Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary

Advancements in Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Cancer of Unknown Primary in the Era of Precision Medicine

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP), a set of histologically confirmed metastases that cannot be identified or traced back to its primary despite comprehensive investigations, accounts for 2-5% of all malignancies. CUP is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with a median overall survival (OS) of 3-16 months. CUP has long been challenging to diagnose principally due to the occult properties of primary site. In the current era of molecular diagnostics, advancements in methodologies based on cytology, histology, gene expression profiling (GEP), and genomic and epigenomic analysis have greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy of CUP, surpassing 90%. Our center conducted the world's first phase III trial and demonstrated improved progression-free survival and favorable OS by GEP-guided site-specific treatment of CUP, setting the foundation of site-specific treatment in first-line management for CUP. In this review, we detailed the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, as well as the histologic, genetic, and clinical characteristics of CUP. We also provided an overview of the advancements in the diagnostics and therapeutics of CUP over the past 50 years. Moving forward, we propose optimizing diagnostic modalities and exploring further-line treatment regimens as two focus areas for future studies on CUP.

Diagnosis progress of carcinoma of unknown primary

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is a common and complex type of tumor in clinical practice, where the primary site cannot be determined through conventional diagnostic methods, posing significant challenges for clinical diagnosis and treatment. In recent years, advancements in gene expression profiling and genetic testing technologies have provided new perspectives for CUP research, driving progress in this field. By analyzing gene expression profiles, researchers can more effectively identify the tissue origin of tumors, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy. At the same time, the potential application of genetic testing is continuously being explored, offering new possibilities for personalized treatment. This article aims to discuss the latest advancements in the diagnosis of CUP, analyze the importance of gene expression profiling and genetic testing in tumor origin identification and their clinical applications, and summarize current research progress and future research directions, with the goal of providing a theoretical basis for the early diagnosis and treatment of CUP.

PD-L1 expression associates with favorable survival of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) not treated with checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous entity with limited overall survival (OS) in most patients. Prognostic biomarkers are needed, particularly for treatment stratification. We investigated the impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as prognostic marker in immunotherapy-naïve CUP patients.

METHODS

Clinical data from patients with confirmed CUP diagnosis according to ESMO guidelines, treated at the West German Cancer Center, Essen from 2015 to 2021, were analyzed. Patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors were excluded. PD-L1 expression was assessed in tumor tissues following established guidelines.

RESULTS

Of a cohort of 132 patients, 62 patients, including 30 patients with prognostically unfavorable CUP, met inclusion criteria and were evaluable for PD-L1 expression. Comparing PD-L1 Tumor Proportional Score (TPS) and Combined Positive Score (CPS) revealed almost complete concordance (96.2 %). Patients with PD-L1-positive CUP (TPS ≥1 %; n = 36; 58 %) had superior overall survival (median not reached) as compared to patients with PD-L1-negative CUP (median 14 months, 95 %CI 10.0-18.0; HR 0.3, p < 0.001). The benefit of PD-L1 positivity (n = 12; 40 %) was maintained in the unfavorable CUP subgroup (median 20 months, 95 %CI 3.0-37.0 versus 10 months, 95 %CI 3.1-16.9; HR 0.4, p = 0.032). In PD-L1-positive CUP there was a positive correlation between the level of PD-L1 expression and survival (TPS ≥50 %: median survival not reached, HR 0.1; TPS 1 to 49 %: OS: 77 months, HR 0.4).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression associates with favorable survival in checkpoint inhibitor-naïve CUP patients. This implies a role of cancer immunity in CUP biology and may nominate PD-L1 for patient stratification in further studies and clinical care.

Exploring the molecular landscape of cancer of unknown primary: A comparative analysis with other metastatic cancers

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) tumors are biologically very heterogeneous, which complicates stratification of patients for treatment. Consequently, these patients face limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. With this study, we aim to expand on the current knowledge of CUP biology by analyzing two cohorts: a well-characterized cohort of 44 CUP patients, and 213 metastatic patients with known primary. These cohorts were treated at the same institution and characterized by identical molecular assessments. Through comparative analysis of genomic and transcriptomic data, we found that CUP tumors were characterized by high expression of immune-related genes and pathways compared to other metastatic tumors. Moreover, CUP tumors uniformly demonstrated high levels of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and circulating T cells, indicating a strong immune response. Finally, the genetic landscape of CUP tumors resembled that of other metastatic cancers and demonstrated mutations in established cancer genes. In conclusion, CUP tumors possess a distinct immunophenotype that distinguishes them from other metastatic cancers. These results may suggest an immune response in CUP that facilitates metastatic tumor growth while limiting growth of the primary tumor.

The evolution of molecular management of carcinoma of unknown primary

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is significant need to improve diagnostic and therapeutic options for patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). In this review, we discuss the evolving landscape of molecular profiling in CUP.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular profiling is becoming accepted into the diagnostic work-up of CUP patients with tumour mutation profiling now described in international CUP guidelines. Although tissue-of-origin (ToO) molecular tests utilising gene-expression and DNA methylation have existed some time, their clinical benefit remains unclear. Novel technologies utilising whole genome sequencing and machine learning algorithms are showing promise in determining ToO, however further research is required prior to clinical application. A recent international clinical trial found patients treated with molecularly-guided therapy based on comprehensive-panel DNA sequencing had improved progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone, confirming utility of performing genomic profiling early in the patient journey. Small phase 2 trials have demonstrated that some CUP patients are responsive to immunotherapy, but the best way to select patients for treatment is not clear.

SUMMARY

Management of CUP requires a multifaceted approach incorporating clinical, histopathological, radiological and molecular sequencing results to assist with identifying the likely ToO and clinically actionable genomic alternations. Rapidly identifying a subset of CUP patients who are likely to benefit from site specific therapy, targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy will improve patient outcomes.

