Implementing gene curation for hereditary cancer susceptibility in Australia: achieving consensus on genes with clinical utility

The clinical utility and costs of whole-genome sequencing to detect cancer susceptibility variants-a multi-site prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Many families and individuals do not meet criteria for a known hereditary cancer syndrome but display unusual clusters of cancers. These families may carry pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes and be at higher risk for developing cancer.

METHODS

This multi-centre prospective study recruited 195 cancer-affected participants suspected to have a hereditary cancer syndrome for whom previous clinical targeted genetic testing was either not informative or not available. To identify pathogenic disease-causing variants explaining participant presentation, germline whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and a comprehensive cancer virtual gene panel analysis were undertaken.

RESULTS

Pathogenic variants consistent with the presenting cancer(s) were identified in 5.1% (10/195) of participants and pathogenic variants considered secondary findings with potential risk management implications were identified in another 9.7% (19/195) of participants. Health economic analysis estimated the marginal cost per case with an actionable variant was significantly lower for upfront WGS with virtual panel ($8744AUD) compared to standard testing followed by WGS ($24,894AUD). Financial analysis suggests that national adoption of diagnostic WGS testing would require a ninefold increase in government annual expenditure compared to conventional testing.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings make a case for replacing conventional testing with WGS to deliver clinically important benefits for cancer patients and families. The uptake of such an approach will depend on the perspectives of different payers on affordability.

Analysis of hereditary cancer gene variant classifications from ClinVar indicates a need for regular reassessment of clinical assertions

The clinical classification of variants may change with new information, however, there is limited guidance on how often significant changes in variant classification occur. We used ClinVar to examine how variant classification changes over time. We developed a custom parser and accessed variant data from ClinVar between January 2015 and July 2021. The ClinVar-assigned "aggregate" classification of variants in 121 hereditary cancer genes was harmonized across releases to align to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology terms. Aggregate classification categories were grouped as: benign/likely benign (B/LB); likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P); variant of uncertain significance (VUS); conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (Conflicting); or Other. We profiled changes in aggregate variant classification between consecutive semi-annual ClinVar releases. The proportion of variants that changed aggregate classification between semi-annual ClinVar releases ranged from 0.6% to 6.4%. The most frequent changes were "VUS to conflicting," "other to LP/P," and "B/LB to Conflicting." A limited number of variants changed aggregate classification from "LP/P to B/LB," or vice versa. Our analysis indicates need for regular reassessment of clinical variant interpretations. The parser developed for this project will facilitate extraction of relevant interpretation data from ClinVar.

Establishing the Medical Actionability of Genomic Variants

Actionability is an important concept in medicine that does not have a well-accepted standard definition, nor is there a general consensus on how to establish it. Medical actionability is often conflated with clinical utility, a related but distinct concept. This lack of clarity contributes to practice variation and inconsistent coverage decisions in genomic medicine, leading to the potential for systematic bias in the use of evidence-based interventions. We clarify how medical actionability and clinical utility are distinct and then discuss the spectrum of actionability, including benefits for the person, the family, and society. We also describe applications across the life course, including prediction, diagnosis, and treatment. Current challenges in assessing the medical actionability of identified genomic variants include gaps in the evidence, limited contexts with practice guidelines, and subjective aspects of medical actionability. A standardized and authoritative assessment of medical actionability is critical to implementing genomic medicine in a fashion that improves population health outcomes and reduces health disparities. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, Volume 23 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.