1
|
Pierron L, Tezenas du Montcel S, Heinzmann A, Coarelli G, Héron D, Heide S, Herson A, Hennessy J, Petit E, Gargiulo M, Durr A. Reproductive choices and intrafamilial communication in neurogenetic diseases with different self-estimated severities. J Med Genet 2023; 60:346-351. [PMID: 36270767 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low uptake of presymptomatic testing and medically assisted reproduction in families impacted by neurogenetic diseases prompted us to investigate how reproductive options are considered and whether there is a relationship with perceived severity of the disease. We hypothesised that self-estimated severity would influence opinion on reproductive options and that prenatal/preimplantation diagnosis would be a motivation to inform relatives about their risk. METHODS We invited people impacted by neurogenetic diseases to evaluate the severity of their familial disease using analogic visual scales and to answer questionnaires about reproductive choices and intrafamilial communication. We compared answers between diseases and with the perceived severity of each disease. RESULTS We analysed 562 questionnaires. Participants were impacted by Huntington disease (n=307), spinocerebellar ataxias (n=114), Steinert myotonic dystrophy (n=82) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia (n=59). Self-estimated severity differed between pathologies (p<0.0001). Overall, participants considered prenatal diagnosis (78.0±34.4 out of 100) and preimplantation diagnosis (75.2±36.1 out of 100) justified more than termination of pregnancy (68.6±38.5 out of 100). They were less in favour of gamete donation (48.3±39.8 out of 100) or pregnancy abstention (43.3±40.3 out of 100). The greater the perceived severity of the disease, the more reproductive options were considered justified, except for gamete donation. Prenatal/preimplantation diagnosis was a motivation to inform relatives for only 55.3% of participants (p=0.01). CONCLUSION Self-estimated severity minimally impacts opinions towards reproductive options. Medically assisted reproduction procedures are rarely sought and do not motivate familial communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Pierron
- Genetics Department, University Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Tezenas du Montcel
- Institut Pierre Louis de Santé Publique, Medical Information Unit, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université and Paris Brain Institute, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Pitié- Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Anna Heinzmann
- Genetics Department, University Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université and Paris Brain Institute, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Pitié- Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Giulia Coarelli
- Genetics Department, University Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université and Paris Brain Institute, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Pitié- Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Delphine Héron
- Genetics Department, University Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Solveig Heide
- Genetics Department, University Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Ariane Herson
- Genetics Department, University Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Juliette Hennessy
- Sorbonne Université and Paris Brain Institute, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Pitié- Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Elodie Petit
- Genetics Department, University Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université and Paris Brain Institute, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Pitié- Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Marcela Gargiulo
- Genetics Department, University Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Laboratoire de Psychologie Clinique, Psychopathologie, Psychanalyse, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Alexandra Durr
- Genetics Department, University Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université and Paris Brain Institute, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Pitié- Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
When does Huntington disease begin? Rev Neurol (Paris) 2022; 178:422-425. [PMID: 35597611 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
3
|
Amador MDM, Gargiulo M, Boucher C, Herson A, Staraci S, Salachas F, Clot F, Cazeneuve C, Le Ber I, Durr A. Who and Why? Requests for Presymptomatic Genetic Testing for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/Frontotemporal Dementia vs Huntington Disease. NEUROLOGY-GENETICS 2020; 7:e538. [PMID: 33376800 PMCID: PMC7768924 DOI: 10.1212/nxg.0000000000000538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective We aimed to describe the population of subjects seeking presymptomatic counseling for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and/or frontotemporal dementia (ALS/FTD) and compared them with those demanding the well-established presymptomatic test for Huntington disease (HD). Methods We retrospectively examined the requests of a cohort of individuals at risk of familial ALS/FTD and 1 at risk of HD over the same time frame of 11 years. The individuals were seen in the referral center of our neurogenetics unit. Results Of the 106 presymptomatic testing (PT) requests from subjects at risk of ALS/FTD, 65% were seen in the last 3 years. Over two-thirds of the subjects were at risk of carrying mutations responsible for ALS, FTD, or both. Sixty-two percent of the subjects came from families with a known hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72. During the same period, we counseled 840 subjects at risk of HD. Subjects at risk of ALS/FTD had the presymptomatic test significantly sooner after being aware of their risk, but were older than those at risk of HD. The youngest subjects requesting the test had the highest disease load in the family (p < 0.05). Conclusions Demands for PT for ALS/FTD have been increasingly growing, particularly since the discovery of the C9ORF72 gene. The major specificity of the genetic counseling for these diseases is the unpredictability of the clinical phenotype for most of the genes involved. Awareness of this added uncertainty does not prevent individuals from taking the test, as the dropout rate is not higher than that for HD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Del Mar Amador
