1
|
Vortman R, Echar M, Singer A, Sagi-Dain L. Compliance and satisfaction with BRCA surveillance in specialized clinics versus community follow-up. Eur J Cancer Prev 2024:00008469-990000000-00157. [PMID: 38870036 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess adherence to medical follow-up protocols among BRCA1/2 carriers and compare outcomes between dedicated carrier clinics and community healthcare settings. METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted by distributing an anonymous questionnaire within the 'Good BRCA Genes - Support and Information Group for BRCA Carriers' association. The questionnaire assessed adherence to recommended surveillance and satisfaction with various aspects of the follow-up. RESULTS Of the 682 BRCA carriers surveyed, 68.5% reported fully adhering to recommended medical follow-up. Those not fully adhering cited bureaucracy challenges, scheduling difficulties, timing uncertainties, and difficulty remembering examination dates. Less than 50% were satisfied with appointment availability, scheduling, contact persons, and general practitioners' knowledge of BRCA carrier risks and follow-up. The 417 women monitored in dedicated breast clinics reported notably higher optimal adherence to recommended surveillance (78.3 vs. 53.6%, P < 0.0001). In addition, they noted greater satisfaction with appointment availability (63.7 vs. 25.0%, P < 0.0001), appointment scheduling process (58.1 vs. 24.7%, P < 0.0001), availability of breast surgeons/gynecology specialists (67.4 vs. 50.8%, P < 0.0001), and availability of a contact person for consultations between appointments (53.5 vs. 20.8%, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION Our findings highlight the advantages of surveillance in dedicated BRCA1/2 clinics, including closer monitoring and increased satisfaction. Given the limited availability of such clinics and the growing number of BRCA1/2 carriers, the opening of additional dedicated clinics and the consideration of alternative surveillance-enhancing solutions, such as training healthcare professionals, using digital tools, and employing artificial intelligence, are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Vortman
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus
| | - Moran Echar
- Genetics Institute, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa
| | - Amihood Singer
- Community Genetics, Public Health Services, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem
| | - Lena Sagi-Dain
- Genetics Institute, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa
- The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adolph L, Warias A, Stairs J, Collins-McNeil K, Penney L, Kieser K. Hereditary ovarian cancer risk reduction: a retrospective evaluation of patient perspectives and service provision at a regional hereditary gynaecologic cancer clinic 2006–2016. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:263. [PMID: 35768821 PMCID: PMC9245201 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01844-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 have been established in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and result in significantly elevated lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Risk reduction interventions are presently the only effective means of improving survival and specialized counselling clinics have been established as an effective means of aiding this population in navigating complex decisions surrounding these interventions. This study sought to evaluate patient perceptions of a specialized counselling clinic for patients with HBOC Syndrome and referral patterns to this clinic.
Methods
We completed a retrospective review of 200 patients with HBOC in Nova Scotia, Canada seen through Maritime Medical Genetics Services between 2006 and 2016. Data were collected on referral pattern to the Hereditary Gynaecologic Risk Reduction Clinic (HGRRC), demographics, health history, and uptake of risk-reducing interventions. Participants were invited to complete a questionnaire about their experience.
Results
156/200(78%) women were referred to HGRCC and 135/156 (85.9%) of those referred attended their appointment. 124/200 (62%) were over age 40 at the time of testing. The mean time from referral to HGRCC appointment was 134.68 days (SD 85.78). 85/135 (63%) underwent risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy following their HGRCC appointment. The questionnaire was completed by 94/188 (50.3%) women. Most participants found information received from genetics clinics (81/94; 91%) and genetic counsellors (87/94; 95%) most helpful in making choices around risk-reduction strategies. 83/94 (88%) participants felt they had sufficient information to make an informed decision.
Conclusion
The majority of women with HBOC in Nova Scotia during the study period were referred to and counselled through HGRRC. Genetic counselling was found most valuable in risk-reduction decision making, which highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary team. Patients viewed this clinic as an effective care model to support informed choice about risk-reducing intervention.