Molecularly guided therapy versus chemotherapy after disease control in unfavourable cancer of unknown primary (CUPISCO): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Patients with unfavourable subset cancer of unknown primary (CUP) have a poor prognosis when treated with standard platinum-based chemotherapy. Whether first-line treatment guided by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can improve outcomes is unknown. The CUPISCO trial was designed to inform a molecularly guided treatment strategy to improve outcomes over standard platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, unfavourable, non-squamous CUP. The aim of the trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of molecularly guided therapy (MGT) versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy in these patients. This was to determine whether the inclusion of CGP in the initial diagnostic work-up leads to improved outcomes over the current standard of care. We herein report the primary analysis.

METHODS

CUPISCO was a phase 2, prospective, randomised, open-label, active-controlled, multicentre trial done at 159 sites in 34 countries outside the USA. Patients with central eligibility review-confirmed disease (acceptable histologies included adenocarcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, evaluated by CGP, who reached disease control after three cycles of standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 3:1 via a block-stratified randomisation procedure to MGT versus chemotherapy continuation for at least three further cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03498521, and follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

From July 10, 2018, to Dec 9, 2022, 636 (42%) of 1505 screened patients were enrolled. Median follow-up in the treatment period was 24·1 months (IQR 11·6-35·6). Of 438 patients who reached disease control after induction chemotherapy, 436 were randomly assigned: 326 (75%) to the MGT group and 110 (25%) to the chemotherapy group. Median progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 6·1 months (95% CI 4·7-6·5) in the MGT group versus 4·4 months (4·1-5·6) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·56-0·92]; p=0·0079). Related adverse event rates per 100-patient-years at risk were generally similar or lower with MGT versus chemotherapy.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with previously untreated, unfavourable, non-squamous CUP who reached disease control after induction chemotherapy, CGP with subsequent MGTs resulted in longer progression-free survival than standard platinum-based chemotherapy. On the basis of these results, we recommend that CGP is performed at initial diagnosis in patients with unfavourable CUP.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Comprehensive biomarker diagnostics of unfavorable cancer of unknown primary to identify patients eligible for precision medical therapies

PURPOSE

Current guidelines recommend combination chemotherapy for treatment of patients with unfavorable cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Biomarker-guided targeted therapies may offer additional benefit. Data on the feasibility and effectiveness of comprehensive genomic biomarker profiling of CUP in a standard clinical practice setting are limited.

METHODS

This analysis included 156 patients with confirmed unfavorable CUP diagnosis according to ESMO guidelines, who were treated at the West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany, from 2015 to 2021. Clinical parameters and outcome data were retrieved from the electronic hospital information system. Genomic biomarker analyses were performed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue whenever possible using the QIAseq Multimodal-Pancancer-Panel.

RESULTS

Non-squamous histologies, high tumor burden, and age above 60 years associated with poor survival outcome. Tissue availability restricted comprehensive biomarker analyses to 50 patients (32%), reflecting a major limitation in the real-world setting. In those patients a total of 24 potentially actionable alterations were identified in 17 patients (34% of profiled patients, 11% of total population). The most prevalent biomarkers were high tumor mutational burden and BRCA-mutations.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting precision medicine for patients with CUP is severely restricted by tissue availability, and a limited spectrum of actionable alterations. Progress for patients may require emphasizing the need for sufficient biopsies, and prospective exploration of blood-based biomarker profiling.

Advances in Cancer Research: Current and Future Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies

Cancers of unknown primary (CUP) exhibit significant cellular heterogeneity and malignancy, which poses significant challenges for diagnosis and treatment. Recent years have seen deeper insights into the imaging, pathology, and genetic characteristics of CUP, driven by interdisciplinary collaboration and the evolution of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. However, due to their insidious onset, lack of evidence-based medicine, and limited clinical understanding, diagnosing and treating CUP remain a significant challenge. To inspire more creative and fantastic research, herein, we report and highlight recent advances in the diagnosis and therapeutic strategies of CUP. Specifically, we discuss advanced diagnostic technologies, including 12-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) or 68Ga-FAPI (fibroblast activation protein inhibitor) PET/CT, liquid biopsy, molecular diagnostics, self-assembling nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence (AI). In particular, the discussion will extend to the effective treatment techniques currently available, such as targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and bio-nanotechnology-based therapeutics. Finally, a novel perspective on the challenges and directions for future CUP diagnostic and therapeutic strategies is discussed.

2-Year survival benefit from immunotherapy for squamous cell cancer with cancer of unknown primary in mediastinum: a case report

Cancers of unknown primary (CUP) account for 2%-5% of all diagnosed cancers and are always characterized with fast-paced aggression, early metastasis, and unpredictable spread patterns Mediastinum metastasis with unknown primary origin is extremely rare and with a poor prognosis and short survival. There is no literature to refer to for its treatment. Here, we reported a case of squamous cell CUP in the mediastinum. A 50-year-old male patient was admitted after multi-line treatment of low differentiated squamous cell carcinoma in the mediastinum diagnosed 8 months before. In August 2019, the patient went to a local hospital for cough and dyspnea for 2 weeks. Then, he was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary origin with multiple lymph nodes metastasis. The patient was featured with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression strongly positive in 90% of tumor cells and the combined positive score of 90 and a tumor mutation burden of 1.79 MUts/Mb and microsatellite stable phenotype. The patient was treated with anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibodies in combination with chemotherapy and responded to the treatment. The patient showed stable disease to multi-line immunotherapy for more than 7 months and finally got a clinical benefit of 2-year survival benefit. In conclusion, immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with chemotherapy may play a crucial role in the later-line treatment and palliative care of CUP.