- Maria del Mar Amador, Département de Neurologie (M.d.M.A., F.S.), Centre de Référence SLA de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Département de Génétique (M.d.M.A., M.G., C.B., A.H., S.S., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Laboratory of Clinical Psychology (M.G.), Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis PCPP, EA 4056, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris City, Psychology Institute, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Département de Génétique (F.C., C.C.), UF de Neurogénétique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Centre de Référence des Démences Rares ou Précoces (I.L.B.), IM2A, Département de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; and Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) (I.L.B., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Marcela Gargiulo
- Maria del Mar Amador, Département de Neurologie (M.d.M.A., F.S.), Centre de Référence SLA de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Département de Génétique (M.d.M.A., M.G., C.B., A.H., S.S., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Laboratory of Clinical Psychology (M.G.), Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis PCPP, EA 4056, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris City, Psychology Institute, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Département de Génétique (F.C., C.C.), UF de Neurogénétique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Centre de Référence des Démences Rares ou Précoces (I.L.B.), IM2A, Département de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; and Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) (I.L.B., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Christilla Boucher
- Maria del Mar Amador, Département de Neurologie (M.d.M.A., F.S.), Centre de Référence SLA de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Département de Génétique (M.d.M.A., M.G., C.B., A.H., S.S., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Laboratory of Clinical Psychology (M.G.), Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis PCPP, EA 4056, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris City, Psychology Institute, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Département de Génétique (F.C., C.C.), UF de Neurogénétique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Centre de Référence des Démences Rares ou Précoces (I.L.B.), IM2A, Département de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; and Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) (I.L.B., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Ariane Herson
- Maria del Mar Amador, Département de Neurologie (M.d.M.A., F.S.), Centre de Référence SLA de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Département de Génétique (M.d.M.A., M.G., C.B., A.H., S.S., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Laboratory of Clinical Psychology (M.G.), Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis PCPP, EA 4056, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris City, Psychology Institute, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Département de Génétique (F.C., C.C.), UF de Neurogénétique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Centre de Référence des Démences Rares ou Précoces (I.L.B.), IM2A, Département de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; and Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) (I.L.B., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Staraci
- Maria del Mar Amador, Département de Neurologie (M.d.M.A., F.S.), Centre de Référence SLA de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Département de Génétique (M.d.M.A., M.G., C.B., A.H., S.S., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Laboratory of Clinical Psychology (M.G.), Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis PCPP, EA 4056, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris City, Psychology Institute, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Département de Génétique (F.C., C.C.), UF de Neurogénétique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Centre de Référence des Démences Rares ou Précoces (I.L.B.), IM2A, Département de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; and Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) (I.L.B., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - François Salachas
- Maria del Mar Amador, Département de Neurologie (M.d.M.A., F.S.), Centre de Référence SLA de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Département de Génétique (M.d.M.A., M.G., C.B., A.H., S.S., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Laboratory of Clinical Psychology (M.G.), Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis PCPP, EA 4056, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris City, Psychology Institute, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Département de Génétique (F.C., C.C.), UF de Neurogénétique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Centre de Référence des Démences Rares ou Précoces (I.L.B.), IM2A, Département de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; and Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) (I.L.B., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Fabienne Clot
- Maria del Mar Amador, Département de Neurologie (M.d.M.A., F.S.), Centre de Référence SLA de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Département de Génétique (M.d.M.A., M.G., C.B., A.H., S.S., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Laboratory of Clinical Psychology (M.G.), Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis PCPP, EA 4056, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris City, Psychology Institute, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Département de Génétique (F.C., C.C.), UF de Neurogénétique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Centre de Référence des Démences Rares ou Précoces (I.L.B.), IM2A, Département de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; and Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) (I.L.B., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Cazeneuve
