Brain metastasis and survival outcomes after first-line therapy in metastatic melanoma: a multicenter DeCOG study on 1704 patients from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG

Improved Survival and Prognostication in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases: An Update of the Melanoma Graded Prognostic Assessment

PURPOSE

Survival for patients with melanoma has recently improved. The propensity of melanoma to metastasize to the brain remains a common and serious feature of this disease. The purposes of this study were to evaluate prognostic factors for patients with newly diagnosed melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) in a large cohort treated with modern multimodal therapies, compare those results with those in prior eras, and update the Melanoma Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA).

METHODS

Univariable and multivariable (MVA) analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival were performed on 1,796 patients with newly diagnosed MBM treated between January 01, 2015, and December 31, 2021, using a multi-institutional retrospective database. Multiple imputation was used to address missingness of potential predictors. Significant variables in combined MVA were used to update the Melanoma GPA. Comparisons were made with legacy cohorts.

RESULTS

Median survivals for cohorts A (1985-2007, n = 481), B (2006-2015, n = 823), and C (2015-2021, n = 1,796) were 6.7, 9.8, and 16.6 months and median follow-up times were 40.1, 43.6, and 48.8 months, respectively. In combined MVA, significant prognostic factors for survival were higher Karnofsky Performance Status, fewer MBMs, absence of extracranial metastases, lower serum lactate dehydrogenase, and no immunotherapy before MBM. These factors were incorporated into the updated Melanoma GPA. The combined median and 3-year survivals for patients with GPA 0-1, 1.5-2, and 2.5-4.0 were 5.4, 13.2, and 43.2 months and 12.4%, 28.8%, and 51.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Prognostic factors have changed and survival has improved for patients with MBM but varies widely by GPA. The updated Melanoma GPA calculator (BrainMetGPA), available free online, can be used to estimate survival, individualize treatment, stratify clinical trials, guide surveillance, and augment clinical trial eligibility. Multidisciplinary treatment is essential. Trials are needed to elucidate the optimal sequencing of various therapeutic modalities.

Timing of brain metastases in relation to outcome during first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy for metastatic melanoma in a community oncology practice

PURPOSE

Patients with metastatic melanoma frequently develop brain metastases. Due to recent advances in melanoma therapy, we evaluated the timing of brain metastases diagnosis in relation to outcome during melanoma immunotherapy.

METHODS

Patients who received 1st -line treatment with ipilimumab plus nivolumab for metastatic melanoma were identified via a database search. Patient characteristics and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 73 patients that met study criteria, 20 patients developed brain metastases (27.4%). Of these 20 patients, 14 had brain metastases at diagnosis of metastatic disease, Only 6 progressed in the brain following immunotherapy. All but one patient with brain metastases at diagnosis were symptomatic. Following immunotherapy, 4/15 (all with BRAF V600E mutations) achieved complete remissions and prolonged survival. Each of these patients was able to undergo elective treatment discontinuation. One additional patient developed stable disease. Delayed brain metastases proved to be infrequent (6/59 patients). Delayed brain metastases were always diagnosed within the first 15 months of treatment. Five of these 6 patients died, with a median progression-free survival of only 2.1 months.

CONCLUSION

Brain metastases frequently complicated the course of metastatic melanoma. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases at diagnosis had a potential for durable remissions following multidisciplinary treatment, particularly if a BRAF V600E mutation was present. This included 2 of 10 patients who were on steroid treatment prior to the start of immunotherapy. Treatment with combination immunotherapy seemed to reduce the development of subsequent brain metastases. Patients who developed delayed brain metastases had a very poor outlook, despite attempted salvage therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is associated with a decreased risk of developing melanoma brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advancements in metastatic melanoma treatment, the emergence of melanoma brain metastases (MBM) continues to pose a challenge. This study aimed to explore factors associated with MBM development.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma (unresectable stages III and IV [M1a-c]) between 2013 and 2019 at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Differences in baseline and primary tumor characteristics, mutational status, biomarker levels, and first-line treatment between patients who developed MBM (BM+) and patients who did not develop MBM (BM-) were analyzed using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULT

Of 395 patients, 91 subsequently developed MBM. Patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as first-line treatment had a reduced risk of MBM development (p ≤ 0.001). None of the eleven patients who received CTLA-4 inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination with PD-1 inhibitors as first-line treatment developed brain metastases. Elevated plasma levels of S100B (p = 0.021) and higher metastatic stage (p = 0.047) were also associated with an increased risk of MBM development.

CONCLUSION

ICI treatment is associated with a decreased risk of MBM development, suggesting a protective role. Elevated S100B levels and stage IV disease at advanced melanoma diagnosis might indicate an increased risk of MBM development.

Sequencing of Checkpoint or BRAF/MEK Inhibitors on Brain Metastases in Melanoma

BACKGROUND

The impact of the order of treatment with checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors on the development of brain metastases in patients with metastatic unresectable BRAFV600-mutant melanoma is unknown. The SECOMBIT trial examined the impact of the order of receipt of these treatments in such patients.