Collapse
|
3
|
Surgical Outcome Measures in a Cohort of Patients at High Risk of Breast Cancer Treated by Bilateral Risk Reducing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:496e-505e. [PMID: 35749222 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women with breast cancer related genetic pathogenic variants (e.g. BRCA1, BRCA2) or with a strong family history carry lifetime risks of developing breast cancer of up to 80-90%. A significant proportion of these women proceed to bilateral risk reducing mastectomy (RRM). We aimed to document the surgical morbidity of RRM and establish whether a diagnosis of breast cancer at the time of surgery impacted on outcomes. METHODS Clinical details of 445 women identified as having >25% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer who underwent RRM and breast reconstruction were interrogated for surgical outcomes such as planned, unplanned and emergency procedures, complication rates, length of stay and longevity of breast reconstruction. These outcome measures were recorded in women diagnosed with breast cancer perioperatively (cancer group, CG) and those without malignancy (benign group, BG). RESULTS Median follow up was similar in both groups (BG, 70months; CG 73 months). Patients were older in the CG than BG (43y v 39y; p<0.001). Women in the CG required more planned procedures to complete reconstruction than those in the BG (4 v 2; p=0.002). Emergency procedures, unplanned surgical interventions (e.g. capsulectomy) and post reconstruction complication rates were similar between groups.One in five women overall required revisional surgery. Patients with autologous reconstructions had a revision rate of 1.24/1000 person years compared with 2.52 in the implant reconstruction group. CONCLUSION Women contemplating RRM can be reassured that this a safe and effective procedure but will likely take multiple interventions. This knowledge should be integral to obtaining informed consent.
Collapse
|
4
|
Petelin L, Hossack L, Mitchell G, Liew D, Trainer AH, James PA. A Microsimulation Model for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Risk Management for BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers: miBRovaCAre. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:854-862. [PMID: 31426925 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a validated model for evaluating the real-world effectiveness of long-term clinical management strategies for women with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants. METHODS A microsimulation model was developed that included a BRCA-specific natural history for breast and ovarian cancer, a clinical framework for carrier follow-up, and cancer risk management strategies (breast screening, risk-reducing mastectomy, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). Adherence rates and outcomes for breast screening and risk-reducing surgery were obtained from BRCA carriers seen through a familial cancer service in Melbourne, Australia. The model was assessed for internal and external validity. The model was used to compare women perfectly adhering to screening recommendations versus actual adherence of the clinical cohort. RESULTS The model accurately predicted cancer incidence, pathology, and mortality. Using actual adherence for breast screening resulted in additional breast cancer deaths (per 1000 women: BRCA1, 2.7; BRCA2, 1.6) compared with perfect screening adherence. This decreased average life expectancy by 0.30 life-years for BRCA1 and 0.07 life-years for BRCA2. When carriers had access to risk-reducing mastectomy, the benefit from improved screening adherence was not significant. CONCLUSIONS The developed model is a good descriptor of BRCA carriers' lifetime trajectory and its modification by use of risk management strategies alone or in combination. Evaluations of breast screening in BRCA carriers may overestimate the benefits of screening programs unless adherence is considered. By incorporating real-world clinical practice and patient behavior, this model can assist in developing clinical services and improving clinical outcomes for carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Petelin
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Lucinda Hossack
- Clinical Genetics, Austin Health, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison H Trainer
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Puski A, Hovick S, Senter L, Toland AE. Involvement and Influence of Healthcare Providers, Family Members, and Other Mutation Carriers in the Cancer Risk Management Decision-Making Process of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:1291-1301. [PMID: 29594659 PMCID: PMC6612901 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0254-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Deciding between increased cancer screening or prophylactic surgery and the timing of such procedures can be a difficult and complex process for women with BRCA mutations. There are gaps in our understanding of involvement of others in the decision-making process for women with BRCA mutations. This study evaluated the management decision-making process of women with BRCA mutations, focusing on the involvement of others. Grounded theory was used to analyze and code risk management decision-making information from interviews with 20 BRCA mutation carriers. Unaffected at-risk participants with a BRCA mutation, those under age 40, and those with no children described having a difficult time making risk management decisions. Physicians were an integral part of the decision-making process by providing decisional support and management recommendations. Family members and other mutation carriers filled similar yet distinct roles by providing experiential information as well as decisional and emotional support for carriers. Participants described genetic counselors as short-term providers of risk information and management recommendations. The study findings suggest that unaffected at-risk women, women under 40, and those who do not have children may benefit from additional support and information during the decision-making process. Genetic counselors are well trained to help women through this process and connect them with resources, and may be under-utilized in long-term follow-up for women with a BRCA mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athena Puski
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 21602 PFP, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - Shelly Hovick
- School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amanda Ewart Toland
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lewis RS, George A, Rusby JE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in women at high risk of developing breast cancer. Gland Surg 2018; 7:325-336. [PMID: 29998082 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.04.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Nipple-sparing mastectomy is a valuable addition to the options available for women at high risk of developing breast cancer. In this review, we summarize current knowledge about the high-risk genes, BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 and the associated guidelines with regard to risk-reducing surgery. We consider other genetic risks and high-risk lesions. We discuss the literature on bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer risk-reduction, and the results of nipple-sparing mastectomy in particular. Finally, we report on patient satisfaction with these procedures and the impact that nipple-sparing mastectomy may have on women at high-risk of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca S Lewis