- Maria del Mar Amador, Département de Neurologie (M.d.M.A., F.S.), Centre de Référence SLA de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Département de Génétique (M.d.M.A., M.G., C.B., A.H., S.S., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Laboratory of Clinical Psychology (M.G.), Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis PCPP, EA 4056, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris City, Psychology Institute, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Département de Génétique (F.C., C.C.), UF de Neurogénétique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Centre de Référence des Démences Rares ou Précoces (I.L.B.), IM2A, Département de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; and Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) (I.L.B., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Le Ber
- Maria del Mar Amador, Département de Neurologie (M.d.M.A., F.S.), Centre de Référence SLA de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Département de Génétique (M.d.M.A., M.G., C.B., A.H., S.S., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Laboratory of Clinical Psychology (M.G.), Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis PCPP, EA 4056, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris City, Psychology Institute, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Département de Génétique (F.C., C.C.), UF de Neurogénétique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Centre de Référence des Démences Rares ou Précoces (I.L.B.), IM2A, Département de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; and Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) (I.L.B., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Durr
- Maria del Mar Amador, Département de Neurologie (M.d.M.A., F.S.), Centre de Référence SLA de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Département de Génétique (M.d.M.A., M.G., C.B., A.H., S.S., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Laboratory of Clinical Psychology (M.G.), Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis PCPP, EA 4056, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris City, Psychology Institute, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Département de Génétique (F.C., C.C.), UF de Neurogénétique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Centre de Référence des Démences Rares ou Précoces (I.L.B.), IM2A, Département de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; and Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) (I.L.B., A.D.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pierron L, Hennessy J, Tezenas du Montcel S, Coarelli G, Heinzmann A, Schaerer E, Herson A, Petit E, Gargiulo M, Durr A. Informing about genetic risk in families with Huntington disease: comparison of attitudes across two decades. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 29:672-679. [PMID: 33299145 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-00776-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The low uptake of presymptomatic testing in Huntington disease prompted us to question family members on how they handle the transmission of information regarding genetic risk. We hypothesised that in 2019, parents would inform their at-risk children about their genetic risk more and at a younger age than in 2000, given the availability of prenatal diagnosis, French legislation changes since 2011, and recent therapeutic advances. We made a questionnaire available about the transmission of genetic information within families with Huntington disease in 2000 and 2019. We obtained 443 questionnaires (295 in 2019 and 148 in 2000). Participants were mainly at-risk for Huntington disease (n = 113), affected (n = 85), and spouses (n = 154). In 2019, participants had a higher mean education level (p < 0.01) and a mean age of 44.1 ± 15.1 years (vs 48.1 ± 11.4 years in 2000, p < 0.01). They had been informed about the risk of being a carrier at around 30 years of age (29.0 ± 14.2 in 2019 vs 32.2 ± 13.8 in 2000, p = 0.09). However, they would inform at an earlier age (≤18 years, 67% vs 59%, p = 0.16). Information on transmission risk had been given primarily by parents (45% vs 30%, p = 0.06). In addition, genetic testing for relatives unaware of their status was recommended more frequently in 2019 (46% vs 32%, p < 0.001). Respondents in 2019 recommended genetic testing more often but overall attitudes towards information and testing have not changed significantly over the 19-year time period since the questionnaire was first delivered even despite recent clinical trials potential disease modifying therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Pierron
- AP-HP, Department of Genetics, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Juliette Hennessy
- Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Tezenas du Montcel
- Sorbonne Université, Medical Information Unit, AP-HP, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis de Santé Publique, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Giulia Coarelli
- Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Anna Heinzmann
- Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Elodie Schaerer
- AP-HP, Department of Genetics, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.,AP-HP, Institute of Myology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Ariane Herson
- AP-HP, Department of Genetics, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.,AP-HP, Institute of Myology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Elodie Petit
- Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Marcela Gargiulo
- AP-HP, Department of Genetics, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France. .,AP-HP, Institute of Myology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France. .,Université de Paris, Laboratoire de Psychologie Clinique et Psychopathologie, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut de Psychologie, EA 4056, Paris, France.
