon based next generation sequencing in first line non small cell lung cancer patients

The assessment of ctDNA has emerged as a minimally invasive avenue for molecular diagnosis and real-time tracking of tumor progression in NSCLC. However, the evaluation of ctDNA by amplicon-based NGS has been not endorsed by all the healthcare systems and remains to be fully integrated into clinical routine practice. To compare tissue single-gene with plasma multiplexed testing, we retrospectively evaluated 120 plasma samples from 12 consecutive patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who were part of a prospective study enrolling treatment-naïve patients and in which tissue samples were evaluated using a single-gene testing approach. While the plasma ctDNA detection of EGFR and BRAF mutations had an acceptable level of concordance with the archival tissue (85%), discordance was seen in all the patients in whom ALK alterations were only detected in tissue samples. Among six responders and six non-responders, early ctDNA mutant allelic frequency (MAF) reduction seemed to predict radiologic responses and longer survival, whereas increasing MAF values with the emergence of co-mutations like BRAFV600E, KRASG12V or TP53M237I seemed to be an early indicator of molecular and radiologic progression. This report using an amplicon-based NGS assay on ctDNA underscores the real-life need for plasma and tissue genotyping as complementary tools in the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process.

Theranostic biomarkers and PARP-inhibitors effectiveness in patients with non-BRCA associated homologous recombination deficient tumors: Still looking through a dirty glass window?

Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 (BRCA2) deleterious variants were the first and, still today, the main biomarkers of poly(ADP)ribose polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors (PARPis) benefit. The recent, increased, numbers of individuals referred for counseling and multigene panel testing, and the remarkable expansion of approved PARPis, not restricted to BRCA1/BRCA2-Pathogenic Variants (PVs), produced a strong clinical need for non-BRCA biomarkers. Significant limitations of the current testing and assays exist. The different approaches that identify the causes of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD), such as the germline and somatic Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) gene PVs, the testing showing its consequences, such as the genomic scars, or the novel functional assays such as the RAD51 foci testing, are not interchangeable, and should not be considered as substitutes for each other in clinical practice for guiding use of PARPi in non-BRCA, HRD-associated tumors. Today, the deeper knowledge on the significant relationship among all proteins involved in the HRR, not limited to BRCA, expands the possibility of a successful non-BRCA, HRD-PARPi synthetic lethality and, at the same time, reinforces the need for enhanced definition of HRD biomarkers predicting the magnitude of PARPi benefit.

Next-generation sequencing in breast pathology: real impact on routine practice over a decade since its introduction

The diagnosis, histomolecular classes of breast cancers (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal-like), and accurate prediction of prognosis are commonly determined using morphological and phenotypical analyses in clinical practice worldwide. Therapeutic strategies are mostly based on the disease stage and molecular subclasses of breast cancer. Targeted therapies, such as anti-HER2s, poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors or, to a lesser extent, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase inhibitors, have substantially improved breast cancer patient prognosis over the past decades. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is widely determined based on immunohistochemistry, while next-generation sequencing (NGS) is currently employed to assess the presence of molecular alterations, including breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) and 2 or phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations, which are targets of these new approved therapies. In addition, next-generation sequencing (NGS) can aid the pathologist in challenging situations, such as a diagnostic workup for a metastatic carcinoma in lymph nodes of unknown origin, differential diagnosis of spindle cell tumourtumor in the breast between metaplastic carcinoma, malignant PT and sarcoma, o, as well as determining relatedness between primary breast cancers and recurrences. NGS offers a powerful tool that enables the pathologist to combine morphological analyses together with molecular alterations in challenging diagnostic situations.

Trans-Renal Cell-Free Tumor DNA for Urine-Based Liquid Biopsy of Cancer

Cancer biomarkers are a promising tool for cancer detection, personalization of therapy, and monitoring of treatment response or recurrence. “Liquid biopsy” commonly refers to minimally invasive or non-invasive sampling of a bodily fluid (i.e., blood, urine, saliva) for detection of cancer biomarkers such as circulating tumor cells or cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA). These methods offer a means to collect frequent tumor assessments without needing surgical biopsies. Despite much progress with blood-based liquid biopsy approaches, there are limitations—including the limited amount of blood that can be drawn from a person and challenges with collecting blood samples at frequent intervals to capture ctDNA biomarker kinetics. These limitations are important because ctDNA is present at extremely low levels in plasma and there is evidence that measuring ctDNA biomarker kinetics over time can be useful for clinical prediction. Additionally, blood-based assays require access to trained phlebotomists and often a trip to a healthcare facility. In contrast, urine is a body fluid that can be self-collected from a patient’s home, at frequent intervals, and mailed to a laboratory for analysis. Multiple reports indicate that fragments of ctDNA pass from the bloodstream through the kidney’s glomerular filtration system into the urine, where they are known as trans-renal ctDNA (TR-ctDNA). Accumulating studies indicate that the limitations of blood based ctDNA approaches for cancer can be overcome by measuring TR-ctDNA. Here, we review current knowledge about TR-ctDNA in urine as a cancer biomarker approach, and discuss its clinical potential and open questions in this research field.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Concurrent EGFR Genomic Alterations: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of the Double Dilemma

The molecular pathways which promote lung cancer cell features have been broadly explored, leading to significant improvement in prognostic and diagnostic strategies. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically altered the treatment approach for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Latest investigations by using next-generation sequencing (NGS) have shown that other oncogenic driver mutations, believed mutually exclusive for decades, could coexist in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. However, the exact clinical and pathological role of concomitant genomic aberrations needs to be investigated. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the recent data on the oncogenic role of concurrent genomic alterations, by specifically evaluating the characteristics, the pathological significance, and their potential impact on the treatment approach.

Urine as a Source of Liquid Biopsy for Cancer

Simple Summary

Tissue biopsy is essential for diagnosis and characterization of a tumor. Recently circulating tumor cells and other tumor-derived nucleic acid can be detected from blood, which is called liquid biopsy. Now this concept has been expanded to many other body fluids including urine. Urine is the least invasive method to obtain a liquid biopsy and can be done anywhere, which allows longitudinal repeated sampling. Here, we review the latest update on urine liquid biopsy in urological and non-urological cancers.

Abstract

Tissue biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis and morphological and immunohistochemical analyses to characterize cancer. However, tissue biopsy usually requires an invasive procedure, and it can be challenging depending on the condition of the patient and the location of the tumor. Even liquid biopsy analysis of body fluids such as blood, saliva, gastric juice, sweat, tears and cerebrospinal fluid may require invasive procedures to obtain samples. Liquid biopsy can be applied to circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or nucleic acids (NAs) in blood. Recently, urine has gained popularity due to its less invasive sampling, ability to easily repeat samples, and ability to follow tumor evolution in real-time, making it a powerful tool for diagnosis and treatment monitoring in cancer patients. With the development and advancements in extraction methods of urinary substances, urinary NAs have been found to be closely related to carcinogenesis, metastasis, and therapeutic response, not only in urological cancers but also in non-urological cancers. This review mainly highlights the components of urine liquid biopsy and their utility and limitations in oncology, especially in non-urological cancers.