- Department of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute for Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Angela George
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Jennifer E Rusby
- Department of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute for Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Madorsky-Feldman D, Sklair-Levy M, Perri T, Laitman Y, Paluch-Shimon S, Schmutzler R, Rhiem K, Lester J, Karlan BY, Singer CF, Van Maerken T, Claes K, Brunet J, Izquierdo A, Teulé A, Lee JW, Kim SW, Arun B, Jakubowska A, Lubinski J, Tucker K, Poplawski NK, Varesco L, Bonelli LA, Buys SS, Mitchell G, Tischkowitz M, Gerdes AM, Seynaeve C, Robson M, Kwong A, Tung N, Tessa N, Domchek SM, Godwin AK, Rantala J, Arver B, Friedman E. An international survey of surveillance schemes for unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 157:319-327. [PMID: 27117159 PMCID: PMC5508745 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3805-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 04/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Female BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and/or ovarian cancer, and are offered enhanced surveillance including screening from a young age and risk-reducing surgery (RRS)-mastectomy (RRM) and/or salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). While there are established guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in high-risk women who have not undergone RRM, there are less developed guidelines after RRM. We evaluated the schemes offered before and after RRS in internationally diverse high-risk clinics. An e-mailed survey was distributed to high-risk clinics affiliated with CIMBA. Overall, 22 centers from 16 countries responded. Pre RRS surveillance schemes overwhelmingly included breast imaging (primarily MRI) from 18 to 30 years and clinical breast exam (CBE) at 6-12 month intervals. For ovarian cancer, all but 6 centers offered semiannual/annual gynecological exam, transvaginal ultrasound, and CA 125 measurements. Post RRM, most centers offered only annual CBE while 4 centers offered annual MRI, primarily for substantial residual breast tissue. After RRSO only 4 centers offered specific gynecological surveillance. Existing guidelines for breast/ovarian cancer detection in BRCA carriers are being applied pre RRS but are not globally harmonized, and most centers offer no specific surveillance post RRS. From this comprehensive multinational study it is clear that evidence-based, long-term prospective data on the most effective scheme for BRCA carriers post RRS is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miri Sklair-Levy
- The High Risk Clinic, Meirav Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Tamar Perri
- The High Risk Clinic, Meirav Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Yael Laitman
- The High Risk Clinic, Meirav Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | | | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jenny Lester
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tom Van Maerken
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kathleen Claes
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joan Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology Cancer Network, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angel Izquierdo
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology Cancer Network, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alex Teulé
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology Cancer Network, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jong Won Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Daerim Saint Mary's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Banu Arun
- Breast Medical Oncology and Clinical Cancer Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katherine Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Service Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicola K Poplawski
- Adult Genetics Unit, South Australian Clinical Genetics Service SA Pathology at the Women's and Children's Hospital Site, North Adelaide, Australia
- University Department of Pediatrics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | - Saundra S Buys
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Hereditary Cancer Program at the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Mark Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY, USA
| | - Ava Kwong
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, and Department of Breast Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | | | | | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Johanna Rantala
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brita Arver
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eitan Friedman
- The High Risk Clinic, Meirav Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
- The Susanne Levy Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
- The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jeffers L, Morrison PJ, McCaughan E, Fitzsimons D. Maximising survival: the main concern of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who undergo genetic testing for BRCA1/2. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2014; 18:411-8. [PMID: 24731853 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2014] [Revised: 03/10/2014] [Accepted: 03/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about how women with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer who test positive for a BRCA gene manage the impact of a positive test result on their everyday lives and in the longer term. This study defined the experience and needs of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and a positive BRCA test over time. METHODS A grounded theory approach was taken using qualitative interviews (n = 49) and reflective diaries. Data collected from December 2006 until March 2010 was analysed using the constant comparative technique to trace the development of how women manage their concerns of inherited cancer. RESULTS A four stage substantive theory of maximising survival was generated that defines the experience of women and how they resolve their main concerns. The process of maximising survival begins prior to genetic testing in women from high risk families as they expect to get a cancer diagnosis at some time. Women with cancer felt they had experienced the worst with a cancer diagnosis and altruistically tested for the sake of their children but a positive test result temporarily shifted their focus to decision-making around their personal health needs. CONCLUSION This study adds to clinical practice through raising awareness and adding insights into how women cope with living with inherited cancer risk and the personal and familial ramifications that ensue from it. A clear multi-professional structured care pathway for women from genetic testing result disclosure to undergoing risk-reducing surgery and/or surveillance should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Jeffers
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Department of Genetics, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK.