| | - Alexandra Durr
- Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tillerås KH, Kjoelaas SH, Dramstad E, Feragen KB, von der Lippe C. Psychological reactions to predictive genetic testing for Huntington's disease: A qualitative study. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:1093-1105. [PMID: 32162754 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
There is a lack of qualitative research investigating the experience of individuals at risk for Huntington's disease (HD) during the period prior to undergoing predictive testing, as well as their reaction to the test result. This secondary analysis study aimed to explore the experiences during the predictive testing process of individuals who had been or who were at risk for HD. For the primary study, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. We employed the explorative qualitative design for this study, which involved 33 individuals who had been or who were at risk for HD. Results indicate that many had been anticipating the onset of the disease even before they knew their mutation status. Their choice of whether to get tested or not was influenced by personal, social, and practical factors. Whether the test result was positive or negative, coping with the test result was reported to be difficult. Participants with a mutation-negative result felt a need for more follow-up consultations than what they had received. Findings indicate that the decision to undergo predictive testing for HD was not only a personal choice, but was also influenced by both proximal and distant factors. Similar to individuals who tested positive for the mutation, individuals who tested negative for the mutation may need comprehensive follow-up to adapt to the reality of the test result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine H Tillerås
- Centre for Rare Disorders, Oslo University Hospital HF, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siri H Kjoelaas
- Centre for Rare Disorders, Oslo University Hospital HF, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Dramstad
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital HF, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin B Feragen
- Centre for Rare Disorders, Oslo University Hospital HF, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schwartz M, Brandel JP, Babonneau ML, Boucher C, Schaerer E, Haik S, Laplanche JL, Gargiulo M, Durr A. Genetic Testing in Prion Disease: Psychological Consequences of the Decisions to Know or Not to Know. Front Genet 2019; 10:895. [PMID: 31616476 PMCID: PMC6764331 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Presymptomatic testing for susceptibility to genetic prion diseases is often delivered in difficult circumstances, as the index case is often dying when a genetic diagnosis is obtained. Since test requests in these diseases are very rare, the factors underlying decisions of relatives to be tested or not and the long-term psychological consequences are not reported. Methods: We contacted subjects who had consulted between 2004 and 2017 because a relative carried a pathological PRNP variant. Standardized psychological scales and semistructured interviews were proposed. Results: We did contact 19 of the 30 subjects who had consulted: 6 of 10 who did not undergo testing, 10 of 12 noncarriers, and 3 of 8 mutation carriers. Anxiety rates were high and similar between noncarriers and untested subjects. Conclusions: Living in a family with inherited prion disease produced psychological burden, regardless of the decision to undergo testing and its results. Decisions in favor of being testing did not allow relief of anxiety about the family disease. The dilemmatic decision not to know remained a burden to be coped with. Genetic counseling procedures should take into account all these situations, even that of noncarriers and that of untested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Schwartz
- APHP, Department of Genetics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Brandel
- Cellule nationale de référence des maladies de Creutzfeldt-Jakob, APHP, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), AP-HP, Inserm, CNRS, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Marie Lise Babonneau
- APHP, Department of Genetics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Cellule nationale de référence des maladies de Creutzfeldt-Jakob, APHP, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Christilla Boucher
- APHP, Department of Genetics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Elodie Schaerer
- APHP, Department of Genetics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Stephane Haik
- Cellule nationale de référence des maladies de Creutzfeldt-Jakob, APHP, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), AP-HP, Inserm, CNRS, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jean Louis Laplanche
- Cellule nationale de référence des maladies de Creutzfeldt-Jakob, APHP, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Département de Biochimie et biologie moléculaire, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Marcela Gargiulo
- APHP, Department of Genetics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Laboratoire de Psychologie Clinique et Psychopathologie, Institut de Psychologie, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Institut of Myologie, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Durr