METHODS

In this three-arm trial, we reviewed patients without brain metastases who received the BRAF/MEK inhibitors encorafenib and binimetinib until they had progressive disease followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab and nivolumab (arm A); or treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by encorafenib and binimetinib (arm B); or treatment with encorafenib and binimetinib for 8 weeks followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by retreatment with encorafenib arm binimetinib (arm C).

RESULTS

Brain metastases were discovered during the trial in 23/69 patients in arm A, 11/69 in arm B, and 9/68 in arm C. At a median follow-up of 56 months, the 60-month brain metastases-free survival rates were 56% for arm A, 80% for arm B (hazard ratio [HR] vs. A: 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.58), and 85% for arm C (HR vs. A: 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma, the treatment sequence of immune checkpoint inhibition followed by BRAF/MEK inhibitors was associated with longer periods of new brain metastases-free survival than the reverse sequence. A regimen in which immune checkpoint inhibition was sandwiched between BRAF/MEK inhibition also appeared to be protective against brain metastases. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02631447.).

Predictive Impact of Tumor Mutational Burden on Real-World Outcomes of First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Melanoma

PURPOSE

The choice of threshold and reliability of high tumor mutational burden (TMB) to predict outcomes and guide treatment choice for patients with metastatic melanoma receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in the real world is not well known.

METHODS

Using a deidentified nationwide (US-based) melanoma clinicogenomic database, we identified a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma (N = 497) who received first-line monotherapy anti-PD-1 (n = 240) or dual anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 ICI (n = 257) and had a tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling test TMB score.

RESULTS

TMB-high (TMB-H; ≥10 mutations per megabase [muts/Mb], n = 352, 71%) was independently predictive of superior real-world progression-free survival and overall survival versus TMB-low (<10 mut/Mb, n = 145, 29%) in both mono ICI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.63]; P < .001; HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.41 to 0.90]; P = .01, respectively) and dual ICI (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.90]; P = .009; HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.88]; P = .007, respectively) patients. Dual ICI offered no significant advantage in BRAFwt patients and unexpectedly demonstrated greatest benefit in the TMB 10-19 mut/Mb group, identifying a TMB-very high (≥20 mut/Mb, n = 247, 50%) BRAFmut patient subgroup for whom mono ICI may be preferable.

CONCLUSION

TMB-H predicts superior outcomes on ICI while coassessment of BRAF status and TMB may inform first-line regimen choice.

Brain metastases and next-generation anticancer therapies: a survival guide for clinicians

Historically, patients with brain metastases (BMs) have been characterized by few systemic treatment options and poor prognosis. The recent introduction of next-generation anticancer therapies such as molecular targeted agents and immunotherapy have revolutionized the clinical decision-making process of this sub-population, posing new challenges to physicians. In this review, current evidence for the use of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in patients with BMs are discussed, with a focus on lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, providing suggestions and potential workflows for daily clinical practice. Several other on-going and future challenges, such as clinical trials design, ways to improve CNS penetration of novel drugs and unique molecular characteristics of BMs, are also discussed. The aim is producing an updated and easy-to-read guide for physicians, to improve decision-making in clinical practice.

Immunotherapy Combined with Radiation in Malignant Melanoma without BRAF Mutations Brain Metastases-Favorable Response after Immunotherapy Continued beyond Progression

We present the case of a patient who was diagnosed in 2018 with nodular Malignant Melanoma (MM) without BRAF V 600 mutations stage 3 C (pT4b pN1a M0), and who underwent adjuvant citokines treatment with Interferon alpha 2b-48 weeks. Immunotherapy was initiated in January 2021 for lung and lymph node metastases. In June 2021, there was a partial response of the lung and lymph node metastases, but there was also progression to brain metastases. Immunotherapy was continued and Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) was performed. In September 2023, the imaging investigations revealed a favorable response, with no lesions suggestive of secondary determinations. The combination of Radiotherapy (RT) and Immunotherapy (IT) with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) has an abscopal effect. There is a coordinated action in the combination of RT and IT in order to obtain a common result, with the antitumor effect being greater than if RT or IT acted separately.

Cutaneous melanoma

Cutaneous melanoma is a malignancy arising from melanocytes of the skin. Incidence rates are rising, particularly in White populations. Cutaneous melanoma is typically driven by exposure to ultraviolet radiation from natural sunlight and indoor tanning, although there are several subtypes that are not related to ultraviolet radiation exposure. Primary melanomas are often darkly pigmented, but can be amelanotic, with diagnosis based on a combination of clinical and histopathological findings. Primary melanoma is treated with wide excision, with margins determined by tumour thickness. Further treatment depends on the disease stage (following histopathological examination and, where appropriate, sentinel lymph node biopsy) and can include surgery, checkpoint immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy. Systemic drug therapies are recommended as an adjunct to surgery in patients with resectable locoregional metastases and are the mainstay of treatment in advanced melanoma. Management of advanced melanoma is complex, particularly in those with cerebral metastasis. Multidisciplinary care is essential. Systemic drug therapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have substantially increased melanoma survival following a series of landmark approvals from 2011 onward.