| | - Patrick J Morrison
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Department of Genetics, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK
| | - Eilis McCaughan
- Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK
| | - Donna Fitzsimons
- Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK; Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Burger A, Thurtle D, Owen S, Mannu G, Pilgrim S, Vinayagam R, Pain S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for risk-reducing mastectomy. Breast J 2013; 19:529-32. [PMID: 23865803 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) confers 90-95% decreased risk of breast cancer, and may reduce mortality, especially in high-risk groups such as BRCA carriers. Risk of occult disease in RRM specimen is ~5%. This demands axillary staging: sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is no longer possible, axillary clearance confers significant risks and may prove negative. Contemporaneous SLN biopsy allows axillary staging with minimal further dissection. Women undergoing RRM and SLN biopsy between June 2005 and July 2010 were reviewed retrospectively from our prospectively maintained database of 1,522 SLN procedures in 1,498 patients. SLN(s) localized using routine tracer methods. SLNs and mastectomy specimens underwent routine histologic examination. Eighty-three RRMs with SLN biopsy were performed in 71 patients (12 bilateral). Indications for RRM: contralateral invasive (55), in situ (5) disease, BRCA 1/2 mutation (12), and strong family history (10). Mean number of SLNs: 1.35. Occult disease was detected in four cases (4.8%), with one case of occult invasive lobular carcinoma (1.2%). Remaining occult disease was lobular in situ neoplasia (LISN). SLNs were negative in all cases. Our findings are comparable to those in the literature: 4.8% rate of occult disease overall, 1.2% invasive. The significant risk with SLN biopsy is lymphoedema, quoted around 7%. We have had no reports of symptomatic lymphoedema in patients undergoing RRM and SLN biopsy. We propose that SLN at the time of mastectomy requires only limited further dissection, and confers minimal risk compared with secondary axillary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Burger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
A multidisciplinary clinic for individualizing management of patients at increased risk for breast and gynecologic cancer. Fam Cancer 2012; 11:419-27. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9530-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
11
|
Sidon L, Ingham S, Clancy T, Clayton R, Clarke A, Jones EA, Lalloo F, Evans DGR. Uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: evidence for lower uptake in women affected by breast cancer and older women. Br J Cancer 2011; 106:775-9. [PMID: 22187038 PMCID: PMC3322942 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bilateral risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (BRRSO) is the only effective way of reducing mortality from ovarian cancer. This study investigates uptake of BRRSO in 700 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers from Greater Manchester. METHODS Dates of last follow-up and BRRSO were obtained, and the following variables were investigated: ovarian cancer risk/gene, age and breast cancer history. The date of the genetic mutation report was the initiation for Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS The uptake of BRRSO in BRCA1 mutation carriers was 54.5% (standard error 3.6%) at 5 years post testing compared with 45.5% (standard error 3.2%) in BRCA2 mutation carriers (P=0.045). The 40-59 years category showed the greatest uptake for BRRSO and uptake was significantly lower in the over 60 s (P<0.0001). Of the unaffected BRCA1 mutation carriers, 65% (standard error 5.1%) opted for surgery at 5 years post-testing compared with 41.1% (standard error 5.1%) in affected BRCA1 mutation carriers (P=0.045). CONCLUSION The uptake of BRRSO is lower in women previously affected by breast cancer and in older women. As there is no efficient method for early detection of ovarian cancer, uptake should ideally be greater. Counselling should be offered to ensure BRCA1/2 mutation carriers make an informed decision about managing their ovarian cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Sidon
- Department of Genetic Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|