Safety and efficacy of drug coated balloon angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerotic disease

Stenting Versus Medical Therapy for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Whether the long-term benefit of stroke prevention when stenting is added to medical therapy (MT) over MT alone for symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis offsets the perioperative risks of the stenting has not been directly evaluated in a randomized trial. We aimed to compare the long-term (>3 years) effect of stenting versus MT alone in patients with symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis in a randomized trial.

METHODS

We extended the follow-up of 358 subjects enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial conducted at 8 centers in China. Patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke attributed to severe intracranial stenosis (70% to 99%) were recruited between March 5, 2014, and November 10, 2016. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days. Other secondary outcomes included stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery, as well as disabling stroke or death after enrollment.

RESULTS

A total of 358 patients (stenting 176 versus MT 182) were recruited from March 5, 2014, and followed up till January 22, 2024. The median duration of follow-up was 7.4 years (interquartile range, 6.0-8.0). The primary outcome was not significantly different (stenting 14.8% versus MT 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.58-1.77]; P=0.97). No significant difference was found between groups for the secondary outcomes: stroke in the territory of qualifying artery (14.8% versus 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.58-1.77]; P=0.97), disabling stroke or death (16.5% versus 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.66-1.91]; P=0.70), and death (9.1% versus 7.1%; hazard ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.58-2.58]; P=0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides compelling evidence that, even over prolonged observed periods, the addition of stenting to MT does not confer additional benefits to MT alone in patients with symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis. These results underscore the importance of MT as the cornerstone of long-term stroke prevention in this patient population.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01763320.

Comparison of safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatments for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: results from a single center

Background

Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) is one of the common causes of ischemic stroke. However, the treatment of sICAS has remained a challenge in the past with unfavorable findings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different endovascular treatment methods for sICAS.

Methods

The study involved 154 patients with sICAS who received endovascular treatment at Qingdao University Hospital between January 2021 and October 2023. Based on the characteristics of the lesions, three different types of treatments were performed: bare metal stent group (BMS group), drug-coated balloon group (DCB group), and drug-eluting stent group (DES group). The primary endpoints included the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the 6-month, periprocedural complications, the rate of stroke recurrence in the area of the stented artery during the follow-up period, and modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge, at 1-month, at 3-month, at 6-month of patients after stenting.

Results

The incidence of perioperative complications did not differ significantly between groups (11.3% in the BMS group, 8.0% in the DCB group, and 6.1% in the DES group, p = 0.776). All patients (154/154) had successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment. The incidence of stroke during follow-up was 4.5% (7/154), with 5 (7.0%) patients in the BMS group, 1 (2.0%) patient in the DCB group, and 1 (3.0%) patient in the DES group. The restenosis rate in the BMS group [35.2% (25/71)] tended to be higher than that in the DCB group [6.0% (3/50)] and DES group [9.1% (3/33)]. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, endovascular treatment strategy and vessel distribution were significant independent risk factors for ISR within 6 months (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Adverse events and success rates following stent implantation are comparable across therapy groups in individuals with sICAS. When compared to BMS, DES, and DCB reduce the risk of ISR, with the advantages of the DCB appearing to be greater for some high-risk patients with ICAS.

Comparison of drug-coated balloon with bare-metal stent in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: the AcoArt sICAS randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Restenosis after stenting with a standard bare-metal stent (BMS) is the main cause of stroke recurrence for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS). Whether a drug-coated balloon (DCB) could reduce the risk of restenosis for such patients is unknown. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DCB in reducing 6 month restenosis in patients with sICAS.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint clinical trial was conducted at 13 stroke centers across China. Eligible patients aged 18-80 years with sICAS defined as a recent transient ischemic attack (<180 days) or ischemic stroke (14-180 days) before enrollment attributed to a 70-99% atherosclerotic stenosis of a major intracranial artery were recruited between June 4, 2021 and September 15, 2022 (final follow-up: April 13, 2023). Patients were randomly assigned to receive a DCB (n=90) or BMS at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the post-procedure incidence of restenosis in the target lesion at 6 months (165-225 days). The safety outcome was post-procedure target vessel-related stroke (hemorrhage or ischemia) or death at 30 days.

RESULTS

Among 201 randomized patients, 180 were confirmed eligible (mean age 58 years) and completed the trial. Compared with BMS, DCB was associated with a lower rate of post-procedure incidence of restenosis in the target lesion at 6 months (6.9% vs 32.9%, OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.42, P=0.0003). Regarding the safety outcome, post-procedure target vessel-related stroke (hemorrhage or ischemia) or death at 30 days did not differ between the two groups (4.4% vs 5.6%, OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.21 to 3.05, P=0.73).

CONCLUSION

DCB was superior to BMS in reducing the incidence of restenosis without increasing the risk of target vessel-related stroke or death within 6 months. Further trials comparing the outcomes of DCB with medical management for sICAS are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04631055.

