Are patents for methods of medical treatment contrary to the ordre public and morality or "generally inconvenient"?

Pharmaceutical patenting and the transformation of American medical ethics

The attitudes of physicians and drug manufacturers in the US toward patenting pharmaceuticals changed dramatically from the mid-nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth. Formerly, physicians and reputable manufacturers argued that pharmaceutical patents prioritized profit over the advancement of medical science. Reputable manufactures refused to patent their goods and most physicians shunned patented products. However, moving into the early twentieth century, physicians and drug manufacturers grew increasingly comfortable with the idea of pharmaceutical patents. In 1912, for example, the American Medical Association dropped the prohibition on physicians holding medical patents. Shifts in wider patenting cultures therefore transformed the ethical sensibilities of physicians.

Nonprofit drugs as the salvation of the world's healthcare systems: the case of Antabuse (disulfiram)

The effort to repurpose old drugs for new uses is not sufficient; even drugs that have been used clinically for decades must undergo expensive clinical trials. This process requires the pharmaceutical industry to fund the repatenting of old drugs. Because inexpensive drugs are necessary for people around the world, attempts should be made to develop nonprofit drugs through clinical trials of generic drugs that are funded by governments and charities. Evidence supports the use the old anti-alcoholic drug Antabuse as a new nonprofit drug for cancer.