- APHP, Department of Genetics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), AP-HP, Inserm, CNRS, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Houdayer F, Putois O, Babonneau ML, Chaumet H, Joly L, Juif C, Michon CC, Staraci S, Cretin E, Delanoue S, Charron P, Chassagne A, Edery P, Gautier E, Lapointe AS, Thauvin-Robinet C, Sanlaville D, Gargiulo M, Faivre L. Secondary findings from next generation sequencing: Psychological and ethical issues. Family and patient perspectives. Eur J Med Genet 2019; 62:103711. [PMID: 31265899 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Access to active search for actionable secondary findings (SF) in diagnostic practice is a major psychological and ethical issue for genomic medicine. In this study, we analyzed the preferences of patients and their families regarding SF and identified the reporting procedures necessary for informed consent. We interviewed parents of patients with undiagnosed rare diseases potentially eligible for exome sequencing and patients affected by the diseases listed in the ACMG recommendations. Four focus groups (FG) were formed: parents of patients with undiagnosed rare diseases (FG1, n = 5); patients with hereditary cancers (FG2, n = 10); patients with hereditary cardiac conditions (FG3, n = 3); and patients with metabolic diseases (FG4, n = 3). Psychologists presented three broad topics for discussion: 1. Favorable or not to SF access, 2. Reporting procedures, 3. Equity of access. Discussions were recorded and analyzed using simplified Grounded Theory. Overall, 8 participants declared being favorable to SF because of the medical benefit (mainly FG1); 11 were unfavorable because of the psychological consequences (mainly FG2, FG3, FG4); 2 were ambivalent. The possibility of looking for SF in minors was debated. The 4 key information-based issues for participants ranked as follows: explanation of SF issues, autonomy of choice, importance of a reflection period, and quality of interactions between patients and professionals. Examining equity of access to SF led to philosophical discussions on quality of life. In conclusion, individual experience and life context (circumstances) were decisive in participants' expectations and fears regarding access to SF. Additional longitudinal studies based on actual SF disclosure announcements are needed to establish future guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Houdayer
- Genetics Department, Reference Centre for Developmental Disorders Centre East, HCL, Bron, France; Université de Paris, PCPP, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - O Putois
- SuLiSoM EA 3071, Univ. Strasbourg, France; Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addictology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - H Chaumet
- Genetics Department, Oncogenetics, HCL, Bron, France
| | - L Joly
- Genetics Department, The Centre of Reference for Rare Diseases East, Dijon University Hospital, France
| | - C Juif
- Genetics Department, The Centre of Reference for Rare Diseases East, Dijon University Hospital, France
| | - C C Michon
- Filière Cardiogen, GH APHP, Paris, France
| | - S Staraci
- Genetics Department, Reference Centre for Hereditary Cardiac Disorders, GH APHP, Paris, France; Clinical Psychology Laboratory, Psychopathology, Psychoanalysis (EA4056), Univ. Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France
| | - E Cretin
- CIC, 1431 INSERM, CHU Besançon, France; Philosophy Laboratory « Logiques de l'Agir » EA2274, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
| | | | - P Charron
- Filière Cardiogen, GH APHP, Paris, France; Genetics Department, Reference Centre for Hereditary Cardiac Disorders, GH APHP, Paris, France
| | - A Chassagne
- CIC, 1431 INSERM, CHU Besançon, France; FHU TRANSLAD, Dijon University Hospital, France
| | - P Edery
- Genetics Department, Reference Centre for Developmental Disorders Centre East, HCL, Bron, France; INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, CRNL, GENDEV Team, Univ. Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Bron, France
| | - E Gautier
- Genetics Department, The Centre of Reference for Rare Diseases East, Dijon University Hospital, France
| | | | - C Thauvin-Robinet
- Genetics Department, The Centre of Reference for Rare Diseases East, Dijon University Hospital, France; FHU TRANSLAD, Dijon University Hospital, France
| | - D Sanlaville
- Genetics Department, Reference Centre for Developmental Disorders Centre East, HCL, Bron, France; INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, CRNL, GENDEV Team, Univ. Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Bron, France
| | - M Gargiulo
- Université de Paris, PCPP, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Institute of Myology, GH APHP, Paris, France
| | - L Faivre
- Genetics Department, The Centre of Reference for Rare Diseases East, Dijon University Hospital, France; FHU TRANSLAD, Dijon University Hospital, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Migliore S, Jankovic J, Squitieri F. Genetic Counseling in Huntington's Disease: Potential New Challenges on Horizon? Front Neurol 2019; 10:453. [PMID: 31114543 PMCID: PMC6503085 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Huntington's disease (HD) is a rare, hereditary, neurodegenerative and dominantly transmitted disorder affecting about 10 out of 100,000 people in Western Countries. The genetic cause is a CAG repeat expansion in the huntingtin gene (HTT), which is unstable and may further increase its length in subsequent generations, so called anticipation. Mutation repeat length coupled with other gene modifiers and environmental factors contribute to the age at onset in the offspring. Considering the unpredictability of age at onset and of clinical prognosis in HD, the accurate interpretation, a proper psychological support and a scientifically sound and compassionate communication of the genetic test result are crucial in the context of Good Clinical Practice and when considering further potential disease-modifying therapies. We discuss various genetic test scenarios that require a particularly careful attention in psychological and genetic counseling and expect that the counseling procedures will require a constant update.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Migliore