Impact of drug-coated balloon for vascular luminal dilatational remodeling after balloon angioplasty in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis - a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the effect of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) on vascular luminal dilatational remodeling (VLDR) following simple balloon angioplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients diagnosed with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), who were treated exclusively with balloon angioplasty at Henan Provincial People's Hospital between June 2019 and April 2023. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to create balanced cohorts of patients who underwent drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). The primary endpoint was VLDR occurrence during follow-up, with the effect of DCBA on VLDR assessed by adjusted multivariate regression.

RESULTS

The study included 110 patients who underwent simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, with 60 in the DCBA group and 50 in the POBA group. At follow-up, the stenosis rate in the DCBA group was lower than in the POBA group (P<0.001). The decrease in stenosis rate (DSR) was greater in the DCBA group compared with the POBA group (P<0.001). Nineteen patients (31.7%) in the DCBA group experienced VLDR, whereas only four (8%) in the POBA group developed VLDR, a statistically significant difference (P=0.002). After IPW adjustment, differences in stenosis rate (34.17 (20.00, 46.72) vs 46.00 (37.88, 70.00), P<0.001), DSR (-1.66 (-16.71, 11.40) vs -18.00 (-28.00, -3.00), P<0.001) and VLDR incidence (32.2% vs 9.9%, P<0.001) between the DCBA and POBA groups remained significant. Multivariate regression analysis identified DCBA as an independent factor influencing VLDR occurrence.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that, compared with POBA, DCBA increases VLDR occurrence in ICAS patients during follow-up.

Roles of Nontraditional Lipid Parameters for Predicting Restenosis in Patients with Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis After Endovascular Treatment

PURPOSE

Nontraditional lipid parameters are associated with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) progression. This study aimed to investigate the association of nontraditional lipid parameters with the risk of restenosis in patients with ICAS after endovascular treatment (EVT).

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with symptomatic ICAS after successful EVT followed by at least 3 months of angiography. Participants were divided into restenosis or non-restenosis groups based on the angiographic follow-up results. The nontraditional lipid parameters were calculated from conventional lipid parameters. The COX regression models and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to explore the association between nontraditional lipid parameters and restenosis.

RESULTS

This study recruited 222 cases with 224 lesions eligible for our study, of which 56 (25%) had restenosis. Compared with the non-restenosis group, patients in the restenosis group had higher levels of the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) (0.211, interquartile range, IQR, 0.065-0.404 vs. 0.083, IQR, -0.052-0.265, P = 0.001), remnant cholesterol (RC) (0.55, IQR, 0.33-0.77 vs. 0.30, IQR, 0.18-0.49, P < 0.001) and Castelli's index‑I (CRI-I) (4.13, IQR, 3.39-5.34 vs. 3.74, IQR, 2.94-4.81, P = 0.030). In the multivariable COX regression analysis, a 0.1 unit increase of AIP was an independent risk factor for restenosis (hazard ratio, HR = 1.20, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.05-1.35, P = 0.005) whereas such an association was not observed for RC (HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.15, P = 0.835). The restricted cubic spline (RCS) plot revealed a linear relationship between AIP and restenosis (P for nonlinear = 0.835) but a nonlinear relationship for RC (P for nonlinear = 0.012). Patients were stratified according to tertiles (T) of AIP and RC and the risk of restenosis increased in T3 compared to T1 (HR = 3.21, 95% CI 1.35-7.62, P = 0.008 and HR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.11-8.03, P = 0.030, respectively). Furthermore, this association remained stable within each LDL‑C level subgroup.

CONCLUSION

The AIP and RC were positively and independently associated with restenosis in patients with ICAS after EVT.

Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for ischemic stroke recurrence after successful stent implantation in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the risk factors for recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) who underwent successful stent placement and to establish a nomogram prediction model.

METHODS

We utilized data from a prospective collection of 430 consecutive patients at Jining NO.1 People's Hospital from November 2021 to November 2022, conducting further analysis on the subset of 400 patients who met the inclusion criteria. They were further divided into training (n=321) and validation (n=79) groups. In the training group, we used univariate and multivariate COX regression to find independent risk factors for recurrent stroke and then created a nomogram. The assessment of the nomogram's discrimination and calibration was performed through the examination of various measures including the Consistency index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC), and the calibration plots. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the nomogram by quantifying the net benefit to the patient under different threshold probabilities.

RESULTS

The nomogram for predicting recurrent ischemic stroke in symptomatic ICAS patients after stent placement utilizes six variables: coronary heart disease (CHD), smoking, multiple ICAS, systolic blood pressure (SBP), in-stent restenosis (ISR), and fasting plasma glucose. The C-index (0.884 for the training cohort and 0.87 for the validation cohort) and the time-dependent AUC (>0.7) indicated satisfactory discriminative ability of the nomogram. Furthermore, DCA indicated a clinical net benefit from the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive model constructed includes six predictive factors: CHD, smoking, multiple ICAS, SBP, ISR and fasting blood glucose. The model demonstrates good predictive ability and can be utilized to predict ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic ICAS after successful stent placement.