- Huntington and Rare Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza Research Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Joseph Jankovic
- Department of Neurology, Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ferdinando Squitieri
- Huntington and Rare Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza Research Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Potier R, Putois O. A Lacanian Approach to Medical Demand, With a Focus on Pediatric Genetics: A Plea for Subjectivization. Front Psychol 2018; 9:2021. [PMID: 30443227 PMCID: PMC6221934 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Current psychological research on contemporary medicine, and in particular genetics, often targets the underpinnings of patients' attitudes and behaviors with respect to biomedical knowledge and healthcare practices. But few studies approach these underpinnings as manifestations of the unconscious, while so doing could (in particular) help understand patients' apparent difficulties to understand information, and to subsequently act accordingly (e.g., in making therapeutic decisions, etc.). We hypothesize that Lacan's (1966) remarks ("The place of psychoanalysis in medicine") on the transferential nature of the demand addressed by the patient (or his family) to the doctor can help account for these issues: demand filters medical information received from the practitioner, and thereby motivates subsequent decisions. In this paper, we try and shed light on this thesis, and focus on pediatric genetics. We start by describing the manifest doctor-patient-family relationship in the pediatric genetics consultation, in order to show where unconscious determinants can come to play a role (1). We then explain Lacan's theory of demand: what the patient unknowingly demands is knowledge (savoir), the object of which is the body of jouissance - the libidinal experience of one's body through the first libidinal exchanges with the Other of early infancy, whereby the subject is assigned by the Other (subjectification) a specific fantasmatic status organizing his desire. Patients' understanding and attitudes thus vary so greatly because of this pre-existing filter. Healing and cure are merely apparent objects of the medical demand, which is an invocative drive seeking knowledge on the cause of one's desire: medical demand is an instance of transference. Doctors should thus enable patient subjectivization, i.e., help them realize that their demand's genuine object lies in their pre-existing subjective coordinates (2). In pediatric genetics, apparently paradoxical family attitudes heavily draw on what G. Raimbault, drawing on Lacan, called implicit demand, the object of which is knowledge about the family fantasy giving shape to the guilt of possibly transmitting the disease. We give a clinical example, then show how the concept of demand helped us elaborate the core of a research project on the subjective effects of a genetic deafblindness handicap (3).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémy Potier
- Centre de Recherches Psychanalyse, Médecine et Société CRPMS (EA 3522), Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Putois
- Université de Strasbourg, SuLiSoM EA 3071, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addictology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lêdo S, Ramires A, Leite Â, Dinis MAP, Sequeiros J. Long-term predictors for psychological outcome of pre-symptomatic testing for late-onset neurological diseases. Eur J Med Genet 2018; 61:575-580. [PMID: 29581083 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Revised: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
This longitudinal study aimed at determining predicting variables for middle and long-term psychological disturbance due pre-symptomatic testing (PST) for two late-onset neurological diseases, Huntington disease (HD) and TTR (transthyretin protein) familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) Val30Met (now classified as Val50Met). 196 clinical records of persons who performed PST at least three years ago and answered to the two stages of evaluation (before PST and least 3 years after disclosure of results) were analysed. For this purpose, regression analysis was performed, showing that the Positive Symptom Distress Index (PSDI), psychoticism, somatization and paranoid ideation dimensions assume predictive value in the middle and long-term impact for total anxiety and PSDI. The result of PST was not a relevant predictor. The application of an evaluation instrument of various psychopathological dimensions played a fundamental role in the detection of clinical situations that may arise several years later after PST. Attention should be paid to providing psychological support to persons at-risk who, at the pre-test phase, present some psychopathology indices before pursuing with genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Lêdo
- IBMC - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Ana Ramires
- European University, Lisboa, Portugal; GOVCOPP - Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, University of Aveiro, Portugal
| | | | - Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis
- UFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit (FP-ENAS), University Fernando Pessoa (UFP), Porto, Portugal
| | - Jorge Sequeiros
- IBMC - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; ICBAS - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|